Sign into an existing account

https://gab.com/Robert_May/posts/114410135103766079

This is the ultimate proof that it is a completely false allegation.

The jewish holocaust is a lie

https://www.whitehouse.gov/founding-fathers/#thomas-jefferson

The White House has put up a very good series of official pages about the founding fathers. This one about Thomas Jefferson talks about as early work against slavery but fails to mention he outlawed the participation of America and the international slave trade when he became president which is a rather important oversight. His law against the international slavery participation was passed exactly 20 years after the ratification of the Constitution which legally was the earliest time according to the terms of the Constitution when slavery could be outlawed. The proponents of this legislation thought that it would end slavery in the United States and it would gradually die out as the importation of new slaves were forbidden. Be made to be outfitted to participate in the slave trade.

The only reason it did not end slavery in America with the gradual death of the original slaves was there became an increasing breeding program in America as well as an illegal slave trade run through smugglers.

Nonetheless Thomas Jefferson not Abraham Lincoln actually took the official action to officially end slavery in America nearly 20 years after the ratification of the Constitution and legally as early as it could possibly be done because the ratification of the Constitution included a clause that said slavery could not be addressed any sooner than 20 years after the ratification of that document to give the slave states sometime to adjust to what was going to be expected to be a world without slavery. This shows that even in the beginning of the Constitution when it was ratified the founding fathers who are often thought of as racist and slave owners were actually anticipating the end of slavery at 1787 at the time of the ratification of the constitution.

of course the largest Force against the ending of slavery or the Jews who dominated the slave trade who owned most of the massive slave ships which brought most of the slaves to America which owned most of the slave auction houses and also own most of the large plantations where slaves were used.

In fact it was the Jews who supported the South and the Confederacy the most to try to break away from the United States in order to keep their slave trade profits going.


Even though the official White House page does need to be corrected to include this egregious oversight it is a rather excellent page and I'm assuming some of the other pages they put up about the founding fathers will also dispel some myths that have been promoted by Jews recently to try to critique the founding fathers of America and make people hate the United States and white people.


More about Jefferson's laws outlawing participation in the slave trade and forbidding the importation's latest to America and behind here and some other places.
It is of course on purpose that this fact is excluded from discussions about Jefferson which things did like to include the lies that he had sex with his " slave who was actually his half his wife's half sister and who was free to leave him at any time they were in France yet she chose to remain with him. In which DNA has shown did not result from Thomas Jefferson himself but rather from his nephews.


Background and text of the anti-slavery log Jefferson promoted and signed and insured was made into law at the first legal opportunity
During Thomas Jefferson's presidency
https://socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/eras/colonial-postrev/act-to-prohibit-the-importation-of-slaves-1807/


https://libguides.snhu.edu/c.php?g=1184812&p=8902755


More about it

https://www.monticello.org/slavery/online-exhibitions-related-to-slavery/paradox-of-liberty/thomas-jefferson-liberty-slavery/jefferson-s-antislavery-actions/


Additional info lrmation including active seizing of Jewish ships involved in the slave trade

https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/slave-trade.html

It's never stated but it should be obvious to those with a thinking brain which includes most liberals but the idea of completely ending slavery would have left all slaves homeless as slaves were provided homes and food and sheltered by their owners based on their economic output. To outlaw that would have immediately made a huge number of these people homeless a much worse situation than the gradual eventual phasing out of slavery which the law anticipated in which of course indeed happened but not without struggle

https://www.sott.net/article/498864-Unknown-human-lineage-lived-in-Green-Sahara-7000-years-ago-ancient-DNA-reveals


Translation: not niggers

https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=45704

Consider this guy. Famous for breaking of architectural conventions, friendly with Jews, probably a pedo...

It's fascinating to read about the adversity his tiny revolt against prevailing aesthetics caused in Austrian society. He argued it was more pure. More modest. Entirely reasonable. But also dangerously subversive.

In the end he advocated nothing less than to abandon tradition which is also the first step to nihilism. Of course people complained and wanted him out. This is what a society with something to lose acted like.

https://youtu.be/wWtwrUIHqcY

Very interesting documentary here somebody who lets his religious beliefs get in the way of the science a little bit but in this they do a couple of things number one they correlate the shroud of Turin with another shroud that was reputed to wrap jesus's face and has exactly the same matching markings as the face on the trout of Turin and this other cloth has a much more documented history of its location. They all talk about how the DNA and if they take from the blood clots off the shroud of Turin is definitely dated to the time period of Jesus which is interesting and that the DNA is not of European origin which would be if the blood on it and the child was from Europe and later a fake. And the most interesting thing is then they do a little more in-depth discussion of the DNA and they find out that Jesus is blood was actually what is called a sect called a Drew d r e w. Which is an ancient sect older than Christianity and predates Jesus by about two or 3,000 years and is basically originally Egyptian origin which makes sense because there's a lot of talk about how Jesus between his birth and his return to Israel or Jerusalem I actually probably went to Egypt and studied with the mystics. Furthermore the Drew sect descendants actually live in Nazareth which is right around where Jesus was from and they have a continuing history and low and behold they go and they test some blood of some living druze and guess what they match the blood of Jesus so pretty conclusive evidence here that I had not heard before of number one the offense of the shroud because of the correlation with the other cloth which has even more documented history and I hadn't even heard of before and then this DNA analysis that kind of makes sense.

Now the one area where this documentary fails is that the two religious guys who are Christians and believe in jesus's resurrection deny the possibility that this other professor found the actual ossuary which is where the bones of dead people were kept in those times of both the mother Mary Mary Magdalene Jesus jesus's son and jesus's brother the names were all on the different oscillaries in this one tomb which is quite a coincidence if that's not who it is and these two guys reject the possibility that those are the bones of Jesus because they believe Jesus rose from the dead and therefore no bones were left behind. So I guess they just believe that his body just disappeared and vaporized as he mystically did whatever he did. Personally I think it would have been very interesting to try to get some testing of all those bone samples as well and the fact that that even exists is another interesting aspect of this video.