b) Nature moves and cannot be held onto...to atone implies being "at one" with nature, hence with the flow, not with what has been formed within like oaths/agreements/consent given to suggested information etc.
yesterday
"All my troubles seems so far away; now it looks as though they're here to stay"
From inception towards death...ones life can only perceive the perceivable moment(um) of NOW. Adapting to now implies being at-one with natural law. A jew suggests before (yesterday) and after (tomorrow) to trick gentiles to assume far away troubles and look/lock onto what continues to pass, hence staining self with memorial residue.
To atone implies letting go of what (sins) one holds onto mentally, hence at-one-ment.
what it's like to deal with a jew
Ones consent to any suggestion by another implies the "art" of the deal, hence ignoring natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion), when buying into and thereby selling oneself out to literally negotiate/nego/neg - "nothing". Ignorance implies de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable.
Nature moves everything through ones perception; gentiles ignore that by holding onto what a jew suggests...with ignorance representing "nothing" (de-nial of everything).
always ask for more
Being implies one (partial) within all (whole)...all gives each one being. To ask implies for more (suggestion) than all (perceivable) offers.
Ask/ais - "to wish; desire"...a jewish merchant of temptation sells gentiles whatever they wish or desire, by suggesting gentiles to follow temptation towards outcome, hence towards getting the desired wish fulfilled. Moving forwards destroys gentiles faster than a jew.
Motion delivers outcome for anything within, hence "ask an ye shall receive". Anything formed (life) within flow (inception towards death) needs to resist wanted temptation...or die trying to reach it, hold onto it, and protect it from ongoing flow.
jews aren't logical
A jew suggests the artificial word (logos) within natural sound, which when consented to by gentiles...establishes circular logic within each gentile; turning into conflicts of reason among all gentiles, which a jew steers from both sides with talmudic reasoning aka suggesting contradictions to both sides to keep them going against each other.
Reason implies imbalance; implication implies balance...being implies choice. Consenting to a suggestion by another establishes ones choice under a chosen one; thereby invert choice within origin for chance towards outcome...on the off-chance that a conflict of reason could be won.
Take for example any conflict of reason...yes vs no; true vs false; good vs evil; rich vs poor; us vs them etc. Neither of which can ever be won from within. Both sides consent to mutual destruction, while perpetuating the conflict for the next participants, no matter which side is chosen.
they don't remember
What if memory wants to hold onto (hard-drive) but needs to let go of (ram)? What happens if one fills up ram? What if Random Access Memory isn't random (course without direction) but directed from inception towards death, hence only temporary accessible by those living within?
If remember implies ones re-sponse to memory, then what else could one respond to instead? How do artificial words enter memory, when natural sound moves through it?
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 2 months ago
a) Atonement of Kol Nidre (all oaths)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kol_Nidre
b) Nature moves and cannot be held onto...to atone implies being "at one" with nature, hence with the flow, not with what has been formed within like oaths/agreements/consent given to suggested information etc.
"All my troubles seems so far away; now it looks as though they're here to stay"
From inception towards death...ones life can only perceive the perceivable moment(um) of NOW. Adapting to now implies being at-one with natural law. A jew suggests before (yesterday) and after (tomorrow) to trick gentiles to assume far away troubles and look/lock onto what continues to pass, hence staining self with memorial residue.
To atone implies letting go of what (sins) one holds onto mentally, hence at-one-ment.
Ones consent to any suggestion by another implies the "art" of the deal, hence ignoring natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion), when buying into and thereby selling oneself out to literally negotiate/nego/neg - "nothing". Ignorance implies de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable.
Nature moves everything through ones perception; gentiles ignore that by holding onto what a jew suggests...with ignorance representing "nothing" (de-nial of everything).
Being implies one (partial) within all (whole)...all gives each one being. To ask implies for more (suggestion) than all (perceivable) offers.
Ask/ais - "to wish; desire"...a jewish merchant of temptation sells gentiles whatever they wish or desire, by suggesting gentiles to follow temptation towards outcome, hence towards getting the desired wish fulfilled. Moving forwards destroys gentiles faster than a jew.
Motion delivers outcome for anything within, hence "ask an ye shall receive". Anything formed (life) within flow (inception towards death) needs to resist wanted temptation...or die trying to reach it, hold onto it, and protect it from ongoing flow.
A jew suggests the artificial word (logos) within natural sound, which when consented to by gentiles...establishes circular logic within each gentile; turning into conflicts of reason among all gentiles, which a jew steers from both sides with talmudic reasoning aka suggesting contradictions to both sides to keep them going against each other.
Reason implies imbalance; implication implies balance...being implies choice. Consenting to a suggestion by another establishes ones choice under a chosen one; thereby invert choice within origin for chance towards outcome...on the off-chance that a conflict of reason could be won.
Take for example any conflict of reason...yes vs no; true vs false; good vs evil; rich vs poor; us vs them etc. Neither of which can ever be won from within. Both sides consent to mutual destruction, while perpetuating the conflict for the next participants, no matter which side is chosen.
What if memory wants to hold onto (hard-drive) but needs to let go of (ram)? What happens if one fills up ram? What if Random Access Memory isn't random (course without direction) but directed from inception towards death, hence only temporary accessible by those living within?
If remember implies ones re-sponse to memory, then what else could one respond to instead? How do artificial words enter memory, when natural sound moves through it?