"a 24/7 reminder of a violation which would ideally be inconceivable" Ok, I can see how you might not do well with reading comprehension and the context of the wall of text I was responding to. Let's start with "Should a woman, raped by a male family member, be forced to carry that child," What is with you faggots and the framing you you always desperately use. "Forced to carry that child" She IS carrying that child. Ending that childs life isn't going to un-rape her. Now while I wasn't advocating for a universal death penalty for abortion, everything I said could easily be applied to rape as well. I would in fact be very comfortable with applying a universal death penalty or some kind of castration to rapists. Provided our justice system was functioning properly. However I am less willing to apply broad implications from what is a tiny fraction of cases. You don't get to use a horrific occurrence to justify an arguably more horrific policy.
Greskibon 0 points 11 months ago
"a 24/7 reminder of a violation which would ideally be inconceivable" Ok, I can see how you might not do well with reading comprehension and the context of the wall of text I was responding to. Let's start with "Should a woman, raped by a male family member, be forced to carry that child," What is with you faggots and the framing you you always desperately use. "Forced to carry that child" She IS carrying that child. Ending that childs life isn't going to un-rape her. Now while I wasn't advocating for a universal death penalty for abortion, everything I said could easily be applied to rape as well. I would in fact be very comfortable with applying a universal death penalty or some kind of castration to rapists. Provided our justice system was functioning properly. However I am less willing to apply broad implications from what is a tiny fraction of cases. You don't get to use a horrific occurrence to justify an arguably more horrific policy.