A cautionary tale for those with ambiguous morality, should the perspective shift from tolerance to defense, it should also follow that the destruction of everything you love is inevitable.
We’re watching a biblical event occur in real time at small scale.
A math proof should not be required to make a true or false statement of a general observation, though it is an academic exercise that should be attempted at least once to recognize how difficult it is to provide logical evidence of the realness of anything.
True skepticism is a much better beginning premise than blind acceptance, so that you demand evidence that I can’t provide still shouldn’t be cause to dismiss my premise or anyone else’s premise out of hand — unless you are prepared to defense your own with equal veracity and proof
Battlefat 1 points 3 months ago
A math proof should not be required to make a true or false statement of a general observation, though it is an academic exercise that should be attempted at least once to recognize how difficult it is to provide logical evidence of the realness of anything.
True skepticism is a much better beginning premise than blind acceptance, so that you demand evidence that I can’t provide still shouldn’t be cause to dismiss my premise or anyone else’s premise out of hand — unless you are prepared to defense your own with equal veracity and proof