Depends on the white and on the other half, and it goes beyond race, I also consider her nationality, ethnicity, family name, and the legacy of her bloodline.
For other race, I might tolerate it if it isn't Sub-Saharan african or Jewish, within that, I have my preferences, Australian aboriginal should be the most "fuck no" of them all, as they offer nothing good aside from their talent at tracking.
In most cases east Indian (and Paki, and Sri Lankan, and gaosian, etc) is as completely off the. Just south Asian in general) are as off the table as Abo wog, Nigger, or kike, unless i can be confident that the pajeeta part of her is of the highest most Aryan castes, undiluted the shitskin dna of the lower castes.
From there we have more respectable cases, the Arabs are far from dysfunctional, they are conquerors who cause continual existential problems for the yids, and have a history of rivalry with whites, I see them as enemies of my race, but worthy ones.
East Asians are pretty much the favorites of the white nationalists because of their women's natural femininity insofar as physical appearance is concerned, they also come from accomplished peoples who've built great empires that remain competitive with white today.
Native Americans, Latin Americans, and Polynesians are all very respectable, they were both valuable Allies of the white man and worthy enemies of them, if you keep alcohol away from them then they aren't too much of an issue and plenty can even pass themselves off as white (living as white). They managed to push whites out of the americas when we were the first to arrive on those continents, and claim from us the title of the indigenous races of the Americas. I can respect that.
So now we move onto the white half:
Northern European is kino, northwestern is a close second, and northeastern is probably the best bet you could realistically aim for today, of northeastern, Russian is best.
So we get the norse-germanics in first place with the gold, the celtic-britonians in second at silver, and the Slavic peoples taking the bronze at third.
From there we have the rest of Europe and parts of Asia, those whites are, well, not as great.
The closer they are to the Mediterranean they more admired they likely have become throughout their histories as they'd been colonized and conquered by other races (such as the Arabs and moors). Women are disloyal sluts who will monkeybrsnch to the most dominant males whenever possible, meaning they are mudsharks by design in time when skitskins rule supreme.
The muddied up dna of once great peoples like the Greeks, Italians, Spaniards and Portuguese all testify to this.
anon 0 points 3 hours ago
Depends.
Depends on the white and on the other half, and it goes beyond race, I also consider her nationality, ethnicity, family name, and the legacy of her bloodline.
For other race, I might tolerate it if it isn't Sub-Saharan african or Jewish, within that, I have my preferences, Australian aboriginal should be the most "fuck no" of them all, as they offer nothing good aside from their talent at tracking.
In most cases east Indian (and Paki, and Sri Lankan, and gaosian, etc) is as completely off the. Just south Asian in general) are as off the table as Abo wog, Nigger, or kike, unless i can be confident that the pajeeta part of her is of the highest most Aryan castes, undiluted the shitskin dna of the lower castes.
From there we have more respectable cases, the Arabs are far from dysfunctional, they are conquerors who cause continual existential problems for the yids, and have a history of rivalry with whites, I see them as enemies of my race, but worthy ones.
East Asians are pretty much the favorites of the white nationalists because of their women's natural femininity insofar as physical appearance is concerned, they also come from accomplished peoples who've built great empires that remain competitive with white today.
Native Americans, Latin Americans, and Polynesians are all very respectable, they were both valuable Allies of the white man and worthy enemies of them, if you keep alcohol away from them then they aren't too much of an issue and plenty can even pass themselves off as white (living as white). They managed to push whites out of the americas when we were the first to arrive on those continents, and claim from us the title of the indigenous races of the Americas. I can respect that.
So now we move onto the white half:
Northern European is kino, northwestern is a close second, and northeastern is probably the best bet you could realistically aim for today, of northeastern, Russian is best.
So we get the norse-germanics in first place with the gold, the celtic-britonians in second at silver, and the Slavic peoples taking the bronze at third.
From there we have the rest of Europe and parts of Asia, those whites are, well, not as great.
The closer they are to the Mediterranean they more admired they likely have become throughout their histories as they'd been colonized and conquered by other races (such as the Arabs and moors). Women are disloyal sluts who will monkeybrsnch to the most dominant males whenever possible, meaning they are mudsharks by design in time when skitskins rule supreme.
The muddied up dna of once great peoples like the Greeks, Italians, Spaniards and Portuguese all testify to this.