Chicken Alfredo is a dream-team combination of juicy, golden-brown slices of chicken breast and long, slurp-able strands of thick fettuccine pasta in a luxuriant creamy Alfredo pasta sauce. Brown and cook the chicken in a skillet, then make the sauce in the same pan, using just heavy cream, butter, garlic and Parmesan cheese. Learn how to make this Italian restaurant-style dish at home — it cooks in about 25 minutes, and is much easier to make than you might think!
Super-luxe is the best way to describe chicken Alfredo pasta. I mean, next to cheesy cacio e pepe, what’s better than rich, creamy sauce coating thick pasta strands and slices of juicy chicken?
This pasta dinner recipe is always a family favorite. It’s definitely rich-tasting and indulgent, something of a treat to cook at home, along with homemade pasta carbonara and real-deal penne alla vodka.
I worked in homestyle Italian restaurants when I was learning to cook. Any kind of creamy pasta with Alfredo sauce with chicken, shrimp or salmon added to them were always a hit with customers. And along the way, I learned there’s really nothing complicated involved to make it. I’m happy to share the “secret” to nailing this fantastic chicken pasta recipe.
What you need to make the recipe:
Chicken breasts: Boneless, skinless chicken breasts are seasoned with a simple rub, then seared in a skillet. They cook quickly to juicy perfection.
Seasonings: To make the savory rub for the chicken, combine garlic powder, onion powder, salt, and pepper and season the chicken breasts before cooking or up to 8 hours ahead.
Fettuccine pasta: This long, thick noodle is classic shape for making the best fettuccine Alfredo, but any long pasta shape (fresh or dried) will work in this recipe. Instead of fettuccine noodles, try linguine, spaghetti, or pappardelle.
Heavy cream: The key ingredient of the most sumptuous Alfredo sauce is heavy cream. Its high fat content creates a luscious coating for the pasta, so there’s no need to use added thickeners (such as flour or cream cheese). For that reason, milk or half-and-half won’t work for this recipe. When shopping for cream to make Alfredo sauce, choose containers labeled “heavy whipping cream” or simply “heavy cream” which has a fat content of up to 38%. Plain “whipping cream” is about 35% fat, but can also be used.
Parmesan cheese: Use the best freshly grated Parmesan you can afford, or buy a chunk of cheese and grate it yourself in a food processor or by hand using a rasp or box grater.
Butter: Use your choice of salted or unsalted butter. Good Irish or European-style butter is amazing in this recipe.
Garlic: A small clove of grated fresh garlic (about a teaspoon) infusing the cream with flavor.
Parsley: I love the fresh color and flavor that fresh parsley adds as a garnish. If you don’t have any on hand, just leave it out.
Seasoning the chicken
Before cooking the chicken and adding to the Alfredo sauce, the first step is to make a simple seasoning rub to give it lots of fla
As many generations as it takes, Amalek will be defeated. Or maybe he won't. I don't know.Go ask a zoltar machine, you act like I have answers to these mysteries.
We're gonna need some sacrificial cheesi jews come americas future government-sponsored antisemitic holocaust, in order to victim-monger for the next couple generations seeing as memory of the prior holocaust is fading.
I'll counter your argument. Acceptance isn't important, thats a forgone conclusion that I will be distrusted and treated as 'other', likewise my children and grandchildren. The first generation always is. Thats the price of entry. But my grandchildren and onward will be full-blood Jews and I'm satisfied to be able to write that. Their future is secure.
The christian resolve is formidable no doubt. But while it has bucked our control for a thousand years, I would keep in mind no group besides ours has survived over a hundred expulsions and pogroms. It was a matter of time till we reached a status and power that couldn't be undone, or else were destroyed.
We are at the point where it is likely the only group capable of defeating us or unseating us, is ourselves.
In fact if our race, religion, and culture vanished from the face of the earth, our position as psycho-social influence brokers is so necessary to the functioning of what might even be termed the PREMODERN world, that some other group would develop in our behavioral and cultural image, to fill the gap. The world is "bad" not because of Jews, but because the world has always been rotten, and we are merely the vultures. We didn't kill it, we just benefited from it dying and decaying throughout the ages. Power and money goes to not merely to those who take it, but those who are WILLING to stoop low enough to claim it.
Everything else, the gentile's protest against historic amorality, arrogance, and more, is merely sour grapes in comparison.
When, or more likely if, some group comes along to competently challenge or unseat us, if they weren't simply manufactured by us (to quench the global desire to be through with us), I will still be a Jew. I decided on it, I claim it, and I am invested in seeing the success of Judaism. I smelled the rot and decay of white western culture, and was so long prepared to become a fighter for it, but no one else answered the call, no one else was ready. And I waited in that headspace for so long that I had time to see through the illusion of hope, to the cards we had been dealt, and finally come to the truth of reality, europeans are outmoded, as is european culture and civilization, as surely as the native americans had no chance against the whites. I will be a Jew till the day I die, and then I will be a Jew even after. And in the face of a real future holocaust, if ever there is one, I will still be a Jew, and having the european blood that I do, I will fight with ever ruthless bone in my body, to preserve my new people and a future for my Jewish descendants. This is the beauty of it, that intermixing, hybrids, are usually far more capable and dangerous than either parent. I don't have the blood, but I do have the bastardized intermixed attitude of a former euro, and the fanaticism of a Jew. My descendants will be like David, destroyer of giants, hands steady and eyes unflinching, convinced to utter contempt of the enemy, and driven like zealots toward the success of the mission.
There is honor if this, if honor ever existed in the universe, just as anyone who is honest can admire benjis brother who died fighting for israel, not died FOR israel, but was lost in the process of destroying his enemies and the enemies of his people (assuming of course benji didn't bump his brother off himself, lol).
Even in the face of obliteration, an apparently unwinnable fight is the only fight worth trying to win.
So is Judaism a suicide cult?
No more or less than Europeanism.
The battle between which is the engine that turns the great wheel of history and progress, and the fuel is blood and the treasures of nations and generations.
The places that are least speech/thought restricted will be least visited by the public, and conversely attract the most diverse political set, across a wide ranges of careers, incomes, and influence levels.
There are presidential speech writers here and on a couple other sites (which some might consider significant given the life position most of us are in), there are people here with 7-8 figure incomes and wealth (and rumors of someone worth 9+ figures), and there are a couple people here who have the direct ear of major people, not through this site, but through other communications medium.
I'm not one of them of course, but once you know what and who to look for you can't help but see it. The information BOTTLENECKS are where "muh important people" gather (along with all the rest of us), which, if you're not aware of this, it becomes easy to believe because a site or social media is small, therefore it couldn't possibly have any traction with decision makers.
This sentiment, so carefully expressed, before I had put in words, is exactly what moved me to convert.
If in fighting Them, gentiles must NECESSARILY absolutely become them (in the short or long term), then it makes
no sense to fight them at all. Why not win by default, by simply converting to what we will all become regardless?
Of course the critical thing is not to become like the cheesy Jews, the limited number of real holocaust deaths (a couple hundred thousand), who like gentiles, gave up on the long generational conquest of the globe, to become mere low level businessmen who just wanted a comfortable life, betraying the greater cause of global Jewish and oligarchical dominance, to establish one monument and mausoleum to outdated branches of humanity, celebrating the end of vain and counterproductive moral civilizations, for The Final And Ultimate Morality of nature, which is simply the Rule of The Most Capable.
You should not react, you should convert. It is a vain and pointless battle. I know you won't convert, but you seem amicable enough to learn how we think and embrace it. Whether you can accept it fully, and live it wholly, is another matter.
Common Good is an illusion. The good of your people is the first truth of nature, all of us, versus all of you.
A Jew is one who wants to be judged individually, if at all, and not as a collective, while judging all others collectively, this is the longing of Jews, to not be subsumed by history, being integrated but in their own way, separate all at the same time. To be a Jew is to create a dominant culture, both to assist the creation of it, and to capture the imagination of those who engage in it.
I think all groups plan at one level or another. What defines them isn't who they are, but the scope of what they do, which is longer-term than most anyone else. I don't think anyone ever falls out of the group so much as changes position and rank. I do not know if anyone makes entrance into the group, or if it is people in the secular and semi-secular diaspora that are 'found' and admitted based on ethnicity or usefulness, or if it is strictly closed and only admits those born to it.
I wish I could say I regret to say I am not familiar with the phrase 'two Branch dancer', which puts me in an outsider position, but I am new to Judaism.
As for Obama, I'd like you to consider Kalergi, who due to his heritage, sat between two worlds. He is less significant than he appears, and undoubtedly his blackmailable sexual orientation, and the psycho-sexual control of homosexuality made him an excellent pawn at one time.
Whether he has power, strictly speaking, isn't important, because in this context we should recognize that power is a relative concept.
As far as putin goes, that would be the multinational asset operations infighting, maybe, but I'm speculating. The key thing to realize is either Putin is utterly aware of his place, or completely and utterly ignorant of his real purpose.
If there were some ultimate hierarchy, with Just One Man deciding everything, it would probably either be someone distantly connected to rome, or the head of the world jewish congress, a rabbi. And to achieve something like that, absolute command, rather than the networks of strong influence and controlled opposition? It would be the eighth and final wonder of the world.
Where influence reaches 100%, it elides into absolute control hierarchies. I don't think we've achieved that yet, but there are mysteries that even I can only speculate on.
I didn't avoid the foreskin comment because it was inconvenient. I avoided it because it is irrelevant, and I'm not insulted by the truth that my people chop fucking dicks.
Do you want to go into the weeds about irrelevant back-and-forth insults or do you actually want to discuss a topic with your enemies? You seek a better understanding of Jews, I seek a better understanding of gentiles.
Both of us are looking to understand one another for the sake of defeating the opponent, but that is of no consequence.
If you're just here to insult me you're just giving me free entertainment, in which case I'll laugh at you, call you a swine, and enjoy labeling you my slave. If you want to play that game, I'm more than satisfied in wasting your time and keeping you here to verbally excoriate for my pleasure.
There is some commonality of religion and nationality, but while significant, isn't the be-all end-all. A lot of power is inherited, and decision makers are raised. At the national level there are the yales, and rhodes-scholars, these are just factory-made leaders for global ideology. At the highest level, the names we don't hear on the news, the power behind the power, the board members of trillion-dollar covert asset networks, all have private generational minders and tutors for their family members. It is a scientific process for taking the personality of one individual who has been reliable for the network all their life, and reproducing that exact personality and style of decision making in their offspring. These people are mentally carbon copies of their parents, in terms of style of choices, strategies, thinking, and loyalties. It is about predictability.
They are slaves in as much as the conditioning perfectly traps them in that life and the role their parents have assigned them, a self-perpetuating organism observing and molding itself to better expand, dominate, and control the environment outside it. You may say, they are utterly, and completely, victims of their own success.
Most of the world powers, not the nations, but the asset networks, were established in the late 1600 to 1700s.
Power struggles happen, but it is more like trading nations like baseball cards, small matters that are left to be reverted or fought over for another day.
6. Imohoff is more powerful than you think, but less powerful than people suspect.
He is a mid-high level player, roughly on par with Obama.
Those who believe he isn't that powerful, will discount this. Those who believe he
is very important, will also discount this, naturally.
But put in perspective, notice how relatively invisible he has been, in the background
so to speak? And yet kamala went from nothing, to vp, and then leading presidential
candidate in a relatively short span of time. He is also, obviously kammy's handler,
really goes without saying. Obama opposed him because obama is at a triple-junction,
stuck between the CCP, the muslim and russian sphere of influence, and the pentagon,
and has been playing a balancing act between them ever since.
7. Doesn't appear to be a question. Newland, Blinken, are all the 'background' front guys for
most of the schemes. Remember, you have handlers, front guys, then handlers for handlers.
They're playing the bumbling fools bit, and are obviously smarter than they act.
But they are mainly where they are because of their loyalty, which is to say, how controllable,
bribeable, blackmailable, and self-interested they are. That is all. This is standard-fare
discussion of the obvious.
8. Straussians, ah, "the blob". Somewhat powerful, mostly the covert military-fund-solicitation
arm of....someone. Lot of connections to the pentagon. They create the circumstances and deals
that initiate things like ukraine. They're mercenaries with a hint of idealogical flare, in
that regard. Call them the American-Real-Politiks.
9. I wrote what their plan for the u.s. is. Timeframes are like fortune cookies for oracles,
rarely meaningful, often subject to change. Most of this will go down, gradually, and over
the course of years, leading up to 2100.
5. We Jews are warriors. Not in the sense of "noble and virtuous fighters" like the common misconception
based on gentile morality that you see everywhere. We take what we want, we fight for what we want,
we scheme for what we want, because this is the way of the world, and always has been.
To risk it all in order to gain it all, everything. "And after fame comes oblivion."
If you have not accepted this as the hard truth of nature and the universe, then you are in denial
about the stakes (everything), and what you have to lose (everything). At the end of history,
when civilization expands out from this planet (if it ever does), there will be only one government,
and one ethnicity left, one religion, one culture, one ethnic group. This is an absolute certainty.
First mover advantage. It can only be such, and no other way.
We have no sympathies, for those, who given our position, would, either immediately, or in the
very long term, become exactly what we are.
On the schizophrenia front, I'll discuss some theories. Psychopathy is, like gravity, a force which
allows leaders to arise that gain territory, resources, and dominance from surrounding groups which
they stamp out through force and scheming. Paranoia and schizophrenia developed as an evolutionary
trait because those people often come up with schemes that sound completely outlandish, but could
work if whoever implemented them completely abandoned common morality and did whatever was pragmatic
to the point of utter immorality (becoming "monsters" as it were).
The schizos come up with these theories, these paranoias, as a defense mechanism, but because
of human incredulity, and how couragable it is, it is a failing genetic strategy. The pathocracy is
likely to win and rule the emerging global order in less than a thousand years, out right dominate
all of human civilization. There is no good or bad here, just people covering the face of the earth, like
bacteria inventing increasingly subtle poisons, to compete for surface area on a petridish.
The morality of the matter, good and bad, is a delusion, a artificial human construct (to enhance
cooperation and increase social organizational efficiency UNDER SOME CIRCUMSTANCES) that has no
basis in hard physics. The aztecs sacrificed their enemies, by the thousands to 'the sun god.'
This was undoubtedly simply a control mechanism over the neighbors they had dominated, a psychopathic
scheme. Sure some saw this. But most simply accepted as their culture and way of life. There was
no consideration for the artifice of wrong and right. The Zeitgeist of the times makes their own Moral Law,
and with the circumstances which gave birth to them, dissolve it too, and history forgets the massacres.
A mere thousand years from this day, people will still be going to work, fucking around in college, or
whatever else people do, with little more than transient bored pseudo-interest in all the countless injustices,
massacres, and wickedness that established the regimes which they will live in. Ghangis khan is celebrated today
by a billion asians. Ghangis Khan built pyramids of skulls out of the inhabitants of whole cities.
On the topic of belief, belief is a feeling backed up by a mixture of evidence, 1st person experience, and mere
emotion. Every group believes in things that are not real. Every effective group believes in its own infallability,
this is in fact a prerequisite to power, the justification it provides for dominating others. This is
the junction between idealism and pragmatism, ideology, and a girdle against uncertainty.
There is the possibility us Jews will destroy the world. Like every group in our position, we will consider it
for a moment, discount it, and then just in case, say "oh well. What will be will be."
As for the matter of creating paradise on earth: If we succeed, we will. If we fail, we'll take everyone with us
down into the grave of history. All or nothing. The universe and history demands of every group, that it
commit wholly. The historical dialectic, like god "spits out the lukewarm" from its mouth as it were.
Which is why the europeans have all but lost their chance at being on top of the pile. They were too good to
everyone else.
2. The rothschilds are also called "the red shield" for a reason. It is because they are a front for another power. The standard reply is "the papacy", but while that answer has explanatory power in the simplicity of it, it is broader than that. The conspiracy theorists call them "the families", but it is more like covert multinational conglomerates, VERY LARGE SCALE asset networks. The rothschilds group is just a name for that is all, but there are others. The network behind them, if I had to guess, and I'm just guessing, control multiple front groups just like they do the rothschilds group. If this, out of anything is true, it is also probably genuinely dangerous to discuss in a deeper manner, so I won't speculate because it isn't useful.
3. There are factions everywhere you look, it is the only thing that explains all the conflicting priorities and agendas, short of believing everything IN TOTALITY is utterly and completely planned down to the brass tacks, which is a non-starter explanation that is unlikely. There is a lot more false infighting than the mid-level experts believe, a lot more two-sided fronts that are unified behind the scenes, but also far fewer global scale conspiracies than the conspiracy theorists assume. The head of a major nation dying for example, is at the limit, a mid-high level event, but not strictly HIGH level, event. These things in short, are to be expected, but looked at from a global scope, are not the major events that most people believe they are. They're more than nudge the political calculus, but they don't go so far as to throw it around.
So feuds? Yes. Do most of the high level players see the bigger picture and general arc of things and what side they'll ultimately probably have to fall on? Yes.
4. You underestimate the Jewish appetite for risk. There is always more of us to be found for whatever task must be done. Some of our planners for example suggested throwing in battlefield nukes during vietname to "mix it up and keep the enemy off balance". Thats how casual we are. These are for some of us, big issues, and some of us not so much.
By the way, none of the fission or fusion weapons actually work. The arsenals that all the cooperating nuclear powers have are all salted dirty bombs. So in the event of nuclear war, the earth won't be dead for 2 years. It'll be dead for 20,000, because the isotopes used last a lot longer than the isotopes claimed to be produced in "fission/fusion" nukes.
This was considered politically necessary, because plenty of people saw a global multi-year apocalypse as tenable, even acceptable losses, but the public would have outright rejected the possibility of COMPLETE extinction of ALL multicellular life on earth. The world powers knowing this, mostly realized what it would actually mean to use a weapon, far more deadly than anyone in the public possibly believes.
And the sheer insanity of this plan, the real madness of MAD, the scale of which has actually been VASTLY hidden, has mostly worked to privately keep world leaders in check as we fight for further control. We mostly don't think of it as a real possibility, because we're masters at assessing risk, far and beyond even the gentiles on this matter.
Incidentally, to those wondering why japan isn't radioactive today, its because the initial air raid was a mass firebombing attack, with minimal radioactive salting, to establish a visual totem, or idol, in the public mind, as a metaphor for how destructive a nuclear war would be. I think we undersold it significantly, but seeing is believing.
Because you have chosen to ask questions, I will give you a serious reply.
1. There were multiple reasons for ukraine. Normally a response like this is an admission by the party replying that they "don't know", but we can reasonably conclude a few things. First, the obvious, keeping russia busy, which is a good indicator that a war is planned in the middle east.
Second, ukraine is a major breadbasket. This cannot be understated, how big of a difference this is.
In years 2021/2022 russias agricultural export was $37.7 billion dollars, for a land area of 6.6 million square miles.
In those same years, ukraine's agricultural export was $27.8 billion, for a land area of just 233,062 square miles.
Thats about $5712 per square mile of russian territory.
Whereas ukraine produced $119,281 of agricultural exports per square mile.
By capturing most of ukraines breadbasket, russia increased future agricultural output by a margin of 2088%, almost 21 times
the current russian exports. Think on that.
Why do they need that kind of exports?
Precisely because I wrote they intend to be the primary export provider in the BRICS currency. It gives them leverage over
the chinese, who will move on south america and africa in the future, to make their future reliance russian exports unnecessary.
By seizing ukraine, they cut the CCPs plans off at the knees.
Which is why the CCP controlled elements of the u.s. have been so aggressive to hold ukraine.
Theres also elements of the builder coalition (what some call The International Blob), who want to make a fuck ton of money
rebuilding ukraine, using ukraine as a buffer between europe and russia (and hoping russia buy into the trap), reestablishing
their dachas, playground, and other operations, with a new coat of suburban paint to cover over all the decay and corpses, but
thats mostly an explanation without any further threads to pull on so it is a dead end for expanding explanatory power to other areas.
And of course the standard conspiracies of a new ersatz israel being put in place, which I'm sure some buy into and believe.
It's not that it isn't true, it is just that the israelis being brought in are simply the warm-bodies human component in the
minefield being established on russia's border. They're a white elephant that will lead to endless series of PR nightmares,
unproductive and damaging negotiations, and bottomless pits of concessions the russians will be forced into, while giving
leverage and staging grounds for all sorts of interior operations against russia in the LONG term. It is a trap of course, but
if the russians want to keep their gains, they might be tempted into buying in to rather than continuing to fight.
A war in the middle east, in order to prevent the u.s. from smashing its way through various nations, like the koolaid man smashing through bin laden's compound walls, would force putin to choose between continuing the fight over ukraine and abandoning the middle east, or settling for the ukrainian peace trap so they can redirect to preventing the u.s. from losing its foothold in the middle east and blowing up the BRICS deal as a consequence.
Third, theres the issue of uranium. Many scientists are now predicting we will have fusion "soon", theres a lot of talk about it.
Clinton sold most of the u.s. uranium to russia, possibly to force us into the middle east. Where? Iran, which holds world altering reserves of the ore. It would redefine negotiations about u.s. oil, coal, and the u.s. dollar if Iran were to become
the de facto nuclear materials exporter of the globe, and put us on a seriously disadvantaged footing.
The ukrainian bread basket may have effectively been 'given' by clinton, to russia, in order to get their cooperation in staying out of our future smash and grab.
This post is already very long, so I'll post it, and then post replies to your other questions afterward.
You think the americans will be left alone during all this?
The weaker you get the more you will be fucked with on ever larger scales by your opponents.
conrad 0 points 10 months ago
Sure thing.
Chicken Alfredo is a dream-team combination of juicy, golden-brown slices of chicken breast and long, slurp-able strands of thick fettuccine pasta in a luxuriant creamy Alfredo pasta sauce. Brown and cook the chicken in a skillet, then make the sauce in the same pan, using just heavy cream, butter, garlic and Parmesan cheese. Learn how to make this Italian restaurant-style dish at home — it cooks in about 25 minutes, and is much easier to make than you might think!
Super-luxe is the best way to describe chicken Alfredo pasta. I mean, next to cheesy cacio e pepe, what’s better than rich, creamy sauce coating thick pasta strands and slices of juicy chicken?
This pasta dinner recipe is always a family favorite. It’s definitely rich-tasting and indulgent, something of a treat to cook at home, along with homemade pasta carbonara and real-deal penne alla vodka.
I worked in homestyle Italian restaurants when I was learning to cook. Any kind of creamy pasta with Alfredo sauce with chicken, shrimp or salmon added to them were always a hit with customers. And along the way, I learned there’s really nothing complicated involved to make it. I’m happy to share the “secret” to nailing this fantastic chicken pasta recipe.
What you need to make the recipe:
Chicken breasts: Boneless, skinless chicken breasts are seasoned with a simple rub, then seared in a skillet. They cook quickly to juicy perfection.
Seasonings: To make the savory rub for the chicken, combine garlic powder, onion powder, salt, and pepper and season the chicken breasts before cooking or up to 8 hours ahead.
Fettuccine pasta: This long, thick noodle is classic shape for making the best fettuccine Alfredo, but any long pasta shape (fresh or dried) will work in this recipe. Instead of fettuccine noodles, try linguine, spaghetti, or pappardelle.
Heavy cream: The key ingredient of the most sumptuous Alfredo sauce is heavy cream. Its high fat content creates a luscious coating for the pasta, so there’s no need to use added thickeners (such as flour or cream cheese). For that reason, milk or half-and-half won’t work for this recipe. When shopping for cream to make Alfredo sauce, choose containers labeled “heavy whipping cream” or simply “heavy cream” which has a fat content of up to 38%. Plain “whipping cream” is about 35% fat, but can also be used.
Parmesan cheese: Use the best freshly grated Parmesan you can afford, or buy a chunk of cheese and grate it yourself in a food processor or by hand using a rasp or box grater.
Butter: Use your choice of salted or unsalted butter. Good Irish or European-style butter is amazing in this recipe.
Garlic: A small clove of grated fresh garlic (about a teaspoon) infusing the cream with flavor.
Parsley: I love the fresh color and flavor that fresh parsley adds as a garnish. If you don’t have any on hand, just leave it out.
Seasoning the chicken
Before cooking the chicken and adding to the Alfredo sauce, the first step is to make a simple seasoning rub to give it lots of fla
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad 0 points 10 months ago
It was bound to happen that two powerful factions would be at each other's throats, but thank you for your insight.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad 0 points 10 months ago
As many generations as it takes, Amalek will be defeated. Or maybe he won't. I don't know.Go ask a zoltar machine, you act like I have answers to these mysteries.
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=66a6761793949
conrad 1 point 10 months ago
People are stupid.
/v/news viewpost?postid=66a61ea0688ca
conrad 0 points 10 months ago
Sure, anyone can get in on the shekelscheming.
We're gonna need some sacrificial cheesi jews come americas future government-sponsored antisemitic holocaust, in order to victim-monger for the next couple generations seeing as memory of the prior holocaust is fading.
Sign right up.
/v/Holohoax viewpost?postid=66a6443f7cf92
conrad 0 points 10 months ago
> White [Christ-Cucks] will believe it and vote to give them [White] money
My hand-rubbing is intensifying as we speak.
/v/Holohoax viewpost?postid=66a6443f7cf92
conrad 0 points 10 months ago
"I suspect it's as simple as there was not only short term pragmatism at play in those events but a longer term vision to isolate Ahmed and friends. "
As a Jew, I concur. Isn't this what you would try to do to YOUR enemies?
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=66a6761793949
conrad 0 points 10 months ago
SuperAI in five years?
Yeah I think that is perfectly plausible, a real possibility, but still unlikely.
Five years time I could see the globe embroiled in a world war that kills have the planetary population. No great loss all in all.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad 0 points 10 months ago
I'd mostly forgotten about the zionism/chabad dialectic. I don't think it is entirely accurate, but I think there is an element of truth to it.
I'd be glad to hear more.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad 0 points 10 months ago
I'll counter your argument. Acceptance isn't important, thats a forgone conclusion that I will be distrusted and treated as 'other', likewise my children and grandchildren. The first generation always is. Thats the price of entry. But my grandchildren and onward will be full-blood Jews and I'm satisfied to be able to write that. Their future is secure.
The christian resolve is formidable no doubt. But while it has bucked our control for a thousand years, I would keep in mind no group besides ours has survived over a hundred expulsions and pogroms. It was a matter of time till we reached a status and power that couldn't be undone, or else were destroyed.
We are at the point where it is likely the only group capable of defeating us or unseating us, is ourselves.
In fact if our race, religion, and culture vanished from the face of the earth, our position as psycho-social influence brokers is so necessary to the functioning of what might even be termed the PREMODERN world, that some other group would develop in our behavioral and cultural image, to fill the gap. The world is "bad" not because of Jews, but because the world has always been rotten, and we are merely the vultures. We didn't kill it, we just benefited from it dying and decaying throughout the ages. Power and money goes to not merely to those who take it, but those who are WILLING to stoop low enough to claim it.
Everything else, the gentile's protest against historic amorality, arrogance, and more, is merely sour grapes in comparison.
When, or more likely if, some group comes along to competently challenge or unseat us, if they weren't simply manufactured by us (to quench the global desire to be through with us), I will still be a Jew. I decided on it, I claim it, and I am invested in seeing the success of Judaism. I smelled the rot and decay of white western culture, and was so long prepared to become a fighter for it, but no one else answered the call, no one else was ready. And I waited in that headspace for so long that I had time to see through the illusion of hope, to the cards we had been dealt, and finally come to the truth of reality, europeans are outmoded, as is european culture and civilization, as surely as the native americans had no chance against the whites. I will be a Jew till the day I die, and then I will be a Jew even after. And in the face of a real future holocaust, if ever there is one, I will still be a Jew, and having the european blood that I do, I will fight with ever ruthless bone in my body, to preserve my new people and a future for my Jewish descendants. This is the beauty of it, that intermixing, hybrids, are usually far more capable and dangerous than either parent. I don't have the blood, but I do have the bastardized intermixed attitude of a former euro, and the fanaticism of a Jew. My descendants will be like David, destroyer of giants, hands steady and eyes unflinching, convinced to utter contempt of the enemy, and driven like zealots toward the success of the mission.
There is honor if this, if honor ever existed in the universe, just as anyone who is honest can admire benjis brother who died fighting for israel, not died FOR israel, but was lost in the process of destroying his enemies and the enemies of his people (assuming of course benji didn't bump his brother off himself, lol).
Even in the face of obliteration, an apparently unwinnable fight is the only fight worth trying to win.
So is Judaism a suicide cult?
No more or less than Europeanism.
The battle between which is the engine that turns the great wheel of history and progress, and the fuel is blood and the treasures of nations and generations.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad 0 points 10 months ago
The places that are least speech/thought restricted will be least visited by the public, and conversely attract the most diverse political set, across a wide ranges of careers, incomes, and influence levels.
There are presidential speech writers here and on a couple other sites (which some might consider significant given the life position most of us are in), there are people here with 7-8 figure incomes and wealth (and rumors of someone worth 9+ figures), and there are a couple people here who have the direct ear of major people, not through this site, but through other communications medium.
I'm not one of them of course, but once you know what and who to look for you can't help but see it. The information BOTTLENECKS are where "muh important people" gather (along with all the rest of us), which, if you're not aware of this, it becomes easy to believe because a site or social media is small, therefore it couldn't possibly have any traction with decision makers.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad 0 points 10 months ago
Which is why the US will not be left alone to reestablish any sort of footing.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad -1 points 10 months ago
This sentiment, so carefully expressed, before I had put in words, is exactly what moved me to convert.
If in fighting Them, gentiles must NECESSARILY absolutely become them (in the short or long term), then it makes
no sense to fight them at all. Why not win by default, by simply converting to what we will all become regardless?
Of course the critical thing is not to become like the cheesy Jews, the limited number of real holocaust deaths (a couple hundred thousand), who like gentiles, gave up on the long generational conquest of the globe, to become mere low level businessmen who just wanted a comfortable life, betraying the greater cause of global Jewish and oligarchical dominance, to establish one monument and mausoleum to outdated branches of humanity, celebrating the end of vain and counterproductive moral civilizations, for The Final And Ultimate Morality of nature, which is simply the Rule of The Most Capable.
You should not react, you should convert. It is a vain and pointless battle. I know you won't convert, but you seem amicable enough to learn how we think and embrace it. Whether you can accept it fully, and live it wholly, is another matter.
Common Good is an illusion. The good of your people is the first truth of nature, all of us, versus all of you.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad 0 points 10 months ago*
A Jew is one who wants to be judged individually, if at all, and not as a collective, while judging all others collectively, this is the longing of Jews, to not be subsumed by history, being integrated but in their own way, separate all at the same time. To be a Jew is to create a dominant culture, both to assist the creation of it, and to capture the imagination of those who engage in it.
I think all groups plan at one level or another. What defines them isn't who they are, but the scope of what they do, which is longer-term than most anyone else. I don't think anyone ever falls out of the group so much as changes position and rank. I do not know if anyone makes entrance into the group, or if it is people in the secular and semi-secular diaspora that are 'found' and admitted based on ethnicity or usefulness, or if it is strictly closed and only admits those born to it.
I wish I could say I regret to say I am not familiar with the phrase 'two Branch dancer', which puts me in an outsider position, but I am new to Judaism.
As for Obama, I'd like you to consider Kalergi, who due to his heritage, sat between two worlds. He is less significant than he appears, and undoubtedly his blackmailable sexual orientation, and the psycho-sexual control of homosexuality made him an excellent pawn at one time.
Whether he has power, strictly speaking, isn't important, because in this context we should recognize that power is a relative concept.
As far as putin goes, that would be the multinational asset operations infighting, maybe, but I'm speculating. The key thing to realize is either Putin is utterly aware of his place, or completely and utterly ignorant of his real purpose.
If there were some ultimate hierarchy, with Just One Man deciding everything, it would probably either be someone distantly connected to rome, or the head of the world jewish congress, a rabbi. And to achieve something like that, absolute command, rather than the networks of strong influence and controlled opposition? It would be the eighth and final wonder of the world.
Where influence reaches 100%, it elides into absolute control hierarchies. I don't think we've achieved that yet, but there are mysteries that even I can only speculate on.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad -1 points 10 months ago
I didn't avoid the foreskin comment because it was inconvenient. I avoided it because it is irrelevant, and I'm not insulted by the truth that my people chop fucking dicks.
Do you want to go into the weeds about irrelevant back-and-forth insults or do you actually want to discuss a topic with your enemies? You seek a better understanding of Jews, I seek a better understanding of gentiles.
Both of us are looking to understand one another for the sake of defeating the opponent, but that is of no consequence.
If you're just here to insult me you're just giving me free entertainment, in which case I'll laugh at you, call you a swine, and enjoy labeling you my slave. If you want to play that game, I'm more than satisfied in wasting your time and keeping you here to verbally excoriate for my pleasure.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad 0 points 10 months ago
Teaching you gentiles IS manual labor, goy. And trust me, getting you to learn anything, like your place in the world, is LABORIOUS.
/v/ClownWorld viewpost?postid=66a667444dd88
conrad -2 points 10 months ago
Blood can sometimes take a little while to well-up from a wound believe it or not.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad 0 points 10 months ago
It is not as big of a struggle as you think. It just looks major because it was what is CURRENTLY driving international finance and politics.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad 0 points 10 months ago*
There is some commonality of religion and nationality, but while significant, isn't the be-all end-all. A lot of power is inherited, and decision makers are raised. At the national level there are the yales, and rhodes-scholars, these are just factory-made leaders for global ideology. At the highest level, the names we don't hear on the news, the power behind the power, the board members of trillion-dollar covert asset networks, all have private generational minders and tutors for their family members. It is a scientific process for taking the personality of one individual who has been reliable for the network all their life, and reproducing that exact personality and style of decision making in their offspring. These people are mentally carbon copies of their parents, in terms of style of choices, strategies, thinking, and loyalties. It is about predictability.
They are slaves in as much as the conditioning perfectly traps them in that life and the role their parents have assigned them, a self-perpetuating organism observing and molding itself to better expand, dominate, and control the environment outside it. You may say, they are utterly, and completely, victims of their own success.
Most of the world powers, not the nations, but the asset networks, were established in the late 1600 to 1700s.
Power struggles happen, but it is more like trading nations like baseball cards, small matters that are left to be reverted or fought over for another day.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad -1 points 10 months ago
I'm not saying hes not to be in office next. Go learn to read.
I AM saying there are factions and elements that don't believe in changing the color of their puppets mid-theatre.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad 0 points 10 months ago*
6. Imohoff is more powerful than you think, but less powerful than people suspect.
He is a mid-high level player, roughly on par with Obama.
Those who believe he isn't that powerful, will discount this. Those who believe he
is very important, will also discount this, naturally.
But put in perspective, notice how relatively invisible he has been, in the background
so to speak? And yet kamala went from nothing, to vp, and then leading presidential
candidate in a relatively short span of time. He is also, obviously kammy's handler,
really goes without saying. Obama opposed him because obama is at a triple-junction,
stuck between the CCP, the muslim and russian sphere of influence, and the pentagon,
and has been playing a balancing act between them ever since.
7. Doesn't appear to be a question. Newland, Blinken, are all the 'background' front guys for
most of the schemes. Remember, you have handlers, front guys, then handlers for handlers.
They're playing the bumbling fools bit, and are obviously smarter than they act.
But they are mainly where they are because of their loyalty, which is to say, how controllable,
bribeable, blackmailable, and self-interested they are. That is all. This is standard-fare
discussion of the obvious.
8. Straussians, ah, "the blob". Somewhat powerful, mostly the covert military-fund-solicitation
arm of....someone. Lot of connections to the pentagon. They create the circumstances and deals
that initiate things like ukraine. They're mercenaries with a hint of idealogical flare, in
that regard. Call them the American-Real-Politiks.
9. I wrote what their plan for the u.s. is. Timeframes are like fortune cookies for oracles,
rarely meaningful, often subject to change. Most of this will go down, gradually, and over
the course of years, leading up to 2100.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad 1 point 10 months ago*
5. We Jews are warriors. Not in the sense of "noble and virtuous fighters" like the common misconception
based on gentile morality that you see everywhere. We take what we want, we fight for what we want,
we scheme for what we want, because this is the way of the world, and always has been.
To risk it all in order to gain it all, everything. "And after fame comes oblivion."
If you have not accepted this as the hard truth of nature and the universe, then you are in denial
about the stakes (everything), and what you have to lose (everything). At the end of history,
when civilization expands out from this planet (if it ever does), there will be only one government,
and one ethnicity left, one religion, one culture, one ethnic group. This is an absolute certainty.
First mover advantage. It can only be such, and no other way.
We have no sympathies, for those, who given our position, would, either immediately, or in the
very long term, become exactly what we are.
On the schizophrenia front, I'll discuss some theories. Psychopathy is, like gravity, a force which
allows leaders to arise that gain territory, resources, and dominance from surrounding groups which
they stamp out through force and scheming. Paranoia and schizophrenia developed as an evolutionary
trait because those people often come up with schemes that sound completely outlandish, but could
work if whoever implemented them completely abandoned common morality and did whatever was pragmatic
to the point of utter immorality (becoming "monsters" as it were).
The schizos come up with these theories, these paranoias, as a defense mechanism, but because
of human incredulity, and how couragable it is, it is a failing genetic strategy. The pathocracy is
likely to win and rule the emerging global order in less than a thousand years, out right dominate
all of human civilization. There is no good or bad here, just people covering the face of the earth, like
bacteria inventing increasingly subtle poisons, to compete for surface area on a petridish.
The morality of the matter, good and bad, is a delusion, a artificial human construct (to enhance
cooperation and increase social organizational efficiency UNDER SOME CIRCUMSTANCES) that has no
basis in hard physics. The aztecs sacrificed their enemies, by the thousands to 'the sun god.'
This was undoubtedly simply a control mechanism over the neighbors they had dominated, a psychopathic
scheme. Sure some saw this. But most simply accepted as their culture and way of life. There was
no consideration for the artifice of wrong and right. The Zeitgeist of the times makes their own Moral Law,
and with the circumstances which gave birth to them, dissolve it too, and history forgets the massacres.
A mere thousand years from this day, people will still be going to work, fucking around in college, or
whatever else people do, with little more than transient bored pseudo-interest in all the countless injustices,
massacres, and wickedness that established the regimes which they will live in. Ghangis khan is celebrated today
by a billion asians. Ghangis Khan built pyramids of skulls out of the inhabitants of whole cities.
On the topic of belief, belief is a feeling backed up by a mixture of evidence, 1st person experience, and mere
emotion. Every group believes in things that are not real. Every effective group believes in its own infallability,
this is in fact a prerequisite to power, the justification it provides for dominating others. This is
the junction between idealism and pragmatism, ideology, and a girdle against uncertainty.
There is the possibility us Jews will destroy the world. Like every group in our position, we will consider it
for a moment, discount it, and then just in case, say "oh well. What will be will be."
As for the matter of creating paradise on earth: If we succeed, we will. If we fail, we'll take everyone with us
down into the grave of history. All or nothing. The universe and history demands of every group, that it
commit wholly. The historical dialectic, like god "spits out the lukewarm" from its mouth as it were.
Which is why the europeans have all but lost their chance at being on top of the pile. They were too good to
everyone else.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad 1 point 10 months ago
2. The rothschilds are also called "the red shield" for a reason. It is because they are a front for another power. The standard reply is "the papacy", but while that answer has explanatory power in the simplicity of it, it is broader than that. The conspiracy theorists call them "the families", but it is more like covert multinational conglomerates, VERY LARGE SCALE asset networks. The rothschilds group is just a name for that is all, but there are others. The network behind them, if I had to guess, and I'm just guessing, control multiple front groups just like they do the rothschilds group. If this, out of anything is true, it is also probably genuinely dangerous to discuss in a deeper manner, so I won't speculate because it isn't useful.
3. There are factions everywhere you look, it is the only thing that explains all the conflicting priorities and agendas, short of believing everything IN TOTALITY is utterly and completely planned down to the brass tacks, which is a non-starter explanation that is unlikely. There is a lot more false infighting than the mid-level experts believe, a lot more two-sided fronts that are unified behind the scenes, but also far fewer global scale conspiracies than the conspiracy theorists assume. The head of a major nation dying for example, is at the limit, a mid-high level event, but not strictly HIGH level, event. These things in short, are to be expected, but looked at from a global scope, are not the major events that most people believe they are. They're more than nudge the political calculus, but they don't go so far as to throw it around.
So feuds? Yes. Do most of the high level players see the bigger picture and general arc of things and what side they'll ultimately probably have to fall on? Yes.
4. You underestimate the Jewish appetite for risk. There is always more of us to be found for whatever task must be done. Some of our planners for example suggested throwing in battlefield nukes during vietname to "mix it up and keep the enemy off balance". Thats how casual we are. These are for some of us, big issues, and some of us not so much.
By the way, none of the fission or fusion weapons actually work. The arsenals that all the cooperating nuclear powers have are all salted dirty bombs. So in the event of nuclear war, the earth won't be dead for 2 years. It'll be dead for 20,000, because the isotopes used last a lot longer than the isotopes claimed to be produced in "fission/fusion" nukes.
This was considered politically necessary, because plenty of people saw a global multi-year apocalypse as tenable, even acceptable losses, but the public would have outright rejected the possibility of COMPLETE extinction of ALL multicellular life on earth. The world powers knowing this, mostly realized what it would actually mean to use a weapon, far more deadly than anyone in the public possibly believes.
And the sheer insanity of this plan, the real madness of MAD, the scale of which has actually been VASTLY hidden, has mostly worked to privately keep world leaders in check as we fight for further control. We mostly don't think of it as a real possibility, because we're masters at assessing risk, far and beyond even the gentiles on this matter.
Incidentally, to those wondering why japan isn't radioactive today, its because the initial air raid was a mass firebombing attack, with minimal radioactive salting, to establish a visual totem, or idol, in the public mind, as a metaphor for how destructive a nuclear war would be. I think we undersold it significantly, but seeing is believing.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad 1 point 10 months ago
Because you have chosen to ask questions, I will give you a serious reply.
1. There were multiple reasons for ukraine. Normally a response like this is an admission by the party replying that they "don't know", but we can reasonably conclude a few things. First, the obvious, keeping russia busy, which is a good indicator that a war is planned in the middle east.
Second, ukraine is a major breadbasket. This cannot be understated, how big of a difference this is.
In years 2021/2022 russias agricultural export was $37.7 billion dollars, for a land area of 6.6 million square miles.
In those same years, ukraine's agricultural export was $27.8 billion, for a land area of just 233,062 square miles.
Thats about $5712 per square mile of russian territory.
Whereas ukraine produced $119,281 of agricultural exports per square mile.
By capturing most of ukraines breadbasket, russia increased future agricultural output by a margin of 2088%, almost 21 times
the current russian exports. Think on that.
Why do they need that kind of exports?
Precisely because I wrote they intend to be the primary export provider in the BRICS currency. It gives them leverage over
the chinese, who will move on south america and africa in the future, to make their future reliance russian exports unnecessary.
By seizing ukraine, they cut the CCPs plans off at the knees.
Which is why the CCP controlled elements of the u.s. have been so aggressive to hold ukraine.
Theres also elements of the builder coalition (what some call The International Blob), who want to make a fuck ton of money
rebuilding ukraine, using ukraine as a buffer between europe and russia (and hoping russia buy into the trap), reestablishing
their dachas, playground, and other operations, with a new coat of suburban paint to cover over all the decay and corpses, but
thats mostly an explanation without any further threads to pull on so it is a dead end for expanding explanatory power to other areas.
And of course the standard conspiracies of a new ersatz israel being put in place, which I'm sure some buy into and believe.
It's not that it isn't true, it is just that the israelis being brought in are simply the warm-bodies human component in the
minefield being established on russia's border. They're a white elephant that will lead to endless series of PR nightmares,
unproductive and damaging negotiations, and bottomless pits of concessions the russians will be forced into, while giving
leverage and staging grounds for all sorts of interior operations against russia in the LONG term. It is a trap of course, but
if the russians want to keep their gains, they might be tempted into buying in to rather than continuing to fight.
A war in the middle east, in order to prevent the u.s. from smashing its way through various nations, like the koolaid man smashing through bin laden's compound walls, would force putin to choose between continuing the fight over ukraine and abandoning the middle east, or settling for the ukrainian peace trap so they can redirect to preventing the u.s. from losing its foothold in the middle east and blowing up the BRICS deal as a consequence.
Third, theres the issue of uranium. Many scientists are now predicting we will have fusion "soon", theres a lot of talk about it.
Clinton sold most of the u.s. uranium to russia, possibly to force us into the middle east. Where? Iran, which holds world altering reserves of the ore. It would redefine negotiations about u.s. oil, coal, and the u.s. dollar if Iran were to become
the de facto nuclear materials exporter of the globe, and put us on a seriously disadvantaged footing.
The ukrainian bread basket may have effectively been 'given' by clinton, to russia, in order to get their cooperation in staying out of our future smash and grab.
This post is already very long, so I'll post it, and then post replies to your other questions afterward.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6
conrad 0 points 10 months ago
You think the americans will be left alone during all this?
The weaker you get the more you will be fucked with on ever larger scales by your opponents.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66a667f3bc9a6