Sign into an existing account

So I've spoken of this a bit. I'm not going to flesh it all out here but questions are welcome. You might say it is a very French idea as the foremost intellectual influences on it are French: the Marquis de Sade and Auguste Comte. A Russian intelligence agent told me in 2022 that without my use of Comte I would not be here. Here being where I had just entered. I.e., talking to him.

It's a glorified camping trip until the pigs make it something else. Basically lots of sex, nudity, squatting and trespassing on federal lands, moving around (no stupid compounds for Waco enthusiasts) and ignoring the law. In practice that means no applications for things like fishing and hunting licenses. I expect lots of fugitives and other outcasts to get in pretty early. My basic demographic is hobos and college sluts. It's family formation. Think of the Manson Family had they moved to more defensible areas than Death Valley. 12-35 people to start, men outnumbering women suggesting a gangbang. Children raised in common. No work. No inequality created by private property. And while I say my plan this comes courtesy of Iranian intelligence - with Don Pendleton's 'Nuclear Storm' serving as a huge influence.

No, the FBI is not a political police force; it's a national security and law enforcement agency with both intelligence and law enforcement responsibilities, focusing on investigating federal crimes and protecting the nation from threats.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

FBI's Role:

The FBI is the principal investigative arm of the U.S. Department of Justice and a member of the U.S. Intelligence Community.

Focus Areas:

The FBI's mission includes counterterrorism, counterintelligence, and criminal investigations, with jurisdiction over violations of more than 200 categories of federal crimes.

Not a National Police Force:

The FBI is one of many federal agencies with law enforcement responsibilities, and it does not function as a national police force.

Intelligence-Driven:

The FBI is an intelligence-driven and threat-focused organization, meaning it uses intelligence to inform its law enforcement activities.

Public Corruption:

The FBI investigates violations of federal law by public officials at the federal, state, and local levels of government.

Oversight:

The FBI is responsible to the attorney general, and its intelligence activities are overseen by the Director of National Intelligence.

Accountability:

The FBI is committed to holding powerful people accountable when they break the law.

FBI Police:

The FBI has a police unit that provides security for the FBI Director, the Attorney General, and other national security events.

------

No, the FBI is not a secret police force; it's a national security organization with domestic law enforcement powers, designed to be transparent and accountable, with oversight from Congress, the media, and internal controls.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

Not a Secret Police:

The FBI is designed to be as transparent as possible to ensure it protects the nation while upholding constitutional rights and liberties.

Domestic Law Enforcement:

The FBI has domestic law enforcement powers and is one of many federal agencies with law enforcement responsibilities.

Oversight and Accountability:

The FBI is subject to oversight from Congress, the media, and internal controls within the FBI and the Department of Justice.

Focus on National Security:

The FBI works closely with partners to address the most serious security threats facing the nation.
Transparency vs. Secrecy:
While the FBI sometimes operates in secret, it doesn't mean it's a "secret police".

CIA vs. FBI:

The CIA operates in secrecy, conducting classified missions and covert activities abroad, while the FBI's operations are more transparent.

Some thoughts on my recent discussions with an Episcopal deacon.

- He tells me he favors 'socialized capitalism'. Make all the money you want but don't forget those left behind. In other words be sure to donate to churches so guys like him can make a living.

- Today I mention to him that his church does as well with homeless outreach as the local homeless shelter. I mention that this is the case despite being a 'side hustle'. He laughs.

But these guys are running a business.

Christianity will be more authentic when we're fucking in the streets.

I guess this is why Jake Sullivan compared me to Luther...

Francis is an Argie. He is merely a reflection of his constituency.

https://www.ncregister.com/cna/vatican-statistics-africa-had-biggest-increase-in-catholics-while-numbers-fell-in-europe

Thank God I'm not a papist...

And Buddha was an Aryan. Diogenes too for that matter.

Various items taken from the AI:

Yes, Jesus's itinerant ministry and the accounts in the Gospels suggest he lacked a permanent home during his public ministry, often relying on the hospitality of others and even sleeping outside, as evidenced by the saying "the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head".

Here's a more detailed explanation:

Itinerant Ministry:

Jesus's ministry involved traveling from place to place, teaching, and performing miracles, which meant he didn't have a fixed residence.

Lack of a Permanent Home:

The Gospels indicate that Jesus and his disciples moved from place to place, staying in people's homes or sleeping outside.

"Nowhere to Lay His Head":

Jesus himself famously stated, "Foxes have dens, and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head" (Matthew 8:20, Luke 9:58).

Identifying with the Homeless:

This lack of a permanent home and reliance on others' hospitality could be seen as an identification with the plight of the poor and marginalized, including those who were homeless.

The Homeless Jesus:

Some interpretations and artistic representations, like the "Homeless Jesus" statue, emphasize Jesus's connection to the homeless and marginalized, urging people to see Jesus in the vulnerable.

---------

Yes, after witnessing the realities of suffering and impermanence, Siddhartha Gautama, the future Buddha, left his life of luxury and became a homeless, wandering ascetic, seeking enlightenment.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

Leaving a Life of
Privilege:

Siddhartha, born into a royal family, was destined for a life of comfort and power. However, after seeing old age, sickness, and death for the first time, he realized the impermanence and suffering inherent in human existence.

The Great Renunciation:

This realization led him to leave his palace, family, and kingdom, embarking on a path of self-discipline and spiritual seeking.

A Homeless Ascetic:

He became a homeless, wandering yogi, seeking the truth and enlightenment through ascetic practices.

Seeking Enlightenment:

He engaged in rigorous practices, including meditation and self-denial, under the guidance of ascetic teachers.

The Buddha's Teachings:

After years of practice, he attained enlightenment and became the Buddha, the "Awakened One," sharing his teachings to help others find liberation from suffering.

---------

Yes, the ancient Greek philosopher Diogenes was known for his unconventional lifestyle, which included living in a barrel and embracing a life of poverty and self-sufficiency, essentially making him homeless.

Here's a more detailed look:

Diogenes of Sinope:

Diogenes was a prominent figure in the Cynic school of philosophy, known for his radical and unconventional approach to life.

Living in a Barrel:

He famously lived in a large earthenware storage jar (a "kynikos" or "barrel") in the marketplace, which became a symbol of his rejection of societal norms and material possessions.

Poverty and Self-
Sufficiency:

Diogenes embraced a life of poverty and self-sufficiency, rejecting societal expectations and living according to what he believed was natural and virtuous.

Challenging Societal Norms:

His unconventional behaviors, such as living in a barrel, wandering public spaces with a lit lantern in daylight, and other actions, were meant to challenge societal norms and provoke thought.

"Homeless" Philosopher:

While not literally homeless in the modern sense, Diogenes' lifestyle and rejection of societal norms led to him being seen as a "homeless" philosopher, living outside the conventional structures of society.

Alleged enslavement:

Some accounts suggest Diogenes was even enslaved at one point.

While both the US and Nazi Germany have engaged in surveillance, the US's surveillance capabilities, particularly with modern technology, are arguably more extensive and pervasive than those of Nazi Germany, though the context and goals differ greatly.

Here's a breakdown of the comparison:

Nazi Germany:

Relied heavily on informers, physical surveillance, and rudimentary forms of technology.
Targeted specific groups (e.g., Jews, political opponents) and used surveillance to enforce its ideology and suppress dissent.
Had a network of informers and an advanced technology base in computing and spy-camera technology.

Modern US:

Utilizes advanced technologies like data analysis, facial recognition, and telecommunications monitoring.
Justifies surveillance as necessary for national security, such as to prevent crime or acts of terrorism.
The US has programs like PRISM which collects internet communications from various U.S. internet companies.
Surveillance is justified as being necessary for national security.

Key Differences:

Scope:

Nazi Germany's surveillance was largely focused on specific groups, while the US's surveillance, while targeted in some cases, also has a broader scope due to its technological capabilities.

Technology:

Nazi Germany's surveillance relied on human intelligence and rudimentary technology, while the US uses advanced technologies for mass surveillance.
Justification: Nazi Germany's surveillance was used to enforce its ideology and suppress dissent, while the US justifies its surveillance as necessary for national security.
Context:

The US operates within a democratic framework, while Nazi Germany was a totalitarian regime.