Is the idea that niggers or some other group Helena dislikes don't have a fuck n' suck society a no true Scotsman fallacy?
(OccidentalEnclave)https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=67d2a47972017#comment_67d3090da990cThis isn't difficult to rebut and maybe it isn't even serious enough to rebut - but what the hell.
The fuck n' suck, in its early form, is a revolutionary anarcho-primitivist society in the Rockies wilderness. It's an opt-in model by contract where we self-govern and have a minimalist ethic of few rules.
This creates white living space as the borders are group membership. Later, the plan intends its spread to more populated settled communities as people defy ordinances against public nudity and public sex and forsake their overworked, stressful, moneycentric lifestyle for fucking in the streets.
Helena is like some kind of anti-sex militant from Orwell's 1984 and oddly sees my system as existing with niggers already. It's not like we've had some Communist regime failing and then some Marxist saying it wasn't really Marxist. That WOULD be a no true Scotsman fallacy. My idea has literally never been tried though. The closest thing to it in contemporary terms would be primitive tribes, even pre-contact, or the ancients, even pre-civilization.
So while you're welcome to argue why the fuck n' suck won't work for some other reason this ain't it. Worse, Helena is dogmatic in argument. Which means she lacks seriousness. She has called the fuck n' suck 'crazy' - yet this is the kind of weak sauce we get?
Truth is, she expounds on what she knows not. She doesn't know much about this project. Instead of asking me questions she spouts off.
https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=65b550170ebc0