I used to love the electric universe theory, but Kenny makes extremely logical arguments against it that I'm afraid hold more weight than EU :( Which saddens me, I really liked the charm of EU but It makes sense, electricity itself being a hybrid of two forces can't be the primary field modality or carrier of the universe.
Hmm you just motivated me to go into detail over every single chapter of his book on this site, and now I will, at least weekly I'll post an entire chapter out of his book and everyone, including you Doubting Thomas's will get a chance to see the truth for yourselves.
That being said, Yeah Dark Energy / Dark Matter is just the dielectric field itself, seeing how its counterspatial and the opposite of magnetism and magnetism is what gives us this cartesian realm, the dielectric exists in the inverse of cartesian space, so by definition it has no magnitude and thus cannot be optically detected. Its influence though can still be observed just not its magnitude (presence in cartesian monkey space).
Congratulations, after much kikery and stubbornness on your part, you have now reached the part of the journey where I'm at, using my spare time to formalize his theory into a proper one, so its something we can check for fallibility and come up with experiments to test for the theory.
If someone slapped you right now, would you call that strike a "Slap particle"? Atomists everywhere, they really want to know.
Holy shit I learned today about the phonon too, a quasi-particle (lmfao) in sound. CHRIST these people are insane AND their hubris blinds them to their own insanity.
All the better, the more pride, the mightier the fall ;D
Ken hates the plasma electric universe model btw. From his framework it makes sense, since magnetism and the dielectric are already fired pressure modalities and electricity is a hybrid so it can't be the main aether modality of all Cartesian spacetime
Also, lmfao, it made an inference that Ken had spoken about and I hadn't added yet to my notes It was using, that was an amazing moment. Kens theory cannot be this logically sound without having at least some truth for it, and seeing how he's basing all of this on the demigods of field theory and not the one marbled One Stone "Ein Stein" I'm gonna to go on the easiest bet of my life and say he's probably closer to the truth than Jewish mysticism.
Oh well, I can't please everyone and I dont care to. i also dont care if this ends up being true or not, I care only about ultimate truth - and this more elegantly explains all the forces in nature and unifies them in a better framework than the standard model. Now there's just a bunch of homework to do, big whoop :)
Exactly, I was talking about how the standard model is a Hodge podged assembly of theorums working together. Good shit, mathematically checks out but just like those demigods of science said, Ugh you've wandered away from reality into an insane realm of equations that bear no resemblance to ultimate reality.
And so thusly it must be so that the model is flawed and something new will supercede it :)
Instead of arrogantly assuming we were right, I'm merely "returning to form" and going back to where we dropped the thread, and picking it up again.
Yup the secrets are divinely simplex, almost beautifully so. It's not that difficult and the part he devotes 30+ pages showing how literally all the Greats, the literally GOATED Demigods amongst men: Heaviside, Steinmetz, Tesla, JJ Thompson, Maxwell, lmao literally ALL of them believed in a type of aether and it's this belief that gave them the necessary FRAMEWORK to advqnce and find The next leap!!
And along comes Einstein and claims nah fam, the force intersection of electricity and magnetism - by this means Vee shall redefine all of physics, to now be relative!!! Lmfaooooo
Fucking clowns.
I can't wait to have equations and a plausible experimental pathway. I'll make you eat those equations, if only I could - and cared enough. You clearly enjoy this world so much so like Tesla did, I'll sit back and let you have it ;)
Nah, you mistakenly presume that I spent 2 years constantly attempting to crack this time like I was Tommy Brits and the Enigma.
Nah, it was bathroom reading, and keeping the pDf on my phone so when I was bored or stuck, if have something fun to ready.
Two years and reading it 4 time and I could barely comprehend it, but in working it through GPT and by slimming it down into a set of condensed Cornell style notes, i could feed it into GPT4 and have enough tokens so that I could ask a questions and get meaningful replies back. That helped tremendously, especially since I could ask GPT4 to use metaphors to explain some of the autismic word salad Ken puts out.
Look, you can be a subversive all you want, I'm just going to go ahead and light the way and the two mathematicians I've been working with recently both agree this is simultaneously a good exercise for how science approaches things, and I'm excited for it to be disproven or proven right, I dont care either way. I only care for the truth.
Now, you're a filthy consensist. Be gone. Your place is with Listers peers who would t wash their fucking hands and also tried taking his medical license for washing his. That's you :)
I have a deeply intuitive feeling that the math could be correct but it's just describing a partial aspect of the entire picture.
Tesla himself asked an amazing question which seems to take out quantum BS by the weight of it's own ask: how can a lowly candle output particles with the same velocity as the mighty sun if light is not a disturbance in the medium?
page 176 from kens book on Magnetism:
https://files.catbox.moe/4i0xr1.png
Idk about creating capacitance, that seems to be a property of the dielectric field if I've got this right.
The torsion itself is squeezing the aether, you do this with Magnetism. And then you read that one patent from the US navy the high frequency electromagnetic wave generator and suddenly it makes wayyyy more sense how that thing works. Prigogine's self organizing principle is what the patent itself claims is what allows the second spinning electromagnetic field in that configuration to allow "high order stable energy states" to manifest and thus we get the exotic effects that particular craft claims to be able to achieve. Ken claims you squeeze the aether with well, the aether (fields) so magnetic fields are key to basically creating torsion if you will, in the aether. And what do you know, spinning a second EM field through an already spinning one seems to be the trick this patent claims to use.
They curiously leave a bunch out though,which makes sense in the eyes of national security and all that.
Curiously when I feed that patent to GPT4 and a modified streamlined token-friendly version of Ken's theory I've loosely named "non-linear field theory", GPT4 of its own cognition surmises that the craft may be playing with the "plane of inertia" of the craft or i.e. the natural equilibrium of the geometric shape of the magnetic field and the dielectric field of the saucer itself (I'm loosely saying saucer since I have lazars sports model in mind but tic tac, whatever).
When asked what possible propulsive effects could a craft achieve by manipulating the equilibrium of its magneto-dielectric configuration and it said "near instant acceleration with no inertia" lmfao.
Fuck yeah đ imma get double Clintoned in my braincase because I listened to an autist and accidentally discovered the secrets that Tesla left the US government, lmfao.
Bingo. Except that he almost got it right, then dropped the ball massively. Like Eric Dollard says, Einstein and the quantum mystic fuckheads that followed created meaning and significance out of the intersection of the force vectors of electricity and magnetism and somehow we're supposed to divine the secrets of the universe because these two forces intersect or something. Pure insanity.
---
LIGHT
Let us first wipe away a century of nonsense about light by stating that light is not 1. A particle 2. A wave 3. A wave-particle
duality 4. An emission 5. Nor does light have a speed. Oh heavens! Heresy! This will be heard screamed by many a brainwashed
Atomist.
Light in short is a coaxial circuit (see coax cross section image below). Light is not a material emanation or projection, rather a
sheer induction containing two axial and one longitudinal/radial components. By true definition, the very nature of all
electromagnetism is a split wheel (like a vortex antenna), as is the co-axial geometry of light. Spatial electrical and magnetic
components, induce each other via the dielectric center axial and radial point.
In very simplex illumination say what light is, is akin to (see images below) dropping a stone into the water in which two
phenomena manifest, perpendicular to one another, the radial waves of the water, and what rises out in the line of propagation, which is a drop, and this water drop is what the Atomists conflate in their ignorance, as a âphotonâ. The higher the power the light, the
smaller the waves and the bigger the (of power) drop, this is why Gamma radiation is so dangerous, its literally quasi-matter; but also
still merely light. Remember, smaller the space, the higher the capacitance.
Tesla is right (see quote below) in saying light is merely a âsound wave in the Etherâ; light is not an emission at all, nothing emits
light (heresy!!), nor does anything literally emit sound, since sound is a perturbation in the nitrogen and oxygen of the air, which has a
rate of induction or propagation, but this rate of induction is not fixed for light nor for sound, since sound changes rates (or wrongly
âspeedsâ) depending on elevation, humidity and temperature.
The same is true of light which changes its rate of induction in air, glass, water etc. All notions of speed regarding light are false
ones, since speed infers something is moving from A to B, and this is utterly false. As for light âwavesâ, well waves do not exist, for
waves are what things do, not what things are. Light likewise cannot be a duality for nature has no dualities implying an inherent
contradiction. Light in most simplex explanation is coaxial circuit Ether perturbation modality. The most simplex of field phenomena
along with the dielectric and magnetic. Literally by their own admission, all of Quantum is based on their understanding of the nature
of light, and they have not a single clue what light is whatsoever, ergo all of Quantum is built upon a lie and fantasy which does not
reflect nature.
---
Matter is just condensed aether you are correct. Also he's seeing a torus because that's the shape of a magnetic field :)
I'm actually working right now so this is perfect, Ken is streaming at the moment so once he starts talking about photography or something else outside of field physics again, I will watch your video and get back to you.
And I agree, when I was 11 my uncle left a physics textbook for a university class on the dining room table and I ate that shit up. No way in hell I could understand the math, but I could read very well and having this description of reality mesmerized me and set me on a path for discovery that obviously hasn't ended yet.
Incorrect this is all logically consistent and checks out.
You are correct in the first half of your sentences it is used to describe their theories - yes. This does not by any stretch of the imagination mean it explains reality.
Virtual photons? Are you fucking kidding me? Aaaaaaaahahahahhah
No, nature doesn't *do math* nature is a dirty hippie with her armpits full of hair. All she knows is pressure and pressure mediation.
Just keep in mind he's autistic but he DOES eventually cover every single crazy thing he says lmfao. I'm beginning to notice that most people panic on page one or two and instantly can't read any more due to Jewish programming.
It took me 4 read throughs, a little over two years in my spare time etc, and GPT4 powered analysis to help fully break apart the autismo and have it make sense.
But it's downright beautiful, and not only that, but you find evidence of the Absolute if you look hard enough. The CCs might call that God, sure. I won't argue with you. I just think it's really cool.
Lmfaooo, to answer you directly I'm actually working with two mathematicians to properly formalize Kens theories and hypothesis.
But you didn't answer me, which is a massive red banner indicating subversive behaviour on your part.
I ask nothing, i am selling nothing, and offering nothing. I am simply lighting the way so that others may find it, like I did when I wanted to learn the deep mysteries of the universe.
Took me three years to shake off the consensus conditioning.
HAH, Pure quantum mysticism but I -- I am the insane one. Or ken is for thinking about these concepts for over ten years and writing a 230+ page book that not only overs his hypothesis but the scientific history in great detail from faraday through maxwell, steimetz, tesla, and shows how the world got derailed with quantum mysticism and jewish magic.
You only have to read, but either by programming, inability, or genetic disposition, you MUST subvert. Mmkay:
---The erroneous Einstein mental failure as currently thought of as a âwave packetâ is in fact a dielectric pulse in the radial center of EM propagation. This pulse is proportional to the frequency, the intensity of the EM being emitted as the Z-axis radial-dielectric (wrongly called photo-electric) charges indicate from experimentation. The Quantum notion of a âwave packetâ and the âphotonâ do not exist in the electromagnetic-dielectric model of the EM spectrum. They are phantom misunderstandings of electrodynamics, dielectric capacitance and reciprocating mutual conjugation by and thru magneto-spatial and dielectric-counterspatial co-axial energy formations.
The test and results of the photoelectric experiment are, of course, completely accurate and valid, the **explanation however** (where myopic pseudo-science fails typically) is a pure insane fantasy, both illogical, irrational, absurd, and purely the insane conclusion of Einsteinâs idiocy and his atomistic proclivities. **Einstein had absolute NO training or study in electrical theory** ala Tesla, Faraday, Maxwell and others. His only acclaim, his Nobel Prize for the photoelectric effect (not its results, but its explanation!) is a complete lie, fabrication and utter farce in the extreme.
Insanity defined in pure rarified form: âPhotons have no mass, but they have momentum and they have an energyâ. A massless mass/particle is an absurd premise in the extreme, in defining the so-called photon, which in reality is a radial dielectric Z-axis component of the so-called âelectromagnetismâ. It has inertia (not momentum, which is applicable to mass/matter), it of course has energy and is the only component of light that is the source for the energy of both its discharge as magnetism, and its magneto- dielectric mirror in transverse composition as electricity in the dielectro-electromagnetic true nature of light. This applies to the entire âelectromagneticâ spectrum. Light itself (as this work expands in form and editions) cannot exist without a Z-axis radial dielectric component, absolutely no different than the coaxial cable.
Dielectricity has the attributes of a refractive index depending on the field or material encountered (dielectric, diamagnetic, ferrous, etc.), dielectric inductivity and a luminal velocity when bounded by a co-axial electromagnetic geometry. This dielectric nature explains photoelectrical effects, refraction, dispersion, wave-particle dualities, diffusion, slow down in a dielectric medium, polarization phenomena, and high frequency power in electromagnetics.
In the magneto-electric-dielectric geometry of âelectromagnetismâ, all magnetic lines are closed in upon themselves and likewise induce the dielectric conductor to electrification. Likewise the dielectric lines of force are counterspatially self terminating in radiating thru space and are the âcrankshaftâ for electrical and magnetic reciprocation and inductance, which cannot, may not, as is commonly believed âself induceâ each other.
The so-called âphotoelectric effectâ explains why the energy of the charging dielectric was dependent only on the frequency of the incident light and not on its intensity: a low-intensity, high-frequency source could supply a few high energy dielectric pulsations, whereas a high-intensity, low-frequency source would supply no radial dielectric pulsations of sufficient energy to cause charge upon the striking surface.
Einsteinâs unintelligent conclusions were that this wrongly conceived âphotoelectric effectâ contradicted the wave theory of light that followed by J.C. Maxwellâs equations for electromagnetic behavior, however the truth of course is that this observed effect is the resultant of charging from dielectric inductance from the radial center-co-axial nature of high-energy and frequency light which is dielectro-electromagnetic. Contrary to belief, they did not contradict Maxwell's equations in the observed results, rather proved the central axial conductor of electromagnetism, the dielectric, however wrongly interpreted and understood by the lesser mind of Einstein.
The prediction that the energy in charge created in this effect increases radially with the frequency of the light was accurate, its interpretation however was wholly inaccurate.
The wrongly conceived photoelectric effect helped to propel the then-emerging quantum mysticism forward in a radical fashion. Light simultaneously possesses the characteristics of both waves and particles, each being manifested according to the circumstances, however horribly misunderstood by Einstein and his henchmen, and likewise their blind followers.
The effect was impossible to be understood in terms of the classical wave descriptions of light obviously, since the energy of the charge did not depend on the intensity of the incidental EM radiation.
---
this isn't a fucking dilectic you hermetic cocksucker, I'm not here to erase distinctions and play any magic nonsense. Cut that out. I'm here purely for the truth, utterly purely for the truth. If your linear mind either can't comprehend or is ordered or compelled to subvert, that seems like a bigger problem now doesn't it.
yeah thats why we're at a dead end in physics. He simply set the tone and we have to do a million other theories and explanations an models to make it all work. lmfao but Ken is the insane one, lmfaoooo
keep subverting, berg. Imma fly that tic tac one day and there isn't much your handlers can do about it because godwilling, i'll build my fucking own :)
you call a 236 page book a paper? it shows you didn't read it, Goldsteinberg.
you read one thing that triggers your subversive mind "NO , my jewish programming tells me it cannot be so!"
and so you can't be fucked to go down to page 26 where he makes his position brilliantly and logically clear:
---
Iron dust fails to accurately represent a magnetic field because the iron filings are deeply immersed in the magnetic field's fluctuating waves. While they can display the magnetic flow's direction, they do not reveal its spiral or vortex characteristics. In contrast, hydrogen bubbles and pyrolytic graphite, among other materials, can demonstrate these features, as they are positioned on the peaks of the vortex magnetic flow. The iron filings cannot form a vortex because they become miniature magnets themselves when magnetically induced, and are held in place by their own polarization. Surprisingly, 3D models of magnetism using iron filings are actually 2D misrepresentations that cannot demonstrate magnetic field architecture.
Relying on iron filings to model a magnetic field's architecture is fundamentally flawed. A substance that can be magnetized is unsuitable for this purpose, as it creates numerous tiny magnets locked into the 2D constraints of the magnetic field geometry, offering no insight into the 3D spatial-counterspatial magnetic vortex architecture of a magnet or magnetism. Instead, diamagnetic materials should be used. Ferrous 'field demonstrators' can show polarized direction but fail to display 3D spatial-counterspatial field architectures. While it may seem that suspending a magnet in the air and sprinkling iron filings on it would produce a genuine 3D model of magnetism, the field geometries of magnetism dictate that only materials that cannot be magnetized themselves can reveal magnetism's 3D spatial-counterspatial nature and its flow.
To truly observe magnetism's field architecture, a diamagnetic material that operates in time and is not fixed in a spatial vector is necessary. Recognizing that a field is a non-local attribute, not separate from the object it encompasses, can be challenging for those with a linear mindset. A diamagnetic material is needed to observe a spatial-counterspatial field that reciprocates spirally and in pressure gradients without any phenomenal quantity. A snapshot of a tornado, for example, merely shows a curve of wind with unusual phenomena occurring outside of the curve. This is the issue with using iron dust to model magnetic fieldsâit is highly inaccurate at best.
---
so your stupid subversive faggot ass instead of bothering to do a keyword search or to read 26 pages and realize that this autist is simply saying "a picture of a tornado would at best provide highly inaccurate data about the conditions of the curve of the wind shown in that snapshot" and that's why magnetic filings produce an at best, incomplete understanding of magnetism.
God chose you but we're done with your majiiiiiickkkkk ;}
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
I used to love the electric universe theory, but Kenny makes extremely logical arguments against it that I'm afraid hold more weight than EU :( Which saddens me, I really liked the charm of EU but It makes sense, electricity itself being a hybrid of two forces can't be the primary field modality or carrier of the universe.
/v/science viewpost?postid=644a35b743c6e
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
Hmm you just motivated me to go into detail over every single chapter of his book on this site, and now I will, at least weekly I'll post an entire chapter out of his book and everyone, including you Doubting Thomas's will get a chance to see the truth for yourselves.
That being said, Yeah Dark Energy / Dark Matter is just the dielectric field itself, seeing how its counterspatial and the opposite of magnetism and magnetism is what gives us this cartesian realm, the dielectric exists in the inverse of cartesian space, so by definition it has no magnitude and thus cannot be optically detected. Its influence though can still be observed just not its magnitude (presence in cartesian monkey space).
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
Congratulations, after much kikery and stubbornness on your part, you have now reached the part of the journey where I'm at, using my spare time to formalize his theory into a proper one, so its something we can check for fallibility and come up with experiments to test for the theory.
eh i'm casting pearls before atomistic swine.
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
If someone slapped you right now, would you call that strike a "Slap particle"? Atomists everywhere, they really want to know.
Holy shit I learned today about the phonon too, a quasi-particle (lmfao) in sound. CHRIST these people are insane AND their hubris blinds them to their own insanity.
All the better, the more pride, the mightier the fall ;D
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 2 points 2.1 years ago
Ken hates the plasma electric universe model btw. From his framework it makes sense, since magnetism and the dielectric are already fired pressure modalities and electricity is a hybrid so it can't be the main aether modality of all Cartesian spacetime
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
Also, lmfao, it made an inference that Ken had spoken about and I hadn't added yet to my notes It was using, that was an amazing moment. Kens theory cannot be this logically sound without having at least some truth for it, and seeing how he's basing all of this on the demigods of field theory and not the one marbled One Stone "Ein Stein" I'm gonna to go on the easiest bet of my life and say he's probably closer to the truth than Jewish mysticism.
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
Gibberish doesn't make logical sense, lmfaoooo
Oh well, I can't please everyone and I dont care to. i also dont care if this ends up being true or not, I care only about ultimate truth - and this more elegantly explains all the forces in nature and unifies them in a better framework than the standard model. Now there's just a bunch of homework to do, big whoop :)
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
Exactly, I was talking about how the standard model is a Hodge podged assembly of theorums working together. Good shit, mathematically checks out but just like those demigods of science said, Ugh you've wandered away from reality into an insane realm of equations that bear no resemblance to ultimate reality.
And so thusly it must be so that the model is flawed and something new will supercede it :)
Instead of arrogantly assuming we were right, I'm merely "returning to form" and going back to where we dropped the thread, and picking it up again.
Your choice to follow or not, subversive.
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
Yup the secrets are divinely simplex, almost beautifully so. It's not that difficult and the part he devotes 30+ pages showing how literally all the Greats, the literally GOATED Demigods amongst men: Heaviside, Steinmetz, Tesla, JJ Thompson, Maxwell, lmao literally ALL of them believed in a type of aether and it's this belief that gave them the necessary FRAMEWORK to advqnce and find The next leap!!
And along comes Einstein and claims nah fam, the force intersection of electricity and magnetism - by this means Vee shall redefine all of physics, to now be relative!!! Lmfaooooo
Fucking clowns.
I can't wait to have equations and a plausible experimental pathway. I'll make you eat those equations, if only I could - and cared enough. You clearly enjoy this world so much so like Tesla did, I'll sit back and let you have it ;)
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
Nah, you mistakenly presume that I spent 2 years constantly attempting to crack this time like I was Tommy Brits and the Enigma.
Nah, it was bathroom reading, and keeping the pDf on my phone so when I was bored or stuck, if have something fun to ready.
Two years and reading it 4 time and I could barely comprehend it, but in working it through GPT and by slimming it down into a set of condensed Cornell style notes, i could feed it into GPT4 and have enough tokens so that I could ask a questions and get meaningful replies back. That helped tremendously, especially since I could ask GPT4 to use metaphors to explain some of the autismic word salad Ken puts out.
Look, you can be a subversive all you want, I'm just going to go ahead and light the way and the two mathematicians I've been working with recently both agree this is simultaneously a good exercise for how science approaches things, and I'm excited for it to be disproven or proven right, I dont care either way. I only care for the truth.
Now, you're a filthy consensist. Be gone. Your place is with Listers peers who would t wash their fucking hands and also tried taking his medical license for washing his. That's you :)
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
I have a deeply intuitive feeling that the math could be correct but it's just describing a partial aspect of the entire picture.
Tesla himself asked an amazing question which seems to take out quantum BS by the weight of it's own ask: how can a lowly candle output particles with the same velocity as the mighty sun if light is not a disturbance in the medium?
page 176 from kens book on Magnetism:
https://files.catbox.moe/4i0xr1.png
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
Idk about creating capacitance, that seems to be a property of the dielectric field if I've got this right.
The torsion itself is squeezing the aether, you do this with Magnetism. And then you read that one patent from the US navy the high frequency electromagnetic wave generator and suddenly it makes wayyyy more sense how that thing works. Prigogine's self organizing principle is what the patent itself claims is what allows the second spinning electromagnetic field in that configuration to allow "high order stable energy states" to manifest and thus we get the exotic effects that particular craft claims to be able to achieve. Ken claims you squeeze the aether with well, the aether (fields) so magnetic fields are key to basically creating torsion if you will, in the aether. And what do you know, spinning a second EM field through an already spinning one seems to be the trick this patent claims to use.
They curiously leave a bunch out though,which makes sense in the eyes of national security and all that.
Curiously when I feed that patent to GPT4 and a modified streamlined token-friendly version of Ken's theory I've loosely named "non-linear field theory", GPT4 of its own cognition surmises that the craft may be playing with the "plane of inertia" of the craft or i.e. the natural equilibrium of the geometric shape of the magnetic field and the dielectric field of the saucer itself (I'm loosely saying saucer since I have lazars sports model in mind but tic tac, whatever).
When asked what possible propulsive effects could a craft achieve by manipulating the equilibrium of its magneto-dielectric configuration and it said "near instant acceleration with no inertia" lmfao.
Fuck yeah đ imma get double Clintoned in my braincase because I listened to an autist and accidentally discovered the secrets that Tesla left the US government, lmfao.
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 1 point 2.1 years ago
Bingo. Except that he almost got it right, then dropped the ball massively. Like Eric Dollard says, Einstein and the quantum mystic fuckheads that followed created meaning and significance out of the intersection of the force vectors of electricity and magnetism and somehow we're supposed to divine the secrets of the universe because these two forces intersect or something. Pure insanity.
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
Close but not quite I think...
Light is just an ether perturbation modality, i.e. it's just a ripple in the aether.
Kenny recently (less than a month ago) released a new PDF where he unifies the forces under one theory.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hfhFCZMgUrCQjttwT8mR68ayuPp2doap/view?usp=drivesdk
From that PDF, here is the entry on light:
---
LIGHT
Let us first wipe away a century of nonsense about light by stating that light is not 1. A particle 2. A wave 3. A wave-particle
duality 4. An emission 5. Nor does light have a speed. Oh heavens! Heresy! This will be heard screamed by many a brainwashed
Atomist.
Light in short is a coaxial circuit (see coax cross section image below). Light is not a material emanation or projection, rather a
sheer induction containing two axial and one longitudinal/radial components. By true definition, the very nature of all
electromagnetism is a split wheel (like a vortex antenna), as is the co-axial geometry of light. Spatial electrical and magnetic
components, induce each other via the dielectric center axial and radial point.
In very simplex illumination say what light is, is akin to (see images below) dropping a stone into the water in which two
phenomena manifest, perpendicular to one another, the radial waves of the water, and what rises out in the line of propagation, which is a drop, and this water drop is what the Atomists conflate in their ignorance, as a âphotonâ. The higher the power the light, the
smaller the waves and the bigger the (of power) drop, this is why Gamma radiation is so dangerous, its literally quasi-matter; but also
still merely light. Remember, smaller the space, the higher the capacitance.
Tesla is right (see quote below) in saying light is merely a âsound wave in the Etherâ; light is not an emission at all, nothing emits
light (heresy!!), nor does anything literally emit sound, since sound is a perturbation in the nitrogen and oxygen of the air, which has a
rate of induction or propagation, but this rate of induction is not fixed for light nor for sound, since sound changes rates (or wrongly
âspeedsâ) depending on elevation, humidity and temperature.
The same is true of light which changes its rate of induction in air, glass, water etc. All notions of speed regarding light are false
ones, since speed infers something is moving from A to B, and this is utterly false. As for light âwavesâ, well waves do not exist, for
waves are what things do, not what things are. Light likewise cannot be a duality for nature has no dualities implying an inherent
contradiction. Light in most simplex explanation is coaxial circuit Ether perturbation modality. The most simplex of field phenomena
along with the dielectric and magnetic. Literally by their own admission, all of Quantum is based on their understanding of the nature
of light, and they have not a single clue what light is whatsoever, ergo all of Quantum is built upon a lie and fantasy which does not
reflect nature.
---
https://files.catbox.moe/ucuc3f.png
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
Yes, it's magic. Or sorcery
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 1 point 2.1 years ago
Matter is just condensed aether you are correct. Also he's seeing a torus because that's the shape of a magnetic field :)
I'm actually working right now so this is perfect, Ken is streaming at the moment so once he starts talking about photography or something else outside of field physics again, I will watch your video and get back to you.
Kens livestream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1TurHV0WUE
And I agree, when I was 11 my uncle left a physics textbook for a university class on the dining room table and I ate that shit up. No way in hell I could understand the math, but I could read very well and having this description of reality mesmerized me and set me on a path for discovery that obviously hasn't ended yet.
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
Incorrect this is all logically consistent and checks out.
You are correct in the first half of your sentences it is used to describe their theories - yes. This does not by any stretch of the imagination mean it explains reality.
Virtual photons? Are you fucking kidding me? Aaaaaaaahahahahhah
No, nature doesn't *do math* nature is a dirty hippie with her armpits full of hair. All she knows is pressure and pressure mediation.
For example, human monké brains have reified H2O into three separate things: water steam and ice. But with a more comprehensive approach, it's understood to be three pressure modalities of H2O.
Likewise, we have reified the ether into being different, unique things but that's beyond incorect.
Tell me, what is a field? Lines of force and measurement taken across a grid are not only unacceptable, but horrifyingly wrong.
The aether is undeniable and it's removal just causes problems and requires nonsense quantum mysticism to make up for its absence.
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
My first reaction was one of disbelief and rejection and to call my friend flat earth adjacent for this heresy.
So i understand.
I ask nothing of you but to read the source lmao:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FGbr7PpLZRx0DpGACEc1KgUQ8JXvlEhW/view?usp=drivesdk
Just keep in mind he's autistic but he DOES eventually cover every single crazy thing he says lmfao. I'm beginning to notice that most people panic on page one or two and instantly can't read any more due to Jewish programming.
It took me 4 read throughs, a little over two years in my spare time etc, and GPT4 powered analysis to help fully break apart the autismo and have it make sense.
But it's downright beautiful, and not only that, but you find evidence of the Absolute if you look hard enough. The CCs might call that God, sure. I won't argue with you. I just think it's really cool.
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
Lmfaooo, to answer you directly I'm actually working with two mathematicians to properly formalize Kens theories and hypothesis.
But you didn't answer me, which is a massive red banner indicating subversive behaviour on your part.
I ask nothing, i am selling nothing, and offering nothing. I am simply lighting the way so that others may find it, like I did when I wanted to learn the deep mysteries of the universe.
Took me three years to shake off the consensus conditioning.
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 1 point 2.1 years ago
Again, your inability to understand him doesn't make him wrong. You've been noticed!
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
HAH, Pure quantum mysticism but I -- I am the insane one. Or ken is for thinking about these concepts for over ten years and writing a 230+ page book that not only overs his hypothesis but the scientific history in great detail from faraday through maxwell, steimetz, tesla, and shows how the world got derailed with quantum mysticism and jewish magic.
You only have to read, but either by programming, inability, or genetic disposition, you MUST subvert. Mmkay:
---The erroneous Einstein mental failure as currently thought of as a âwave packetâ is in fact a dielectric pulse in the radial center of EM propagation. This pulse is proportional to the frequency, the intensity of the EM being emitted as the Z-axis radial-dielectric (wrongly called photo-electric) charges indicate from experimentation. The Quantum notion of a âwave packetâ and the âphotonâ do not exist in the electromagnetic-dielectric model of the EM spectrum. They are phantom misunderstandings of electrodynamics, dielectric capacitance and reciprocating mutual conjugation by and thru magneto-spatial and dielectric-counterspatial co-axial energy formations.
The test and results of the photoelectric experiment are, of course, completely accurate and valid, the **explanation however** (where myopic pseudo-science fails typically) is a pure insane fantasy, both illogical, irrational, absurd, and purely the insane conclusion of Einsteinâs idiocy and his atomistic proclivities. **Einstein had absolute NO training or study in electrical theory** ala Tesla, Faraday, Maxwell and others. His only acclaim, his Nobel Prize for the photoelectric effect (not its results, but its explanation!) is a complete lie, fabrication and utter farce in the extreme.
Insanity defined in pure rarified form: âPhotons have no mass, but they have momentum and they have an energyâ. A massless mass/particle is an absurd premise in the extreme, in defining the so-called photon, which in reality is a radial dielectric Z-axis component of the so-called âelectromagnetismâ. It has inertia (not momentum, which is applicable to mass/matter), it of course has energy and is the only component of light that is the source for the energy of both its discharge as magnetism, and its magneto- dielectric mirror in transverse composition as electricity in the dielectro-electromagnetic true nature of light. This applies to the entire âelectromagneticâ spectrum. Light itself (as this work expands in form and editions) cannot exist without a Z-axis radial dielectric component, absolutely no different than the coaxial cable.
Dielectricity has the attributes of a refractive index depending on the field or material encountered (dielectric, diamagnetic, ferrous, etc.), dielectric inductivity and a luminal velocity when bounded by a co-axial electromagnetic geometry. This dielectric nature explains photoelectrical effects, refraction, dispersion, wave-particle dualities, diffusion, slow down in a dielectric medium, polarization phenomena, and high frequency power in electromagnetics.
In the magneto-electric-dielectric geometry of âelectromagnetismâ, all magnetic lines are closed in upon themselves and likewise induce the dielectric conductor to electrification. Likewise the dielectric lines of force are counterspatially self terminating in radiating thru space and are the âcrankshaftâ for electrical and magnetic reciprocation and inductance, which cannot, may not, as is commonly believed âself induceâ each other.
The so-called âphotoelectric effectâ explains why the energy of the charging dielectric was dependent only on the frequency of the incident light and not on its intensity: a low-intensity, high-frequency source could supply a few high energy dielectric pulsations, whereas a high-intensity, low-frequency source would supply no radial dielectric pulsations of sufficient energy to cause charge upon the striking surface.
Einsteinâs unintelligent conclusions were that this wrongly conceived âphotoelectric effectâ contradicted the wave theory of light that followed by J.C. Maxwellâs equations for electromagnetic behavior, however the truth of course is that this observed effect is the resultant of charging from dielectric inductance from the radial center-co-axial nature of high-energy and frequency light which is dielectro-electromagnetic. Contrary to belief, they did not contradict Maxwell's equations in the observed results, rather proved the central axial conductor of electromagnetism, the dielectric, however wrongly interpreted and understood by the lesser mind of Einstein.
The prediction that the energy in charge created in this effect increases radially with the frequency of the light was accurate, its interpretation however was wholly inaccurate.
The wrongly conceived photoelectric effect helped to propel the then-emerging quantum mysticism forward in a radical fashion. Light simultaneously possesses the characteristics of both waves and particles, each being manifested according to the circumstances, however horribly misunderstood by Einstein and his henchmen, and likewise their blind followers.
The effect was impossible to be understood in terms of the classical wave descriptions of light obviously, since the energy of the charge did not depend on the intensity of the incidental EM radiation.
---
LUX ET VERITAS
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 0 points 2.1 years ago
this isn't a fucking dilectic you hermetic cocksucker, I'm not here to erase distinctions and play any magic nonsense. Cut that out. I'm here purely for the truth, utterly purely for the truth. If your linear mind either can't comprehend or is ordered or compelled to subvert, that seems like a bigger problem now doesn't it.
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 2 points 2.1 years ago
yeah thats why we're at a dead end in physics. He simply set the tone and we have to do a million other theories and explanations an models to make it all work. lmfao but Ken is the insane one, lmfaoooo
keep subverting, berg. Imma fly that tic tac one day and there isn't much your handlers can do about it because godwilling, i'll build my fucking own :)
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe 1 point 2.1 years ago
https://files.catbox.moe/d7utz3.jpg
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6
VarlotPsykhe -1 points 2.1 years ago
you call a 236 page book a paper? it shows you didn't read it, Goldsteinberg.
you read one thing that triggers your subversive mind "NO , my jewish programming tells me it cannot be so!"
and so you can't be fucked to go down to page 26 where he makes his position brilliantly and logically clear:
---
Iron dust fails to accurately represent a magnetic field because the iron filings are deeply immersed in the magnetic field's fluctuating waves. While they can display the magnetic flow's direction, they do not reveal its spiral or vortex characteristics. In contrast, hydrogen bubbles and pyrolytic graphite, among other materials, can demonstrate these features, as they are positioned on the peaks of the vortex magnetic flow. The iron filings cannot form a vortex because they become miniature magnets themselves when magnetically induced, and are held in place by their own polarization. Surprisingly, 3D models of magnetism using iron filings are actually 2D misrepresentations that cannot demonstrate magnetic field architecture.
Relying on iron filings to model a magnetic field's architecture is fundamentally flawed. A substance that can be magnetized is unsuitable for this purpose, as it creates numerous tiny magnets locked into the 2D constraints of the magnetic field geometry, offering no insight into the 3D spatial-counterspatial magnetic vortex architecture of a magnet or magnetism. Instead, diamagnetic materials should be used. Ferrous 'field demonstrators' can show polarized direction but fail to display 3D spatial-counterspatial field architectures. While it may seem that suspending a magnet in the air and sprinkling iron filings on it would produce a genuine 3D model of magnetism, the field geometries of magnetism dictate that only materials that cannot be magnetized themselves can reveal magnetism's 3D spatial-counterspatial nature and its flow.
To truly observe magnetism's field architecture, a diamagnetic material that operates in time and is not fixed in a spatial vector is necessary. Recognizing that a field is a non-local attribute, not separate from the object it encompasses, can be challenging for those with a linear mindset. A diamagnetic material is needed to observe a spatial-counterspatial field that reciprocates spirally and in pressure gradients without any phenomenal quantity. A snapshot of a tornado, for example, merely shows a curve of wind with unusual phenomena occurring outside of the curve. This is the issue with using iron dust to model magnetic fieldsâit is highly inaccurate at best.
---
so your stupid subversive faggot ass instead of bothering to do a keyword search or to read 26 pages and realize that this autist is simply saying "a picture of a tornado would at best provide highly inaccurate data about the conditions of the curve of the wind shown in that snapshot" and that's why magnetic filings produce an at best, incomplete understanding of magnetism.
God chose you but we're done with your majiiiiiickkkkk ;}
/v/science viewpost?postid=644991414d5e6