Sure, correct me if i'm wrong, but wouldn't rounding out the 8% then be 3300%. So even allowing for an incorrectly placed decimal point, that is 330% or maybe 3500% - My whole thing is that isn't statistical analysis facilitated by being accurate, or is all just a case of 'close enough is good enough' for examining and interpreting data ?. Just what is going on here. My mind is blown.
dassar 0 points 6 hours ago
Sure, correct me if i'm wrong, but wouldn't rounding out the 8% then be 3300%. So even allowing for an incorrectly placed decimal point, that is 330% or maybe 3500% - My whole thing is that isn't statistical analysis facilitated by being accurate, or is all just a case of 'close enough is good enough' for examining and interpreting data ?. Just what is going on here.
My mind is blown.