To be fair you didn't refute any of the reasons I proved why cannot be leaders.
To be fair you did nothing of the kind. You didnt prove that women were biologically incapable of planning or that “sacrifice everything” to nuture a hamster or whatever, or that their decisions are more ‘emotions’ based then men’s are. You just made a bunch of assertions which we know you can’t prove.
If you could prove anything you assert you could cite a supporting argument, but you can’t. That is why you self -hypnotize, to reassure yourself in light of your lack of evidence.
Treasonous men are not trustworthy. Women. As in all. Are not trustworthy.
This is called a ‘No True Scotsman’ fallacy. To be fair, it proves you argue like a kike.
I spent a lot of time in the last comment PROVING why males’ behavior is as emotion based as females’, why it is biologically driven, and why it is ‘treasonous’, ie exploitive of other whites. But, to be fair, you don’t give a shit about evidence or logic, or rational arguments.
As for competition. Men are competitive. It's a driver of progress.
There are two types of male competition, constructive and destructive.
There are two types of males: monogamists/producers and polygamists/parasites.
Every man rushing off to war is rushing off to loot and enslave another group of males so they can have more females or better females than they could otherwise deserve, based on their own productivity. One can hardly ignore that the majority of wars waged on whites throughout history were waged BY WHITES, specifically white males.
You choose to conveniently ignore that all the european nobility descend from parasitic white warlords that lived off the the slavery of other white men while stealing their women and turning them into concubines.
And said women ready to spread her wet legs for the invading Victor's.
Women who don’t do so willingly will usually have their legs forced apart by a man. Europeans didnt do this to women? Haha.
Uncooperative women were often killed, so maybe don’t blame women for selective pressures implemented by men which had the dysgenic result of increasing the number of women with transferable loyalties! Men literally make that happen.
Warlording and exploitation is the basis of the sham “legitimate” governemnts that exploited working class europeans for thousands of years. It is the cause of wealth disparity and corruption and war within white civilization. These parasitic white men let jews into country after country within europe and america, because they were partners in crime with the jews.
Your so-called white male ‘leadership’ has always been a pack of jew friendly collaborators. Always. They always sold out their own people to jews for more shekels.
PostWallHelena 0 points 2.2 years ago
To be fair you did nothing of the kind. You didnt prove that women were biologically incapable of planning or that “sacrifice everything” to nuture a hamster or whatever, or that their decisions are more ‘emotions’ based then men’s are. You just made a bunch of assertions which we know you can’t prove.
If you could prove anything you assert you could cite a supporting argument, but you can’t. That is why you self -hypnotize, to reassure yourself in light of your lack of evidence.
This is called a ‘No True Scotsman’ fallacy. To be fair, it proves you argue like a kike.
I spent a lot of time in the last comment PROVING why males’ behavior is as emotion based as females’, why it is biologically driven, and why it is ‘treasonous’, ie exploitive of other whites. But, to be fair, you don’t give a shit about evidence or logic, or rational arguments.
There are two types of male competition, constructive and destructive.
There are two types of males: monogamists/producers and polygamists/parasites.
Every man rushing off to war is rushing off to loot and enslave another group of males so they can have more females or better females than they could otherwise deserve, based on their own productivity. One can hardly ignore that the majority of wars waged on whites throughout history were waged BY WHITES, specifically white males.
You choose to conveniently ignore that all the european nobility descend from parasitic white warlords that lived off the the slavery of other white men while stealing their women and turning them into concubines.
Women who don’t do so willingly will usually have their legs forced apart by a man. Europeans didnt do this to women? Haha.
Uncooperative women were often killed, so maybe don’t blame women for selective pressures implemented by men which had the dysgenic result of increasing the number of women with transferable loyalties! Men literally make that happen.
Warlording and exploitation is the basis of the sham “legitimate” governemnts that exploited working class europeans for thousands of years. It is the cause of wealth disparity and corruption and war within white civilization. These parasitic white men let jews into country after country within europe and america, because they were partners in crime with the jews.
Your so-called white male ‘leadership’ has always been a pack of jew friendly collaborators. Always. They always sold out their own people to jews for more shekels.
Pure talmudry