The book you referenced is not a historic source, what is relevant is how and where the author sourced it from.
Correct.
Irrespective on the rhetorical direct of the text, if the information can be verified, then it remains factual.
Correct. The list appears to come from the author, so I need to find a copy of his book for his sources, unless his sources are listed online somewhere. From the basic information I'm seeing and reading while looking for it, it looks like it only covers Roman Christianity.
"As for the edit, you're perhaps correct, I thought I had done before you would have read it. Dishonesty is not the intent. I prefer to not devolve into the realm of emotive vomit, so if I perceive that in my tone, it is my inclination to reign it in." Thank you very much then.
Edit: Deleted repeated phrase, it's 10:30 and I need to stop antagonizing Foo and go to bed.
s23erdctfvyg 1 points 1.5 years ago
From the basic information I'm seeing and reading while looking for it, it looks like it only covers Roman Christianity.
"As for the edit, you're perhaps correct, I thought I had done before you would have read it.
Dishonesty is not the intent.
I prefer to not devolve into the realm of emotive vomit, so if I perceive that in my tone, it is my inclination to reign it in."
Thank you very much then.
Edit: Deleted repeated phrase, it's 10:30 and I need to stop antagonizing Foo and go to bed.