Wife took a photo of me moments after informing me that our two friends down the street that we've known for years passed away during the hurricane - Upgoat

Wife took a photo of me moments after informing me that our two friends down the street that we've known for years passed away during the hurricane
submitted by Trumpman1488 to whatever 1 weekOct 1, 2024 09:38:35 ago (+10/-7) (files.catbox.moe)
https://files.catbox.moe/4m016t.jpeg

I had a very somber moment and thought I should share it with y'all. This can't go on like this, I'm sorry to say but I've hit my breaking point my fellow Upgoaters. If President Donald J. Trump has this election stolen from him again there will be hell to pay. I will do everything in my power to make sure HE is put into office! Now I don't like to "fedpost" but I'm really itching to!! YOU WON'T WIN YOU NIGGER BITCH KAMALA!!!! TRUMP WILL BEAT YOUR LYING CORRUPT BLACK ASS!!! WWG1WGA!!!! 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸

37 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] we_kill_creativity 5 points 1 weekOct 1, 2024 09:45:34 ago (+7/-2)

This is so obviously an AI generated image...

Is OP's entire account AI generated too...?

https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=66fb56d195066

[ + ] Spaceman84

[ - ] Spaceman84 4 points 1 weekOct 1, 2024 09:55:17 ago (+5/-1)

No, bots can’t produce garbage like that very well. He’s just playing into the character with the cheap AI art.

[ + ] Her0n

[ - ] Her0n 1 point 1 weekOct 1, 2024 11:49:31 ago (+1/-0)

FREE AI art lol

[ + ] we_kill_creativity

[ - ] we_kill_creativity 0 points 1 weekOct 1, 2024 10:03:47 ago (+0/-0)

I don't see why the account itself couldn't be an AI bot (look at its responses in this thread...) and the last two images it posted also be AI generated. It could be an actual human prompting both things for instance, but I also think the AI bot could easily be prompting the creation of the obvious AI images.

[ + ] Spaceman84

[ - ] Spaceman84 5 points 1 weekOct 1, 2024 10:14:33 ago (+5/-0)

It’s a dude with a troll account making AI art. Take your meds, spaz.

[ + ] we_kill_creativity

[ - ] we_kill_creativity 0 points 1 weekOct 1, 2024 10:21:20 ago (+0/-0)

Can you prove that...?

Can you prove that the account itself isn't an AI bot?

[ + ] Spaceman84

[ - ] Spaceman84 3 points 1 weekOct 1, 2024 11:52:45 ago (+3/-0)

Can you prove that you aren’t a retard?

[ + ] Whatthefuck

[ - ] Whatthefuck 0 points 1 weekOct 1, 2024 14:23:49 ago (+0/-0)

Lol, this is a perfect and succinct argument. I doubt it will be appreciated by those who needed it however.

[ + ] Whatthefuck

[ - ] Whatthefuck 2 points 1 weekOct 1, 2024 10:29:59 ago (+2/-0)

No, you cannot prove the negative. The onus for proof lies with the person making the claim. In this case, that would be you.

[ + ] we_kill_creativity

[ - ] we_kill_creativity 0 points 1 weekOct 1, 2024 10:40:16 ago (+0/-0)

I didn't make a claim, I asked a question. Spaceguy then made the claim that it couldn't possibly be a bot. I am asking him to prove that because he is the only one to have made any sort of claim in this situation. Try to not be stupid.

[ + ] Whatthefuck

[ - ] Whatthefuck 0 points 1 weekOct 1, 2024 14:16:25 ago (+0/-0)

You specifically asked for proof of a negative. That's the only part I replied to. I don't care about the wider argument, and you're probably right about it being a bot. But you don't prove the non-existence of something, fundamentally.

[ + ] registereduser

[ - ] registereduser 0 points 1 weekOct 1, 2024 10:58:52 ago (+0/-0)

You've got that backwards, sounds like you got your science degree from reddit. That is exactly backwards from how science works.

@we_kill_creativity has posited a hypothesis with evidence, the OP's post history is that evidence.

The ball is in your court now to disprove it if you can.

Stop perpetuating this backward ass bullshit.

[ + ] Whatthefuck

[ - ] Whatthefuck 0 points 1 weekOct 1, 2024 14:22:33 ago (+0/-0)

I'm guessing you're trying to refer to the scientific method when you say "how science works". I can assure you that the scientific method is based on observations (you guys got this part right), making a theory as to why this observable phenomenom is occuring (check mark here as well), and then designing a repeatable experiment that has a predictable outcome that supports your theory. Then you would make a nice little write up concluding how your hypothesis was or wasn't correct, based on your repeatable and predictable experiment.

Do you see now where you're failing to "prove" your claim, which makes it simply conjecture? Do you also see how any hypothesis must be falsifiable, but can't actually prove the non-existence of something?

Perhaps your non-reddit-affiliated "science degree" could help fill the gaps for you?

[ + ] Trumpman1488

[ - ] Trumpman1488 [op] 4 points 1 weekOct 1, 2024 09:56:53 ago (+5/-1)

YOU WATCHING ME FED BITCH?!?!

[ + ] we_kill_creativity

[ - ] we_kill_creativity 1 point 1 weekOct 1, 2024 10:00:15 ago (+4/-3)

Are you an AI bot?

[ + ] lord_nougat

[ - ] lord_nougat 0 points 1 weekOct 1, 2024 14:29:08 ago (+0/-0)

Stop fed bitching and we might stop watching!

But do please proceed, actually.

[ + ] lord_nougat

[ - ] lord_nougat 0 points 1 weekOct 1, 2024 14:28:15 ago (+0/-0)

No, because AI is short for Artificial Intelligence.

Op is generated by Artificial RETARDATION!