Technically there are reduced risks of specific ailments with circumcision, but it's never explained that the reduction in risk is relative, not absolute. For example, slicing off that foreskin may reduce the rate of dick rot from .001% to .0005%. That's a 50% reduction!
green_man 0 points 1 year ago
Technically there are reduced risks of specific ailments with circumcision, but it's never explained that the reduction in risk is relative, not absolute. For example, slicing off that foreskin may reduce the rate of dick rot from .001% to .0005%. That's a 50% reduction!