I ended up reading a bunch of flat earther comments like these a little bit ago, entertaining shit. The Dunning–Kruger Effect is strong in these people. I'm guessing their average IQ is somewhere between 70 to 90 at most. They can generally construct sentences without the grammar itself being catastrophically retarded, but in hypotheticals, they completely fall apart. Here are some examples that I found particularly funny:
Many of them think that if the earth is spinning, if you jump in the air and come back down on the same spot, that is proof to them that there is no spin. They can't grasp the idea that everything in that frame of reference is in motion together; they have a hard time understanding that the air is moving with the earth. When people bring up the fact that you can jump up and down on an airplane and land in the same place. They then come up with silly explanations for the difference, like the air being in an enclosed space. "Try doing that outside the plane while it's in motion."
I've seen flat earthers routinely having a hard time understanding gasses and pressure. Many of them think that if the earth doesn't have some sort of dome, then the air would just float off into space. I've seen many of them believe that it is impossible for two gasses of different pressures to coexist without mixing instantly. They don't understand the concept of barometric pressure changes due to altitude and compression or stratification of gasses or liquids, even though these things are easy to demonstrate.
Anyways, it's dumb stuff like this that leads me to pin them at the 70-90 IQ range mostly. We should be using the retards of the world to our advantage by imprinting stupid shit into their brains that works in our favor in some way. If we can imprint them with something targeted and destructive like the niggy belief that bald people have gold inside their head, then we can harness this retardation.
Lol, as dumb as it sounds, we can probably convince them that jews are the final boss of the simulation, and if you kill one, you can get out. We can tell them that their simulated body will still be here, but with only a copy of their consciousness. The real you is now free! "Awe, damn. I'm still here. I guess I'm the copy. Oh well, the 50/50 chance was worth a shot."
Anyways, the central theme here is that we should be using idiots to our advantage somehow. They are easy to manipulate, and there are a lot of them available all over the world. I'm going to term this strategy the ARFM or Autonomous Retard Force Multiplier.
A related recent post: Anon shares his IQ research:
https://files.catbox.moe/r97erg.jpg![]()
dicedice -2 points 2.6 years ago
Do you know what anticrepuscular rays are?
Here's the lazypedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anticrepuscular_rays
Of main interest are the photographs.
Do you see how all of those lines appear to converge to a point? There is nothing emanating from that point. The sun is on the other side of the sky. The light rays are converging to that point.
No matter what you view the sky as, whether you think the earth is a ball or a plane or a cosmic sandwich, that phenomena is observable, it exists, and it can be photographed. Whatever the sun actually is, whether it be billions of miles away and large, very near and small, or whatever else you may wish to model it as, it's light rays can appear to converge to a point.
Now imagine if you can that you can make those light rays spin. To rotate over your head the way the night sky changes over the course of the night bringing new stars into view. Would every observer still see all of those lines converging to a point? Yes. Turning big stripes in the sky should have no effect on the matter.
Now instead imagine that the source of this celestial pinwheel is at the north star instead of at one end of the sky. It is even higher than the light source that creates the sun and turns beyond the field of view. What would happen to those bands caused by the pinwheel? Should they do anything other than converge to a point?