Sign into an existing account

So I've spoken of this a bit. I'm not going to flesh it all out here but questions are welcome. You might say it is a very French idea as the foremost intellectual influences on it are French: the Marquis de Sade and Auguste Comte. A Russian intelligence agent told me in 2022 that without my use of Comte I would not be here. Here being where I had just entered. I.e., talking to him.

It's a glorified camping trip until the pigs make it something else. Basically lots of sex, nudity, squatting and trespassing on federal lands, moving around (no stupid compounds for Waco enthusiasts) and ignoring the law. In practice that means no applications for things like fishing and hunting licenses. I expect lots of fugitives and other outcasts to get in pretty early. My basic demographic is hobos and college sluts. It's family formation. Think of the Manson Family had they moved to more defensible areas than Death Valley. 12-35 people to start, men outnumbering women suggesting a gangbang. Children raised in common. No work. No inequality created by private property. And while I say my plan this comes courtesy of Iranian intelligence - with Don Pendleton's 'Nuclear Storm' serving as a huge influence.

https://www.liberalcurrents.com/nietzsches-critique-of-liberalism/

Liberal institutions straightway cease from being liberal, the moment they are soundly established: once this is attained no more grievous and more thorough enemies of freedom exist than liberal institutions! One knows, of course, what they bring about: they undermine the Will to Power, they are the levelling of mountain and valley exalted to a morality, they make people small, cowardly and pleasure-loving,—by means of them the gregarious animal invariably triumphs. Liberalism, or, in plain English, the transformation of mankind into cattle… Freedom is the will to be responsible for ourselves. It is to preserve the distance which separates us from other men. To grow more indifferent to hardship, to severity, to privation, and even to life itself. To be ready to sacrifice men for one’s cause, one’s self included. Freedom denotes that the virile instincts which rejoice in war and in victory, prevail over other instincts; for instance, over the instincts of “happiness.” The man who has won his freedom, and how much more so, therefore, the spirit that has won its freedom, tramples ruthlessly upon that contemptible kind of comfort which tea—grocers, Christians, cows, women, Englishmen and other democrats worship in their dreams. The free man is a warrior.

- Friedrich Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols

While the Safavid Empire (modern-day Iran) and the Ottoman Empire were rivals, the Safavids' existence and conflicts with the Ottomans did not directly "save" Europe, but rather, they prevented the Ottomans from focusing solely on European expansion.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

Ottoman-Safavid Rivalry:
The Safavid Empire, a Shi'a Muslim dynasty, emerged in Persia (modern-day Iran) in the early 16th century, challenging the Ottoman Empire's dominance in the region.

Ottoman Expansion in Europe:

The Ottomans were expanding into Europe, particularly in the Balkans and Hungary, and were a significant threat to the Habsburgs and other European powers.

The "Long" Ottoman War:

The Ottomans engaged in a prolonged conflict with the Safavids, known as the "long" Ottoman war (1603-1618), which diverted Ottoman resources and attention from their European campaigns.

Ottoman-Safavid Wars:

The Ottoman-Safavid wars, including the Ottoman-Safavid War of 1623-1639, were fought over control of Mesopotamia and other territories.

The Safavids' Role:

The Safavids' existence as a strong, independent power in the East meant that the Ottomans could not focus all their resources on Europe.

Ottoman-Habsburg Wars:

The Ottomans also fought wars with the Habsburgs in Europe, including the Siege of Vienna in 1683, which marked a turning point in Ottoman expansion in Europe.

Decline of the Ottoman Empire:

The Ottomans faced internal problems and external pressures, including wars with Russia, Austria, and Poland, which led to the decline of the Ottoman Empire in the late 17th and 18th centuries.

Conclusion:

While the Safavids' actions did not directly "save" Europe from the Ottomans, their resistance and the wars they fought against the Ottomans did prevent the Ottomans from fully consolidating their power in Europe and allowed European powers to resist their expansion.

Portugal 1494 to 1580 (From the end of the Italian Wars to Spanish-Portuguese Union). Based on Portugal's dominance in navigation.

Spain 1516 to 1659 (From the accession of Charles I of Spain to the Treaty of the Pyrenees). Based on the Spanish dominance of the European battlefields and the global exploration and colonization of the New World.

The Netherlands 1580 to 1688 (From the 1579 Treaty of Utrecht, which marks the foundation of the Dutch Republic, to the Glorious Revolution, William of Orange's arrival in England). Based on Dutch control of credit and money.

France 1643 to 1763 (From the accession of Louis XIV to the end of the Seven Years' War).

Britain 1688 to 1792 (From the Glorious Revolution to the start of the French Revolutionary Wars). Based on British textiles and command of the high seas.

French Revolution and Napoleonic France (1789 to 1815).

Britain 1815 to 1914 (From the Congress of Vienna to the start of the Great War). Based on British industrial supremacy and railroads.