Sign into an existing account

So apparently per the media israel is reclaiming its land since they were the original heirs to that land. Now without going into the Biblical implications, this raises some issues to me. First, if jews were the original land owners why do the Palestinians live there now? If the Palestinians never moved, then wouldn't that prove the opposite, that jews are invaders, and Palestinians the real jews of the area? This then begs the question, why would Palestinians who have been there need to be displaced for a group that can at best make a claim to the same land for less than a century? Why then was this land gifed back to the jews if it was always their land, hence bringing into question the motives balfour declaration? This then brings into question the motives of Hitler who was trying to move them back to israel. Why would a supposed genocidal maniac spend Germany's money to displace jews if he hated them so much? And since they got a free country, courtesy of Western Europe and America, why do jews hate White people so much? Doesn't that prove Hitler's point?

Looking into this debacle, the jewish lies don't even stand to scrutiny WITHOUT the Bible. When you add in the Bible, it makes even less sense. If we have the letter to the phillistines, where is the letter to the jews who are now claiming they live there and got displaced? We have a few notable events like the assyrian exile, but that would only explain why the jews were fragmented into multiple tribes. It doens't really explain how israel was "stolen" from people who supposedly already live there.

And you know, maybe im hopelessly wrong on this, and just dont understand the nuances. I dont know