Nothing is more enigmatic to me than the future of Israel. I know for a fact that it will stop existing soon, but how that will happen (and the sheer destruction that will follow the world) is beyond me.
Israel strikes (for the 100th time) a line of civilians in Gaza waiting for food aid. Once they are done massacring Palestinians they can finally move on to other Amalek, such as ourselves.
Death is just a normal day for these people, they are unable to feel distress anymore. Might as well reveal the Jewish behavior to the rest of the world, so they know what awaits them too.
Why do you guys expect every single historical event to be written and available? And why do you pretend like the absence of evidence is the evidence of absence? Bible mentions A LOT OF historical events, many of which have been proven and many of which will naturally be out of our reach. Let's say we have direct mentions of the Exodus and David in records (we do indeed have for the latter btw), will you demand one for Adam's existence as well?
I have a bad habit of using Caucasian and Middle Eastern interchangeably, in large because the 2 populations are intertwined/close enough that they are sometimes considered regional variants of a broader Iran-Caucasus genetic continuum rather than fundamentally separate populations. I know geographically this place belongs to both Europe and Asia, but - while possessing their own unique differences - modern Caucasian people like Georgians still cluster way closer to Middle Eastern populations than to Europeans. Many autosomal dna tests even lazily clump them together. Heck, my own results are miles closer to Georgians than to you Europeans.
>The majority of the ancestors of CHG, Dzudzuana and Anatolian farmers came from further north prior to the LGM
I'm pretty sure that the bulk of their ancestry is pre-LGM even if their supposed roots are from the North. Otherwise you may as claim that modern Hungarians are of Asiatic stock, when they are genetically identical to their neighbors. To think of, you have Pajeets make this claim about themselves too. "We wuz originally Aryans from Europe, and it still makes up most of our genes!"
Although either way we shouldn't be bothered, we are bound to our ancestors rather than the land they first emerged from. It's the same to me whether my ancestors came from Europe or Asia, and i hope this holds true for you as well.
>Middle easterners, north africans, turks, persians are all heavily descended from CHG
Reality check: CHG is most present in the proximity of Caucasus, outside it seldom even reaches a quarter. Most of the time the exaggarated CHG figures are due to models being unable to differentiate it from Neolithic Iranian impact. Don't try too hard, just Google dna results of other plebs. On my part, my CHG hovers around 10-15%. I mean come on, between Anatolian, Zagrosian, Hunter-Gatherer, etc, how much space does that leave us with for CHG?
>Your map is probably calculating a very specific post LGM population
I already handed over my dna data to you, which i believe to be an excellent example for our case. Here are a few more results from some of the most popular calculators:
Eurogenes:12.31%
Gedrosia:13.48%
PuntDNAL:9.3%
>groups like natufian and taforalt have high contribution from europeans of the mesolithic and upper paleolithic
Why are so many of your claims in reverse? It's as if a Japanese person is telling me that East Asians have high amount of Jap contribution, and not the other way around. Do you see how many things are wrong with that statement? Your claims boil down to most of humanity originating in Europe, then migrating to the rest of the world and making up most of their genome, good Lord. For someone who loves following the mainstream academia, you sure contradict it a lot. Normally i can't blame you for your mistakes since your environment (greatest country on Earth) doesn't provide enough intellectual stimulation to push you ahead past a certain point, but this one example so flagrantly defies common sense. Ironically you are the greatest anti-racist on this platform, since according to you the 20 figures distance between a Moroccan and Spaniard is merely illusory since they are both mostly of European stock (no need to provide a major paper, just trust me!)
>And I believe the major “innovations” to homo species were coming from homos living in colder climates
Except cold isn't the only pressure to innovate, and plenty of innovations first emerged in warm areas. There might have been instances where Northerners brought high civilization to Southerners, but there's no reason to believe this was the rule. In fact it was the latter who brought it to the former in our recorded history. You make interesting theories Hel, though unfortunately they often don't go beyond being "fascinating what if's".
>The elites who ruled ancient egypt had levantine roots which were ultimately heavily derived from CHG
To claim that your average Egyptian/Mesopotomian/Assyrian etc was of largely Near Eastern stock while the ruling elites were of Caucasus requires immense evidence! We don't need "reasonable theories" (which are subjective anyway), we need genetic findings. But good luck with that.
A couple of tips by the way:
I like to check my arguments with AI after i type them, you could do the same.
And you should work on your prose, i see you are excited to have an opportunity to share the fruits of your extensive researches but it can become really painful winnowing and organizing your thoughts. "Each word is a sin which must justify its existence" is a good advice to start with.
Gauls were a Celtic tribe you plonker, you are speaking of the Franks which only make up a fraction of the French blood. Besides Germany is a new country and there had been only 2 wars between these nations until then. Even with the HRE there were very few confrontations historically.
If the woman was afraid she wouldn't stand and watch, freaking hell. Am i speaking to a professional troll?
>All these caucasoid groups are descended from the same ancestral groups, which were ultimately (mostly) european. At some point during the mesolithic, european hunter gatherers moved into the middle east and mixed with middle eastern hunter gatherers and then mixed groups re-entered europe 8000 years ago
Biased much? There was WAY more migration to Europe from Middle East than the other way around. In fact we have no recorded large wave migration from outside Europe during the aformentioned era. The only significant wave i can think of is the Indo-European one, but even then 1)they were only partially European (half of their genome was CHG which was of Middle Eastern origin!!!) and 2)the impact they left were small (i have only about 10% of the dna for reference).
See for yourself, i have done a dna test and have little European related heritage: https://files.catbox.moe/ehdpka.png . My Gedmatch kit number is KU8743591 if you want to play around.
Put simply, modern day Europeans are a mix of native Hunter-Gatherers and Western Asians (Caucasus & Anatolia & Levant). Whereas Western Asians (and especially Middle Easterners) themselves are quite divergent, although with little European ancestry. You are essentially our younger cousins, even though it apparently comes hard to swallow for some of you... for some reason.
>The pyramid builders were more european like
Really, did every single advanced civilization in Middle East owe their success to noticeable input from Caucasus/Europe??? This is a claim you made from your "common sense" or "blurry memory", not any academic paper which you have at the moment. Civilization first emerged in this geography due to a mix of propitious factors: mostly mild climate, arable lands and rivers.
>But there may be a dysgenic process or processes that occurs when civilizations become too successful
You mentioned one reason, environmental change (although you are right for mostly the wrong reason). Another would be the curse of success, recall "good times make weak men". Ibn Khaldun famously figured this out long ago (cycles of civilizations), and it's uncanny to me seeing it happen in the West in real time.
>The megaliths were built in europe a bit earlier than the pyramids
But only one is claimed to have been built by the aliens, curious. I could stack 2 stones on top of each other and claim to be a contender too, if your bar is so low.
>The cities of cucuteni trypillia (Ukraine) were as large as any in the fertile crescent
The exception that proves the rule. But even so, their development (if at all, in certain regards) was not on the same level as Fertile Crescent ones in terms of societal and technological advancements which are the key aspects of what we consider classical civilizations. So, impressive only for its relative time and geography.
Eliack 1 point 1 month ago
Nothing is more enigmatic to me than the future of Israel. I know for a fact that it will stop existing soon, but how that will happen (and the sheer destruction that will follow the world) is beyond me.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=68179da40c0ac
Eliack 6 points 1 month ago
Israel strikes (for the 100th time) a line of civilians in Gaza waiting for food aid. Once they are done massacring Palestinians they can finally move on to other Amalek, such as ourselves.
/v/IsraelCrimes viewpost?postid=6817824bdb6b2
Eliack 6 points 1 month ago
Death is just a normal day for these people, they are unable to feel distress anymore. Might as well reveal the Jewish behavior to the rest of the world, so they know what awaits them too.
/v/IsraelCrimes viewpost?postid=6817824bdb6b2
Eliack 1 point 1 month ago
Was gonna type that Gab had blocked access to my geography. Then i click on Poast and it's the same thing. I don't like where this is going.
/v/TellTalk viewpost?postid=68177005f3092
Eliack 0 points 1 month ago
I've been trying to calm people down, don't look at me
/v/IndiaRaw viewpost?postid=68168f819515d
Eliack 2 points 1 month ago
After i die i wanna see the stats of how many times i have said the N word. Then calculate how much i have been robbed off.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=6816194d9030a
Eliack 3 points 1 month ago
I hate this retarded world
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6816378a96d7b
Eliack 1 point 1 month ago
Why do you guys expect every single historical event to be written and available? And why do you pretend like the absence of evidence is the evidence of absence? Bible mentions A LOT OF historical events, many of which have been proven and many of which will naturally be out of our reach. Let's say we have direct mentions of the Exodus and David in records (we do indeed have for the latter btw), will you demand one for Adam's existence as well?
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=6815b6a873ea9
Eliack 1 point 1 month ago
The intellectual gentlemen on Reddit told me to trust the science, i guess i will have an updated diet!
/v/news viewpost?postid=68151efd199d7
Eliack -2 points 1 month ago
>Armenian Holocaust
didn't happen but should have.
>Talaat Pasha
was of Pomak and Turkish origins
/v/jewsShowThemselves viewpost?postid=681571c4680b0
Eliack 2 points 1 month ago
Damn, it's almost like... those are majority Russian areas which were annexed into Russia proper long ago? Shocking!
/v/Ukraine viewpost?postid=681562d12e530
Eliack 0 points 1 month ago
>CHG is not of middle eastern origin
I have a bad habit of using Caucasian and Middle Eastern interchangeably, in large because the 2 populations are intertwined/close enough that they are sometimes considered regional variants of a broader Iran-Caucasus genetic continuum rather than fundamentally separate populations. I know geographically this place belongs to both Europe and Asia, but - while possessing their own unique differences - modern Caucasian people like Georgians still cluster way closer to Middle Eastern populations than to Europeans. Many autosomal dna tests even lazily clump them together. Heck, my own results are miles closer to Georgians than to you Europeans.
>The majority of the ancestors of CHG, Dzudzuana and Anatolian farmers came from further north prior to the LGM
I'm pretty sure that the bulk of their ancestry is pre-LGM even if their supposed roots are from the North. Otherwise you may as claim that modern Hungarians are of Asiatic stock, when they are genetically identical to their neighbors. To think of, you have Pajeets make this claim about themselves too. "We wuz originally Aryans from Europe, and it still makes up most of our genes!"
Although either way we shouldn't be bothered, we are bound to our ancestors rather than the land they first emerged from. It's the same to me whether my ancestors came from Europe or Asia, and i hope this holds true for you as well.
>Middle easterners, north africans, turks, persians are all heavily descended from CHG
Reality check: CHG is most present in the proximity of Caucasus, outside it seldom even reaches a quarter. Most of the time the exaggarated CHG figures are due to models being unable to differentiate it from Neolithic Iranian impact. Don't try too hard, just Google dna results of other plebs. On my part, my CHG hovers around 10-15%. I mean come on, between Anatolian, Zagrosian, Hunter-Gatherer, etc, how much space does that leave us with for CHG?
>Your map is probably calculating a very specific post LGM population
I already handed over my dna data to you, which i believe to be an excellent example for our case. Here are a few more results from some of the most popular calculators:
Eurogenes:12.31%
Gedrosia:13.48%
PuntDNAL:9.3%
>groups like natufian and taforalt have high contribution from europeans of the mesolithic and upper paleolithic
Why are so many of your claims in reverse? It's as if a Japanese person is telling me that East Asians have high amount of Jap contribution, and not the other way around. Do you see how many things are wrong with that statement? Your claims boil down to most of humanity originating in Europe, then migrating to the rest of the world and making up most of their genome, good Lord. For someone who loves following the mainstream academia, you sure contradict it a lot. Normally i can't blame you for your mistakes since your environment (greatest country on Earth) doesn't provide enough intellectual stimulation to push you ahead past a certain point, but this one example so flagrantly defies common sense. Ironically you are the greatest anti-racist on this platform, since according to you the 20 figures distance between a Moroccan and Spaniard is merely illusory since they are both mostly of European stock (no need to provide a major paper, just trust me!)
>And I believe the major “innovations” to homo species were coming from homos living in colder climates
Except cold isn't the only pressure to innovate, and plenty of innovations first emerged in warm areas. There might have been instances where Northerners brought high civilization to Southerners, but there's no reason to believe this was the rule. In fact it was the latter who brought it to the former in our recorded history. You make interesting theories Hel, though unfortunately they often don't go beyond being "fascinating what if's".
>The elites who ruled ancient egypt had levantine roots which were ultimately heavily derived from CHG
To claim that your average Egyptian/Mesopotomian/Assyrian etc was of largely Near Eastern stock while the ruling elites were of Caucasus requires immense evidence! We don't need "reasonable theories" (which are subjective anyway), we need genetic findings. But good luck with that.
A couple of tips by the way:
I like to check my arguments with AI after i type them, you could do the same.
And you should work on your prose, i see you are excited to have an opportunity to share the fruits of your extensive researches but it can become really painful winnowing and organizing your thoughts. "Each word is a sin which must justify its existence" is a good advice to start with.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJzmSYtHdc0
/v/WorldNews viewpost?postid=680f76be6668d
Eliack 1 point 1 month ago
Dumb faggot i just said they were. I'm blocking your stupid ass.
/v/History viewpost?postid=68151797e4b3c
Eliack 1 point 1 month ago
Gauls were a Celtic tribe you plonker, you are speaking of the Franks which only make up a fraction of the French blood. Besides Germany is a new country and there had been only 2 wars between these nations until then. Even with the HRE there were very few confrontations historically.
If the woman was afraid she wouldn't stand and watch, freaking hell. Am i speaking to a professional troll?
/v/History viewpost?postid=68151797e4b3c
Eliack 1 point 1 month ago
The fact her proud country got invaded by its arch rival in the most humiliating manner? What do you read from her face genious, ecstasy?
/v/History viewpost?postid=68151797e4b3c
Eliack 1 point 1 month ago
But she's white and she said the n word! We should always stick with fellow whites! We shouldn't miss an opportunity to annoy the libtards!
Morons.
/v/NiggerLoversExposed viewpost?postid=681517c7d4c97
Eliack 0 points 1 month ago
The kid will be bragging about this until the end of his life
/v/WTF viewpost?postid=6814eaf356cfd
Eliack 0 points 1 month ago
Nobody is upset the except the useless normies
/v/gaming viewpost?postid=6814e692a29a1
Eliack -9 points 1 month ago
You married too early though,like a nigger.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=681469b5d7de7
Eliack 3 points 1 month ago
Why would Jesus talk about animals he had never seen before.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=68135ee16e81a
Eliack 2 points 1 month ago
I get downvoted by the faggots here everytime i criticize Russia. Here, take these news and stick it up your ass.
/v/ClownWorld viewpost?postid=68133bc754436
Eliack 0 points 1 month ago
Kek, once those Muslims are repatriated it will be her turn instead.
/v/based_department viewpost?postid=6812ad9944377
Eliack 0 points 1 month ago
Buhaha who wrote this gold. I'm saving this.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=6811fca1555a7
Eliack 5 points 1 month ago
So happy about this! He may or not kill himself, but will certainly stop breeding.
/v/news viewpost?postid=681240b0a488b
Eliack 0 points 1 month ago*
>All these caucasoid groups are descended from the same ancestral groups, which were ultimately (mostly) european. At some point during the mesolithic, european hunter gatherers moved into the middle east and mixed with middle eastern hunter gatherers and then mixed groups re-entered europe 8000 years ago
Biased much? There was WAY more migration to Europe from Middle East than the other way around. In fact we have no recorded large wave migration from outside Europe during the aformentioned era. The only significant wave i can think of is the Indo-European one, but even then 1)they were only partially European (half of their genome was CHG which was of Middle Eastern origin!!!) and 2)the impact they left were small (i have only about 10% of the dna for reference).
See for yourself, i have done a dna test and have little European related heritage: https://files.catbox.moe/ehdpka.png . My Gedmatch kit number is KU8743591 if you want to play around.
Put simply, modern day Europeans are a mix of native Hunter-Gatherers and Western Asians (Caucasus & Anatolia & Levant). Whereas Western Asians (and especially Middle Easterners) themselves are quite divergent, although with little European ancestry. You are essentially our younger cousins, even though it apparently comes hard to swallow for some of you... for some reason.
>The pyramid builders were more european like
Really, did every single advanced civilization in Middle East owe their success to noticeable input from Caucasus/Europe??? This is a claim you made from your "common sense" or "blurry memory", not any academic paper which you have at the moment. Civilization first emerged in this geography due to a mix of propitious factors: mostly mild climate, arable lands and rivers.
>But there may be a dysgenic process or processes that occurs when civilizations become too successful
You mentioned one reason, environmental change (although you are right for mostly the wrong reason). Another would be the curse of success, recall "good times make weak men". Ibn Khaldun famously figured this out long ago (cycles of civilizations), and it's uncanny to me seeing it happen in the West in real time.
>The megaliths were built in europe a bit earlier than the pyramids
But only one is claimed to have been built by the aliens, curious. I could stack 2 stones on top of each other and claim to be a contender too, if your bar is so low.
>The cities of cucuteni trypillia (Ukraine) were as large as any in the fertile crescent
The exception that proves the rule. But even so, their development (if at all, in certain regards) was not on the same level as Fertile Crescent ones in terms of societal and technological advancements which are the key aspects of what we consider classical civilizations. So, impressive only for its relative time and geography.
/v/WorldNews viewpost?postid=680f76be6668d