Lazaridis et al. (2016) notes "The demographic impact of steppe related populations on South Asia was substantial, as the Mala, a south Indian Dalit population with minimal ANI (Ancestral North Indian) along the 'Indian Cline' of such ancestry is inferred to have ~ 18% steppe-related ancestry, while the Kalash of Pakistan are inferred to have ~ 50%, similar to present-day northern Europeans." The study estimated (6.5–50.2%) steppe-related admixture in South Asians.
Pathak et al. 2018 concluded that the Indo-European speakers of the Gangetic Plains and the Dravidian speakers have significant Yamnaya Early-Middle Bronze Age (Steppe_EMBA) ancestry but no Middle-Late Bronze Age Steppe (Steppe_MLBA) ancestry. On the other hand, the "North-Western Indian and Pakistani" populations (PNWI) showed significant Steppe_MLBA ancestry along with Yamnaya (Steppe_EMBA) ancestry. The study also noted that ancient South Asian samples had significantly higher Steppe_MLBA than Steppe_EMBA (or Yamnaya)
David Reich in his 2018 book Who We Are and How We Got Here states that the 2016 analyses found the ASI to have significant amounts of an ancestry component deriving from Iranian farmers (about 25% of their ancestry), with the remaining 75% of their ancestry deriving from native South Asian hunter-gatherers..... In the case of the ANI, the Iranian farmer ancestry is 50%, with the rest being from steppe groups related to the Yamnaya.[45]
Couldn't care less what language they speak.
The propragation of linguistic families serves as corroborating evidence for a model of migration and race mixture. Don’t play dumb.
The problem is you are relying on graphs that are taking different pockets of races in the data. But if you look around you and see the subcontinents at work for example, you couldn't tell a hindu from a paki just by looking or hearing them
Maybe you can’t. But thats not what we are discussing. We are discussing genetic differences, stop moving the goal posts
Look at this again. This clearly demonstrates high variability in proportion of racial components in different regions and castes of the sub-continent with dark green AASI being highest in the southeast and low castes like the paniya and irula and european (light blue) and other middle eastern/caucasus populations (light green, dark blue ) being higher in the northwest and upper castes like brahmins.
My whole argument is they are the same people despite their genetic makeup
Youre full of shit. I asserted there was a racial cline. You said,
incorrect, it's not Pakistan as a whole. You are thinking of the very northwest that is a pashtoon region. They are afghans with high Caucasoid ancestry, they are not subcontinentals.
Now youre trying to claim that only culture matters, not genetics? I was raised catholic. So were several million Haitians. Me and Haitians not one people though. Youre desperate and your contradicting yourself. Culture is everything now? But also who cares what language they speak?
Why don’t you admit you will have to reevaluate your understanding of pajeets, because apparently you are unaware of all the research on their race that has emerge in the last decade?
PostWallHelena 0 points 5 hours ago
Its literally called the indian cline.
The propragation of linguistic families serves as corroborating evidence for a model of migration and race mixture. Don’t play dumb.
Maybe you can’t. But thats not what we are discussing. We are discussing genetic differences, stop moving the goal posts
Look at this again. This clearly demonstrates high variability in proportion of racial components in different regions and castes of the sub-continent with dark green AASI being highest in the southeast and low castes like the paniya and irula and european (light blue) and other middle eastern/caucasus populations (light green, dark blue ) being higher in the northwest and upper castes like brahmins.
https://files.catbox.moe/2kpa4o.jpeg
Youre full of shit. I asserted there was a racial cline. You said,
Now youre trying to claim that only culture matters, not genetics? I was raised catholic. So were several million Haitians. Me and Haitians not one people though. Youre desperate and your contradicting yourself. Culture is everything now? But also who cares what language they speak?
Why don’t you admit you will have to reevaluate your understanding of pajeets, because apparently you are unaware of all the research on their race that has emerge in the last decade?