Could be; JIDF is clearly obsessed with this place, and they’re permitted to collectivize for any reason - in contrast with Whites, who’d rouse the wrath of the FBI for trying to cooperate like that.
Well, I do not, which means there’s some statistically significant percentage of Whites who reject the anti-White rhetoric. And that means we can begin to make life difficult for anyone who pushes it.
The only problem with that strategy - which may not be a problem for you, but it would be for me - is if the label sticks, one can lose their job/contracts, or get into legal trouble.
What I am proposing is to go on the offensive, and attack the label itself, and those using it, as anti-White hatred. Because it clearly is. As you’ve seen, it’s the new “nigger”. And just as there is high social cost against a White man using the word “nigger”, there needs to be an even higher cost for using the word “racist”.
After all, real damage can be done to a person being labeled “racist”, while the same is not true of “nigger”. There’s no consequence to being called the latter.
Edit: “anti-White rhetoric” is a great attack word. If people in the vicinity start pushing White Guilt or whatnot, just announce that you won’t tolerate the “anti-White rhetoric”. Probably about nine times out of ten, they’ll be so shocked they’ll shut up.
Anymore, it only means “low-status individual” with zero societal protections and safeguards. Police have no obligation to respond to calls made by “racists”. “Racists” cannot win lawsuits, or keep their jobs.
As I was saying, there exist young women at Church who *don’t* have Missing-Daddy Syndrome.
Women are hypergamous by nature. Complaining that “they’re all whores” just bespeaks a lack of basic understanding. Though it’s clearly in decline now, Western Civilization wouldn’t have ascended in the first place if we hadn’t found a working mechanism to keep women in check.
That mechanism still works, if you avail yourself of it.
Or, contrarily, keep kicking against the pricks. No skin off my nose either way.
There’s too many fat and ugly women everywhere; no-one is forcing you to take an interest in them.
Church is where you meet daughters of men who are active fathers in their lives, who teach them right from wrong. You can expect them to have at least a basic understanding of what a wife is supposed to do.
The purpose of dating is to find a wife. Might as well go somewhere you could find a decent one.
That sounds imminently reasonable, in a world wherein Whites are permitted to secure their own continued existence.
But the most pressing problem I can see is that, if they pursue their scorched-earth strategy, they will most certainly rouse the wrath of International Jewry, prompting them to turn the whole world against the Whites.
I could easily see American gunboats launching missiles at them from offshore, due to some trumped-up “atrocity” committed by these “arrogant racist bigots”.
That sounds imminently reasonable, in a world wherein Whites are permitted to secure their own continued existence.
But the most pressing problem I can see is that, if they pursue their scorched-earth strategy, they will most certainly rouse the wrath of International Jewry, prompting them to turn the whole world against the Whites.
I could easily see American gunboats launching missiles at them from offshore, due to some trumped-up “atrocity” committed by these “arrogant racist bigots”.
KingOfWhiteAmerica 2 points 3.9 years ago
Well now that we figured it out, I guess they’re just go back to honest, objective data collection and reporting. Right guys ?
/v/science viewpost?postid=60f84aa1c046e
KingOfWhiteAmerica 2 points 3.9 years ago
The word you are looking for is “based”. It’s already been established for at least few years, now.
/v/SoapboxBongHits viewpost?postid=60f754db09f3d
KingOfWhiteAmerica 0 points 3.9 years ago
By “woke” you mean “based” ?
/v/announcements viewpost?postid=60e4ccbcded65
KingOfWhiteAmerica 0 points 3.9 years ago
Well if you’re not getting paid, maybe you’re some kind of monk, and this is an obedience.
/v/JewishPrivilege viewpost?postid=60f6dedf96456
KingOfWhiteAmerica 0 points 3.9 years ago
You’re always trying to get people to commit to extermination-not-transportation. It’s like you’re getting paid for it or something.
/v/JewishPrivilege viewpost?postid=60f6dedf96456
KingOfWhiteAmerica 9 points 3.9 years ago
Pretty good, except that “avoid segregation” nonsense.
Leave us alone.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=60f4c073098e8
KingOfWhiteAmerica 1 point 3.9 years ago
I didn’t see any American women in that video.
/v/FatPeopleHate viewpost?postid=60f47f71a96e2
KingOfWhiteAmerica 6 points 3.9 years ago
Attempted flattery.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60f4445b5ca93
KingOfWhiteAmerica 2 points 3.9 years ago
Could be; JIDF is clearly obsessed with this place, and they’re permitted to collectivize for any reason - in contrast with Whites, who’d rouse the wrath of the FBI for trying to cooperate like that.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60f4579873830
KingOfWhiteAmerica 1 point 3.9 years ago
The Media.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60f41af3502aa
KingOfWhiteAmerica 0 points 3.9 years ago
I’m not saying they shouldn’t do it. Just that the global scope of the problem can’t be dismissed.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=60f0095de9c1a
KingOfWhiteAmerica 2 points 3.9 years ago
Well, I do not, which means there’s some statistically significant percentage of Whites who reject the anti-White rhetoric. And that means we can begin to make life difficult for anyone who pushes it.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60f396132e67e
KingOfWhiteAmerica 3 points 3.9 years ago*
The only problem with that strategy - which may not be a problem for you, but it would be for me - is if the label sticks, one can lose their job/contracts, or get into legal trouble.
What I am proposing is to go on the offensive, and attack the label itself, and those using it, as anti-White hatred. Because it clearly is. As you’ve seen, it’s the new “nigger”. And just as there is high social cost against a White man using the word “nigger”, there needs to be an even higher cost for using the word “racist”.
After all, real damage can be done to a person being labeled “racist”, while the same is not true of “nigger”. There’s no consequence to being called the latter.
Edit: “anti-White rhetoric” is a great attack word. If people in the vicinity start pushing White Guilt or whatnot, just announce that you won’t tolerate the “anti-White rhetoric”. Probably about nine times out of ten, they’ll be so shocked they’ll shut up.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60f396132e67e
KingOfWhiteAmerica 3 points 3.9 years ago
Anymore, it only means “low-status individual” with zero societal protections and safeguards. Police have no obligation to respond to calls made by “racists”. “Racists” cannot win lawsuits, or keep their jobs.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60f396132e67e
KingOfWhiteAmerica 0 points 3.9 years ago
As I was saying, there exist young women at Church who *don’t* have Missing-Daddy Syndrome.
Women are hypergamous by nature. Complaining that “they’re all whores” just bespeaks a lack of basic understanding. Though it’s clearly in decline now, Western Civilization wouldn’t have ascended in the first place if we hadn’t found a working mechanism to keep women in check.
That mechanism still works, if you avail yourself of it.
Or, contrarily, keep kicking against the pricks. No skin off my nose either way.
/v/dating viewpost?postid=60f25a67cf1c7
KingOfWhiteAmerica 2 points 3.9 years ago
There’s too many fat and ugly women everywhere; no-one is forcing you to take an interest in them.
Church is where you meet daughters of men who are active fathers in their lives, who teach them right from wrong. You can expect them to have at least a basic understanding of what a wife is supposed to do.
The purpose of dating is to find a wife. Might as well go somewhere you could find a decent one.
/v/dating viewpost?postid=60f25a67cf1c7
KingOfWhiteAmerica 2 points 3.9 years ago
Go to Church, and abstain from sex until marriage. If she cooperates, she’s a keeper.
/v/dating viewpost?postid=60f25a67cf1c7
KingOfWhiteAmerica 1 point 3.9 years ago
Sounds like encouragement to become Orthodox.
/v/Christianity viewpost?postid=60f1fb343e6d2
KingOfWhiteAmerica 4 points 3.9 years ago
I was told there’d be privileges ...
/v/WhiteBeauty viewpost?postid=60f217a852aa8
KingOfWhiteAmerica 2 points 3.9 years ago
DeMoCRaTS aRe THe ReaL FaSCiSTS !!
/v/Mildlyinfuriating viewpost?postid=60f0e7fa9abb1
KingOfWhiteAmerica 2 points 3.9 years ago
Who, Ezra Levant ?
I mean, *Ezra Levant* ... really??
Might as well be like Herschel Goldbergstein
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60f0a7719b2fe
KingOfWhiteAmerica 7 points 3.9 years ago
It does, however, nicely reframe all the medieval literature which refers to Pride as the deadliest sin.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60f0373d2500d
KingOfWhiteAmerica 0 points 3.9 years ago
Where are you seeing this ? I haven’t run into any buyer’s remorse.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=60f0291920e6d
KingOfWhiteAmerica 1 point 3.9 years ago
That sounds imminently reasonable, in a world wherein Whites are permitted to secure their own continued existence.
But the most pressing problem I can see is that, if they pursue their scorched-earth strategy, they will most certainly rouse the wrath of International Jewry, prompting them to turn the whole world against the Whites.
I could easily see American gunboats launching missiles at them from offshore, due to some trumped-up “atrocity” committed by these “arrogant racist bigots”.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=60f0095de9c1a
KingOfWhiteAmerica 9 points 3.9 years ago
That sounds imminently reasonable, in a world wherein Whites are permitted to secure their own continued existence.
But the most pressing problem I can see is that, if they pursue their scorched-earth strategy, they will most certainly rouse the wrath of International Jewry, prompting them to turn the whole world against the Whites.
I could easily see American gunboats launching missiles at them from offshore, due to some trumped-up “atrocity” committed by these “arrogant racist bigots”.
/v/AskVoat viewpost?postid=60f0095de9c1a