Sign into an existing account

The american elite are faced with a dilemma. Our ability
to print infinite dollars (and export inflation) is going away.
The russian conflict was the nail in the confine, but our trade
war with china also assured a decoupling anyway. They might put
trump in to end the war in ukraine, assuming the regime can decouple
from foreign influence (ccp, britain, and israel), but trump
would just magnify the war with china instead. Rock meet hard place.

The other problem is public obligations: social security, the pension
system, and welfare, military and military benefits, not to mention all the other payouts the petrodollar
sustained.

Most of the regime officials in the u.s. are pro-israel or are themselves dual-citizens.

Ironically, the only way to solve their dilemma is to eliminate from power/influence/existence some internal factions in order to reconsolidate and maintain control.

Their options are
1. whites
2. blacks
3. hispanics
4. some other minority group

The whites make up the majority, the whites are heavily armed, the whites make up the primary donators class, the middle class, the welfare class which supports the regime's criminal element, and most importantly, the whites are the ones who support the pensions and the unions, which are the base of the powerbrokers in the u.s.

The whites cannot therefore be eliminated.

The blacks meanwhile are a large minority, 14%, are also a major component of the welfare system that supports the regime's criminal element (election engineering, drug trafficking, weapon trafficking, human trafficking, prison population to support the unions, ebt to support payouts to the food producers, etc).
The blacks are violent, heavily armed, and hold some sway with the religion components of the nation. The blacks cannot be eliminated.

The hispanics also meet these criteria.

What other major group could the nation target?

The same that post-weimer germany did.

The alternative is an east coast/west coast split, which would see the existing ruling regime standardize the already existing but unacknowledge power-divide in the u.s.
This is highly unlikely.

The removal of dual-citizen influence, the abandonment of zionism, will likely happen because zionism depends on supporting all the divides already mentioned. Zionism is a roadblock to nationalism, be it national socialism, or civic nationalism. It presupposes its power on importing foreigns, making minorities socially/morally/economically unquestionable, creating an unofficial 'class' system between the races, and defending its "racial allies" at all costs. Therefore, assuming the first major three demographics cannot be removed in order to save u.s. elite's territorial control, without provoking zionists (neoliberals/neocons), then the next logical conclusion is that the u.s. will abandon zionism and take an explicitly antizionist stance soon (within the next 5-10 years).

This is not without precedent, and in fact, assuming global zionism has its roots in britain (as a proxy for british soft power), then there is already example to go by.
This is nothing more or less than an extension of the war we already fought against them for independance. The war never ended, and therefore we must conclude some final severing of their influence here.

If that is the case, then a precursor sign we can look for is pro-communist sentiment rising in the u.s. to counteract this push, while an east/west divide within the conus
develops geopolitically over support for ESG (blackrock/vanguard being extensions of british zionist financial warfare against the u.s.)

Smoke Screen To Big Tent. Big Tent To Defense In Depth. Defense In Depth To Central Position:

The premise is simple: in an environment of pervasive social/economic/political suppression, through large scale opaque organizations (letter agencies, NGOs),
this situation resembles that of the central position strategy.
And while this may seem hopeless, in a diffuse environment, this becomes
a degenerate approach under deliberate counter-effort.
What would otherwise be outposts are reduced to screening forces.

Screening forces are easily broken, and easily demoralized. Under tight recon
requirements, vis-a-vis the sociological/political/economic equivalent of guerillas,
home field advantage converts pensioned and little-motivated 'dynamic' methodologies
into essentially static forces. Strategy for the regime, here, becomes a sort of noose
of diminishing returns, the loss of which accelerates with well-directed opposition.

What is advanced is a simple idea - all the organizations infiltrated? All the social
movements spied on? All the political groups monitored, threatened, entrapped, and
shutdown? These are numerous, many thousands of them exist locally across
the territories of the illegitimate u.s. regime.

It should be imperative to approach these groups, to recruit them, minimally.
The goal is to have them keep their ears to the ground, get them to assess their
available resources, and put them on minimal tasks.
This may seem counter-intuitive, but what is does is this:

1. decisively lowers the barrier to recruitment
2. minimizes the legal attack surface regime agencies use against populist movements.
3. provides a seductively-simple on-ramp for new and existing organizations and their
increasing involvement
And finally
4. embeds regime secret police directly in the movement.

Wait what? Thats right, in this case, number four is fact, desirable.

Under the correct conditions, the greatest asset of the u.s. regime is in fact its
most dangerous achilles heel. It is startling once you see it for what it is.
If you look at reports for example, of the proud boys, and various militias over
the last twenty-thirty years, the regime's secret police went so far as to embed
agents in groups as little as three or four people. The lack of "terrorism" in
the u.s. and the west is so paltry in comparison, we can only conclude these
behaviors are widespread policies that exist, not to prevent violence or illegal
action, but to act as nothing more than unlawful outright suppression measures against
things such as populist movements, boycotts, general strikes, and counter-political
movements to a government that has become wholly unresponsive, and utterly unaccountable
at any level whatsoever.

Therefore, why would it become desirable to provoke the maintenance, and even
intensification of these anti-natal and anti-populist policies?

Again, under the correct conditions, and with the correct counter-strategy, which
I will identify here, these 'embedded forces' of informants throughout american society,
become a resource and effective opportunity for shutting down the regime.
For example, one estimate puts the DOD's informant network
at 70k+, while the FBI employs an estimated 20-30K paid full and part time informants,
many even authorized to commit serious crimes, even purjury.

How can this geopolitical landscape be utilized to shutdown the regime in the u.s.?

THE BASICS

The existing policies of suppression, large-scale informant networks, and legal warfare
against organic organized movements, atomize the social, political, and economic landscape. This is inarguable. The utilization of silo-ing today allows high level
actors within the alphabet agencies (and associated NGOs) to, if they so desired,
kill, maim, coerce, threaten, blackmail, frame, bribe, or effectively rendition
anyone who opposes them--whether or not they do these things is another matter,
though ample evidence, enough to indict countless NGOs and alphabet agencies, exists
for anyone that doen't have their blinders on. Likewise the secretive nature
and the silo-design of information operations is such that wherever large scale
RICO-style crimes are (or could be) engaged in by these very agencies, high-level
and mid-level bureaucrats and officials no longer even need to throw up a smoke screen
after the fact in order to hide the intention of these policies, and programs from
lower level officials and agents. No, the silo system and state secrets guarantees that no one within the three letters who is low on the totem pole will even know of
such crimes to begin with, and if they ever do become so much as suspicious, they
are easily let go, or like any other sufficiently dangerous dissidents in the u.s., silenced in one manner or another.

But with every cloud, a silver lining. The very same atomization of society, reminiscent
if not in symbol and name, than in operation, to east germany under the communists--
that atomization results in something startling.

The state is spread startlingly thin. This would not be a problem if not for
the strategy of the 'central position' which they employed in the first space.
Into this gap enters a 'dead territory', that which is only superficially monitorable.
The regime is overwhelmed with information, so much so that it is reduced almost to noise.
The consequence is they are paralyzed about what to do.

This manifests in one of two approaches: They can ignore a great deal of it, and in the past they did. Or they can tamp down on dissent, increase division, apply further
secret police to ever greater suppression campaigns, and resort to even more
intense censorship of political, economic, social and religious thought, organization,
and action.

They have recently adopted the latter approach.

Because of this alienation in society increase.

The greatest initial cost of resisting an illegitimate and out of control regime is simply
man power.

The solution therefore is to start with recruiting not individuals, but entire small groups. The central positions 'screening' force of informants now becomes a system
by which they are pinned in place to one course and one outcome--the increasing irrelevance and exposure of their methods.

With each organization, in each area of operation, that is recruited, you will no doubt
take on more and more part time, and full time informants.

However because of the loose affiliation, strictly legal mission orders/activities given to each group, and limited contact, every group is
1. disposable
2. can quickly be disaffiliated
3. only dependent on a single contact, which can cut off contact
4. can be fed both true information to further the effectiveness of their participation, and false information which eventually feeds back to the regime and hampers their
efforts signficantly.

Here signficant effort is put into identifying informants, and rather than kicking them out, recruiting them into busy-work that misleads about organizational goals, keeps them busy, wastes resources, solicits resources from the state according to their policy
of providing resources to organizations they intend to setup/destroy--and in the process
those resources are instead allocated to legitimate means thus wasting agency budgets
and discrediting and demoralizing them.
Ideally this would look like them providing for example, money for weapons (which they intend to provide, talk about, or plant, not unlike they did with some J6 and proud boys), only for this to be exposed veritas style, or for this to be reported to the IRS or any other agency that will listen at all, exploiting inter-party rivalries for maximum exposure, such that it breaks the silo-effect of secrecy inter-agency officials use to commit crimes.

Likewise some percentage of informants (or likely informants) we identify should be
cultivated and 'moved up' in 'the organization'. They should believe they are moving
up, that they are "going deeper", while being exploited to misdirect the agencies and efforts of unlawful policies-of-suppression being committed against
political/social movements by illegitimate domestic federal police/intelligence
agencies.

In this way these agencies can be wielded against themselves and the very regime
and political rackets they have been co-opted into protecting.

This effect should be designed to maximize alienation by directing the coherence of the information to cause our short and midterm goals to be misidentified, to misidentify our
organizational charts, our money flows, our operational procedures, and everything else. The flow of information likewise should be designed to cause these suppressive and illegitimate agencies to misidentify bystander organizations as dissidents or extremists
as to maximize social instability and grievances in order to induce political upheaval
and economic instability. Likewise this should be used to damage politically,socially, and economic the credibility, stability, and public sentiment of their support networks,
political donors, NGOs, recruitment-flows to their organizations/campaigns/agencies/political parties/etc.

In the process their 'screening-force' of mass informants becomes our big tent movement
with the enemy right in reach, not for destruction, but for utilization toward a greater end.

This big-tent from here converts an offensive approach to a political/social/economic
"defense in depth", where the harder the regime's secret police attempt to shut down
populist movements, the more they harm their credibility, public support, and ultimately, their budgets. The goal is to reduce these agencies' budgets significantly, undermine public suppport for their pensions/bailouts, and increase political resistance to any further expansion of their workforce, capabilities, and legal powers.

THE FINAL PUSH

This is not where it stops though, because upon further insight, something else becomes
clear. This campaign, pushed far enough, long enough, itself manifests as the strategy
of the central position. You see, the informants, being the most easy to recognize, and
the most easily to interface with (the most reachable) are the outward face
of the illegitimate fourth (intelligence) and fifth branch (private sector) of the regime in the u.s.

Because they are the most visible, and lowest on the totem pole, by definition they are the weakest. By exploiting the central position created by the active persuit of
recruiting already-infiltrated or high-profile localized groups, while strictly
maintaining a public face and strictly legal operation, the atomization effect is
effectively neutralized.

In the central position strategy, a smaller force intercedes between two larger forces
before they can join together and defeat the one taking up the position between them. The smaller force then uses the relative advantage of its position to defeat the smaller of the two opponent forces. Extended to many forces, prioritized by size, this strategy converts to that of 'defeat in detail'.

In short, if this strategy is persued far enough, the u.s. regime will be forced into
two possible outcomes: a direct approach which will lead alienation of the populace and to large scale social unrest not unlike OWS or similar events. Or second,
they will be forced to dismantle the existing informant/social disruption networks,
leaving them dependant strictly on electronic control measures (Social media/media manipulation) which, with the failing public trust, and the failing dollar, will ultimately see a loss of control over populist movements entirely.

/legal bullshit/
Disclaimer (naturally): I am not a lawyer. This post, to the best of my intention and
knowledge, advocates no illegality. Consult a lawyer if you are unsure.

/End of legal bullshit/

This post is strictly for entertainment, and information-purposes only.

Understand the difference.

The national situation is in fact changing.

You're not seeing it because those changes are either mostly invisible, transparent, or otherwise delayed in some way.

Actually a pretty good get-out-of-jail-card too.

One person is the designated snitch. They spoon feed the secret police chosen details regularly.

The FBI takes down lawful political groups or militias, the snitch who was previously a 'witness' for prosecution, turns it around and destroys the regime's case.

Whoever it is has to be willing to fall on their sword, a completely ballsy motherfucker to the point of not caring for their own life.

Also this strategy could irrevocably legally destroy the agencies in the process, and lead to a lot of fuckhead marxist FBI agents losing their jobs/pensions. Would be grate to see a few of them have their entire lives and families destroyed for corruption.
They deserve it.

Been telling people a while now, with all the domestic spying, illegal political disruption, one-sided prosecution, and uneven enforcement of the law--the only use for a militia from the get go is the explicit goal of entrapping and destroying the careers and livelihoods of agents and their out of control criminal organizations masquerading under color of law.

If the proud boys don't resort to this strategy, then they're fucking stupid. This would be my goto in their shoes. Like from the beginning or founding of an organization. "let see how many federal agents and informants we can drag in, catch on camera, and systematically utterly destroy using lawfare."

Bonus points if anyone can entrap people affiliated with judaism/marxist/antifa/blm in america, the ccp, saudi arabia, british intelligence cut outs, or other FARA-violating motherfuckers.

Keep it peaceful, keep it legal, but always remember:

Who dares wins.

All of them within the $250k FDIC insured limit.

I know this is the case because this is how I would do it.

The banks 'go under', but through quick accounting, and "just in the nick of time" the regime here and abroad (israel) get their largest accounts out, or are made whole.

Regulators come in so it is "out of the banks hands", only after.
The bank then "bails-in" with those customers accounts.

FDIC kicks in, and restores those accounts.

Then they get to double-dip, and the american people get blamed.

Of course california is already a disaster.

Her being gone won't fix anything.

They'd just find a replacement.

However, what she is, is a thread.

Pull that thread and you find her handlers.

Find her handlers and you find their funders.

Find who funds them and you find the entire network of NGOs, money launderers, banks, and media relations.

Her remaining alive, and people like her, are actually the achilles heel here.

Once you can demonstrate the connections, people will usually dot connect on their own.

It's why so much media makes fun with the 'nutty conspiracy theorists' archtype using red thread and pushpins to connect information on corkboards.

They don't want people engaging in visual demonstrations of connections because thats the language that best speaks to others.

The propaganda isn't for the public, its to discourage us.

That the only information I have though. Not much use at the moment.

Maybe ukraine. Maybe something happening in the u.s. Signals suggest an attack of some sort.

edit: Nothing happened. Huzzah.

The cities they will target will likely be in the following list:

New York.
Nashville, Tennessee
St. Louis, Missouri
San Francisco
Miami Florida

The weapon will specifically be nuclear, not biological, not chemical.

Consider
1. the dollar and the euro are both going down in flames, in competition

2. every nation that backed their currency by gold or oil and didn't cooperate with the u.s., we
eventually went to direct war with

3. every move by the u.s. appears to be bankrupting and destroying us on the national stage.
We are partially being given our commands from outside nations.

4. NATO is not entirely cooperating with going to war with russia. If the intent was to bankrupt
and weaken europe (to prevent competition with the u.s.) then the euro must fail. It is not failing
fast enough, and NATO is hesitating too much. Any bombs or weapons dropped on europe will result
in american and allied involvement being exposed. Therefore they cannot go this route

5. this is very likely the reason why we saw early rumors spread about this very thing happening:
"nuclear bombs being dropped in europe" and talk about nuclear material being smuggled into london--
it is a distraction, a look-of-there moment.

6. therefore we will have to go to war directly with russia. The public does not support this.

7. in every world war, germany was used as the lever.

8. it is being used again as the lever.

9. but in both incidents we had major false attacks.

10. if a false attack comes, it cannot be in europe, because it would only make americans more
hesitant and fearful of involvement. Plus its too distant. it would not rally the NIMBY types,
who rather say "not our problem" even if they virtue signal publically about supporting ukraine.
They don't want fallout in their backyard. Therefore in order to get them into such a war,
that is what it will take to motivate them. That and nothing less

11. If the "deaths are ramping up from the vaxx" rumors are true, and it wasn't just a sterilization shot,
but part of a mass die off, then this makes everything prior to this bulletpoint significantly more likely. If the vaxx IS a sterilization shot, they will need an excuse for why people are becoming infertile, "fallout" will be that excuse.
heres why..

12. As the deaths or infertility ramp up they will need a gargantuan distraction. Many times the casualty rate of 9/11.
Lets say 100-250k people (or more) dead.

13. A nuclear bomb satisfies this more controllably, and more readily, than an outbreak. The outbreak
narrative failed. An attack of this type is completely unprecedented on the u.s., and with all the
rumors of "cyberattacks", and "new bioattacks", it makes all of these events less likely, and
all the unstated events, nuclear attacks, more likely the angle of approach.

14. inflation rates are now terminal, so there is a limited window to enact the "cleanest dirty shirt" strategy.
Which requires either that the economic hemispheres (east and west) are entirely severed, thus isolating
and limiting the risk of on-shored cash causing a greater crash--or for the financial order to be completely
upset, such as an american lead war in europe, in direct confrontation with russia.

15. lots of war deaths would cover the vaxx deaths.

16. fallout will be blamed for vaccine damage

17. new stricter masking, and other measures, will become mandatory and federally enforced with
lockstep state support, and various levels of control to prevent blowback. "masks protect against fallout",
Iodine pills available to the public, as rations from the government, will also double as the vaccine.

18. Russia will be blamed for providing the weapons, while the left and militant black groups will be
blamed for the attack. This is to radicalize them, through persecution, against the right.

19. The left will double down on anti-russian sentiment, and become that more verocious in their support
of the u.s. regime, as a psychological reflex to being called terrorists.

20. this will morph into the patriot act on steroids, which in addition to tearing down
old leftwing activism, will, after a period of gloating and rightwing support (because they'll be
going after the left), will expand to going after the right as well.

21. Except for brief and scattered state or regional outages, power and communications will stay on
or be restored after as little as a week, and two weeks for any multi-state regional outage.

22. We will see reports of anyone question the narrative, being aggressively assaulted by individuals,
and outright attacked on occasion by small mobs. This will be very frequent, and will be targetted
against anyone questioning the masks, the pills, the curfews, any new censorship, or anyone who
has doubts about how the attacks happened or who carried them out.

23. Car tires will "carry fallout", likewise trucks, and thus will be limited to essential travel only.

24. to "prevent further attacks" TSA will be expanded to busses, and random (but limited) checkpoints
that are temporary in nature, but larger and disruptive, in order to push a new normal. The military
will be brought in on a "limited bases" to handle these larger checks, but will not be deployed on
a regular basis

25. as this is happening, the war effort will be rolling out. To shore up "production shortages" the governors
offices will pledge the weapons in national guard armories. They will empty them out in practice, without
replacing them.

26. As the war heats up, there will be talk about survivalist/terrorist "hoarders", with too many bullets,
that could be used for the war effort against russia. There will be talk about ammunition taxes
(based on "asset appreciation").

27. We will see greater restrictions, registration, paperwork, cost, and fees for backyard gardens and
amateur farm operations (chickens, pigs, goats, etc), as well as a handful of raids against
"illegal farming" every month widely publicized and hyped on the media. Part of this will be to
prevent "hobbyists from contaminating the food supply with fallout", i.e. chickens picking at bugs,
or cows eating contaminated grass. It will be expensive to have food checked, and so many farms
will shut down, funneling business to only major approved megaoperations, much like was done
with walmart during the covid lockdowns. This fearmongering also pulls doubleduty to choke off
any mom-and-pop gardnerers by making the public too scared to buy food grown by their neighbors
"potentially contaminated with fallout."

28. we will see a huge resurgence in "nazism" in the u.s., almost exclusively federally funded and
directed. Not more than x20 times its current hardcore followers.
This is to siphon of political, social, and military willpower from any consolidated public dissent
or public support for resistance against the new normal.

29. As all of this is going on, we will see a wave of terrorism across europe, and cyberattacks
against their infrastructure, forcing them to rely on american and chinese support.

30. there will be no door to door gun confiscations, just constantly, intentionally spread rumors about it.
instead we will see enormous roll back of existing wins in the courts, followed by outrage and
widely circling talk and fear about confiscations. Oddly, the confiscations will largely not come.

31. Gas will either go to $7-8 a gallon as we tap out the SPR, and sell of mining rights to major
national forests and nature reserves in order to pay for more, or oil will go to $150-200, as gas
reaches $5-6 a gallon nationwide. This is to keep people hurting and waiting for the worst, while
it holds steady at the new normal and crunches them hard so they start strongly limiting their
economic activity.

32. rent moratoriums are made permanent in some areas at first, and then rolled out by several states
with talk of big "court battles."

33. The courts appear to shoot down the moratoriums, while in practice leaving huge loop holes, or
only saying it is up to the states to decide. This was the precedent set with abortion.


Other reasons for the u.s. to become directly involved (necessitating a major attack on u.s. soil):
1. the presidency is decrepit, and whoever controls the executive has little time. To assure their weakest-minded (and thus easiest influenced) asset is still in place when europe, russia, or the u.s. goes down, they will have to move on whatever their plan is before the next elections. That at minimum puts a 1-2 year upper limit on any major turn of events.

2. the war effort in ukraine is risking exhaustion and thus loss of momentum. There is not
the public will to expand further currently, so if the war exhausts supplies on both sides, it won't easily be restarted. The break out of peace is the greatest threat at this time to the u.s. dollar (the second is the war itself). A multi-polar world once established will be almost impossible to put back in a box, so the dollar will fail anyway. This is the straussian's thinking. All or nothing. On this basis they will in fact move to strike within russia, even using the u.s. to do it directly.

3. On this basis they will likely attack a russian ally, maybe turkey, or iran, in order to force russia into a multifront war, or abandoning its allies, which would pretty much open a pandoras box of questions about whether its place in BRICS and thus the alliance itself, is a solution to USD replacement.

4. the gun rights movement is cohesive, and economically consolidating. They are succeeding, wherease all the cohort politicians and NGOs which succeeded in rolling 2A back, are geriatric and failing. Breaking the gun rights movement is key to breaking civic nationalism, and in turn balkanizing the u.s. Therefore there is a limited 10 year window where this can happen if the regime wants to win total control over the u.s. and plunder both europe and russia while maintaining a unipolar world.

5. Control of food is always the playbook, and therefore control of energy is essential.
All aspects of modern life, have been policed at one point or another in u.s. culture.
We've seen the examples on youtube. We've read the articles. We've seen the actions by the DOJ. The strategy of death by papercut can and does work, and they will ramp it up enormously much like they did with the drug war. if its just a $200 fine or "permit" for chickens, how many people are going to get into a militant confrontation with city or county authorities? Even if all their neighbors are going through similar things on a dozen different aspects of life, if the strategy attacks ALL aspects of being able to live, the problem becomes psychologically too diffuse and too LARGE for any one person or group to reason about, and so the public can and will go along with it. This can and will work. This is how they will do it. How do I know this? Because this was the strategy perfected in new zealand and australia.


A nuclear attack on the u.s. is very likely (60-70%) coming within the next four months, and then massive lockdowns and persecution.

Prepare accordingly.

Edit:

On this basis, if russia is going to be blamed for an attack on america, their best and only chance to control the narrative is to be the ones to actually carry out such an attack, and I predict this is what they are already considering. This would explain recent talk of russia esp "the u.s. are the only country in history to drop nukes on another country."
I do not think, if russia carried this out, that they would do so directly, but would use a proxy, such as iran or an eastern european proxy.
By doing it this way, instead of the u.s. forcing a multifront war on russia, russia could force a multifront war on america while denying america a reason to enter the war.
(a third party country not directly tied to russia would be the candidate "responsible" for attacking america).

Ideally this candidate would be selected in such a way that it most complicates the american relationship to NATO, with as minimal ties to russia as possible.

Both iran and turkey offer plausible deniability in this regard, but syrian and lebanese agents also fit the bill simply because it plays on the distraction element while working with americas own conceptions of the middle east due to 9/11. This pulls double duty because it pushes countries which are indecisive, into russia or chinas sphere of influence in order to find security from the americans and israelis.

However, if russia does NOT act in this manner, there can be no doubt they are run by fools. because america will undoubtedly bomb itself, picking the heartland for maximum psychological impact, consolidating control, re-stabalizing itself, and justifying a full blown nato war against russia.

This exact model is what informed my decision to predict that russia WOULD invade ukraine early on. When all the experts, and I do mean all of them, including people on the right, said russia would not. The thinking went that if the war was bound to happen, then it was infinitely preferable for Russia to choose the result on their terms.

I predict they will make the same choice as before.