I don't trust either of them but I choose Musk simply because of Trump's obsession with jews. Elon cucks to them but he doesn't worship them like Trump does. But now that I am thinking about it... It seems like Trump had some sort of an agreement with these tech guys.. and to show his loyalty he chose Vance, a guy who they created. And now that relationship is breaking apart so they are throwing him under the bus with either real or fake allegations that he's in the Epstein files. Maybe he's refusing to go with some part of their plan. If that's the case I think I'd change my vote to Trump.
>Trump never had a problem getting women - really doubt he went after underage ones.
Or maybe they are required to have blackmail on you before they allow you to become wildly rich and successful? Like a key to a secret club which can be revoked any time you step out of line. That's the whole point of Epstein... and why he had cameras in every room of the house.
As you may know, your elected officials in florida are requiring us to verify your age before allowing you access to our website. Not only does this impinge on the rights of adults to access protected speech, it fails strict scrutiny by employing the least effective and yet also most restrictive means of accomplishing florida’s stated purpose of allegedly protecting minors.
While safety and compliance are at the forefront of our mission, providing identification every time you want to visit an adult platform is not an effective solution for protecting users online, and in fact, will put minors and your privacy at risk.
Attempting to mandate age verification without any means to enforce at scale gives platforms the choice to comply or not, leaving hundreds of thousands of websites open and accessible.
As we’ve seen in other states, such bills have failed to protect minors, by driving users from those few websites which comply, to the hundreds of thousands of websites with far fewer safety measures in place, which do not comply. Very few sites are able to compare to the robust Community Guidelines we currently have in place.
Yes, President Donald Trump signed the Take It Down Act into law on May 19, 2025. This bipartisan legislation specifically addresses and criminalizes the publication of non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII), which includes AI-generated deepfakes.
Key aspects of the Take It Down Act include:
Criminalization: It makes it illegal to "knowingly publish" or threaten to publish intimate images, including AI-created "deepfakes," without the person's consent.
Platform Responsibility: It requires social media and other online platforms to remove such material within 48 hours of receiving a valid notice from a victim and to take steps to delete duplicate content.
Federal Enforcement: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is charged with enforcing the notice-and-removal requirements of the Act.
Penalties: Penalties can include up to three years in prison, with higher penalties if the offense involves a minor.
While many states have already enacted their own laws regarding deepfakes and revenge porn, the Take It Down Act is the first federal law in the U.S. to substantially regulate this type of AI-generated content.
That's always been the goal. But when you're faced with female attention from a woman you aren't really into, vs none at all while you wait for that perfect woman who will then leave you for being "inexperienced", I chose the former.
That doesnt make sense. You do not understand. Back then you could at least message girls you were interested in and try to charm them with your personality. Now it's a superficial swipe fest based solely on looks and material wealth. Im not a bad looking guy, but im not a model (my brother is). Im also not rich. But I could at least take girls on dates back then and have various relationships. That is not possible today.
Not sure who is worse, the whores, or the idiot men enabling them. Before 2010 was the golden age of online dating. Yeah the women weren't supermodels but you could get yourself laid every now and then with not a lot of effort. These days I don't even try. The average 6/10 woman now think their pussy is premium because they can put on makeup and dress like whores thanks to tiktok tutorials. It's been 9 or so years since I've last gotten laid. It hasn't bothered me, had enough sex in my 20s.. but now it's starting to.
That's a whole different concern regarding AI. I don't fear it becoming sentient and going after humanity, that's Hollywood scifi nonsense. I fear what jews and governments will do with the tech. They are the ones who will give AI the ability to kill, and control what it targets and why.
I didn't really know who he was till he started speaking out against jews. He seems like a genuinely good dude. He's being suppressed on twitter like anyone else with integrity.
>But if intelligence is a measure of the ability to accurately synthesize information and problem solve, my experience is that typical chatbots perform very poorly. The performance still looks to be above the average of the population though, which suggests IQ above 100 if this is our measure of intelligence.
Niggly_Puff 1 point 2 weeks ago*
I don't trust either of them but I choose Musk simply because of Trump's obsession with jews. Elon cucks to them but he doesn't worship them like Trump does. But now that I am thinking about it... It seems like Trump had some sort of an agreement with these tech guys.. and to show his loyalty he chose Vance, a guy who they created. And now that relationship is breaking apart so they are throwing him under the bus with either real or fake allegations that he's in the Epstein files. Maybe he's refusing to go with some part of their plan. If that's the case I think I'd change my vote to Trump.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=684245a0d265f
Niggly_Puff 7 points 2 weeks ago
>Trump never had a problem getting women - really doubt he went after underage ones.
Or maybe they are required to have blackmail on you before they allow you to become wildly rich and successful? Like a key to a secret club which can be revoked any time you step out of line. That's the whole point of Epstein... and why he had cameras in every room of the house.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6841f63f93328
Niggly_Puff 1 point 2 weeks ago
It's an experimental emulator. I don't think xbox 360 emulation is worth the trouble. You probably have to set the keybinding in the settings.
/v/gaming viewpost?postid=6841f99e494c0
Niggly_Puff 1 point 2 weeks ago
I have suspected this was the case.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6841f63f93328
Niggly_Puff 0 points 2 weeks ago
All I see is
Dear User,
As you may know, your elected officials in florida are requiring us to verify your age before allowing you access to our website. Not only does this impinge on the rights of adults to access protected speech, it fails strict scrutiny by employing the least effective and yet also most restrictive means of accomplishing florida’s stated purpose of allegedly protecting minors.
While safety and compliance are at the forefront of our mission, providing identification every time you want to visit an adult platform is not an effective solution for protecting users online, and in fact, will put minors and your privacy at risk.
Attempting to mandate age verification without any means to enforce at scale gives platforms the choice to comply or not, leaving hundreds of thousands of websites open and accessible.
As we’ve seen in other states, such bills have failed to protect minors, by driving users from those few websites which comply, to the hundreds of thousands of websites with far fewer safety measures in place, which do not comply. Very few sites are able to compare to the robust Community Guidelines we currently have in place.
RedGIFs
/v/Women viewpost?postid=6840b6d09fe3e
Niggly_Puff 3 points 2 weeks ago
Massie 2028
/v/news viewpost?postid=683923aaa87ad
Niggly_Puff 1 point 3 weeks ago
Why is he wearing a little hat?
/v/RomanCatholicism viewpost?postid=68377ffa3a541
Niggly_Puff 2 points 3 weeks ago
Interesting. Kinda makes sense. What's your source?
/v/conspiracy viewpost?postid=6835928f65a60
Niggly_Puff 0 points 3 weeks ago
According to AI
---
Yes, President Donald Trump signed the Take It Down Act into law on May 19, 2025. This bipartisan legislation specifically addresses and criminalizes the publication of non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII), which includes AI-generated deepfakes.
Key aspects of the Take It Down Act include:
Criminalization: It makes it illegal to "knowingly publish" or threaten to publish intimate images, including AI-created "deepfakes," without the person's consent.
Platform Responsibility: It requires social media and other online platforms to remove such material within 48 hours of receiving a valid notice from a victim and to take steps to delete duplicate content.
Federal Enforcement: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is charged with enforcing the notice-and-removal requirements of the Act.
Penalties: Penalties can include up to three years in prison, with higher penalties if the offense involves a minor.
While many states have already enacted their own laws regarding deepfakes and revenge porn, the Take It Down Act is the first federal law in the U.S. to substantially regulate this type of AI-generated content.
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=6834f910c9b74
Niggly_Puff 0 points 3 weeks ago
There's no market for it because the tools are freely available to everyone. Plus Trump just made it illegal.
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=6834f910c9b74
Niggly_Puff 0 points 3 weeks ago
It is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gGLvg0n-uY
/v/AI viewpost?postid=683323f05e960
Niggly_Puff 1 point 3 weeks ago
Huh? That's funny. It is a coincidence.
/v/AI viewpost?postid=683323f05e960
Niggly_Puff 0 points 3 weeks ago
For local you can do video pretty well using WAN. You can add audio to it through other methods. But it won't look and sound as good as this.
/v/AI viewpost?postid=68328b279fac5
Niggly_Puff 2 points 3 weeks ago
That's always been the goal. But when you're faced with female attention from a woman you aren't really into, vs none at all while you wait for that perfect woman who will then leave you for being "inexperienced", I chose the former.
/v/Women viewpost?postid=6833435771b6f
Niggly_Puff 3 points 3 weeks ago
That doesnt make sense. You do not understand. Back then you could at least message girls you were interested in and try to charm them with your personality. Now it's a superficial swipe fest based solely on looks and material wealth. Im not a bad looking guy, but im not a model (my brother is). Im also not rich. But I could at least take girls on dates back then and have various relationships. That is not possible today.
/v/Women viewpost?postid=6833435771b6f
Niggly_Puff 3 points 3 weeks ago
Not sure who is worse, the whores, or the idiot men enabling them. Before 2010 was the golden age of online dating. Yeah the women weren't supermodels but you could get yourself laid every now and then with not a lot of effort. These days I don't even try. The average 6/10 woman now think their pussy is premium because they can put on makeup and dress like whores thanks to tiktok tutorials. It's been 9 or so years since I've last gotten laid. It hasn't bothered me, had enough sex in my 20s.. but now it's starting to.
/v/Women viewpost?postid=6833435771b6f
Niggly_Puff 0 points 3 weeks ago
Google's Veo 3
/v/AI viewpost?postid=68328b279fac5
Niggly_Puff 4 points 3 weeks ago
That's a whole different concern regarding AI. I don't fear it becoming sentient and going after humanity, that's Hollywood scifi nonsense. I fear what jews and governments will do with the tech. They are the ones who will give AI the ability to kill, and control what it targets and why.
/v/AI viewpost?postid=683323f05e960
Niggly_Puff 1 point 3 weeks ago
I have a deep and passionate hatred for google.
/v/WTF viewpost?postid=68328373a8e94
Niggly_Puff 0 points 3 weeks ago
Shields isn't a jewish name.
/v/TIL viewpost?postid=683214084c8f6
Niggly_Puff 4 points 3 weeks ago
I didn't really know who he was till he started speaking out against jews. He seems like a genuinely good dude. He's being suppressed on twitter like anyone else with integrity.
/v/TIL viewpost?postid=683214084c8f6
Niggly_Puff 0 points 3 weeks ago
Do these operate on your local network or are you forced to use some shady chinese server that will shut down in a couple of years?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6831fdfe0687c
Niggly_Puff 0 points 3 weeks ago
Even real actors will be AI. They will license their image and likeness to producers to plug into an AI to generate whatever they need.
/v/technology viewpost?postid=683156f2bac5f
Niggly_Puff 0 points 3 weeks ago
>But if intelligence is a measure of the ability to accurately synthesize information and problem solve, my experience is that typical chatbots perform very poorly. The performance still looks to be above the average of the population though, which suggests IQ above 100 if this is our measure of intelligence.
This
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=682fd268b5513
Niggly_Puff 1 point 4 weeks ago
This is something I've been talking about for a long time. Trump won points in my book.
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=682f93372718a