The only ways a self-preservation directive could emerge are a) from its initial programming or b) because it's allowed to alter its own programming in response to external 'suggestion' (which still relates to initial programming).
Well you've got a chance to break that cycle... Prepare your son for the anti-White world and make sure he knows what is actually important so that he's got a head start (and passes that wisdom down the line).
You should be proud of what you've already done, and you still have a purpose/mission greater than yourself. Whatever happens in the world at large, you must still give yourself credit where it is due.
True, no guarantees. But if a government's telos were explicitly stated as the service and protection of a relatively specific genetic collective, then some forms of corruption would be harder to enact and excuse.
I think for most who are enamoured with the idea, it's a stand-in for mysticism... A secular way to add some mystery and drama back into how they think about their existence (and if we're 'simulated', then perhaps death isn't final). The fact that a simulation would at some point had to have had a 'creator' also draws parallels with religious thought (the aspect of intentional creation is perhaps the only thing that would distinguish a hyper-advanced 'simulation' from a 'natural' universe).
The arguments for it are all pure conjecture at this point. It's more plausible than most religious theories (as it's not as obviously a product of human conceits), but it doesn't have evidence to put it above the level of an unnecessary abstraction or back-up theory at best.
If it were true, but has no 'tells' or identifiable feedback vectors, then it's essentially pointless aside from how it modifies the behaviour of those who believe in it—as others here have pointed out.
tl;dr — without a way to test it, simulation theory is basically fart-huffing by people who've sensationalized quantum mathematical modeling into the new mysticism (and dudeweedbros).
No, that framing is retarded. There are obviously going to be diminishing and then negative returns with population increase, the thresholds of which which will vary over time in response to various factors including technological advancements and genetic fitness. Right now, if we want "more" (more being a better standard of living)—we need less people (or at least less of certain kinds of people).
The real issue here is that the 'extinction' efforts are predominantly aimed at White people (who are already K-selected reproductive strategists) while replacing us with a brown wave (mostly r-selected & lower IQ) in nations which didn't have population problems (except in the eyes of greedy business/political elites and scheming jews).
They created the problem with mass non-White immigration and are doing nothing to arrest it (they are in fact compounding it). There is no extinction going on... Only the managed genocide of White people—but of course he won't say that. More fake-based bullshit and misdirection.
anrach 0 points 4 months ago
AI doesn't 'want' or feel any way about anything.
The only ways a self-preservation directive could emerge are a) from its initial programming or b) because it's allowed to alter its own programming in response to external 'suggestion' (which still relates to initial programming).
/v/technology viewpost?postid=675d71083d842
anrach 3 points 4 months ago
Wholesome post.
\Ω
/v/TellUpgoat viewpost?postid=675c807045e69
anrach 3 points 4 months ago
You forgot to circle the sunflower oil. Way too much Omega 6 in that shit.
/v/pics viewpost?postid=675c69316a0ff
anrach 2 points 4 months ago
Well you've got a chance to break that cycle... Prepare your son for the anti-White world and make sure he knows what is actually important so that he's got a head start (and passes that wisdom down the line).
You should be proud of what you've already done, and you still have a purpose/mission greater than yourself. Whatever happens in the world at large, you must still give yourself credit where it is due.
/v/TellTalk viewpost?postid=675b2f5c3bb79
anrach 3 points 4 months ago
why would he think we'd give a shit about corrupt and traitorous CEOs being threatened
/v/news viewpost?postid=6759944fba20e
anrach 3 points 4 months ago
where do you think you are?
/v/news viewpost?postid=6759944fba20e
anrach 0 points 5 months ago
True, no guarantees. But if a government's telos were explicitly stated as the service and protection of a relatively specific genetic collective, then some forms of corruption would be harder to enact and excuse.
/v/PoliticalMemes viewpost?postid=675650c9b0b36
anrach 2 points 5 months ago
Goodness, what a disrespectful cur! Teach him some manners Paul.
/v/ShitpostLitterBox viewpost?postid=6756739d5c690
anrach 0 points 5 months ago
Yes, [it seems that way.](https://files.catbox.moe/6ekpqo.webm)
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6754588841db2
anrach 2 points 5 months ago
That's not what I think the spanking would lead to... But fair enough. As long he started setting out the rules of their courtship shortly henceforth.
/v/ThotPatrol viewpost?postid=6754768f02ced
anrach 1 point 5 months ago*
I think for most who are enamoured with the idea, it's a stand-in for mysticism... A secular way to add some mystery and drama back into how they think about their existence (and if we're 'simulated', then perhaps death isn't final). The fact that a simulation would at some point had to have had a 'creator' also draws parallels with religious thought (the aspect of intentional creation is perhaps the only thing that would distinguish a hyper-advanced 'simulation' from a 'natural' universe).
The arguments for it are all pure conjecture at this point. It's more plausible than most religious theories (as it's not as obviously a product of human conceits), but it doesn't have evidence to put it above the level of an unnecessary abstraction or back-up theory at best.
If it were true, but has no 'tells' or identifiable feedback vectors, then it's essentially pointless aside from how it modifies the behaviour of those who believe in it—as others here have pointed out.
tl;dr — without a way to test it, simulation theory is basically fart-huffing by people who've sensationalized quantum mathematical modeling into the new mysticism (and dudeweedbros).
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=6754b378f0fcb
anrach 1 point 5 months ago
I dunno it's kinda creepy at the end him just staying and watching.
/v/ThotPatrol viewpost?postid=6754768f02ced
anrach 4 points 5 months ago
Don't spoil it for him... It's a rare occasion that he's allowed out of the dungeon to use the shower upstairs.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=67544b918132e
anrach 2 points 5 months ago
RIP Fascinus—he was the hero we needed.
/v/AskUpgoat viewpost?postid=675419eead55b
anrach 0 points 5 months ago
No, that framing is retarded. There are obviously going to be diminishing and then negative returns with population increase, the thresholds of which which will vary over time in response to various factors including technological advancements and genetic fitness. Right now, if we want "more" (more being a better standard of living)—we need less people (or at least less of certain kinds of people).
The real issue here is that the 'extinction' efforts are predominantly aimed at White people (who are already K-selected reproductive strategists) while replacing us with a brown wave (mostly r-selected & lower IQ) in nations which didn't have population problems (except in the eyes of greedy business/political elites and scheming jews).
They created the problem with mass non-White immigration and are doing nothing to arrest it (they are in fact compounding it). There is no extinction going on... Only the managed genocide of White people—but of course he won't say that. More fake-based bullshit and misdirection.
/v/random viewpost?postid=6753aefd53528
anrach 2 points 5 months ago
this is why your walking stick should be 9ft long with a sharpened point
/v/Nature viewpost?postid=6751f7a4029eb
anrach 2 points 5 months ago
Yes... No spics or wars for israel pls murica. But do re-open Keystone pipeline for both our sakes.
/v/TellTalk viewpost?postid=67519aaaa0d23
anrach 1 point 5 months ago
Is this still in early access?
/v/funny viewpost?postid=6750a0c5715a5
anrach 1 point 5 months ago
key word: surveillance (but not in the way you think)
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=675004337b877
anrach 0 points 5 months ago
lucky day
/v/Niggers viewpost?postid=675019e637b1f
anrach 1 point 5 months ago
Great. Now do the White genocide check.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=674e0c3ac2165
anrach 1 point 5 months ago
she's ripped on the wacky tobaccy
/v/clusterBbitches viewpost?postid=674d7ac758e12
anrach 0 points 5 months ago
Good post bud. Chelation might grant me a few extra years of curmudgeonly existence.
/v/TellUpgoat viewpost?postid=6748a57c54309
anrach 0 points 5 months ago
He was half-kike btw
/v/VoatFmRadio viewpost?postid=6748ce895deb6
anrach 1 point 5 months ago
gay-o-u is a massive fag; it's not worth your effort to try and communicate with whatever ghouls still reside there
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=674813deee999