People 'believe' all sorts of things. If YOU believe something unprovable, its religion. If you don't believe something unprovable but believed to be so by others, that's superstition.
As an example, consider Buddhism, a set of beliefs and practices accepted by millions. But it's far away and misunderstood here, so it might be considered superstition. Beliefs and practices we are taught as children, that's religion.
Religion and superstition do not come to us naturally; they are taught. Same with belief and trust in government. Is belief in the need for government not also at its root a superstition, the most widely accepted superstition of them all?
How is Superstition and Religion not the same thing?
a) Nature implies same; each thing within implies different from one another. One cannot perceive sameness; only moving differences, which a jew tempts gentiles to ignore for suggested "likeness".
b) Religion/religio - "to bind anew" implies binding ones free will of choice to a chosen ones suggestion.
c) Superstition for gentiles implies believing or disbelieving either side (true or false) of any religious suggestion, while superstition for a jew implies super (above) stare (to stand) aka standing above gentiles.
People 'believe' all sorts of things.
To believe implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, which is how few (jew) sort many (gentiles) together, by tricking them to give "alike" consent to "different" beliefs without realizing it.
something unprovable
Proof/prove is in the pudding/putting...being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death), so one cannot prove anything when everything moves; yet one can discern self as being put within motion.
A jew tricks gentiles to seek proves from one another's suggestions; which they hold onto as either true or false, while ignoring that nature moves all perceivable through each ones perception, and since it moves...one cannot hold onto it.
If you don't believe something unprovable but believed to be so by others, that's superstition.
For gentiles only, who fight each other within conflicts of reason like...belief vs disbelief; true vs false; yes vs no; prove vs denial etc. A superstitious jew "standing above" the submissive gentiles; controls both sides of every conflict of reason by simply not choosing to hold onto a side when utilizing talmudic reasoning aka the deliberate contradiction of both sides reasoning.
buddhism
A jew suggests the -ism (buddhism) which shapes any consenting gentile into an -ist (buddhist)...doing that tempts gentiles to ignore the implication of buddha/bheudh -"to be aware".
If one consents to a suggestion; then one corrupts ones perception, hence becoming unaware. A jew governs the minds of unaware gentiles.
Beliefs and practices we are taught as children, that's religion.
Each child consenting to suggested beliefs and practices implies religion aka response (re) to being bound (ligo). A jew utilizes suggestion to trick each gentiles free will of choice into bondage by consent.
This works so great that gentile partents are unknowingly tempting their own children into bondage, way before the jewish state institutions can effortlessly take over their consenting order followers.
Religion and superstition do not come to us naturally; they are taught.
Indeed. Nature moves through each being and cannot be held onto (perceivable inspiration); artifice is shaped among beings within nature and tempts each other to hold onto it (suggested information).
belief and trust in government
Belief and trust imply ones consent to any suggestion by another, which when given...governs ones mind (govern-ment).
Is belief in the need
Belief implies wanting to hold onto suggested; while ignoring needing to let go of perceivable. A jew suggests beliefs to tempt gentiles into a want vs not want conflicts of reason about suggested information, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
Is belief in the need for government not also at its root a superstition
Ones free will of choice to ignore need (perception) for want (suggestion) spreads the roots of mind control (govern-ment) over many onto few.
Nature sets each ones free will of choice as option (life) into necessity (inception towards death) aka one wants to live; yet needs to die. The more one resists want over need; the more resilient one becomes to temptation.
A jew inverts nature with artificial "put options", hence tempting ones choice with a chosen ones suggested options to choose from.
For example...if a jew suggests McDonalds vs Burger King, then gentiles are tempted into a want vs not want conflict, while ignoring natural hunger (need) for artificial appetite (want).
ImplicationOverReason 0 points 6 hours ago
a) Nature implies same; each thing within implies different from one another. One cannot perceive sameness; only moving differences, which a jew tempts gentiles to ignore for suggested "likeness".
b) Religion/religio - "to bind anew" implies binding ones free will of choice to a chosen ones suggestion.
c) Superstition for gentiles implies believing or disbelieving either side (true or false) of any religious suggestion, while superstition for a jew implies super (above) stare (to stand) aka standing above gentiles.
To believe implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, which is how few (jew) sort many (gentiles) together, by tricking them to give "alike" consent to "different" beliefs without realizing it.
Proof/prove is in the pudding/putting...being implies form (life) within flow (inception towards death), so one cannot prove anything when everything moves; yet one can discern self as being put within motion.
A jew tricks gentiles to seek proves from one another's suggestions; which they hold onto as either true or false, while ignoring that nature moves all perceivable through each ones perception, and since it moves...one cannot hold onto it.
For gentiles only, who fight each other within conflicts of reason like...belief vs disbelief; true vs false; yes vs no; prove vs denial etc. A superstitious jew "standing above" the submissive gentiles; controls both sides of every conflict of reason by simply not choosing to hold onto a side when utilizing talmudic reasoning aka the deliberate contradiction of both sides reasoning.
A jew suggests the -ism (buddhism) which shapes any consenting gentile into an -ist (buddhist)...doing that tempts gentiles to ignore the implication of buddha/bheudh -"to be aware".
If one consents to a suggestion; then one corrupts ones perception, hence becoming unaware. A jew governs the minds of unaware gentiles.
Each child consenting to suggested beliefs and practices implies religion aka response (re) to being bound (ligo). A jew utilizes suggestion to trick each gentiles free will of choice into bondage by consent.
This works so great that gentile partents are unknowingly tempting their own children into bondage, way before the jewish state institutions can effortlessly take over their consenting order followers.
Indeed. Nature moves through each being and cannot be held onto (perceivable inspiration); artifice is shaped among beings within nature and tempts each other to hold onto it (suggested information).
Belief and trust imply ones consent to any suggestion by another, which when given...governs ones mind (govern-ment).
Belief implies wanting to hold onto suggested; while ignoring needing to let go of perceivable. A jew suggests beliefs to tempt gentiles into a want vs not want conflicts of reason about suggested information, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
Ones free will of choice to ignore need (perception) for want (suggestion) spreads the roots of mind control (govern-ment) over many onto few.
Nature sets each ones free will of choice as option (life) into necessity (inception towards death) aka one wants to live; yet needs to die. The more one resists want over need; the more resilient one becomes to temptation.
A jew inverts nature with artificial "put options", hence tempting ones choice with a chosen ones suggested options to choose from.
For example...if a jew suggests McDonalds vs Burger King, then gentiles are tempted into a want vs not want conflict, while ignoring natural hunger (need) for artificial appetite (want).