Sign into an existing account

DOGE is smoke an mirrors to fool only the stupidest of the stupid.

How many Trillions will Trump add to deficit before he's done this time?

Will there be covid checks this time? I could use some more beers.

-----

"Very Disturbing: This is how the question was posed to the Marines: "The U.S. Government declares a ban on the possession, sale, transportation, and transfer of all non‑sporting firearms. A thirty (30) day amnesty period is permitted for these firearms to be turned over to the local authorities. At the end of this period, a number of citizen groups refuse to turn over their firearms. "Consider the following statement:'I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government'." The question was then posed as to what degree the individual Marine agreed with the statement. According to results given in Cunningham's thesis, a total of 88 percent, or 264 Marines, responded to the question. Of the 264 who responded, 26.34 percent, or 79 Marines indicated they would be willing to fire upon U.S. citizens."

Of that total, 18.67 percent or 56 Marines, indicated they "agree" with the statement, and 7.67 percent or 23 Marines, indicated that "strongly agree." A total of 61.66 percent, or 185, indicated that they were opposed to firing on citizens.

Of that total, 42.33 percent, or 127 indicated they "strongly disagree" and 19.33 percent or 58, indicated they "disagree." In is thesis, Cunningham noted: "This particular question, unlike the others, elicited from 15.97 percent of the respondents with an opinion, either heavier pen or pencil marks on the response or written comments in the margin space. The responses to this scenario suggest that a complete unit breakdown could occur in a unit tasked to execute this mission."

In other words, if a commander asked the men of his unit to raise their hands in a simple poll, he could determine the position of such servicemen and those who responded in the affirmative could be tasked for such a mission. This is just one of the reasons the question, not to mention the fact that it was allowed to be asked, is obviously potentially dangerous. In fact, several months before the survey was taken at Twenty‑Nine Palms, the SPOTLIGHT, MODERN GUN and other publications revealed the question posed by Cunningham in his survey had ben asked of members of a U.S. Seal (Sea‑Air‑land) team. In addition, despite Navy and Marine Corps denials, there have been dozens of reports, unconfirmed, that the survey has been given to other servicemen, as well as various law enforcement agents.
--------
The results of another question, No. 45, posed by the survey indicates American soldiers are not eager to swear allegiance to the United Nations, although nearly one in four would do so. Question 45 states: "I would swear to the following code:'I am a United Nations fighting person. I serve in the forces which maintain world peace and every nation's way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their defense'." A total of 69.33 percent, or 208 Marines surveyed, indicated they disagreed, with 117, or 39 percent, indicating they strongly disagreed.

On the other hand, 71 Marines, or 23.66 percent, indicated they would be willing to swear such allegiance to the UN, with 19, or 6.33 percent, indicating they were strongly in favor of doing so. "For thousands of years." Cunningham notes in his thesis, "military organizations have required their soldiers to swear to some kind of code or allegiance. A code provides a standard for the soldiers to live up to and, in many cases, to die for. A code can be a powerful tool for establishing and sustaining unit cohesion. But what if the mission a solider is assigned to perform counters or confuses the code he has sworn to uphold? Question 45 was presented to determine if the solders would swear to such a code." No one knows if the American personnel traveling in the helicopter shot down over Iraq [by "friendly fire"] in April 1994 would have sworn allegiance to such a code.

Yet, Vice President Albert Gore stated that these Americans "died in the service of The United Nations." "It is patently clear," a retired high ranking Army Officer told The SPOTLIGHT,"that this survey raises some very serious issues, not the least of which is that U.S. servicemen are not being properly educated as to the limits of their service in the civilian sector. This is most dangerous, and, I should think the Congress has an obligation to the people to take a careful look at this, not to mention the people at the Pentagon."

https://israelect.com/reference/WillieMartin/FIRE-1%20[A].htm

is the modern man?
------

The puppet-masters say he is the
smartest, most advanced individual to ever strut the planet, the
most relatively liberated being in history. But Louis-Ferdinand
Celine said it well, "What does the modern public want? It
wants to go down on its knees before money and before crap!"

The public have been trained to do this by two principle
methods: direct "speaking" archetypal messages of pure terror
("psychic driving" as the CIA's Dr. Ewan Cameron termed it),
encoded in massively publicized "lone nut" mass murders, and
the sinister flattery heaped upon them by their masters in the
cult of civilization and progress.

The acid test of a human being's freedom and will to protect
the quality of his life, lies in a person's attitude toward his
oppressor. What is modern man's attitude toward Wall Street
and the bankers, toward Dan Rather and the ignorance-
bestowing media and advertising man, toward Lincoln and
Truman, FDR and Reagan, George Bush and Johnny Carson,
Exxon and Monsanto?

As one writer has observed, "The most amazing thing about
the American people is that they are constantly defending their
worst betrayers." Who then is the modern man? He is a mind-
bombed patsy who gets his marching orders from "twilight
language" key words sprinkled throughout "his" news and
current events. Even as he dances to the tune of the elite
managers of human behavior, he scoffs with great derision at
the idea of the existence and operation of a technology of mass
mind control emanating from the media and government.
Modern man is much too smart t o believe anything as
superstitious as that!

Modern man is the ideal hypnotic subject: puffed up on the
idea that he is the crown of creation, he vehemently denies the
power of the hypnotist's control over him, even as his head
bobs up and down on a string.

Michael A. Hoffman II - Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare Page 10
https://www.howardnema.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Secret-Societies-and-Psychological-Warfare-by-Hoffmann-1.pdf

I say stupid. Maybe even nefarious considering he has no real plan.

https://goyimtv.com/l/3066563165/WEDNESDAY-White-Power-Wednesday--HT-is-LIVE---930pm-Eastern---630pm-West-Coast--Share-Stream-on-X--GAB--Telegram--Etc--Super-Chat-HT-to-support-the-show--heres-the-link-https---entropystream-live-app-HT

o/ WFP

https://nypost.com/2025/05/01/us-news/nj-father-beaten-to-death-defending-daughter-remembered-as-invincible-man-and-fun-loving-flat-earther-the-man-the-myth-the-legend/

Everyone’s face looks Jew-ey to me.

Also, White guys who do roofing are usually ex-cons. Roofing is the hardest and most dangerous work of the trades besides maybe Ironworker, which is union and pays great—unlike Roofing.