No, no man should like fat chicks. You want hot, thin women fucking and sucking in the streets, walking around butt ass naked. And I aim to deliver.
And no, I'm not married. Marriage is a failed institution which will have little place in the fuck n' suck - but marriage also gets in the way of being a revolutionist.
"Once, the Persian king gave order to cut into the rock face of Behistun the following words: 'I, Darius, the Great King, King of Kings, an Aryan, having Aryan lineage'" - Alfred Rosenberg, The Myth of the Twentieth Century
I've alternately seen it stated as 'I, Darius, of Aryan race'
Bibi would like that. But as the BBC noted regime change is "highly unlikely". It's not analogous to Libya or post-9/11 Afghanistan where you had active armed groups to fight the Taliban on the ground. No, this is wag the dog. Bibi is trying to save his own ass. You could argue this even helps him legally, but certainly distracting attention from your domestic troubles by finding an enemy to attack is a favored strategem of demagogues from time immemorial. His government is in trouble, there is talk of civil war in Israel. This unites the public against a foreign foe, or tries to. It's very obvious what he's doing.
Nukes are very much THE issue for the United States. It's the only issue even as a nuclear armed Iran is a threat to the American empire. Oil use by the US is perhaps even less the issue than it having unchallenged supremacy in controlling its access. As of now it has that. A nuclear Iran challenges that.
Conversely, obviously Israel wants to overthrow the Iranian government. Just like they preferred Saddam gone. Both regimes assisted or assist revolutionary groups resisting Israel. I think it pretty plain that Bibi chose NOW to strike though because his country is polarized and his government is in danger of falling. Strictly a wag the dog aggression to distract attention from domestic problems and try to unite Israelis behind him against a foreign adversary. Not a new gambit or idea. It's an old trick of course.
The whole undercurrent of the article, if you read it, is that Israel may not be able to prevent Iran from getting the bomb. That is the hinge. Because with the bomb Iran can use nuclear blackmail to shut down the US led international system.
You guys could have saved yourselves a decade of spamming about j0oz just by understanding geopolitics. The US has the Middle East riddled with bases for a reason: to control the oil, to cut off China, whatever, if they want. Iran with nukes can nuke the US if it closes the spigot with the Strait of Hormuz and the US attacks. Simple as. But Trump, if left with a choice, would rather Israel bomb than him having to do it. For obvious political reasons that countervail Zionist interests. Now he's stuck with the problem that Israel's weapons don't have the power to bomb far enough into the ground.
Women are not hot wearing chadors. Unless you mean, well...
Actually, in reading the bio of Margaret Sanger recently I was enlightened that as late as 1930 even American women were focused on homemaking and were typically heavyset. The focus on being slender and stylish came later. Even Marilyn Monroe is often said to be heavy by the standards of, say, the 90s.
Which is to say that while model types are still hot we have of late been regressing with the obesity epidemic.
All will be revealed, so to speak, with the fuck n' suck and the worship of woman - as abolition of overconsumption finally prioritizes hot women as the goal of the new society.
Of all the times to be bitching about this - you pick now when Israel-Iran is the top story in the news and Israel is the unabashed aggressor?
I mean, this is a board full of Jew hating fringers that blame everything on Jews as a nice tidy, unified field theory - and now, when it makes sense to talk about them a lot, you complain?
No. This whole thing started over you implying I'm stupid after I copy-pasted text from an article.
Here's what commenced:
1. You, apparently not even reading the relevant material, and thus probably also unaware that I was pasting text, suggested I was stupid.
2. You then overtly called me stupid for asserting the OP has relevance or is serious, stating not mentioning provocateurs made me stupid. I still haven't spoken to provocateurs one way or another. I will now though: it, in addition to the stuff I've posted, is among things to consider.
-----
You could have just read the link. Then at minimum you would have realized I was pasting. At most, you could blame me for not using quotes. But that hardly legitimizes this nonsensical flurry of insults and your admitted ignorance in flexing with a superiority pose.
So yeah, pretty fucking unserious. Just read or not read. I don't give a fuck. But the incivility was totally out of line from the get go!
Donald Trump has expressed views about the influence of Israel on the US Congress, suggesting that its power has shifted over time. In November 2021, Trump stated that Israel "literally owned Congress" about 10-15 years prior, implying a significant level of influence, but that this situation had changed. He described the current situation as "almost the opposite".
Trump attributed this change, in part, to the rise of Democratic representatives like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar, whom he characterized as "hating Israel with a passion" and controlling Congress, suggesting that Israel is no longer a major force within the legislative body. He expressed that "Israel had such power — and rightfully — over Congress, and now it doesn't". These comments sparked considerable discussion and analysis, with some observers interpreting them as bordering on antisemitic tropes related to the control of governmental institutions by Jewish people.
----
Of course more recently public support for Israel in the US has largely collapsed, even among Republican voters. You need to look elsewhere. Is it in US interests for Iran to have nuclear weapons for example? The answer there is obviously no. If Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, it can respond to US attacks with nukes. It can't do that presently.
This is about the US controlling Middle East oil, and keeping others from controlling it.
Also worth noting is that the AI suggests Iran's chances get better in a prolonged conflict. This is something Bibi is saying himself. It's why he wants to assassinate Khamenei.
I dunno. If anything so far Iran's performance seems pretty impressive. No one is under any illusions here. Israel has US warplanes. Even there though the BBC has noted Iran continues to maintain its arsenal of medium range antiaircraft missiles firing at them. This is not a cakewalk.
Outside of Christian Identity you're not likely to meet Christians that have a monomania obsession with Jews. Believing in replacement theology is much more moderate than this monomania obsession.
BBC says Netanyahu's regime change is "highly unlikely".
The rest mostly just states what is obvious: Israel, with its US supplied warplanes, has been able to somewhat achieve air superiority. Is this supposed to be surprising or coming off as propaganda?
Then with that attitude expect what any instance of blatant disrespect will get you offline: removal from the premises. We're done here. Clean it up or I will remove you.
The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) launched a fresh wave of missile strikes – the eighth since Friday – against the occupied territories as part of “Operation True Promise III.”
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 14 hours ago
Reminiscent of Saddam Hussein's scud missile attacks on Israel in 1991 in the first Gulf War.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_Iraqi_missile_attacks_against_Israel
To think, if he hadn't been an idiot we might not be in this mess.
https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,972494,00.html
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=6850cd4065442
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 14 hours ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VbfBifiFF8
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=6850ccae8bfee
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 15 hours ago
The Times Of India, I suppose it should be noted, is not some fringe news source.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Times_of_India
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=6850c50ac72c5
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 15 hours ago
Khamenei’s ‘SMASH ISRAEL’ Order Issued From Bunker? Shocking Details About Iran’s Supreme Leader Out - Times Of India
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UK_S1Vsqyqo
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=6850c50ac72c5
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 15 hours ago*
'Will Wipe You Out': Khamenei's FIERY Message To Netanyahu & Israel As Iran Pulverises Tel Aviv - Times Of India
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ojn8H215RQo
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=6850c50ac72c5
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 15 hours ago
No, no man should like fat chicks. You want hot, thin women fucking and sucking in the streets, walking around butt ass naked. And I aim to deliver.
And no, I'm not married. Marriage is a failed institution which will have little place in the fuck n' suck - but marriage also gets in the way of being a revolutionist.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=68509ee5a2877
Joe_McCarthy -1 points 15 hours ago
"Once, the Persian king gave order to cut into the rock face of Behistun the following words: 'I, Darius, the Great King, King of Kings, an Aryan, having Aryan lineage'" - Alfred Rosenberg, The Myth of the Twentieth Century
I've alternately seen it stated as 'I, Darius, of Aryan race'
/v/AryanGods viewpost?postid=6850bbee3d9fd
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 15 hours ago
Bibi would like that. But as the BBC noted regime change is "highly unlikely". It's not analogous to Libya or post-9/11 Afghanistan where you had active armed groups to fight the Taliban on the ground. No, this is wag the dog. Bibi is trying to save his own ass. You could argue this even helps him legally, but certainly distracting attention from your domestic troubles by finding an enemy to attack is a favored strategem of demagogues from time immemorial. His government is in trouble, there is talk of civil war in Israel. This unites the public against a foreign foe, or tries to. It's very obvious what he's doing.
/v/TellTalk viewpost?postid=6850b6f78b43b
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 16 hours ago*
Nukes are very much THE issue for the United States. It's the only issue even as a nuclear armed Iran is a threat to the American empire. Oil use by the US is perhaps even less the issue than it having unchallenged supremacy in controlling its access. As of now it has that. A nuclear Iran challenges that.
Conversely, obviously Israel wants to overthrow the Iranian government. Just like they preferred Saddam gone. Both regimes assisted or assist revolutionary groups resisting Israel. I think it pretty plain that Bibi chose NOW to strike though because his country is polarized and his government is in danger of falling. Strictly a wag the dog aggression to distract attention from domestic problems and try to unite Israelis behind him against a foreign adversary. Not a new gambit or idea. It's an old trick of course.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=68509f3660eeb
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 17 hours ago
The whole undercurrent of the article, if you read it, is that Israel may not be able to prevent Iran from getting the bomb. That is the hinge. Because with the bomb Iran can use nuclear blackmail to shut down the US led international system.
https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=68507a133842d&commentid=68507cb13117c
You guys could have saved yourselves a decade of spamming about j0oz just by understanding geopolitics. The US has the Middle East riddled with bases for a reason: to control the oil, to cut off China, whatever, if they want. Iran with nukes can nuke the US if it closes the spigot with the Strait of Hormuz and the US attacks. Simple as. But Trump, if left with a choice, would rather Israel bomb than him having to do it. For obvious political reasons that countervail Zionist interests. Now he's stuck with the problem that Israel's weapons don't have the power to bomb far enough into the ground.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=68509f3660eeb
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 17 hours ago
No.
Women are not hot wearing chadors. Unless you mean, well...
Actually, in reading the bio of Margaret Sanger recently I was enlightened that as late as 1930 even American women were focused on homemaking and were typically heavyset. The focus on being slender and stylish came later. Even Marilyn Monroe is often said to be heavy by the standards of, say, the 90s.
Which is to say that while model types are still hot we have of late been regressing with the obesity epidemic.
All will be revealed, so to speak, with the fuck n' suck and the worship of woman - as abolition of overconsumption finally prioritizes hot women as the goal of the new society.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=68509ee5a2877
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 18 hours ago
Of all the times to be bitching about this - you pick now when Israel-Iran is the top story in the news and Israel is the unabashed aggressor?
I mean, this is a board full of Jew hating fringers that blame everything on Jews as a nice tidy, unified field theory - and now, when it makes sense to talk about them a lot, you complain?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=68506d554225d
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 18 hours ago*
Why it will be hard for Trump to stay out of the conflict with Iran
https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/16/politics/trump-iran-israel-peace-efforts-g7?iid=cnn_buildContentRecirc_end_recirc
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=68509f3660eeb
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 19 hours ago
Fetterman slams Democratic senators criticizing Israel’s attack against Iran
https://jewishinsider.com/2025/06/fetterman-slams-democratic-senators-who-have-criticized-israels-attack-against-iran/
Graham: U.S. support for Israeli strikes on Iran would ‘reset the position of America in the world’
https://jewishinsider.com/2025/06/lindsey-graham-us-iran-israel-strikes-support/
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=685086da8a89f
Joe_McCarthy 1 point 19 hours ago
Tim Walz: Maybe China can negotiate a Middle East peace deal
https://jewishinsider.com/2025/06/tim-walz-maybe-china-can-negotiate-a-middle-east-peace-deal/
Source: Israel concerned U.S. will push for end of Iran operation before its aims are met
https://jewishinsider.com/2025/06/source-israel-concerned-u-s-will-push-for-end-of-iran-operation-before-its-aims-are-met/
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=685086da8a89f
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 20 hours ago
No. This whole thing started over you implying I'm stupid after I copy-pasted text from an article.
Here's what commenced:
1. You, apparently not even reading the relevant material, and thus probably also unaware that I was pasting text, suggested I was stupid.
2. You then overtly called me stupid for asserting the OP has relevance or is serious, stating not mentioning provocateurs made me stupid. I still haven't spoken to provocateurs one way or another. I will now though: it, in addition to the stuff I've posted, is among things to consider.
-----
You could have just read the link. Then at minimum you would have realized I was pasting. At most, you could blame me for not using quotes. But that hardly legitimizes this nonsensical flurry of insults and your admitted ignorance in flexing with a superiority pose.
So yeah, pretty fucking unserious. Just read or not read. I don't give a fuck. But the incivility was totally out of line from the get go!
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=684b84a75e54e
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 20 hours ago
AI Overview
Donald Trump has expressed views about the influence of Israel on the US Congress, suggesting that its power has shifted over time. In November 2021, Trump stated that Israel "literally owned Congress" about 10-15 years prior, implying a significant level of influence, but that this situation had changed. He described the current situation as "almost the opposite".
Trump attributed this change, in part, to the rise of Democratic representatives like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar, whom he characterized as "hating Israel with a passion" and controlling Congress, suggesting that Israel is no longer a major force within the legislative body. He expressed that "Israel had such power — and rightfully — over Congress, and now it doesn't". These comments sparked considerable discussion and analysis, with some observers interpreting them as bordering on antisemitic tropes related to the control of governmental institutions by Jewish people.
----
Of course more recently public support for Israel in the US has largely collapsed, even among Republican voters. You need to look elsewhere. Is it in US interests for Iran to have nuclear weapons for example? The answer there is obviously no. If Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, it can respond to US attacks with nukes. It can't do that presently.
This is about the US controlling Middle East oil, and keeping others from controlling it.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=68507a133842d
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 20 hours ago
It's just a lot easier for Americans to blame Jews than look inward. And that's a fact.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=68507a133842d
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 20 hours ago
One of the most impartial sources in this may be Indian media.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=68507756d8fd0
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 21 hours ago
Also worth noting is that the AI suggests Iran's chances get better in a prolonged conflict. This is something Bibi is saying himself. It's why he wants to assassinate Khamenei.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=685063e407fc8
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 21 hours ago
Some of this may be a bit Baghdad Bobesque - but even the AI asserts that Iran's ballistic missile arsenal maintains its ability to retaliate:
https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=684e01a130d8e&commentid=684e02df6593a
I dunno. If anything so far Iran's performance seems pretty impressive. No one is under any illusions here. Israel has US warplanes. Even there though the BBC has noted Iran continues to maintain its arsenal of medium range antiaircraft missiles firing at them. This is not a cakewalk.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2lxkpekedo
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=685063e407fc8
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 21 hours ago
Outside of Christian Identity you're not likely to meet Christians that have a monomania obsession with Jews. Believing in replacement theology is much more moderate than this monomania obsession.
/v/Christianity viewpost?postid=684fcee5cfa81
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 21 hours ago
BBC says Netanyahu's regime change is "highly unlikely".
The rest mostly just states what is obvious: Israel, with its US supplied warplanes, has been able to somewhat achieve air superiority. Is this supposed to be surprising or coming off as propaganda?
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=68505db6afe69
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 22 hours ago
Then with that attitude expect what any instance of blatant disrespect will get you offline: removal from the premises. We're done here. Clean it up or I will remove you.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=68488cc8f1576
Joe_McCarthy 0 points 22 hours ago
The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) launched a fresh wave of missile strikes – the eighth since Friday – against the occupied territories as part of “Operation True Promise III.”
https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2025/06/16/749929/true-promise3-israeli-settlers-back-shelters-iran-missile-strikes-
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=685063e407fc8