he was a very good piano man and composer and look what i found....
can DNA damage cause this condition?
ChatGPT said:
>DNA damage itself is not a direct, established cause of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH), but it could play an indirect role, particularly in the idiopathic form (iNPH) seen in older adults. Here's how:
1. DNA Damage and Aging
Cumulative DNA damage is a hallmark of aging and contributes to cellular senescence, neurodegeneration, and loss of homeostatic regulation in brain tissue.
This damage can affect ependymal cells (which line the brain’s ventricles and are involved in CSF movement) and glial cells, potentially disrupting normal CSF dynamics.
2. Impact on CSF Absorption and Brain Structure
If DNA damage contributes to chronic inflammation, vascular changes, or white matter degeneration, it may influence the brain's ability to absorb and regulate CSF — indirectly promoting conditions like NPH.
3. Neurodegenerative Link
There is some overlap in symptoms and pathology between iNPH and neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, **where DNA damage and mitochondrial dysfunction are more clearly implicated.**
Bottom Line:
DNA damage is not a known primary cause of NPH, *but it may contribute to the aging-related processes that predispose individuals to iNPH. More research is needed to clarify these connections.** If you're considering the role of genetic or molecular mechanisms in NPH, it's currently more a matter of hypothesis and indirect association than direct causation.
i really didnt know what to tell him so i my best was to ask the stupid bot. his situation is really though and honestly i wouldnt to be in his shoes one day. am also so sorry for the abuse and neglect that he endured. i was bullied to hell and back when i was a kid and some other nasty stuff happened to me but by the grace of God am here and that's the only i can say i respect his pain and his situation and i understand it fully
so what you were saying YOU sounded irate by the faggot in the video because you like either chump or the woman in question. the fag is right she is obviously wrong. the president doesnt have the power to arbitrarly suspend habeas corpus unless is for a grand emergency.
i dont follow a party or a man i follow the u.s constitution what about you?
i honestly dont know what to say in your situation. i asked AI for you and ....
Immediate Crisis Management
1. Housing Crisis
The top priority is finding a stable place to stay before June 1. Even a less-than-ideal rooming house is better than being homeless. It buys time.
Shelters or transitional housing programs might also be worth contacting. They often help people in eviction or housing crisis situations.
Consider contacting:
Community Advocates Milwaukee (they help with housing, energy assistance, and crisis support).
211 Wisconsin – just dial 2-1-1 or go to 211wisconsin.org for local resources.
Legal Aid Society of Milwaukee – if there's any possibility to challenge the eviction or seek more time.
2. Storage + Planning
If staying put and risking sheriff eviction is on the table, then putting belongings into a storage unit can prevent loss of property and buy some flexibility.
Coordinate that early so it’s not a panic decision at the end.
3. Mental Health
The person clearly mentions being at a breaking point mentally. They need to speak to a professional.
In Milwaukee, there are free or sliding-scale counseling services, like:
Milwaukee County Behavioral Health Services
Sixteenth Street Community Health Centers
IMPACT 211 can help find a crisis counselor or therapist.
4. Employment + Income
Without a car or guaranteed job, it's time to explore:
Remote work opportunities – customer service, virtual assistant, transcription, etc.
Short-term gigs – temp work, warehouse jobs, food delivery (bike options if no car).
Longer-Term Considerations
A. Relocating Out of State
If they truly hate Milwaukee and want to start over, relocation may be viable — but not without some plan or support network in place.
They should not wait until eviction happens. Use the time now to network, look at job boards in other states, and explore relocation assistance programs. Some cities or states offer incentives or help for relocating job seekers.
TL;DR for them:
Move into the rooming house for now. Put your stuff in storage if needed. Get mental health help immediately. Contact local agencies for housing and legal aid. Start working on an exit plan from Milwaukee if that’s what you want — but survive first.
Let me know if you want help drafting a reply to them that says this more tactfully.
i am not subbed to this guy however the person in question is dead wrong about your rights. habeas corpus doesnt mean that the office of the president can do anything he wants. if you believe this then you are an idiot as well.
>Habeas corpus (/ˈheɪbiəs ˈkɔːrpəs/ ⓘ; from Medieval Latin, lit. 'you should have the body')[1] is a legal procedure by which a report can be made to a court alleging the unlawful detention or imprisonment of an individual, and requesting that the court order the individual's custodian (usually a prison official) to bring the prisoner to court, to determine whether their detention is lawful.
>Habeas corpus is generally enforced via writ, and accordingly referred to as a writ of habeas corpus. It is a summons with the force of a court order; it is addressed to the custodian (such as a jailer) and demands that a prisoner be brought before the court, and that the custodian present proof of authority, allowing the court to determine whether the custodian has lawful authority to detain the prisoner. If the custodian is acting beyond their authority, then the prisoner must be released. Any prisoner, or another person acting on their behalf, may petition the court, or a judge, for a writ of habeas corpus. One reason for the writ to be sought by a person other than the prisoner is that the detainee might be held incommunicado. Most continental European law-influenced jurisdictions provide a similar remedy for those unlawfully detained, but this is not always called habeas corpus.[2] For example, in some Spanish-speaking nations, the equivalent remedy for unlawful imprisonment is the amparo de libertad ("protection of freedom").
>The writ of habeas corpus is one of what are called the "extraordinary", "common law", or "prerogative writs", which were historically issued by the English courts in the name of the monarch to control inferior courts and public authorities within the kingdom. The due process for such petitions is not simply civil or criminal, because they incorporate the presumption of non-authority. The official who is the respondent must prove authority to do or not do something. Failing that, the court must decide for the petitioner, who may be any person, not just an interested party. This differs from a motion in a civil process in which the movant must have standing, and bears the burden of proof. Relief, when available, is generally governed by equitable principles.[3][4][5]
>Habeas corpus has certain limitations. The petitioner must present a prima facie case that a person has been unlawfully restrained. In some countries, the writ has been temporarily or permanently suspended on the basis of a war or state of emergency, for example with the Habeas Corpus Suspension Act 1794 in Britain, and the Habeas Corpus Suspension Act (1863) in the United States. Nonetheless, the right to petition for a writ of habeas corpus has long been celebrated as a fundamental safeguard of individual liberty.
from encyclopedia Britannica: https://www.britannica.com/topic/habeas-corpus
A writ of habeas corpus (Latin: “you should have the body”) is a common law order issued by a judge or court requiring the appearance of a prisoner or detainee before the court for a specified purpose. The most common and important purpose of a such a writ is to determine the validity of a person’s arrest, imprisonment, or detention under relevant laws or constitutional provisions. The habeas corpus remedy is recognized in the countries of the Anglo-American legal system but is generally not found in civil-law countries, although some of the latter have adopted comparable procedures.
The origins of the writ of habeas corpus cannot be stated with certainty. Before the Magna Carta (1215) a variety of writs performed some of the functions of habeas corpus. During the Middle Ages writs of habeas corpus were employed to bring cases from inferior tribunals into the king’s courts. The modern history of such a writ as a device for the protection of personal liberty against official authority may be said to date from the reign of Henry VII (1485–1509), when efforts were made to employ it on behalf of persons imprisoned by the Privy Council. By the reign of Charles I, in the 17th century, a writ of habeas corpus was fully established as the appropriate process for checking the illegal imprisonment of people by inferior courts or public officials.
Many of the procedures that made for the effective assertion of these rights were provided by the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679, which authorized judges to issue writs when courts were on vacation and provided severe penalties for any judge who refused to comply with it. Its use was expanded during the 19th century to cover those held under private authority. In 1960 legislation was enacted limiting the instances in which a writ of habeas corpus could be denied and establishing new lines of appeal.
Abraham Lincoln
Abraham LincolnU.S. Pres. Abraham Lincoln, photograph by Mathew Brady, 1864.
In the British colonies in North America, by the time of the American Revolution, the rights to writs of habeas corpus were popularly regarded as among the basic protections of individual liberty. The U.S. Constitution guarantees that the privilege “shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it” (Article I, Section 9, paragraph 2). In England such suspension had occurred during the wars with France at the time of the French Revolution. In the United States, Pres. Abraham Lincoln suspended the writ by executive proclamation at the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861. The presidential act was challenged by Chief Justice Roger Taney who, in the case of Ex parte Merryman, vigorously contended that the power of suspension resided only in Congress. Lincoln ignored the order of the court, but the weight of modern opinion appears to support Taney’s view.
The modern uses of writs of habeas corpus in the United States have been quite varied. In the mid-20th century the U.S. Supreme Court’s expansive interpretation of the constitutional rights of those accused of crime led to the filing of many habeas corpus petitions by prisoners, challenging their convictions. That interpretation was gradually narrowed by the Supreme Court and by congressional acts in the later years of the century.
In contemporary law a writ of habeas corpus is frequently requested on behalf of one in police custody for the purpose of requiring the police to either charge the arrested person with an offense or release that person. Habeas corpus proceedings may be employed to obtain release of an accused individual prior to trial on the ground that the bail set is excessive. On occasion habeas corpus relief has been granted to prisoners who are unlawfully detained after the expiration of their sentences. In cases of persons arrested under a warrant of extradition, a proceeding in habeas corpus may be instituted to challenge the validity of the warrant.
The writ of habeas corpus may also be employed in a wide variety of situations not involving criminal proceedings. Thus, competing claims to the custody of a minor may be adjudicated in terms of habeas corpus. Someone confined to a mental hospital may in some jurisdictions bring about release from the hospital by demonstrating the recovery of sanity at a habeas corpus hearing. In 2004 the Supreme Court held in Rasul v. Bush that a writ of habeas corpus is available to an alien held by the military as an enemy combatant in territory outside the U.S. but under its control. In Boumediene v. Bush (2008), the Supreme Court struck down the Military Commissions Act of 2006, which had barred foreign enemy combatants held by the United States from challenging their detentions in federal courts. In 2025, the second Trump administration indicated its desire to unilaterally suspend the right to request a writ of habeas corpus for detained immigrants who have entered the country illegally.
slogans are made with a purpose. many on both sides get captured by it because it conjures a mental hero that will come and do the work for them and save the day.
shh dont tell anyone. noone is coming, we are done as a nation. some blame the boomers some the hippies some blame the niggers while others blames the jews but aside from all that, the truth of the matter is that humanity is corrupt. there's never been a republic that has lasted more than 200 years. shh we are a republic in name only.
see what happened during the fake pandemic as an obvious example of this. i dont need to go too back in time to prove anything. they will try use all the tricks available too keep it alive but at some point it will morph in to something uglier. when a satanist tells you that the golden age is upon us you reverse that saying and you will find that the opposite is true
> Now has a form of very aggressive cancer, plus other new issues.
i'm so sorry that you have this burden to carry even though you did your best to avoid her further pain and distress and earlier exit from this Godforsaken world. remember you are not alone in this. you have me here at least for moral support and many thousands and possibly millions are going through the same stuff as we. treat this like one of those trials life throws at you. we have to face this, there's no other choice
yeah she is in constant pain, if she could have heard me she would be only dealing with her natural issues of her age but she listened to the tevee and my other neurotic sister that told her if she wasnt vaxxed she wouldnt see the kids. my dad also thought that benefits outweighed the risks but obviously that was a bad calculation of his part
euthanasia its immoral because only your creator can take away your life from you. suicide and euthanasia were used to frown upon and now its celebrated. no, we should celebrate life not death
dosvydanya_freedomz 0 points 4 weeks ago
he was a very good piano man and composer and look what i found....
can DNA damage cause this condition?
ChatGPT said:
>DNA damage itself is not a direct, established cause of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH), but it could play an indirect role, particularly in the idiopathic form (iNPH) seen in older adults. Here's how:
1. DNA Damage and Aging
Cumulative DNA damage is a hallmark of aging and contributes to cellular senescence, neurodegeneration, and loss of homeostatic regulation in brain tissue.
This damage can affect ependymal cells (which line the brain’s ventricles and are involved in CSF movement) and glial cells, potentially disrupting normal CSF dynamics.
2. Impact on CSF Absorption and Brain Structure
If DNA damage contributes to chronic inflammation, vascular changes, or white matter degeneration, it may influence the brain's ability to absorb and regulate CSF — indirectly promoting conditions like NPH.
3. Neurodegenerative Link
There is some overlap in symptoms and pathology between iNPH and neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, **where DNA damage and mitochondrial dysfunction are more clearly implicated.**
Bottom Line:
DNA damage is not a known primary cause of NPH, *but it may contribute to the aging-related processes that predispose individuals to iNPH. More research is needed to clarify these connections.** If you're considering the role of genetic or molecular mechanisms in NPH, it's currently more a matter of hypothesis and indirect association than direct causation.
he is fucked
/v/Health viewpost?postid=6830db747e373
dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 4 weeks ago
nope more like the student of jewish stupidity. often the stupid present themselves as wise as you yourself know
/v/WTF viewpost?postid=6830604e9c03c
dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 4 weeks ago
ask @RabbiKinderschtupper and bigfat dangus they are experts on this topic as of late
/v/Niggerss viewpost?postid=68306bb348d15
dosvydanya_freedomz 3 points 4 weeks ago
some where probably jerked off by rabbi above. he had to help but then then the bigguy had wanted to take sip of nigger dick as well. not my issues
/v/WTF viewpost?postid=6830604e9c03c
dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 4 weeks ago
no it was yours that decided that cuck your dad not with white guys but with 600 chimpanzees lol
why she went zoophiliac on your dad? idk probably because he refused to be fucked with a strap on dildo :)
/v/WTF viewpost?postid=6830604e9c03c
dosvydanya_freedomz 8 points 4 weeks ago
>Annie says that her engagement won't stop her from bedding hundreds of men before her wedding night.
totally NOT a whore i see
/v/WTF viewpost?postid=6830604e9c03c
dosvydanya_freedomz 0 points 4 weeks ago
i really didnt know what to tell him so i my best was to ask the stupid bot. his situation is really though and honestly i wouldnt to be in his shoes one day. am also so sorry for the abuse and neglect that he endured. i was bullied to hell and back when i was a kid and some other nasty stuff happened to me but by the grace of God am here and that's the only i can say i respect his pain and his situation and i understand it fully
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=682f9c2b77e45
dosvydanya_freedomz 0 points 4 weeks ago
so what you were saying YOU sounded irate by the faggot in the video because you like either chump or the woman in question. the fag is right she is obviously wrong. the president doesnt have the power to arbitrarly suspend habeas corpus unless is for a grand emergency.
i dont follow a party or a man i follow the u.s constitution what about you?
/v/videos viewpost?postid=682f694d442cc
dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 4 weeks ago
amen
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=682f9c2b77e45
dosvydanya_freedomz 0 points 4 weeks ago*
i honestly dont know what to say in your situation. i asked AI for you and ....
Immediate Crisis Management
1. Housing Crisis
The top priority is finding a stable place to stay before June 1. Even a less-than-ideal rooming house is better than being homeless. It buys time.
Shelters or transitional housing programs might also be worth contacting. They often help people in eviction or housing crisis situations.
Consider contacting:
Community Advocates Milwaukee (they help with housing, energy assistance, and crisis support).
211 Wisconsin – just dial 2-1-1 or go to 211wisconsin.org for local resources.
Legal Aid Society of Milwaukee – if there's any possibility to challenge the eviction or seek more time.
2. Storage + Planning
If staying put and risking sheriff eviction is on the table, then putting belongings into a storage unit can prevent loss of property and buy some flexibility.
Coordinate that early so it’s not a panic decision at the end.
3. Mental Health
The person clearly mentions being at a breaking point mentally. They need to speak to a professional.
In Milwaukee, there are free or sliding-scale counseling services, like:
Milwaukee County Behavioral Health Services
Sixteenth Street Community Health Centers
IMPACT 211 can help find a crisis counselor or therapist.
4. Employment + Income
Without a car or guaranteed job, it's time to explore:
Remote work opportunities – customer service, virtual assistant, transcription, etc.
Short-term gigs – temp work, warehouse jobs, food delivery (bike options if no car).
Longer-Term Considerations
A. Relocating Out of State
If they truly hate Milwaukee and want to start over, relocation may be viable — but not without some plan or support network in place.
They should not wait until eviction happens. Use the time now to network, look at job boards in other states, and explore relocation assistance programs. Some cities or states offer incentives or help for relocating job seekers.
TL;DR for them:
Move into the rooming house for now. Put your stuff in storage if needed. Get mental health help immediately. Contact local agencies for housing and legal aid. Start working on an exit plan from Milwaukee if that’s what you want — but survive first.
Let me know if you want help drafting a reply to them that says this more tactfully.
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=682f9c2b77e45
dosvydanya_freedomz 0 points 4 weeks ago
i am not subbed to this guy however the person in question is dead wrong about your rights. habeas corpus doesnt mean that the office of the president can do anything he wants. if you believe this then you are an idiot as well.
>Habeas corpus (/ˈheɪbiəs ˈkɔːrpəs/ ⓘ; from Medieval Latin, lit. 'you should have the body')[1] is a legal procedure by which a report can be made to a court alleging the unlawful detention or imprisonment of an individual, and requesting that the court order the individual's custodian (usually a prison official) to bring the prisoner to court, to determine whether their detention is lawful.
>Habeas corpus is generally enforced via writ, and accordingly referred to as a writ of habeas corpus. It is a summons with the force of a court order; it is addressed to the custodian (such as a jailer) and demands that a prisoner be brought before the court, and that the custodian present proof of authority, allowing the court to determine whether the custodian has lawful authority to detain the prisoner. If the custodian is acting beyond their authority, then the prisoner must be released. Any prisoner, or another person acting on their behalf, may petition the court, or a judge, for a writ of habeas corpus. One reason for the writ to be sought by a person other than the prisoner is that the detainee might be held incommunicado. Most continental European law-influenced jurisdictions provide a similar remedy for those unlawfully detained, but this is not always called habeas corpus.[2] For example, in some Spanish-speaking nations, the equivalent remedy for unlawful imprisonment is the amparo de libertad ("protection of freedom").
>The writ of habeas corpus is one of what are called the "extraordinary", "common law", or "prerogative writs", which were historically issued by the English courts in the name of the monarch to control inferior courts and public authorities within the kingdom. The due process for such petitions is not simply civil or criminal, because they incorporate the presumption of non-authority. The official who is the respondent must prove authority to do or not do something. Failing that, the court must decide for the petitioner, who may be any person, not just an interested party. This differs from a motion in a civil process in which the movant must have standing, and bears the burden of proof. Relief, when available, is generally governed by equitable principles.[3][4][5]
>Habeas corpus has certain limitations. The petitioner must present a prima facie case that a person has been unlawfully restrained. In some countries, the writ has been temporarily or permanently suspended on the basis of a war or state of emergency, for example with the Habeas Corpus Suspension Act 1794 in Britain, and the Habeas Corpus Suspension Act (1863) in the United States. Nonetheless, the right to petition for a writ of habeas corpus has long been celebrated as a fundamental safeguard of individual liberty.
from encyclopedia Britannica: https://www.britannica.com/topic/habeas-corpus
A writ of habeas corpus (Latin: “you should have the body”) is a common law order issued by a judge or court requiring the appearance of a prisoner or detainee before the court for a specified purpose. The most common and important purpose of a such a writ is to determine the validity of a person’s arrest, imprisonment, or detention under relevant laws or constitutional provisions. The habeas corpus remedy is recognized in the countries of the Anglo-American legal system but is generally not found in civil-law countries, although some of the latter have adopted comparable procedures.
The origins of the writ of habeas corpus cannot be stated with certainty. Before the Magna Carta (1215) a variety of writs performed some of the functions of habeas corpus. During the Middle Ages writs of habeas corpus were employed to bring cases from inferior tribunals into the king’s courts. The modern history of such a writ as a device for the protection of personal liberty against official authority may be said to date from the reign of Henry VII (1485–1509), when efforts were made to employ it on behalf of persons imprisoned by the Privy Council. By the reign of Charles I, in the 17th century, a writ of habeas corpus was fully established as the appropriate process for checking the illegal imprisonment of people by inferior courts or public officials.
Many of the procedures that made for the effective assertion of these rights were provided by the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679, which authorized judges to issue writs when courts were on vacation and provided severe penalties for any judge who refused to comply with it. Its use was expanded during the 19th century to cover those held under private authority. In 1960 legislation was enacted limiting the instances in which a writ of habeas corpus could be denied and establishing new lines of appeal.
Abraham Lincoln
Abraham LincolnU.S. Pres. Abraham Lincoln, photograph by Mathew Brady, 1864.
In the British colonies in North America, by the time of the American Revolution, the rights to writs of habeas corpus were popularly regarded as among the basic protections of individual liberty. The U.S. Constitution guarantees that the privilege “shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it” (Article I, Section 9, paragraph 2). In England such suspension had occurred during the wars with France at the time of the French Revolution. In the United States, Pres. Abraham Lincoln suspended the writ by executive proclamation at the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861. The presidential act was challenged by Chief Justice Roger Taney who, in the case of Ex parte Merryman, vigorously contended that the power of suspension resided only in Congress. Lincoln ignored the order of the court, but the weight of modern opinion appears to support Taney’s view.
The modern uses of writs of habeas corpus in the United States have been quite varied. In the mid-20th century the U.S. Supreme Court’s expansive interpretation of the constitutional rights of those accused of crime led to the filing of many habeas corpus petitions by prisoners, challenging their convictions. That interpretation was gradually narrowed by the Supreme Court and by congressional acts in the later years of the century.
In contemporary law a writ of habeas corpus is frequently requested on behalf of one in police custody for the purpose of requiring the police to either charge the arrested person with an offense or release that person. Habeas corpus proceedings may be employed to obtain release of an accused individual prior to trial on the ground that the bail set is excessive. On occasion habeas corpus relief has been granted to prisoners who are unlawfully detained after the expiration of their sentences. In cases of persons arrested under a warrant of extradition, a proceeding in habeas corpus may be instituted to challenge the validity of the warrant.
The writ of habeas corpus may also be employed in a wide variety of situations not involving criminal proceedings. Thus, competing claims to the custody of a minor may be adjudicated in terms of habeas corpus. Someone confined to a mental hospital may in some jurisdictions bring about release from the hospital by demonstrating the recovery of sanity at a habeas corpus hearing. In 2004 the Supreme Court held in Rasul v. Bush that a writ of habeas corpus is available to an alien held by the military as an enemy combatant in territory outside the U.S. but under its control. In Boumediene v. Bush (2008), the Supreme Court struck down the Military Commissions Act of 2006, which had barred foreign enemy combatants held by the United States from challenging their detentions in federal courts. In 2025, the second Trump administration indicated its desire to unilaterally suspend the right to request a writ of habeas corpus for detained immigrants who have entered the country illegally.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=682f694d442cc
dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 4 weeks ago
you aint wrong here
/v/videos viewpost?postid=682f694d442cc
dosvydanya_freedomz 0 points 4 weeks ago
if you call gay shit calling out someone that DONT know your rights. yes i do.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=682f694d442cc
dosvydanya_freedomz 2 points 4 weeks ago
no, its all part of the demoralization agenda. some ppl dont understand this
/v/conspiracy viewpost?postid=682f216550211
dosvydanya_freedomz 0 points 4 weeks ago
will go nowhere. they have dirt on each other. this is another distraction like the fake epstein and jfk files being released by blondi
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=682f35b3cdada
dosvydanya_freedomz 3 points 4 weeks ago
slogans are made with a purpose. many on both sides get captured by it because it conjures a mental hero that will come and do the work for them and save the day.
shh dont tell anyone. noone is coming, we are done as a nation. some blame the boomers some the hippies some blame the niggers while others blames the jews but aside from all that, the truth of the matter is that humanity is corrupt. there's never been a republic that has lasted more than 200 years. shh we are a republic in name only.
see what happened during the fake pandemic as an obvious example of this. i dont need to go too back in time to prove anything. they will try use all the tricks available too keep it alive but at some point it will morph in to something uglier. when a satanist tells you that the golden age is upon us you reverse that saying and you will find that the opposite is true
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=682f4d166baf1
dosvydanya_freedomz 0 points 4 weeks ago
yes i dont think she is dalit either
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=682f3c64d296f
dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 4 weeks ago
first time i heard about this too. pink dollar wtf 🤣
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=682f3c64d296f
dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 4 weeks ago
pretty much lol
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=682f3c64d296f
dosvydanya_freedomz 0 points 4 weeks ago
> Now has a form of very aggressive cancer, plus other new issues.
i'm so sorry that you have this burden to carry even though you did your best to avoid her further pain and distress and earlier exit from this Godforsaken world. remember you are not alone in this. you have me here at least for moral support and many thousands and possibly millions are going through the same stuff as we. treat this like one of those trials life throws at you. we have to face this, there's no other choice
/v/Health viewpost?postid=682db0ad515f7
dosvydanya_freedomz 0 points 4 weeks ago
springteen sold out during the vaxx so there's that. many artists that we thought that were anti-establishment actually werent
/v/music viewpost?postid=682e3c09eef7e
dosvydanya_freedomz -1 points 4 weeks ago
indeed
/v/Health viewpost?postid=682e32dc131fb
dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 1 month ago
yeah she is in constant pain, if she could have heard me she would be only dealing with her natural issues of her age but she listened to the tevee and my other neurotic sister that told her if she wasnt vaxxed she wouldnt see the kids. my dad also thought that benefits outweighed the risks but obviously that was a bad calculation of his part
/v/Health viewpost?postid=682db0ad515f7
dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 1 month ago
euthanasia its immoral because only your creator can take away your life from you. suicide and euthanasia were used to frown upon and now its celebrated. no, we should celebrate life not death
/v/Health viewpost?postid=682dc96871c97
dosvydanya_freedomz 1 point 1 month ago
lots of antibiotics and oxygen and thats for cases that were caught early.
/v/Health viewpost?postid=682dc96871c97