×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
-8

Does the Earth Rotate? No! (Videobook)

submitted by DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded to whatever 2.7 yearsSep 12, 2022 07:46:02 ago (+1/-9)     (whatever)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xlN9vGVitE

In the interest of preserving for posterity the wealth of flat Earth knowledge and research done during the late 19th and early 20th century, I will be starting a series of audiobook and PDF downloads to make them more easily and widely available. Today's selection is William Edgell's 1927 book, "Does the Earth Rotate? No!" Unfortunately none of the book's illustrations are available online, but if you listen and use your imagination you should be able to envision them. I have also added relevant videos and pictures throughout the presentation making it not just an audiobook, but a "videobook" documentary. You can download the full PDF here:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/poce3yblk3rev5z/DOSE%20THE%20EARTH%20ROTATE.pdf?dl=0


9 comments block


[ - ] FreeinTX 4 points 2.7 yearsSep 12, 2022 07:51:52 ago (+4/-0)

Unfortunately none of the book's illustrations are available online,

Because it's fucking made up.

[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -4 points 2.7 yearsSep 12, 2022 07:54:20 ago (+0/-4)

Everything is fake and made up ~ FreeinTX

[ - ] FreeinTX 4 points 2.7 yearsSep 12, 2022 07:56:08 ago (+4/-0)

Everything? No. Everything that faggot says, ya, probably.

You have to prove claims.

[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -5 points 2.7 yearsSep 12, 2022 07:59:17 ago (+0/-5)

You have to prove claims.


https://www.bitchute.com/video/XvAwLc7FZm2z/

Here is 200 proofs of a flat earth. What's your proof of a ball earth?

Everything that faggot says, ya, probably.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/2AuypcHCeC2m/

[ - ] FreeinTX 5 points 2.7 yearsSep 12, 2022 08:07:13 ago (+5/-0)

Oh look, disingenuous fucking nigger is trying to strawman me, yet again.

You don't prove a flat earth by trying to prove a "not round" earth.

Fucking kill yourself, you fucking faggot!

[ - ] FreeinTX 4 points 2.7 yearsSep 12, 2022 08:08:49 ago (+4/-0)

What's your proof of a ball earth?

Again, if the Earth was flat centered around a north pole, the distance between the lines of longitude would be greater at 60°south latitude than at the equator. Instead, the distance between lines of longitude at 60°S is approximately the same as the distance between the lines of longitude at 60°N latitude, and both distances are shorter than at the equator. This happens with a globe earth.

Every one of the diagrams of flat earth that have lines of longitude and concentric lines of latitude show that the distance between lines of longitude at latitudes south of the equator are larger than the distance between two lines of longitude at the equator. This is demonstrably false and you can verify that it's false sitting in front of the computer, right now.

[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -5 points 2.7 yearsSep 12, 2022 08:15:34 ago (+0/-5)

Again, if the Earth was flat centered around a north pole, the distance between the lines of longitude would be greater at 60°south latitude than at the equator.

Incorrect. You're basing all of this of 1887 maritime navigation using square grid maps. To top it of the new age science priests of heliocentrism now posit earth to be a pear shape or an oblate spheroid. Rendering any of your globular theoretical equations to be thrown out by the wayside. You are promoting an archaic and outdated belief in a perfect globular earth. Get up to speed with the program smol brain.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hq7T2H6jwlg

[ - ] FreeinTX 3 points 2.7 yearsSep 12, 2022 08:25:44 ago (+3/-0)

Gee, if there was only some way we could measure distances with technology that exists post 1887.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distance_measuring_equipment

[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -3 points 2.7 yearsSep 12, 2022 08:33:53 ago (+0/-3)

Notice how the device doesn't account for the 25,000 mile circumference of earth?

The U.S. Aeronautical Information Manual states, presumably referring to high altitude DME transponders: "reliable signals may be received at distances up to 199 nautical miles [369 km] at line−of−sight altitude"

Using basic spherical trigonometry https://files.catbox.moe/sm1v4b.jpg

There should be at least 6 miles of curvature/earth in the way of those signals. This technology can only exist and operate on Earth being a stationary flat plane.