×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
23
5 comments block

We essentially agree that he is our enemy, we simply differ a bit on how to classify him.
So, read this in that light.
I maintain there is a difference between a subversive foreign actor and a native citizen.
To draw a somewhat more stark comparison, lets say it was the 60's and he was a soviet operative.
He obtains appointment, says whatever bullshit he is required to say, and then acts according to his mission.
Is he a traitor?
Of course not.
He is a foreign operative.
I simply argue Mayorkas be treated according to those considerations.
There were virtually no hispanics in the United States in 1965.
Now the country is over 30% spic.
Rather than cow down and accept that, I argue that every hispanic resident be considered a foreign invader.
Treason is simply a poorly worded, difficult to litigate, concept in American justice.
It could be strengthened, made more robust, and it might when they secure total power and decide to use it against us.
We're just better at handling espionage and subversion than we are at treason.