https://scored.co/c/ConsumeProduct/p/16a9zplvGP/these-based-new-yorkers-migratin/cThe text of the post is clearly bullshit. It is written by someone who has never been outside the urban/sub-urban bubble. The tone was way off but I knew it was fake when i got to "We paid him for rights to use that land, hunting, fishing..." lolz. The entire concept of a 'hunting lease' or paying someone for permission to hunt on their land is something that only makes sense to a city-slicker. If it really was thousands of acres of 'almost completely desolate' land, then there is no way the locals paid anyone to hunt it... they just hunted. Locals always know the good spots and when they will get in trouble. If they need to get permission it is done with a 6pack and a handshake.
So I conclude the post glows. My question is "what is the glowie's angle?" Seems to be pushing feudalism? The message was very much "Everything was better when the king owned everything. It all went to shit when he died and his sons split up the kingdom."
