The retards here genuinely believe you are me. They are referring to all of my flat earth fact posts as trolling and they think you are one of my alts. Low iq kikes we are dealing with
Contain them to lands showcased on the fake globe, making people believe antarctica is an icy shithole so nobody explores and finds more land or resources, which admiral byrd has already talked about in his 1940 expeditions.
Nasa makes over 60 million per day from tax payers to produce cgi and cartoons.
All of your posts rely on the scientific establishment, mainly NASA. Post a single proof that doesnt. Should be simple considering there is a "myriad" of them according to you.
> I dont trust scientific establishment. The shape of the earth can be proven in myriad ways without relying on the scientific establishment
Yes. I dont trust a 2000 year old experiment that assumes the sun to be millions of miles away.
Instead I can do a simple experiment of going to ky local beach and using a telescope and binoculars to look at the islands that are 25km and 45km away.
Using simple spherical trig we can determine how much of earth should be curving away, hiding the shoreline of those 2 islands.
Except in reality when we measure for this curvature, there is zero. I can see the waves meet at the shoreline of both islands.
Pretty funny how there is supposedly a myriad of proofs but you have to rely on a 2000 year old fable.
Pre-placed explosives. I don't deny this theory I just don't have any conclusive evidence for it. I do remember the most likely theory was that days prior to 9/11 the towers were painted and people had assumed that they had planted thermal explosives during this time. However it is pure speculation as I couldn't gather any solid evidence on it unlike the remotely flown aircrafts. Sandniggers with boxcutters didn't have to hijack planes, the technology to remotely hijack the planes was already in place.
> Again, if the Earth was flat centered around a north pole, the distance between the lines of longitude would be greater at 60°south latitude than at the equator.
Incorrect. You're basing all of this of 1887 maritime navigation using square grid maps. To top it of the new age science priests of heliocentrism now posit earth to be a pear shape or an oblate spheroid. Rendering any of your globular theoretical equations to be thrown out by the wayside. You are promoting an archaic and outdated belief in a perfect globular earth. Get up to speed with the program smol brain.
> I'm showing you that the flat earth model with a north pole center is stupid as fuck.
By basing it of 1887 square grid chart navigation. Do you think those old cartographers in the 17th century were using "Russian GPS" to calculate and map longitude and latitude?
Notice how the device doesn't account for the 25,000 mile circumference of earth?
> The U.S. Aeronautical Information Manual states, presumably referring to high altitude DME transponders: "reliable signals may be received at distances up to 199 nautical miles [369 km] at line−of−sight altitude"
Using basic spherical trigonometry https://files.catbox.moe/sm1v4b.jpg
There should be at least 6 miles of curvature/earth in the way of those signals. This technology can only exist and operate on Earth being a stationary flat plane.
> Again, if the Earth was flat centered around a north pole, the distance between the lines of longitude would be greater at 60°south latitude than at the equator.
Incorrect. You're basing all of this of 1887 maritime navigation using square grid maps. To top it of the new age science priests of heliocentrism now posit earth to be a pear shape or an oblate spheroid. Rendering any of your globular theoretical equations to be thrown out by the wayside. You are promoting an archaic and outdated belief in a perfect globular earth. Get up to speed with the program smol brain.
I know the earth is flat through use of odometers and modern technology for measuring distance. Absolutely zero percent of measurable curvature on this earthly plane.
> the guy who wrote that piece is complaining about using a square grid map to navigate.
That's only one part of it you disingenuous nigger faggot. He goes on to draw conclusions about the shape of the earth based on scientific tests conducted with plumblines and pendulums. Flat, motionless plane.
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -2 points 2.6 years ago
"trust the experts"
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=632444ee96a94
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -1 points 2.6 years ago
The retards here genuinely believe you are me. They are referring to all of my flat earth fact posts as trolling and they think you are one of my alts. Low iq kikes we are dealing with
/v/MeanwhileOnScored viewpost?postid=63223bd238ab6
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -1 points 2.6 years ago
(((White man)))
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=632120b9cc8eb
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded 0 points 2.6 years ago
> Where is the ulterior motive for deception?
Control peoples worldview
Contain them to lands showcased on the fake globe, making people believe antarctica is an icy shithole so nobody explores and finds more land or resources, which admiral byrd has already talked about in his 1940 expeditions.
Nasa makes over 60 million per day from tax payers to produce cgi and cartoons.
Lots of other motives to go along.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=631ff22ee67f5
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -1 points 2.6 years ago
All of your posts rely on the scientific establishment, mainly NASA. Post a single proof that doesnt. Should be simple considering there is a "myriad" of them according to you.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=631ff22ee67f5
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded 0 points 2.6 years ago
> I dont trust scientific establishment. The shape of the earth can be proven in myriad ways without relying on the scientific establishment
Yes. I dont trust a 2000 year old experiment that assumes the sun to be millions of miles away.
Instead I can do a simple experiment of going to ky local beach and using a telescope and binoculars to look at the islands that are 25km and 45km away.
Using simple spherical trig we can determine how much of earth should be curving away, hiding the shoreline of those 2 islands.
Except in reality when we measure for this curvature, there is zero. I can see the waves meet at the shoreline of both islands.
Pretty funny how there is supposedly a myriad of proofs but you have to rely on a 2000 year old fable.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=631ff22ee67f5
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -2 points 2.6 years ago
This is even rarer than a dingo eating a baby, mate.
/v/Australia viewpost?postid=63201c5594229
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -2 points 2.6 years ago
Can you view a bus from 50 miles away? Now double that distance and you think you can view a satellite?
Ok tard.
/v/Space viewpost?postid=631fdc4385983
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded 1 point 2.6 years ago
> The shape of the earth can be proven in myriad ways
Go ahead and post a proof
/v/funny viewpost?postid=631ff22ee67f5
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -2 points 2.6 years ago
Until we bring up space or the shape of the earth.
Then you hypocritical faggots begin to trust the experts and their science.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=631ff22ee67f5
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -1 points 2.6 years ago
The whole gang is here
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=631fd34772ae5
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -2 points 2.7 years ago
> No. They are using the current globe model
Which is completely based of 15th - 17th century cartography.
> are accurate to within 3", even in the southern hemisphere.
According to what calculations? What experiments can you source that showcase this accuracy?
> You're a disingenuous fucking nigger.
Project more.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=631f28d0ed402
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -2 points 2.7 years ago
The system of latitude and longitude, a geographical coordinate system developed by the Greeks, is used by cartographers for describing location.
> You're basing all of this of 1887 maritime navigation using square grid maps
Do you think map cartographers in the 15th - 17th century were using Russian GPS to navigate?
Smol brain.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=631f28d0ed402
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -2 points 2.7 years ago
Interesting. Thanks for the information mate.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=631f146bd45cd
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded 2 points 2.7 years ago
Pre-placed explosives. I don't deny this theory I just don't have any conclusive evidence for it. I do remember the most likely theory was that days prior to 9/11 the towers were painted and people had assumed that they had planted thermal explosives during this time. However it is pure speculation as I couldn't gather any solid evidence on it unlike the remotely flown aircrafts. Sandniggers with boxcutters didn't have to hijack planes, the technology to remotely hijack the planes was already in place.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=631ecc26dcbc3
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded 3 points 2.7 years ago
Feds/Mossad, Tomato/Tomato.
What's the difference? Both uphold their allegiance to Israel above any other nation.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=631ecc26dcbc3
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -2 points 2.7 years ago
> Again, if the Earth was flat centered around a north pole, the distance between the lines of longitude would be greater at 60°south latitude than at the equator.
Incorrect. You're basing all of this of 1887 maritime navigation using square grid maps. To top it of the new age science priests of heliocentrism now posit earth to be a pear shape or an oblate spheroid. Rendering any of your globular theoretical equations to be thrown out by the wayside. You are promoting an archaic and outdated belief in a perfect globular earth. Get up to speed with the program smol brain.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hq7T2H6jwlg
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=631f28d0ed402
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -2 points 2.7 years ago
> I'm showing you that the flat earth model with a north pole center is stupid as fuck.
By basing it of 1887 square grid chart navigation. Do you think those old cartographers in the 17th century were using "Russian GPS" to calculate and map longitude and latitude?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=631f1c286c824
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -3 points 2.7 years ago
Notice how the device doesn't account for the 25,000 mile circumference of earth?
> The U.S. Aeronautical Information Manual states, presumably referring to high altitude DME transponders: "reliable signals may be received at distances up to 199 nautical miles [369 km] at line−of−sight altitude"
Using basic spherical trigonometry https://files.catbox.moe/sm1v4b.jpg
There should be at least 6 miles of curvature/earth in the way of those signals. This technology can only exist and operate on Earth being a stationary flat plane.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=631f1bfaf39b5
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -4 points 2.7 years ago
> When you can't answer the question, duck, dodge, Bob, weave, cope and seeth.
Project more nigger faggot. Project more.
https://www.talk.lol/viewpost?postid=631f1bfaf39b5&commentid=631f22e6c75f2
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=631f1c286c824
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -6 points 2.7 years ago*
I'm not the one who thinks boats disappear over some mystical edge like globetards believe in.
Do you think the old cartographers in the 15th - 17th centuries used Russian GPS to calculate longitude and latitude?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=631f1c286c824
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -5 points 2.7 years ago
> Again, if the Earth was flat centered around a north pole, the distance between the lines of longitude would be greater at 60°south latitude than at the equator.
Incorrect. You're basing all of this of 1887 maritime navigation using square grid maps. To top it of the new age science priests of heliocentrism now posit earth to be a pear shape or an oblate spheroid. Rendering any of your globular theoretical equations to be thrown out by the wayside. You are promoting an archaic and outdated belief in a perfect globular earth. Get up to speed with the program smol brain.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hq7T2H6jwlg
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=631f1bfaf39b5
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -2 points 2.7 years ago
> like odometers.
I know the earth is flat through use of odometers and modern technology for measuring distance. Absolutely zero percent of measurable curvature on this earthly plane.
> the guy who wrote that piece is complaining about using a square grid map to navigate.
That's only one part of it you disingenuous nigger faggot. He goes on to draw conclusions about the shape of the earth based on scientific tests conducted with plumblines and pendulums. Flat, motionless plane.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=631f146bd45cd
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -5 points 2.7 years ago
>You have to prove claims.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/XvAwLc7FZm2z/
Here is 200 proofs of a flat earth. What's your proof of a ball earth?
> Everything that faggot says, ya, probably.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2AuypcHCeC2m/
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=631f1bfaf39b5
DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded -2 points 2.7 years ago
> Why are we constrained to 1887 maritime navigation?
Yet you believe in a ball earth based on 400 year old theoretical math equations from a Catholic freemason.
Talk about irony.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=631f146bd45cd