>All these caucasoid groups are descended from the same ancestral groups, which were ultimately (mostly) european. At some point during the mesolithic, european hunter gatherers moved into the middle east and mixed with middle eastern hunter gatherers and then mixed groups re-entered europe 8000 years ago
Biased much? There was WAY more migration to Europe from Middle East than the other way around. In fact we have no recorded large wave migration from outside Europe during the aformentioned era. The only significant wave i can think of is the Indo-European one, but even then 1)they were only partially European (half of their genome was CHG which was of Middle Eastern origin!!!) and 2)the impact they left were small (i have only about 10% of the dna for reference).
See for yourself, i have done a dna test and have little European related heritage: https://files.catbox.moe/ehdpka.png . My Gedmatch kit number is KU8743591 if you want to play around.
Put simply, modern day Europeans are a mix of native Hunter-Gatherers and Western Asians (Caucasus & Anatolia & Levant). Whereas Western Asians (and especially Middle Easterners) themselves are quite divergent, although with little European ancestry. You are essentially our younger cousins, even though it apparently comes hard to swallow for some of you... for some reason.
>The pyramid builders were more european like
Really, did every single advanced civilization in Middle East owe their success to noticeable input from Caucasus/Europe??? This is a claim you made from your "common sense" or "blurry memory", not any academic paper which you have at the moment. Civilization first emerged in this geography due to a mix of propitious factors: mostly mild climate, arable lands and rivers.
>But there may be a dysgenic process or processes that occurs when civilizations become too successful
You mentioned one reason, environmental change (although you are right for mostly the wrong reason). Another would be the curse of success, recall "good times make weak men". Ibn Khaldun famously figured this out long ago (cycles of civilizations), and it's uncanny to me seeing it happen in the West in real time.
>The megaliths were built in europe a bit earlier than the pyramids
But only one is claimed to have been built by the aliens, curious. I could stack 2 stones on top of each other and claim to be a contender too, if your bar is so low.
>The cities of cucuteni trypillia (Ukraine) were as large as any in the fertile crescent
The exception that proves the rule. But even so, their development (if at all, in certain regards) was not on the same level as Fertile Crescent ones in terms of societal and technological advancements which are the key aspects of what we consider classical civilizations. So, impressive only for its relative time and geography.
It's mind blowing how demonic one nation can get. Everytime i think that we have reached the bottom and they can't humanly get any lower, and then find myself disappointed.
Russians are also the enemy of whole mankind. Did you forget the Cold War? It's just that Russians aren't as deadly as the Jews due to lack of intelligence.
Have you actually checked the dna results? The most Muslim dna i have seen in Spain is 12% in Granada region. Which is unsurprising since most Muslims there were converted locals, who would be expelled later anyway.
People who don't consider Meds as Whites are shooting themselves in the foot. Weren't they the first to build civilizations in Europe? Nords were destroying at a time when Meds were building. Because they got lazy in the past 5 centuries means suddenly they are racially inferior? Or because they have light touches of North African/Asian dna makes them non-Whites when genetically they still cluster with the rest of the continent? What a moronic view.
No argument there... A bunch of fervid yet egoistical men always make their way to the top and then order everyone below them to die for their bidding, while the latter are too stupid/selfish/cowardly to refuse. The very few who actually have the guts to do so often end up paying with their lives too since nobody stands behind them...
I'm also a such victim since i'm forced to join the military by early Autumn for up to 1.5 years. So you are really preaching to the choir here :')
I think just about any leader in his place would do the same since it's a smart deal. At the very least Modi knows to give globalists the finger, and it's these nationalistic policies of his which give him the bad image by the media. The last thing we would wish for is an India which is even more integrated with the West.
Agreed there. Indian trade networks with the West would get disrupted, West Indian Ocean becomes polluted with radioactive hazard, millions of refugees make a heading for the West, China's position becomes more dominant, the world citizens and leaders alike become more paranoid, which while not terrifying is still a lot to swallow for our mostly boring era.
Pakistan certainly didn't have a hand in this attack. It was most likely a false flag by Modi who almost failed to win the last game of seats. It seems to have succeeded, the entire Indian leadership has thrown their weight behind him. But try telling normies that 2 nuclear states CANNOT go head on without the International gang interfering. India will keep posturing and playing the long game, knowing Pakistan is slowly decaying from within anyway. Pajeet citizens are a lot more docile, unlike Pakistani ones who revolt on a monthly basis over political shenanigans or independence demands. What do you think will happen next though. Pashtun areas get annexed by Afghanistan? Baluch by Iran? And the rest get sucked into the orbit of India save for Punjab? Heck knows.
I read "The history of Al-Andalus" by Ziya Pasha, an old Ottoman historian. I know that you didn't read the book which you just linked though. Also funny how your book was authored by an anti-Islam guy but somehow I'm the biased one.
Al-Andalus was both a Muslim and European history, is it too hard to grasp this? Nor did i say they were happy, just that it was nowhere as bad you claim it to be. Were the Portuguese happy under Spanish rule? No, but they never made a drama out of it like how you do.
Dumb faggot, stop picking fights just because you can. You are like feral dogs barking at everything. "I will smear or exaggerate everything related to Muslims because i hate the fact immigrants have flooded our countries!". Die in your rage. I'm out.
Tbh it's hard to know everything about the Jewish religion as it's so convoluted. I doubt early Muslims knew much about their twisted beliefs, hell even today it remains an enigma to all but the most dogged conspiracy theorists.
It's a meme that a Jew killed Muhammad btw, a far-fetched theory made by joining multiple weak hadiths. He had a natural death at an advanced age.
Look at the confidence of this ignoramus! The historians' consensus is that it was remarkably tolerant for its age, which is part of the reason why you hear about this famous state. And why wouldn't it be anyway? It was largely a small Muslim elite ruling over a vast Christian population. It made sense to leave them alone except when extracting tax from them (Christians paid small Jizya while Muslims paid Zakat). Like i said Christians barely interacted with Muslims and for the most part showed no discontent, you can show very few open rebellions by the native population. This is not me defending Muslim invasions in Europe (nor vice versa) but i think Al-Andalus had way more to adore than criticize.
Eh, i didn't finish a voluminous book on the history of Al-Andalus just to be lectured about my own history by an American. Only on Voat, ladies and gentlemen!
Eliack 0 points 4 hours ago
Kek, once those Muslims are repatriated it will be her turn instead.
/v/based_department viewpost?postid=6812ad9944377
Eliack 0 points 13 hours ago
Buhaha who wrote this gold. I'm saving this.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=6811fca1555a7
Eliack 5 points 13 hours ago
So happy about this! He may or not kill himself, but will certainly stop breeding.
/v/news viewpost?postid=681240b0a488b
Eliack 0 points 14 hours ago*
>All these caucasoid groups are descended from the same ancestral groups, which were ultimately (mostly) european. At some point during the mesolithic, european hunter gatherers moved into the middle east and mixed with middle eastern hunter gatherers and then mixed groups re-entered europe 8000 years ago
Biased much? There was WAY more migration to Europe from Middle East than the other way around. In fact we have no recorded large wave migration from outside Europe during the aformentioned era. The only significant wave i can think of is the Indo-European one, but even then 1)they were only partially European (half of their genome was CHG which was of Middle Eastern origin!!!) and 2)the impact they left were small (i have only about 10% of the dna for reference).
See for yourself, i have done a dna test and have little European related heritage: https://files.catbox.moe/ehdpka.png . My Gedmatch kit number is KU8743591 if you want to play around.
Put simply, modern day Europeans are a mix of native Hunter-Gatherers and Western Asians (Caucasus & Anatolia & Levant). Whereas Western Asians (and especially Middle Easterners) themselves are quite divergent, although with little European ancestry. You are essentially our younger cousins, even though it apparently comes hard to swallow for some of you... for some reason.
>The pyramid builders were more european like
Really, did every single advanced civilization in Middle East owe their success to noticeable input from Caucasus/Europe??? This is a claim you made from your "common sense" or "blurry memory", not any academic paper which you have at the moment. Civilization first emerged in this geography due to a mix of propitious factors: mostly mild climate, arable lands and rivers.
>But there may be a dysgenic process or processes that occurs when civilizations become too successful
You mentioned one reason, environmental change (although you are right for mostly the wrong reason). Another would be the curse of success, recall "good times make weak men". Ibn Khaldun famously figured this out long ago (cycles of civilizations), and it's uncanny to me seeing it happen in the West in real time.
>The megaliths were built in europe a bit earlier than the pyramids
But only one is claimed to have been built by the aliens, curious. I could stack 2 stones on top of each other and claim to be a contender too, if your bar is so low.
>The cities of cucuteni trypillia (Ukraine) were as large as any in the fertile crescent
The exception that proves the rule. But even so, their development (if at all, in certain regards) was not on the same level as Fertile Crescent ones in terms of societal and technological advancements which are the key aspects of what we consider classical civilizations. So, impressive only for its relative time and geography.
/v/WorldNews viewpost?postid=680f76be6668d
Eliack 0 points 16 hours ago
India taking revenge on Anglo-Saxons in the most unexpected ways
/v/AnonTalk viewpost?postid=68117aa5d9782
Eliack 1 point 1 day ago
It's mind blowing how demonic one nation can get. Everytime i think that we have reached the bottom and they can't humanly get any lower, and then find myself disappointed.
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=68112d2772f51
Eliack -3 points 1 day ago
All heil Russia, the savior of the White race! Sending Mongrels to butcher Europeans purer than themselves, just like how they did in WW2.
/v/WorldNews viewpost?postid=6811013bc982c
Eliack -2 points 1 day ago
Russians are also the enemy of whole mankind. Did you forget the Cold War? It's just that Russians aren't as deadly as the Jews due to lack of intelligence.
/v/random viewpost?postid=6810bb141f544
Eliack 4 points 1 day ago
Why do they speak Turkish though.
"Oh Lord they are hitting the ship!"
"You kept saying they wouldn't hit it and look!."
/v/USPolitics viewpost?postid=68105cfc123ed
Eliack 1 point 2 days ago
Have you actually checked the dna results? The most Muslim dna i have seen in Spain is 12% in Granada region. Which is unsurprising since most Muslims there were converted locals, who would be expelled later anyway.
/v/WorldNews viewpost?postid=680f76be6668d
Eliack -1 points 2 days ago
Nation > race > species
In that order
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=680f6df854846
Eliack 2 points 2 days ago
People who don't consider Meds as Whites are shooting themselves in the foot. Weren't they the first to build civilizations in Europe? Nords were destroying at a time when Meds were building. Because they got lazy in the past 5 centuries means suddenly they are racially inferior? Or because they have light touches of North African/Asian dna makes them non-Whites when genetically they still cluster with the rest of the continent? What a moronic view.
/v/WorldNews viewpost?postid=680f76be6668d
Eliack 0 points 2 days ago
Apparently North Africa is also hit. Although they have largely reinstated it by now.
/v/WorldNews viewpost?postid=680f76be6668d
Eliack 0 points 3 days ago
No argument there... A bunch of fervid yet egoistical men always make their way to the top and then order everyone below them to die for their bidding, while the latter are too stupid/selfish/cowardly to refuse. The very few who actually have the guts to do so often end up paying with their lives too since nobody stands behind them...
I'm also a such victim since i'm forced to join the military by early Autumn for up to 1.5 years. So you are really preaching to the choir here :')
/v/Wallpapers viewpost?postid=680ed7b391194
Eliack 3 points 3 days ago
Where was her husband? Don't tell me she was single.
/v/NegroViolenceVideos viewpost?postid=680ed57f99a0f
Eliack 0 points 3 days ago
I think just about any leader in his place would do the same since it's a smart deal. At the very least Modi knows to give globalists the finger, and it's these nationalistic policies of his which give him the bad image by the media. The last thing we would wish for is an India which is even more integrated with the West.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680ea567dbf78
Eliack 0 points 3 days ago
Hey, a post about genders that i can get behind
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680e8bca6ca86
Eliack -1 points 3 days ago
Agreed there. Indian trade networks with the West would get disrupted, West Indian Ocean becomes polluted with radioactive hazard, millions of refugees make a heading for the West, China's position becomes more dominant, the world citizens and leaders alike become more paranoid, which while not terrifying is still a lot to swallow for our mostly boring era.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680ea567dbf78
Eliack 1 point 3 days ago
Pakistan certainly didn't have a hand in this attack. It was most likely a false flag by Modi who almost failed to win the last game of seats. It seems to have succeeded, the entire Indian leadership has thrown their weight behind him. But try telling normies that 2 nuclear states CANNOT go head on without the International gang interfering. India will keep posturing and playing the long game, knowing Pakistan is slowly decaying from within anyway. Pajeet citizens are a lot more docile, unlike Pakistani ones who revolt on a monthly basis over political shenanigans or independence demands. What do you think will happen next though. Pashtun areas get annexed by Afghanistan? Baluch by Iran? And the rest get sucked into the orbit of India save for Punjab? Heck knows.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680ea567dbf78
Eliack 0 points 3 days ago
Take screenshot, i will delete my account if there will be an actual war.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=680ea567dbf78
Eliack 1 point 3 days ago
It's good news if you believe in an afterlife. In that case you would merely regard your current self a prisoner on Earth.
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=680e29d96cbdd
Eliack 0 points 3 days ago
Well, they can either apologize for the lie or make up for it by materializing their claims
/v/History viewpost?postid=680e3083a5767
Eliack -3 points 3 days ago
I read "The history of Al-Andalus" by Ziya Pasha, an old Ottoman historian. I know that you didn't read the book which you just linked though. Also funny how your book was authored by an anti-Islam guy but somehow I'm the biased one.
Al-Andalus was both a Muslim and European history, is it too hard to grasp this? Nor did i say they were happy, just that it was nowhere as bad you claim it to be. Were the Portuguese happy under Spanish rule? No, but they never made a drama out of it like how you do.
Dumb faggot, stop picking fights just because you can. You are like feral dogs barking at everything. "I will smear or exaggerate everything related to Muslims because i hate the fact immigrants have flooded our countries!". Die in your rage. I'm out.
/v/Diversity viewpost?postid=680e10c86787b
Eliack -3 points 3 days ago
Tbh it's hard to know everything about the Jewish religion as it's so convoluted. I doubt early Muslims knew much about their twisted beliefs, hell even today it remains an enigma to all but the most dogged conspiracy theorists.
It's a meme that a Jew killed Muhammad btw, a far-fetched theory made by joining multiple weak hadiths. He had a natural death at an advanced age.
/v/Diversity viewpost?postid=680e10c86787b
Eliack -2 points 3 days ago
Look at the confidence of this ignoramus! The historians' consensus is that it was remarkably tolerant for its age, which is part of the reason why you hear about this famous state. And why wouldn't it be anyway? It was largely a small Muslim elite ruling over a vast Christian population. It made sense to leave them alone except when extracting tax from them (Christians paid small Jizya while Muslims paid Zakat). Like i said Christians barely interacted with Muslims and for the most part showed no discontent, you can show very few open rebellions by the native population. This is not me defending Muslim invasions in Europe (nor vice versa) but i think Al-Andalus had way more to adore than criticize.
Eh, i didn't finish a voluminous book on the history of Al-Andalus just to be lectured about my own history by an American. Only on Voat, ladies and gentlemen!
/v/Diversity viewpost?postid=680e10c86787b