“Tina Peters backing up the elections data before they wiped the systems gave the public a rare opportunity to analyze before and after the tampering – and it shows clear and deliberate manipulation of the voting systems,” Strand explains.
“Now we know why the Democrat Judge in her case refused nearly all of her witnesses and excluded virtually all of her defenses, then sentenced her to 9 years in prison – because if this became a nationwide story the entire house of cards with Dominion could fall.”
dass 1 points 6 months ago
Absolutely agreed.
To be 'protected' under NZ's whistleblower laws you CAN NOT publicly disseminate any data or information, and you are obliged to first contact the organization you work for (where you came across said info) and they are 'obliged' to investigate your claim and then obliged to inform you of their results - if they dont get back to you after 6 months or some such only then can you attempt to contact either a sitting MP or high ranking law enforcement with your concerns - and if the data requires a security clearance - you can only contact an individual with the relevant security clearance or higher (and they can decline to veiw said information and fobbed you off - which is exactly what happened to the NZ vaccine data guy/ two/ three different MPs cut off all contact with him over several months and refused his calls and emails after attempting to arrange a meeting to pass the info to them for public disclosure. So he went public). Not doing this opens you up for criminal charges and a conviction. Totes pozzed.