I just think youre looking at the problem the wrong way. Blacks should never live with us. Never ever. They are at an earlier stage of evolution. We should not interact with them at all culturally or economically. Because the are so stupid and violent and selfish, manipulative whites will always try to exploit them, in any political system. Blacks deserve to live in the stone age, with technology they can create themselves. They should never be made prosperous and comfortable by technology created by whites. Likewise whites should never benefit from labor performed by blacks.
What you call communism is just one facet of a problem that I call social parasitism. There are all kinds of bureaucracies that create an opportunity for social parasites to feed off society. Wall street is full of them. After all, what is government but a corporation? We were fools to think the little corporations would ever be antithetically opposed to the big corporation. So I believe focusing on communism is short sighted and biased toward last century’s political paradigm which turned out to be wrong.
In fact the communists turned out to be right about a bunch of things, like capitolist elites (didn’t get there by merit) and usury and free markets.
If you ban communism, social parasites will learn to exploit people through capitalism. You have to build a system that does not allow social parasitism to thrive by bureaucracy.
it was always them. korea, vietnam, venezuela, europe, etc. i'm surprised you're so slow on the uptake.
No it was not always them. I think in some ways N. Korea is better than S. Korea, which has adopted crass commercial values like the rest of the west. Vietnam, venezuela, were always bad because of the races that live there. We have got to stop thinking that the problem with venezuala is its government policies. The problem with Venezuela is Venezuelans. They can’t be fixed and aren’t capable of making a nice country under democratic capitalism or any other political system. Why did Venezuela collapse economically? Because the “communist” leader Hugo Chavez was playing capitalist games. The problem with communism is situational, it fails to identify the true problem.
Its like you can’t see the forest through the trees. I like the word conservative, because to me, it encompasses conservative economic behavior and conservative morals which are complementary. But Im afraid that many liberal behaviors have thrived in our non-communist nations from the start and they are as much to blame as communism. Why were niggers transported here in the first place by colonial (non-communist) governments? To grow drugs (tobbacco, rum, caffeine) to addict working class Europeans on, so the upper classes could live off them? That wasn’t communism.
I know you have hope for niggers and spics because there are great niggers like Candace Owens that surpass the average white. But she is a genetic outlier and she should be using her talents to raise up her own people not ours.
PostWallHelena 1 points 4 hours ago
I just think youre looking at the problem the wrong way. Blacks should never live with us. Never ever. They are at an earlier stage of evolution. We should not interact with them at all culturally or economically. Because the are so stupid and violent and selfish, manipulative whites will always try to exploit them, in any political system. Blacks deserve to live in the stone age, with technology they can create themselves. They should never be made prosperous and comfortable by technology created by whites. Likewise whites should never benefit from labor performed by blacks.
What you call communism is just one facet of a problem that I call social parasitism. There are all kinds of bureaucracies that create an opportunity for social parasites to feed off society. Wall street is full of them. After all, what is government but a corporation? We were fools to think the little corporations would ever be antithetically opposed to the big corporation. So I believe focusing on communism is short sighted and biased toward last century’s political paradigm which turned out to be wrong.
In fact the communists turned out to be right about a bunch of things, like capitolist elites (didn’t get there by merit) and usury and free markets.
If you ban communism, social parasites will learn to exploit people through capitalism. You have to build a system that does not allow social parasitism to thrive by bureaucracy.
No it was not always them. I think in some ways N. Korea is better than S. Korea, which has adopted crass commercial values like the rest of the west. Vietnam, venezuela, were always bad because of the races that live there. We have got to stop thinking that the problem with venezuala is its government policies. The problem with Venezuela is Venezuelans. They can’t be fixed and aren’t capable of making a nice country under democratic capitalism or any other political system. Why did Venezuela collapse economically? Because the “communist” leader Hugo Chavez was playing capitalist games. The problem with communism is situational, it fails to identify the true problem.
Its like you can’t see the forest through the trees. I like the word conservative, because to me, it encompasses conservative economic behavior and conservative morals which are complementary. But Im afraid that many liberal behaviors have thrived in our non-communist nations from the start and they are as much to blame as communism. Why were niggers transported here in the first place by colonial (non-communist) governments? To grow drugs (tobbacco, rum, caffeine) to addict working class Europeans on, so the upper classes could live off them? That wasn’t communism.
I know you have hope for niggers and spics because there are great niggers like Candace Owens that surpass the average white. But she is a genetic outlier and she should be using her talents to raise up her own people not ours.