×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
9
12 comments block


[ - ] dassar 2 points 2 hoursMay 13, 2025 21:03:33 ago (+2/-0)

".... I made a mistake with the decimal point; it's not 350% it's 3328%."

Ummm, you still can't math tho.
No wonder the medical establishment is such a mess.
Literally rounding out statistical findings for no reason at all, other than laziness.

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 6 hoursMay 13, 2025 17:41:12 ago (+1/-0)*

[ - ] pickingrinninspittin 1 point 5 hoursMay 13, 2025 18:37:35 ago (+1/-0)

Those are Statistics Canada numbers. The report specifically says it used AHS (Alberta Health Services) data. I looked at that data but it only goes up to 2022.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 5 hoursMay 13, 2025 18:44:43 ago (+0/-0)

The first link can be territory specfic, so you can look at Alberta and see kids 1 and under. And, in the 2nd link, you can see Canada as a whole showing no uptick in childhood mortality. Yes, it's not Alberta specfic, but neither was the jab mandate or the distribution of the jab to Canadians. Unless you're looking for a correlation of child mortality to Alberta where there is no such correlation to any other providence, then you would see at least some sort of similar uptick countrywide, even if it's magnitude isn't the same.

[ - ] pickingrinninspittin 0 points 4 hoursMay 13, 2025 19:04:51 ago (+0/-0)

Your point is valid. The absence of any correlation is concerning.

[ - ] rabidR04CH 0 points 3 hoursMay 13, 2025 20:49:44 ago (+0/-0)

The children of the vaccinated.

[ - ] pickingrinninspittin 0 points 4 hoursMay 13, 2025 18:59:27 ago (+0/-0)

I'm not sure what they getting the figures for "unknown deaths" in the AHS data because I did not see anything that looked like that category.

Unrelated I happened to notice that in 2018 there were a lot of deaths for gender T attributed to Suicide by hanging and to Accidental poisoning by and exposure to drugs and other biological substances. Isn't raw data wonderful.

[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz [op] 0 points 4 hoursMay 13, 2025 19:47:37 ago (+0/-0)

hence the title shocking if true

[ - ] Sector2 0 points 6 hoursMay 13, 2025 17:38:59 ago (+0/-0)

What are the actual numbers?

[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz [op] 1 point 4 hoursMay 13, 2025 19:49:53 ago (+1/-0)

honestly, i have no idea thats why i put a doubt on the title. seems way too high to go unnoticed. that's a type of high sigma deaths if it were true not even the lamestream media would be able to hide those high numbers no way.

[ - ] the_old_ones 1 point 3 hoursMay 13, 2025 20:06:49 ago (+1/-0)

theyre trying to pressure alberta into accepting a measles vaxx and not seceding not right now.

[ - ] dassar 0 points 3 hoursMay 13, 2025 20:47:56 ago (+0/-0)

Yep, asking the real questions.
Thats my go to for any of these medical/ vaccine/ death/ crime/ race statistics and their assumptions/ conclusions - give me the real raw numbers as well so i can actually see how many people the data / graph is based on. (and esp not conflated or obscured by a multitude of different data point adjustments).

And also having the same unadjusted raw numbers for previous years.

Is it 5, 50 , 500 , 5 000 or 50 000.