a) Diverse implies each one apart from one another...multi implies many ones together.
b) Nature implies equality (inception towards death) generating diversity (life)...to equalize natural differences; few are artificially tempting many together.
c) As resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death)...only resisting temptation fertilizes being.
d) Nature utilizes perceivable inspiration to inspire each fertile being to resist...others suggest information to tempt one to ignore resisting. Holding onto information, and sharing it with one another makes one sterile.
In short...adapting to inspiration implies fertility; consenting to information implies sterility.
Free will of choice was given before a bible can be taken...taking and thereby holding onto given binds ones free will of choice.
> God gave us
Did God unite states (us) together or anoint (christ) each one apart from one another? That's a question others cannot answer without tempting one to ignore self discernment.
a) Ultimate/ultimare - "coming to an end"...one needs to resist the wanted temptation to reach towards end.
b) Weapon implies instrument of offense/defense aka ones free will of choice...not whatever tools ones choice utilizes.
c) Love and hate turns life against one another, hence into a conflict of reason (love vs hate) aka mutual destruction.
Furthermore...as hate tempts one to blame others, while ignoring to clear self, so does love tempts one to want to hold onto, while ignoring the need to let go of.
Breaking point implies the status quo of each being, yet most ignored it. Inception sentences each life towards point of death, hence implying a breaking of flow (inception towards death) into form (life).
Few trick many to believe in a breaking point just out of reach, and waiting just "two more weeks" moves ones life sentence ever closer towards point of death.
> when people talk about “resistance”
People (plural) tempts person (singular) to ignore resisting by joining others. Many cannot resist; because they don't permit each other room to exist. Resistance implies each resisting the temptations of each other.
> do we just keep
Nothing within a moving nature can be kept, and so singular (one) also cannot hold onto plural (we) without draining self out of resistance necessary to sustain self.
The issue with the WE is that one after another keeps joining together to refuel collectivism, which permits few to move the unwashed masses down the drain, while exploiting the lack of resistance along the way.
> fixing the system
Suggested information by few represents the system many are affixing mentally by consent. This mentally affixing of suggested information implies each ones ignorance of perceivable inspiration...which moves, and therefore cannot be held onto aka affixed.
It's the mind that ignores motion, which tries to fix the system by seeking endless more information, which is based on jewish mosaic law aka tempting gentiles puzzle together what natural law sets apart from one another. Gentiles are stuck within a mental loop aka circular logic...
> People thought they were rising up for
a) How could a person rise up from within a people? One can only rise (life) within fall (inception towards death)...not by lumping together, while trying to climb on top of each other until unavoidable collapse, which represents the tower of babel allegory.
b) To rise one needs to resist the wanted temptation of being FOR-warded...rising forwards implies moving forwards without resisting. Forwards (inception towards death) implies the way of least resistance...if one ignores to resist (living) temptation (dying).
> Make the system so complex they can’t even see the whole thing.
System/systēma/synistanai aka syn (together) + histanai (to stand) represents a fiction that tempts one to reality...being a partial within whole aka standing apart from one another. That's why THEY cannot see what ONE ignores.
> can't stop when informed to, where it's a compulsion.
How can a being inform nature to stop moving life towards death? If nature is compulsive (forcing together), then why is each being within forced apart from one another?
Nature separates each king (choice) within dom (balance) from one another. A jew suggests united kingdom to tempt consenting gentiles (ones choice) together under a jewish sovereign (chosen one).
> call
Nature doesn't call aka summon aka ask the presence of...all forces (inception towards death) each ones presence (life) to adapt.
To summon implies the SUM of all things put together, to be implies each partial separated from one another wihin whole.
A jew utilizes mosaic law aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) to summon the sum of all gentiles together...as the inversion of nature setting each anointed one apart from one another. YET...a summoned call requires each ones consent answering, and a jew utilizes ignorance as gentile consent given.
> identity
Being implies differential (partial) during equal (whole)...a jew suggests identity to equalize differences among consenting gentiles.
Identity/idem - "the same"...consenting to a suggested identity/idem/ideal/idol destroys differences among beings.
Consent permits suggested to migrate from one into another. Consent opens borders/bord - "edge/side", hence permitting a jew to conquer knowledge by tempting gentiles to choose a side to understand (stand under).
> solution
Solution (inception towards death) generates problems (life); hence each ones struggle to sustain self. A jew suggests gentiles to dissolve problems by seeking solutions...another inversion of being if consented to.
a) Everything forwards each thing by internal separation of partials (life) within whole (inception towards death)...nothing (nihilo) implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable.
b) Nature implies balance forwarding choice...left vs right implies an artificial imbalance of choice...if one chooses to hold onto a suggested side.
> what kind of a future is not worth fighting for?
Value (all perceivable) forwards evaluation (ones perception)...suggested worth tempts evaluation to ignore evaluating by holding onto something, while fighting others about it.
> The word FUTURE is not without ambiguity.
Future/futurus/bheue - "to be"...suggested future tempts perceiving being to ignore self by seeking something "yet to be".
It's ONEs consent to another ONEs suggestion which establishes ambiguity aka equivocalness aka double sense aka dualism (fiction) within singularity (reality).
It's ones choice which selects a chosen ones suggestion, thereby inverting ones choice into a chosen one. Ones consent does it to YOU/JEW.
> will the UN issue a non binding edict for the sacrifice
Free WILL of choice isn't bound unless choosing to bind itself aka sacrifice self by uniting consent with another ones suggestion. Edict/edit aka ordinance implies the natural order generating ones free will of choice by separating each one from one another.
> active measures
Action (perceivable) cannot be measured by reactions (perception) without ignoring the ongoing separation of action into reactions. To exploit this ignorance a jew suggests "active measures" to tempt the reacting choices of gentiles to invert moving reality by holding onto suggested fiction.
> demoralization
Suggested moralism tempts gentiles against each other (good vs bad), while ignoring that nature sets perceivable and perception apart from one another.
> destabilization
Stable motion (inception towards death) generates movable matter (life)...de-stabliz-ation implies this division of stable action, yet the jewish suggestion of the word "destabilization" tempts gentiles to seek stability aka immovability aka cessation of motion aka dormancy aka death.
Consenting to a suggestion tempts a gentile to hold together (destabilization) what nature separates (de-stabiliz-ation), and a jew can only shape words within sound by the use of LETTERS aka by each gentiles consent LETTING a jew shape words into defintions aka DEAF PHONETICIANS aka gentiles deaf to phonics (sound).
a) Christ implies "to anoint" aka each off-spring coming into being through the birth-channel aka each seed coming through all s-oil.
b) Cuck/kuka - "feces" implies the passing through (inception towards death) of each anointed one (life).
c) Putting christ + cuck together tempts one to ignore the implied separation of each anointed mind being passed through.
d) Gentile consent to a jewish suggestion "puts together" what nature sets apart from one another. This inversion of reality with fiction implies sediment aka a gentiles mind settling aka sinking down, which a jew calls faex populi (the dregs of the people; the lowest class of society) aka to void excrement aka the discharging of waste.
To vote implies by ones FREE will of choice, which one thereby ignores by selecting a chosen one as ones selected representative.
> Protesting
Protest/protestor - "to affirm it" aka spending ones resistance to affirm another ones temptation. For example...it's both pro-life and pro-choice protesters which are affirming, and thereby supplying with resistance, the suggested temptation of abortion.
> Flyering
Fly implies flow. Being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death), hence needing to resist the wanted temptation thereof. Resistance fertilizes form; temptation flows resistance out of form. Handing out flyers tempts others to accept wings.
> Petitions
a) Petitioning implies forwards, hence demand establishing supply...which a jewish merchant of temptation exploits for a price, which when payed by consent, makes gentiles the livestock of the jewish stock-market.
Meanwhile...nature implies the origin which sets each being free (will of choice) from one another. Petitioning towards fictitious outcomes cannot change origin of reality...only ones perception thereof; which one willingly ignores.
b) Petition implies petit/pett (partial) + tion (action) aka ones partial reaction within whole action. Petitioning each others suggestions tempts one to ignore being a partial (perception) within whole (perceivable).
A jew suggests petitions to tempt gentiles to feel petit, hence seeking to join with each other to feel bigger than before.
> chance
The inversion of choice. Taking a chance implies wanting outcome; being given choice implies by needed origin.
> success
"Give me your soul, and I give you success"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXIBbcQ3_Ec
> If change isn't brought about with a pen how did they make changes using the pen?
Nature implies change. A jew suggests gentiles to hold onto words (fiction); while ignoring sound (reality). A jew doesn't make change; a jew uses the pen to tempt gentiles to ignore that everything changes, and that nothing can be held onto.
> So how to prevail?
Being implies effect (perception) within cause (perceivable)...a jew tempts gentiles to ignore this by wanting to prevail outcomes. Ones consent to the suggested means of prevention nullify ones effect within cause, while permitting others to affect one.
> Play to their weakness.
Playing implies gambling aka taking a chance, while ignoring being a choice. Only resisting (strength) the temptation (weakness) to gamble grows ones resistance. How does a jew resist the temptation of gambling? By suggesting gentiles to play games.
> They suck at the visual
Visual implies ones sight as perception (expression) within perceivable (impression)...suggested visuals tempt one to ignore that, and its temptation which sucks ones resistance dry.
> So memes
Meme/mime - "to imitate". Suggestion (words) imitates perception (sound). A jew tempts gentiles to think in words, while ignoring sound. A mime is deaf to sound...a gentile holding onto any jewish definition is a DEAF PHONETICIAN, hence deaf to phonics (sound).
A jew tricks gentiles to be pantomimes aka imitators (mimos) of all (pan) instead of ones (perception) originating from within all (perceivable).
> support those attacked
a) Both attack and defense are turning one against one another...nature (the only support of being) separates each one from one another.
A jew suggests logos (words shaped within sound), which tempts each gentile to consent to logic (circular thinking), which in return turns gentiles against each other within conflicts of reason (versus).
b) Form (life) cannot attack against or defend itself from flow (inception towards death)...only against each other, which ignores that flow (dying) supports form (living).
> use their methodologies
a) Method aka meta (in pursuit or quest of) + hodos (way) tempts one (life) to pursuit way (inception towards death). A jew suggests methods to tempt living gentiles to pursuit the only outcome of life...death. It's ones consent to a suggested method, which corrupts ones perception of the perceivable way of life.
b) Logi/logic represents circular thinking within self, turning into conflicts of reason against others. That's gentiles fighting each other (attack vs defense) over suggested methods by a jew.
> lawfare
Being implies FREE will of choice (life) within the fare/fær - "passage" (inception towards death) of natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater). Any suggested laws tempts one to follow along instead of balancing on land; in/ex-haling air, and being solid (living) within fluid (dying) of water.
To follow any law...one pays with ones FREE will of choice. Meanwhile, each jew represents israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God". That ain't following; that's resisting...which fertilizes being.
Nature implies balance (left/right)...driving within implies each ones free will of choice. To manipulate choice...few are suggesting both sides to imbalance each through logic to turn against each other aka reason.
> forcing the brain to adapt to an unnatural orientation.
a) Circular logic implies that unnatural orientation aka if one ignores natural (perception); then one turns to fictional (suggestion).
b) Nature forces ones brain to adapt to change...fiction tempts ones brain to affix it, while ignoring to adapt to natural change.
> driving
a) Nature drives by simultaneously pushing (inception) and pulling (death) each being (life).
b) Few suggest driving to tempt many to either drive towards a goal or to not drive...both of which distract one from being (life) driven (inception towards death).
>why does entropy increase in one direction and decrease in the other
a) Increase in one direction (living) WHILE decreasing in the other (dying)...
b) Entropy implies being within (en) a turn (trope) aka within the transformation (life) of flow (inception towards death) aka living (temporary growth) within the process of dying (ongoing loss).
> the real question
A suggested quest tempts one to seek a suggested outcome (answer) from one another, while ignoring the origin (perceivable) of being (perception) aka a solution (flow) of problems (form).
Solution implies real; question vs answer implies fiction.
> He said it WAS change. Time IS not pushing things forward...
a) Perceivable WAS before perception comes into being...suggesting what IS tempts one to ignore that.
b) Aristotle saying that change WAS implies his response to reality...using what he's saying to suggest each other what IS or ISN'T implies fiction.
WAS moves; IS affixes...if one consents to ignore former (perceivable inspiration) for latter (suggested information).
Sound WAS; the suggested word "sound" IS...if one consents to hold onto the suggestion thereof. Sound doesn't come with a label (word)...it moves instruments apart from one another.
> just a measurement of change
Change implies just; measurement implies odd aka "constituting a unit in excess of an even number". Unit/uni - "one" implies one and only. Any measurement taken above or below one implies excess of ONEself measuring.
There can be only one aka one for all and all for one...energy aka internal power of change aka transformation (life) of flow (inception towards death) aka the alchemical transubstantiation of partials (ones) within whole (oneness).
> like time has a direction
Same (inception towards death) directs differences (life)...others suggest likeness to equalize differences perceived.
a) When push (inception towards death) comes to shove (life)...
b) Engine implies being within (en) generation (gine)
c) Time perceived implies motion; time suggested implies holding onto three fictitious states (past; present; future), while ignoring ones real presence within motion.
d) Motion can only move forwards...it's the matter within which can change directions WHILE being (life) moved forwards (inception towards death).
> What's the energy source for time?
Energy implies "internal/inherent power" aka the external source (action) for each internal effect (reaction).
> a type of motion
Type implies the differentiation of matter within the same motion. Type implies shape...motion implies foundation for matter to be shaped.
> motion in a sense
a) Sense implies "send by", hence motion giving matter "presence/pre-sense".
b) Suggested "motion in a sense" inverts sensing (ones perception) within motion (all perceivable).
> need a power supply
Energy implies the internal differentiation (reaction) of power (action) aka generating its own supply. To be able to react implies being empowered by action.
> engine of some type
Same engine (inception towards death); different types (life)...
Consider being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka instrument within sound. Believing implies holding onto suggested words, while ignoring perceivable sound.
The difference in-between suggested information and perceivable inspiration is that the former tempts one to hold onto it; while the latter can't be held onto...since it moves.
All sound/sanus (entire; whole) allows each one (partial) within to shape by free will of choice...any word tempts ones free will of choice to a) hold onto the shape, while ignoring the moving origin of sound, and b) bind ones choice to a chosen ones suggestion, hence religion/religio - "to bind anew".
Shaping words (fiction) within sound (reality) implies spell-craft...
>the wrong idea
a) Ideal (mental) + idol (physical) implies oneself holding onto the suggestion of another, hence idolatry of idealism.
b) Having choice implies being within balance, hence in-between (life) sides (inception/death)...choosing to hold onto a side implies imbalance for ones choice. This imbalance is called "reason", hence for your example a right vs wrong conflict. Both sides establish a VS aka versus/verto - "to turn" aka an inversion of ones choice.
In other words...choice exists at center of balance; others suggest imbalance to draw ones choice into circumference.
Whatever suggested side (right or wrong; true of false; yes or no; agree or disagree; belief or disbelief; want or not want etc.) one chooses to hold onto, positions one against all those who choose the other side. This is how a suggesting few gain control over both sides of every conflict of reason among a consenting many.
Using implication (if/then) over reason (versus) prevents conflict aka imbalance...if one chooses to resist the tempting choices of another.
> doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result
Same (inception towards death) generates differences (life)...expectancy tempts one to ignore perceivable origin for suggested outcomes.
> REAL definition
Real implies ones RE-sponse to ALL aka ones reaction within action. Definition implies "defining action" aka affixing that which moves.
Consenting to a suggested DEFINITION makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound) while affixing suggested words upon perceivable sound.
Nature moves...few within tempt many to affix labels (words) on what nature moves (sound), which represents a) spell-craft and b) idolatry.
> Insane
Few suggest the label "insane person" to tempt many to ignore the implication of being in-sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound).
> einstein
Aka ONE (ein) SAINT (st) ONE (ein)...saint/sacred - "set apart" aka the oneness of all (whole) setting apart each one within (partials) aka "all for one and one for all".
Nature implies degradation (inception towards death) generating aggrandizement (life)...others utilize magic to distract ones mind from discerning this for self.
One first has to write within another ones mind to be able to read it. Nature moves sound through ones mind...artificial words tempt one to ignore this.
As for the middle-class (bourgeois)...being implies as above/so below, hence as medium in the middle. Others suggest malcom/máel - "servant" to trick the consenting one into servitude to another.
Consenting to the suggestion of another makes one a "malcom in the middle", hence..."yes; no; maybe; I don't know; can you repeat the question?"
ImplicationOverReason -2 points 2 weeks ago
a) Diverse implies each one apart from one another...multi implies many ones together.
b) Nature implies equality (inception towards death) generating diversity (life)...to equalize natural differences; few are artificially tempting many together.
c) As resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death)...only resisting temptation fertilizes being.
d) Nature utilizes perceivable inspiration to inspire each fertile being to resist...others suggest information to tempt one to ignore resisting. Holding onto information, and sharing it with one another makes one sterile.
In short...adapting to inspiration implies fertility; consenting to information implies sterility.
/v/science viewpost?postid=67fe9509b84a7
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2 weeks ago
> gave the bible
Free will of choice was given before a bible can be taken...taking and thereby holding onto given binds ones free will of choice.
> God gave us
Did God unite states (us) together or anoint (christ) each one apart from one another? That's a question others cannot answer without tempting one to ignore self discernment.
/v/Christcucks viewpost?postid=67fe8e1338e1a
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 2 weeks ago
> since 1980
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pawnbroker_(film) "The film was the first produced entirely in the United States to deal with the Holocaust..."
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67fd53f364302
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2 weeks ago
> that's not what cuck means
https://www.etymonline.com/word/cuck
> you're being a faggot
Faggot implies a burden as in if one holds onto a suggested meaning; then one burdens the expression of being.
> definitions
Deaf phonetician implies one deaf to phonics; hence ignoring perceivable sound for suggested words aka spell-craft.
> he christcuck in the video was practicing NO SEX BEFORE MARRIAGE WITH A PORNSTAR
a) Sex/seco - "to divide"...marriage aka wedlock contradicts being divided/divined from one another.
b) Porn/pornē (to buy) + perə/per (to sell)...hence the happy merchant of temptation utilizing porn for his livestock market.
/v/Christcucks viewpost?postid=67fcd6f85d586
ImplicationOverReason -1 points 2 weeks ago
a) Ultimate/ultimare - "coming to an end"...one needs to resist the wanted temptation to reach towards end.
b) Weapon implies instrument of offense/defense aka ones free will of choice...not whatever tools ones choice utilizes.
c) Love and hate turns life against one another, hence into a conflict of reason (love vs hate) aka mutual destruction.
Furthermore...as hate tempts one to blame others, while ignoring to clear self, so does love tempts one to want to hold onto, while ignoring the need to let go of.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67fd47447af79
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2 weeks ago
> You ever think there’s a breaking point?
Breaking point implies the status quo of each being, yet most ignored it. Inception sentences each life towards point of death, hence implying a breaking of flow (inception towards death) into form (life).
Few trick many to believe in a breaking point just out of reach, and waiting just "two more weeks" moves ones life sentence ever closer towards point of death.
> when people talk about “resistance”
People (plural) tempts person (singular) to ignore resisting by joining others. Many cannot resist; because they don't permit each other room to exist. Resistance implies each resisting the temptations of each other.
> do we just keep
Nothing within a moving nature can be kept, and so singular (one) also cannot hold onto plural (we) without draining self out of resistance necessary to sustain self.
The issue with the WE is that one after another keeps joining together to refuel collectivism, which permits few to move the unwashed masses down the drain, while exploiting the lack of resistance along the way.
> fixing the system
Suggested information by few represents the system many are affixing mentally by consent. This mentally affixing of suggested information implies each ones ignorance of perceivable inspiration...which moves, and therefore cannot be held onto aka affixed.
It's the mind that ignores motion, which tries to fix the system by seeking endless more information, which is based on jewish mosaic law aka tempting gentiles puzzle together what natural law sets apart from one another. Gentiles are stuck within a mental loop aka circular logic...
> People thought they were rising up for
a) How could a person rise up from within a people? One can only rise (life) within fall (inception towards death)...not by lumping together, while trying to climb on top of each other until unavoidable collapse, which represents the tower of babel allegory.
b) To rise one needs to resist the wanted temptation of being FOR-warded...rising forwards implies moving forwards without resisting. Forwards (inception towards death) implies the way of least resistance...if one ignores to resist (living) temptation (dying).
> Make the system so complex they can’t even see the whole thing.
System/systēma/synistanai aka syn (together) + histanai (to stand) represents a fiction that tempts one to reality...being a partial within whole aka standing apart from one another. That's why THEY cannot see what ONE ignores.
/v/conspiracy viewpost?postid=67fd2c5643531
ImplicationOverReason -2 points 2 weeks ago
> can't stop when informed to, where it's a compulsion.
How can a being inform nature to stop moving life towards death? If nature is compulsive (forcing together), then why is each being within forced apart from one another?
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=67fcc4237183b
ImplicationOverReason -2 points 2 weeks ago
> UK
Nature separates each king (choice) within dom (balance) from one another. A jew suggests united kingdom to tempt consenting gentiles (ones choice) together under a jewish sovereign (chosen one).
> call
Nature doesn't call aka summon aka ask the presence of...all forces (inception towards death) each ones presence (life) to adapt.
To summon implies the SUM of all things put together, to be implies each partial separated from one another wihin whole.
A jew utilizes mosaic law aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) to summon the sum of all gentiles together...as the inversion of nature setting each anointed one apart from one another. YET...a summoned call requires each ones consent answering, and a jew utilizes ignorance as gentile consent given.
> identity
Being implies differential (partial) during equal (whole)...a jew suggests identity to equalize differences among consenting gentiles.
Identity/idem - "the same"...consenting to a suggested identity/idem/ideal/idol destroys differences among beings.
Consent permits suggested to migrate from one into another. Consent opens borders/bord - "edge/side", hence permitting a jew to conquer knowledge by tempting gentiles to choose a side to understand (stand under).
> solution
Solution (inception towards death) generates problems (life); hence each ones struggle to sustain self. A jew suggests gentiles to dissolve problems by seeking solutions...another inversion of being if consented to.
/v/Technocracy viewpost?postid=67fce2b4a19a2
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2 weeks ago
> A PARTING THOUGHT...what does the future hold
Holding onto ignores partition.
> nothing left to fight for.
a) Everything forwards each thing by internal separation of partials (life) within whole (inception towards death)...nothing (nihilo) implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable.
b) Nature implies balance forwarding choice...left vs right implies an artificial imbalance of choice...if one chooses to hold onto a suggested side.
> what kind of a future is not worth fighting for?
Value (all perceivable) forwards evaluation (ones perception)...suggested worth tempts evaluation to ignore evaluating by holding onto something, while fighting others about it.
> The word FUTURE is not without ambiguity.
Future/futurus/bheue - "to be"...suggested future tempts perceiving being to ignore self by seeking something "yet to be".
It's ONEs consent to another ONEs suggestion which establishes ambiguity aka equivocalness aka double sense aka dualism (fiction) within singularity (reality).
It's ones choice which selects a chosen ones suggestion, thereby inverting ones choice into a chosen one. Ones consent does it to YOU/JEW.
> will the UN issue a non binding edict for the sacrifice
Free WILL of choice isn't bound unless choosing to bind itself aka sacrifice self by uniting consent with another ones suggestion. Edict/edit aka ordinance implies the natural order generating ones free will of choice by separating each one from one another.
> active measures
Action (perceivable) cannot be measured by reactions (perception) without ignoring the ongoing separation of action into reactions. To exploit this ignorance a jew suggests "active measures" to tempt the reacting choices of gentiles to invert moving reality by holding onto suggested fiction.
> demoralization
Suggested moralism tempts gentiles against each other (good vs bad), while ignoring that nature sets perceivable and perception apart from one another.
> destabilization
Stable motion (inception towards death) generates movable matter (life)...de-stabliz-ation implies this division of stable action, yet the jewish suggestion of the word "destabilization" tempts gentiles to seek stability aka immovability aka cessation of motion aka dormancy aka death.
Consenting to a suggestion tempts a gentile to hold together (destabilization) what nature separates (de-stabiliz-ation), and a jew can only shape words within sound by the use of LETTERS aka by each gentiles consent LETTING a jew shape words into defintions aka DEAF PHONETICIANS aka gentiles deaf to phonics (sound).
/v/HDLunited viewpost?postid=67fcd78c8e82c
ImplicationOverReason -2 points 2 weeks ago
a) Christ implies "to anoint" aka each off-spring coming into being through the birth-channel aka each seed coming through all s-oil.
b) Cuck/kuka - "feces" implies the passing through (inception towards death) of each anointed one (life).
c) Putting christ + cuck together tempts one to ignore the implied separation of each anointed mind being passed through.
d) Gentile consent to a jewish suggestion "puts together" what nature sets apart from one another. This inversion of reality with fiction implies sediment aka a gentiles mind settling aka sinking down, which a jew calls faex populi (the dregs of the people; the lowest class of society) aka to void excrement aka the discharging of waste.
/v/Christcucks viewpost?postid=67fcd6f85d586
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2 weeks ago
> Voting
To vote implies by ones FREE will of choice, which one thereby ignores by selecting a chosen one as ones selected representative.
> Protesting
Protest/protestor - "to affirm it" aka spending ones resistance to affirm another ones temptation. For example...it's both pro-life and pro-choice protesters which are affirming, and thereby supplying with resistance, the suggested temptation of abortion.
> Flyering
Fly implies flow. Being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death), hence needing to resist the wanted temptation thereof. Resistance fertilizes form; temptation flows resistance out of form. Handing out flyers tempts others to accept wings.
> Petitions
a) Petitioning implies forwards, hence demand establishing supply...which a jewish merchant of temptation exploits for a price, which when payed by consent, makes gentiles the livestock of the jewish stock-market.
Meanwhile...nature implies the origin which sets each being free (will of choice) from one another. Petitioning towards fictitious outcomes cannot change origin of reality...only ones perception thereof; which one willingly ignores.
b) Petition implies petit/pett (partial) + tion (action) aka ones partial reaction within whole action. Petitioning each others suggestions tempts one to ignore being a partial (perception) within whole (perceivable).
A jew suggests petitions to tempt gentiles to feel petit, hence seeking to join with each other to feel bigger than before.
> chance
The inversion of choice. Taking a chance implies wanting outcome; being given choice implies by needed origin.
> success
"Give me your soul, and I give you success"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXIBbcQ3_Ec
/v/TheEternalJew viewpost?postid=67fc485bda5e2
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2 weeks ago
> If change isn't brought about with a pen how did they make changes using the pen?
Nature implies change. A jew suggests gentiles to hold onto words (fiction); while ignoring sound (reality). A jew doesn't make change; a jew uses the pen to tempt gentiles to ignore that everything changes, and that nothing can be held onto.
> So how to prevail?
Being implies effect (perception) within cause (perceivable)...a jew tempts gentiles to ignore this by wanting to prevail outcomes. Ones consent to the suggested means of prevention nullify ones effect within cause, while permitting others to affect one.
> Play to their weakness.
Playing implies gambling aka taking a chance, while ignoring being a choice. Only resisting (strength) the temptation (weakness) to gamble grows ones resistance. How does a jew resist the temptation of gambling? By suggesting gentiles to play games.
> They suck at the visual
Visual implies ones sight as perception (expression) within perceivable (impression)...suggested visuals tempt one to ignore that, and its temptation which sucks ones resistance dry.
> So memes
Meme/mime - "to imitate". Suggestion (words) imitates perception (sound). A jew tempts gentiles to think in words, while ignoring sound. A mime is deaf to sound...a gentile holding onto any jewish definition is a DEAF PHONETICIAN, hence deaf to phonics (sound).
A jew tricks gentiles to be pantomimes aka imitators (mimos) of all (pan) instead of ones (perception) originating from within all (perceivable).
> support those attacked
a) Both attack and defense are turning one against one another...nature (the only support of being) separates each one from one another.
A jew suggests logos (words shaped within sound), which tempts each gentile to consent to logic (circular thinking), which in return turns gentiles against each other within conflicts of reason (versus).
b) Form (life) cannot attack against or defend itself from flow (inception towards death)...only against each other, which ignores that flow (dying) supports form (living).
> use their methodologies
a) Method aka meta (in pursuit or quest of) + hodos (way) tempts one (life) to pursuit way (inception towards death). A jew suggests methods to tempt living gentiles to pursuit the only outcome of life...death. It's ones consent to a suggested method, which corrupts ones perception of the perceivable way of life.
b) Logi/logic represents circular thinking within self, turning into conflicts of reason against others. That's gentiles fighting each other (attack vs defense) over suggested methods by a jew.
> lawfare
Being implies FREE will of choice (life) within the fare/fær - "passage" (inception towards death) of natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater). Any suggested laws tempts one to follow along instead of balancing on land; in/ex-haling air, and being solid (living) within fluid (dying) of water.
To follow any law...one pays with ones FREE will of choice. Meanwhile, each jew represents israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God". That ain't following; that's resisting...which fertilizes being.
/v/TheEternalJew viewpost?postid=67fc485bda5e2
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2 weeks ago
> Left-side driving Is unnatural, illogical
Nature implies balance (left/right)...driving within implies each ones free will of choice. To manipulate choice...few are suggesting both sides to imbalance each through logic to turn against each other aka reason.
> forcing the brain to adapt to an unnatural orientation.
a) Circular logic implies that unnatural orientation aka if one ignores natural (perception); then one turns to fictional (suggestion).
b) Nature forces ones brain to adapt to change...fiction tempts ones brain to affix it, while ignoring to adapt to natural change.
> driving
a) Nature drives by simultaneously pushing (inception) and pulling (death) each being (life).
b) Few suggest driving to tempt many to either drive towards a goal or to not drive...both of which distract one from being (life) driven (inception towards death).
/v/cars viewpost?postid=67f8eeb4e8f43
ImplicationOverReason 3 points 2 weeks ago
Rooted plants living; uprooted flowers dying...you could exchange the router for a dildo and get the same result.
/v/technology viewpost?postid=67f8b5374f266
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2 weeks ago
> points gravitate in space
If one looks at any suggested constellation of "points", then ones perception thereof draws a "line" of sight...
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=67f8604f717e6
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2 weeks ago
> expansion of energy from a central point
a) EN'ERGY, noun (Greek work) - "internal or inherent power"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/energy
b) What if all was energy before each one power within can come into being as its own center?
c) What if point implies end of sentence, while sentence (life) implies from origin (inception) towards point of end (death)?
d) If one makes a point while being moved, then it becomes a line...YET...one can only be (life) within a line (inception towards death).
> energy is dispersed in all directions
a) What if all implies one direction (inception towards death); which in return allows each dispersed one within (life) to change directions?
b) What if direction implies directed (life) by action (inception towards death)?
> the original source point
a) What if all was before each life within could be sentenced within a line towards a point of death?
b) What if instead of creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing)...it's transformation within everything?
c) To draw a point or a line implies forming a shape DURING FLOW.
d) What if others suggest one to "point out" to distract one from being "sentenced within"?
e) What if stop (cessation of motion) implies matters (life) ignorance of motion (inception towards death) and not the actual cessation of motion?
> big bang
What if it is each little bang within the big sound of silence, which brings "noise" into being?
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=67f8604f717e6
ImplicationOverReason -1 points 2 weeks ago
>why does entropy increase in one direction and decrease in the other
a) Increase in one direction (living) WHILE decreasing in the other (dying)...
b) Entropy implies being within (en) a turn (trope) aka within the transformation (life) of flow (inception towards death) aka living (temporary growth) within the process of dying (ongoing loss).
> the real question
A suggested quest tempts one to seek a suggested outcome (answer) from one another, while ignoring the origin (perceivable) of being (perception) aka a solution (flow) of problems (form).
Solution implies real; question vs answer implies fiction.
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=67f8604f717e6
ImplicationOverReason -1 points 2 weeks ago
> He said it WAS change. Time IS not pushing things forward...
a) Perceivable WAS before perception comes into being...suggesting what IS tempts one to ignore that.
b) Aristotle saying that change WAS implies his response to reality...using what he's saying to suggest each other what IS or ISN'T implies fiction.
WAS moves; IS affixes...if one consents to ignore former (perceivable inspiration) for latter (suggested information).
Sound WAS; the suggested word "sound" IS...if one consents to hold onto the suggestion thereof. Sound doesn't come with a label (word)...it moves instruments apart from one another.
> just a measurement of change
Change implies just; measurement implies odd aka "constituting a unit in excess of an even number". Unit/uni - "one" implies one and only. Any measurement taken above or below one implies excess of ONEself measuring.
There can be only one aka one for all and all for one...energy aka internal power of change aka transformation (life) of flow (inception towards death) aka the alchemical transubstantiation of partials (ones) within whole (oneness).
> like time has a direction
Same (inception towards death) directs differences (life)...others suggest likeness to equalize differences perceived.
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=67f8604f717e6
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2 weeks ago
>what's the engine that pushes time forward?
a) When push (inception towards death) comes to shove (life)...
b) Engine implies being within (en) generation (gine)
c) Time perceived implies motion; time suggested implies holding onto three fictitious states (past; present; future), while ignoring ones real presence within motion.
d) Motion can only move forwards...it's the matter within which can change directions WHILE being (life) moved forwards (inception towards death).
> What's the energy source for time?
Energy implies "internal/inherent power" aka the external source (action) for each internal effect (reaction).
> a type of motion
Type implies the differentiation of matter within the same motion. Type implies shape...motion implies foundation for matter to be shaped.
> motion in a sense
a) Sense implies "send by", hence motion giving matter "presence/pre-sense".
b) Suggested "motion in a sense" inverts sensing (ones perception) within motion (all perceivable).
> need a power supply
Energy implies the internal differentiation (reaction) of power (action) aka generating its own supply. To be able to react implies being empowered by action.
> engine of some type
Same engine (inception towards death); different types (life)...
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=67f8604f717e6
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 3 weeks ago
> language is as fluid as belief
Consider being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka instrument within sound. Believing implies holding onto suggested words, while ignoring perceivable sound.
The difference in-between suggested information and perceivable inspiration is that the former tempts one to hold onto it; while the latter can't be held onto...since it moves.
All sound/sanus (entire; whole) allows each one (partial) within to shape by free will of choice...any word tempts ones free will of choice to a) hold onto the shape, while ignoring the moving origin of sound, and b) bind ones choice to a chosen ones suggestion, hence religion/religio - "to bind anew".
Shaping words (fiction) within sound (reality) implies spell-craft...
>the wrong idea
a) Ideal (mental) + idol (physical) implies oneself holding onto the suggestion of another, hence idolatry of idealism.
b) Having choice implies being within balance, hence in-between (life) sides (inception/death)...choosing to hold onto a side implies imbalance for ones choice. This imbalance is called "reason", hence for your example a right vs wrong conflict. Both sides establish a VS aka versus/verto - "to turn" aka an inversion of ones choice.
In other words...choice exists at center of balance; others suggest imbalance to draw ones choice into circumference.
Whatever suggested side (right or wrong; true of false; yes or no; agree or disagree; belief or disbelief; want or not want etc.) one chooses to hold onto, positions one against all those who choose the other side. This is how a suggesting few gain control over both sides of every conflict of reason among a consenting many.
Using implication (if/then) over reason (versus) prevents conflict aka imbalance...if one chooses to resist the tempting choices of another.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67f6ecc185b19
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 3 weeks ago
> doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result
Same (inception towards death) generates differences (life)...expectancy tempts one to ignore perceivable origin for suggested outcomes.
> REAL definition
Real implies ones RE-sponse to ALL aka ones reaction within action. Definition implies "defining action" aka affixing that which moves.
Consenting to a suggested DEFINITION makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound) while affixing suggested words upon perceivable sound.
Nature moves...few within tempt many to affix labels (words) on what nature moves (sound), which represents a) spell-craft and b) idolatry.
> Insane
Few suggest the label "insane person" to tempt many to ignore the implication of being in-sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound).
> einstein
Aka ONE (ein) SAINT (st) ONE (ein)...saint/sacred - "set apart" aka the oneness of all (whole) setting apart each one within (partials) aka "all for one and one for all".
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67f6ecc185b19
ImplicationOverReason 1 point 3 weeks ago
> it's self agrandizing as fuck.
Nature implies degradation (inception towards death) generating aggrandizement (life)...others utilize magic to distract ones mind from discerning this for self.
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=67f5534264abb
ImplicationOverReason 4 points 3 weeks ago
> steel key-locked barbed reinforced square rounded-edged fat raccoon cage for three
Let me give it a shot...Stahl Schlüssel geschlossener, stacheliger, verstärkter, quadratischer, rund-eckiger, fetter Waschbär Käfig für drei.
/v/news viewpost?postid=67f51a7d1afca
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 3 weeks ago
One first has to write within another ones mind to be able to read it. Nature moves sound through ones mind...artificial words tempt one to ignore this.
As for the middle-class (bourgeois)...being implies as above/so below, hence as medium in the middle. Others suggest malcom/máel - "servant" to trick the consenting one into servitude to another.
Consenting to the suggestion of another makes one a "malcom in the middle", hence..."yes; no; maybe; I don't know; can you repeat the question?"
/v/OccidentalEnclave viewpost?postid=67f4157d7561c
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 3 weeks ago
Occupied Kaiserslautern...
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaiserslautern_Military_Community ...
- https://img.gvid.tv/i/2AV8fSHq.png
...hence masonic fuss-ba'al aka Ba'al Zabub (beelzebub) aka jewish Baʿal zəvuv (Lord of the Flies).
/v/news viewpost?postid=67f3daedd3b3d