Sign into an existing account

"On the eve of historic new peace talks, Hajo Funke, a political scientist at the Free University of Berlin, emphasized that there is no better place than Istanbul for negotiations between Ukraine and Russia.

On May 11, Russian President Putin proposed resuming the direct negotiations in Istanbul that were cut off three years ago, this time without preconditions, and requested Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan host the new peace talks in Istanbul this Thursday. Ukraine responded positively to the proposal, and the international community hailed the holding of new peace talks in Istanbul.

“Meeting in Istanbul is a sign of hope,” Funke told Anadolu.

- 2022 Russia-Ukraine peace talks

Funke stated that under Erdogan's mediation, significant progress was made in the 2022 negotiations. However, the efforts ultimately failed due to NATO's intervention, particularly interference from the US' Joe Biden administration and the British administration of Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who were then in office, which blocked what Zelenskyy sought.

He explained that Johnson's visit to Ukraine's capital Kyiv in early April in 2022, along with then-US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin's statement about weakening Russia to prevent future aggression, signaled a clear escalation in the conflict.

Funke said that during that period, there were 30,000 dead and wounded in the war, but now, over three years later, the number has risen to hundreds of thousands. He said: “It's time to pick up the signal from Istanbul again. And that's how Vladimir Putin phrased it, we want to continue the interrupted talks.”

-'Istanbul is the suitable place'

Emphasizing that Türkiye has been accepted as a mediator by both sides in different ways, he said: “Therefore, Istanbul is the suitable place. There is no better place.”

Noting that neither the Saudi capital Riyadh nor Western European or Western capitals are suitable for this, he said: “Istanbul is the best and maybe the last chance to come to a compromise.”

Whether Putin's participation in the talks is expected, Funke stated that Putin would only come if the possibility of success in the negotiations is clear.

He said that petty games like “I only want it if the other side comes” are not serious matters, stressing that serious negotiations are based on the overlapping interests of both sides.

"It's about more than that. It's about ending the war. It's about preventing further tens of thousands and hundreds of thousands of deaths and injuries. It's about a devastated country, particularly Ukraine," he said.

Funke highlighted that the key challenge for both countries lies in making progress on security and territorial agreements. He emphasized that if progress is made by Thursday, it could be a positive start, but the outcome would only be clear by then.

- Europe's stance

On European leaders' recent visit to Kyiv, on May 10, Funke said that was a signal that should not be overestimated in its significance.

He criticized new German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's statement that the European Union would tighten sanctions if Russia does not accept peace proposals, saying: “It is a sign of solidarity, certainly. But the attempt to force things through ultimatums, like the one from Merz, our chancellor, has already failed in recent days. One doesn't make ultimatums when one doesn't know that they will lead to something.”

Funke also noted that US President Donald Trump asked the Ukrainian and Russian leaders to focus on the issues and engage in negotiations seriously. He added that they may come to Istanbul, but it's uncertain if both will attend or if one might leave early.

Funke emphasized that even if the negotiations fail this time, he suggested that talks will continue, and if Ukraine has a chance for compromise, so does Putin, with Trump putting serious pressure on both sides.

He added that Germany, France, and the UK have only recently shown support for Ukraine, and their failure to initiate peace efforts over the past three years highlights their weakness."

https://www.yenisafak.com/en/news/no-better-place-than-istanbul-for-russia-ukraine-peace-talks-political-scientist-3702221

"The absence of an Israel visit before or after President Trump's Gulf trip erodes the carefully maintained facade of "unshakeable" U.S.-Israel ties. This isn't merely about a diplomatic snub - media reports suggesting Trump's unwillingness to engage with Netanyahu indicate deeper underlying tensions.

Israel's genocidal operation in Gaza has sparked unprecedented debate in American public discourse. Both pro-Israel lobby groups and Netanyahu have exhausted their political capital, creating a serious crisis of legitimacy in American politics. Seeing the high political cost Biden paid for unconditional support, Trump appears to have sidelined Israel after failing to get what he wanted from Netanyahu.

"AMERICA FIRST," THEN ISRAEL

Trump's recent moves to bypass Netanyahu's government demonstrate how the "America First" policy comes at Israel's expense. The most striking example is America negotiating directly with Hamas for a hostage release without Israel's involvement. Other actions that disturbed Netanyahu include successful unilateral ceasefire talks with Yemen's Houthis and conducting nuclear negotiations with Iran independently.

Trump won't miss opportunities for domestic political gains, dealing with any actor who can deliver results. Unlike presidents who shaped Middle East policy through an Israel-first lens, Trump operates differently. While taking strongly pro-Israel steps like recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital, he believed he could resolve the Israel-Palestine issue through the Abraham Accords and "Deal of the Century."

From Trump's perspective: He's given Israel and Evangelical supporters everything they wanted - now he expects political returns. For presidents like Biden, supporting Israel is both strategic necessity and ideological imperative. For Trump? No tangible benefit means no justification for support.

Netanyahu recently proposed occupying Gaza while offering American companies reconstruction contracts, attempting to make Trump complicit while profiting. But compared to trillions in potential Gulf investments, this carrot seems insignificant. Netanyahu's refusal to let Trump claim credit as peacemaker has bred frustration.

Gaza's complete destruction would yield minimal benefits at high cost. Meanwhile, Israel's policies increasingly constrain U.S. freedom of action - opposing Iran deals, escalating Yemen attacks, and pushing permanent Gaza occupation. Through an "America First" lens, Netanyahu creates only liabilities without delivering political wins.

GAZA'S COST TO ISRAEL

Distancing from Israel now carries little domestic cost for Trump due to:" ....

[Continues at the link]:

https://www.yenisafak.com/en/columns/kadir-ustun/why-is-trump-bypassing-israel-3702165

"B’nai B’rith International is a staunch defender of the State of Israel, advocates for global Jewry and champions the cause of human rights. B’nai B’rith is recognized as a vital voice in combatting anti-Semitism, promoting Jewish unity and continuity, a leader in disaster relief and assisting communities in crisis, a provider of safe and affordable housing for low-income older adults and a tireless advocate on behalf of seniors.

Since our founding in 1843, B’nai B’rith has focused on making the world a safer and more tolerant place.

With a presence in countries around the world, B’nai B’rith is the Global Voice of the Jewish Community.

We monitor and combat anti-Semitism and other human rights abuses around the world. We challenge the odious Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement wherever it emerges. B’nai B’rith is dedicated to illuminating the hatred of Jews as a distinct and unique social illness, and to marshaling efforts to combat and, where possible, eradicate this phenomenon. We work diligently to prompt officials to fight anti-Semitism at all levels, delivering that message to governments and intergovernmental bodies, while taking action on college campuses and speaking out in the media.

Through our office of intercommunal affairs, we play an active role cultivating religious tolerance and cooperation internationally."
----
With a dedicated Office of U.N. Affairs and accredited representation at U.N. agencies worldwide, B’nai B’rith has been at the forefront of Jewish engagement with the world body since 1945. B’nai B’rith is committed to holding the U.N. accountable to its essential founding values and aspirations. B’nai B’rith is committed to advocating for fair treatment of Israel at the world body and its affiliates. We have representation at the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva and UNESCO (the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) in Paris.

B’nai B’rith International has a full-time presence in Brussels, the home of the European Union, where we advocate for Jewish issues at European institutions and work to strengthen EU-Israel relations.

Since we launched our first lodge in Latin America in 1926 in Panama City, Panama, B’nai B’rith has maintained a strong presence across the region,...

With a membership across Latin America, B’nai B’rith represents these constituents at the Organization of American States (OAS), which consists of governments and civil society organizations from 34 countries and is the most influential political body in the Americas."

https://www.bnaibrith.org/
https://www.bnaibrith.org/about-us/

Third Comintern Congress (1921) - [VIDEO 1 MIN - 22 SEC]

Description: Center of Moscow. Delegates on the river bank, in cars, in the meeting halls of the Kremlin.

Among them: Bela Kun, M. T. Tskhakaia, Feliks Kon, D. B. Riazanov, Anatolii Lunacharskii, A. T. Okuashvili, Karl Radek, Grigorii Zinoviev, Ember-Dro, V. Kolarov, Dzhenari, Ladzari, Nikolai Bukharin. A rally to honor the Comintern delegates on Red Square. Speakers: Karl Radek, Anatolii Lunacharskii, Vaiian-Kutiur’e. Unveiling of a monument to John Reed on Red Square July 3, 1921. Speakers: Lev Kamenev, Bill Haywood.
-----
Source: Russian State Film & Photo Archive at Krasnogorsk (2000)." [VIDEO 1 MIN - 22 SEC]
https://soviethistory.msu.edu/1921-2/comintern/comintern-video/
===X TEXT
"Changing Name to Communist Party
Vladimir Lenin, Statement at the Seventh Party Congress. March 8, 1918"

"Comrades! The question of changing the name of the party has been before us ever since April 1917 and has brought forth a great deal of discussion … leading to almost complete unanimity … The Central Committee now proposes to change the name … to Russian Communist Party (Bolshevik). The word “Bolshevik” is necessary … I . because it has acquired a certain political significance both in Russia and abroad … The term “Social-Democratic Party” is scientifically inaccurate and our press has already called attention to that fact."

I. The Congress resolves that henceforth the name of the Russian Social-Democratic Labor Party (“Bolshevik”) is changed to Russian Communist Party with the addition of the word “Bolshevik” in parentheses." [MORE]

https://soviethistory.msu.edu/1917-2/communist-party-building/communist-party-building-texts/changing-name-to-communist-party/
===X TEXT
Prepared by John Reed:

"To the average reader the multiplicity of Russian organisations—political groups, Committees and Central Committees, Soviets, Dumas and Unions—will prove extremely confusing. For this reason I am giving here a few brief definitions and explanations."

https://www.marxists.org/archive/reed/1919/10days/10days/notes.htm#soviets

" What would you have done if you had been the leader of Germany and these pictures were placed on your desk?
Ask the Jewish dominated League of Nations, one more time, for help?
Or finally take matters into your own hands?"

https://lovkap.blogspot.com/2016/11/black-sunday.html

"Jews Must Live —By (((Samuel Roth)))
Originally published in 1934

Excerpt from Chapter VI
"THE BRINGING-UP OF THE LITTLE JEW"



"During my days as a bookseller on West Eighth Street, I became friendly with a man who employed more than four thousand people. It was known of him also that he did not permit Jews to work in any branch of his business. "Will you tell me why?" I once asked him.

"Just business," he said, "Jews are not dependable, and they are untrustworthy."

"Would that explain their success in business?" I asked.

"I don't know what explains a Jew's success in business," he replied. "But have you ever heard of a Jew who made a success of another man's business?"

I was silent.

He smiled. "When you find such a Jew," he said "send me a wire collect, and I'll begin hiring Jews immediately."

"Have you never employed a Jew, then?"

"Sure, many of them. By accident. They come around to our employment department, give Christian names, and get away with it - until I spot them. At the works they say that I've got an unfailing eye for Jews. They never escape me."

I protested that this seemed both remarkable and unbelievable. I, a Jew, very frequently mistook a Jew for a gentile!

"Being a Jew isn't it enough, Roth. You've got to have a nose for Jews. You've got to be able to smell them out. If I can't spot it in their features, I can find their Jewishness in their conversation."

"What about Jews with Harvard accents?"

"You've got me wrong. I didn't mean their accents at all. Most American Jews talk like Americans, and less with their hands than regular Americans do. I have a more infallible way of recognizing a Jew in my employ. When a Jew talks to his employer he usually looks over his head."

I think I know exactly what this man meant. Isaac looks over the head of his employer to the invisible Lord God of Israel. Since all the wealth before him was really meant for the enrichment of Israel, there must be at hand some nice easy way to get out of the crude hands of the goy in actual possession. He cannot help this dishonest feeling. It is almost as instinctive with him as it is instinctive for the gentile who sees him to pass by him. That's how poor Isaac has been brought up. And what a little Jewish boy has learnt, to quote a contemporary patriotic Jewish drama, he never forgets.

What is this Jewish upbringing! To know it you have to enter and live in, a Jewish home. I only knew one Jewish home intimately, the one in which I was, so to say reared, and so I shall give you some inkling of it. It was typical of all Jewish homes, rich or poor alike.

The Hebrew of the rabbis was all I had been permitted to learn in Poland. My father's respect for what might be learned outside of the Pentateuch being very scan, it was lucky for me that public school attendance in New York City was compulsory. I was enrolled in the public school of my district. But that did not mean the end of my Hebrew studies. To continue those I was compelled to go to cheder (Hebrew school) for two hours after school every afternoon.

My father had to pay so much every week for my Hebrew schooling. What he paid came out of the slender means by which we were fed and clothed. And what poverty we lived in, those days! My father drudged heavily and bitterly for the little money he earned. For some fifteen or eighteen dollars he found once a week in his pay envelope he had to rise four o'clock mornings to go to work, and he stuck to his machine till nearly ten o'clock at night. The agony his livelihood cost him made a miser out of my father. He could not bear to part with the greenbacks which came to him with so much anguish of body and spirit. But not once did I hear him complain of the cost of my Hebrew education.

It was really heartrending. He grudged my poor mother every penny he allowed her for the bare necessities of life and the rental of the insect-ridden apartment we occupied on Broome Street. If he found in the ice-box, when he came home, apart from what had been left for his supper, a little butter, an egg, or some barley, he quarreled about it interminably with my mother, and was certain to cut down her allowance the following day. Yet when it came to parting with cheder money, no questions were asked. Why?

The explanation for this is simple enough. Without the aid of a local police to enforce it, Hebrew education is compulsory among Jews. To fail to force me to go to cheder would have meant complete social ostracism for my father and mother. The Jewish boy must learn enough Hebrew whereby to read his prayer book on Saturday mornings in synagogue, and for the ceremony of Bar Mitzvah, his thirteenth birthday, when he is installed as a full-grown member of the Jewish community, with full responsibilities of a citizen. To have failed in this important preparation is, in Jewish life, an act of high treason to the Jewish nation. That is how it happened that, against my own wishes I spent the precious hours after school, learning Hebrew [20].

If you stop an American Jew and ask him why he plagues his children with Hebrew studies (after the already exhausting sessions of the public schools) he will give you one of two reasons. He will either plead that he is giving his son the religious education he needs to complete his equipment for a successful career, or that he thinks it is important to supplement the cultural training his son is acquiring in the public school with the cultural Jewish training that is traditionally just as important to his son.

The first answer is given by the simple ignorant Jew, the sort of Jew my own father was. The answer is sincere and honest enough, for it was transmitted to him by a hundred thoughtless generations. But fundamentally it is untrue. The amount of Hebrew a child needs to know for purely religious purposes, he learns in two years, before he is six years old, before he is required to begin his secular education. And religion is not taught in the Hebrew schools.

Hebrew instructors are not religious and do not bother to teach religion. I was a cheder student when a child, and I was never taught religion. When I grew older I held a position with the Bureau of Jewish Education maintained by funds publicly collected from the Jewish community of New York. I do not think I violate any confidences when I assert that neither its chief executive nor any one of his dozen department heads were believers in the Jewish religion.

The cultural reason sounds more plausible but has even less foundation in fact. If the Hebrew schools foster Jewish culture, where is this culture? Now culture is either creative or absorptive. Creative Jewish culture we have not in America even in its lowest form. As for absorptive culture - which consists of the contemplation of culture created by others, and so transmitted through time and space - there is almost none of that in America either. What have we of Jewish culture in America, really? The national anthem, a few field songs from Palestine, and some anemic modern adaptations of themed from the Old Testament. The few serious Hebrew works imported into the United States from Europe and Asia Minor are for the absorption of the few European Jews who have made of America a sort of haven of despair in their old age.

The cultural argument is the rankest sort of pretence. Do the thousands of French families in the United States compel their children to study French after school so as to preserve with them the inheritance of French culture? Or is there any reason to believe that the French think any less of their culture than the Jews think of theirs? How many German schools do the fifteen million Germans in the United States maintain to help their children keep the inheritance of German culture? The preservation of Jewish religion and culture are merely excuses for something else, a smoke-screen. What the Jew really wants and expects to achieve through the instrumentality of the Hebrew school is to cultivate in his son the sharp awareness that he is a Jew and that as a racial Jew - apart from all the other races - he is waging an old war against his neighbors. The young Jew must learn to remember that before anything else he is a Jew, that, before any other allegiance, comes his allegiance to the Jewish People. He may be a good American if it is good business to be a good American. He may even pose as a good Chinaman. But no obligation he contracts with a non-Jew is to be considered valid if it violates the interests of this most important obligation of his.

The first thing the young Jew learns is that he is a Jew. The second thing he learns is that being a Jew makes him different from the members of all the other peoples on the face of the earth. Sanctity, because of the ever presence of the synagogue as a background is inevitably part of his impression of his function as a Jew. If the family in the midst of which he is reared has shed all of its religious feathers, then a sense of superiority takes the place of the feeling of sanctity. The third thing he learns is that, as a member of a nation of priests, it is his business to make for himself a high place in the world, some position from which he will be able to compel the world to pay him tribute.

Most desirable for the young Jew, he is told impressively, is it, for him to become a member of one of the professions - to become a doctor, a lawyer, an engineer, even a salesman or an agent. To be compelled to go to work, to do manual labor for one's livelihood, is the very worse state the young Jew can fall to, something to make him really ashamed and humiliated.

This attitude of the Jews towards manual labor is historic. The Jewish apologists have a neat explanation for it. In most of the countries of the Diaspora the Jews were not permitted to own land or to work on it. Nor were they permitted to work for Christians. And since Jewish merchants could give employment only to a fraction of the great numbers of young Jews, the rest had to turn for careers to salesmanship, money-lending and the other promoting aspects of trade. This does not explain why Jews have never, like other peoples, gone into a wilderness and built up a land of their own. Nor why in England, in the thirteenth century, under Edward I, they did not take advantage of the offer by which Edward promised to give them the very opportunities Jews had been crying for for centuries.

After imprisoning the whole Jewish population in his domain for criminal usury and debasing the coin of the realm, Edward, before releasing them, put into effect two new sets of laws: the first made it illegal for a Jew in England to lend money at interest. The second repealed all the standing laws which kept Jews from the normal pursuits of the kingdom. Under these new statutes Jews could even lease land for a period of fifteen years and work it. Edward advanced this as a test of the Jew's sincerity when he claimed that all he wanted was an opportunity to work like other people. If they proved their fitness to live like other people, the inference was that Edward would let them buy land outright and admit them to the higher privileges of citizenship. Did the Jews take advantage of Edward's decree? This way. To get around the laws against usury they invented such new methods of skinning the peasants and the nobles that the outcry against them became greater than ever, and Edward had to expel them to avert a civil war. It was not recorded that one Jew took advantage of the new right to till the soil.

During the Napoleonic era there was a rabbi in Metz, Aaron Worms by name, who felt deeply the shame of the traditional Jewish attitude towards manual labor. He took the trouble to publicly rebuke the people for it, and, as an example, apprenticed his son Eijah to an artisan. But it was a vain gesture, as has been the effort of every Jew of integrity to civilize his people. For his pains, there were Jews in Europe who called him an apostate - and worse. The Jew's feeling of superiority to manual labor has become second nature with him. It has been inborn and inbred in him as carefully and painstakingly as the virtues of a life of useful labor are inbred in the lives of the children of the rest of the nations.

The Jewish boy's progress through school is observed with the most hawk-like watchfulness. Does he show himself argumentative? Deep of voice? Cunning of device? It is immediately taken for granted that the Law is his natural, God-given profession. Plans are made to finance his way through the best possible law-school. There may not be money for other things in the house or with which to pay legitimate debts. But there will be money, and plenty of it, forthcoming for Willie's tuition and upkeep in law school. Aptness in science, on the other hand, marks Izzie for the medical profession. It is not, of course, as simple to make a doctor as it is to make a lawyer, for at least three times as much time and money is required. To make a doctor out of Izzie, practically the whole family is set to work; it is sometimes even necessary to marry him off in advance so as to get him the help-in-advance of a goodly dowry. A facility with figures, in the same manner, points to a career in engineering and accountancy. Every promise is noted and capitalized.

Now there would not be so much harm in the Jews taking in such immense droves to the practice of the cardinal professions if they approached them in the proper spirit. But the Jew does not, cannot, turn to the law with anything like reverence for the profession or for its splendid traditions. Willie sets his jaw grimly to the task of competing with several thousands of other Willies for the few scraps of pickings in law lying about loose, and Izzie's attitude towards medicine is not much more cheerful or respectful. The attitude of a young Jew towards his profession is really like that of a gangster towards a new racket. The real end is the amount of money it is likely to yield him in exchange for the smallest investment of labor and enthusiasm. But more of this when we take up the Jews as doctors and as lawyers.

Does poor Simon bring home bad marks from school? He is continually warned, by parents and neighbors, that unless he shows decided improvement he will without doubt forfeit the support of his family in the direction of a career. It is pointed out, with the most painful emphasis, that unless he picks up in his studies, he will sink into the horrible ignominy of having to work for his livelihood. So deeply is it impressed on the growing Jew that to have to work with his hands is the most awful humiliation of life, that, no matter what becomes of him, he inwardly determines that he will not submit to work.

The easiest business for the young Jew not apt enough to enter one of the major professions, is selling newspapers. Almost all the news stands in America are owned by Jews. The news stand, however, is only a stepping stone. Once he has saved up a few hundred or a few thousand dollars, the Jew sells his news stand (to some other Jew beginning a similar career) and buys into a business where the chances of monetary profits are greater. He takes to selling haberdashery, hosiery, and real estate. Businesses in which the margin of profit is limited by established prices do not interest him.

But you must have some money with which to buy even a news stand. The young Jews who have no money at all to start with, and certainly no legitimate positions to fill [21], take to selling. They sell kitchen utensils from door to door, things which have no standard price, "blind articles," they are called, on which the return in profit is from five hundred to a thousand percent. These young Jews have created an amazing variety of things to sell.

There was always a strong streak of perverseness in my nature. After being graduated from Public school, in which I showed no aptness for arguments or science, but did write a history of the world in rhymed couplets, I was expected to at least find a position in an office. I went to work instead, in a smoking-pipe factory where the air was full of an evil-smelling dust, most obnoxious in my division where the stems were cut. The factory was on Avenue B and Seventeenth Street, the very heart of the East Side, but there was only one other Jew working in that factory, a Galician Jew who was foreman. When he learned that I was not only a Jew but a graduate from public school, he decided that I must be out of my mind.

What becomes of the young Jews who cannot attain to one of the professions, have not the money with which to buy a news stand or the mental resourcefulness to create a selling line? Most of them remain on the street-corners of their neighborhoods and become the petty thieves, hold-up-men, strike-breakers, back-store crap-shooters, street-corner mashers, dope peddlers and dope smugglers, white slave traffickers, kidnappers and petty racketeers of every peaceful community in America.

Certainly Jews are not the only people who become gangsters, to make civilized life on this continent creepy with a thousand species of repellent crime. The Irish, Greek and Italian immigrants contribute their substantial share. There is, however, this difference between their respective contributions. The Irishman, the Italian and the Greek become criminals out of sheer necessity, and remain so only as long as the necessity lasts. As in every other thing the Jew touches, he immediately conceives of it as a career. The Irish, Italian and Greek gangsters are skin sores on the social body. Eventually, with a little application of remedy, they can be cleared away. The Jewish gangster imbeds himself deeply in the flesh of society. He becomes a permanent if not a fatal tumor."
[END]

https://www.jrbooksonline.com/Roth_JML/chapter_06.htm
https://www.jrbooksonline.com/roth.htm

"In light of the reality that the Vatican has been ruled by the Khazarian Cabal practically forever (that’s why the pope wears a zucchetto skullcap which is really a Hebrew yarmulka or kippah), it appears that Prevost has been methodically mind-controlled and socially engineered since the very day he took birth.

Which is exactly why his hidden Khazarian masters installed an American in the papacy during this raging Second American Revolution. Clearly his Freemasonic/Talmudic handlers will use him to carry out the religious Great Reset in ways that only he could achieve.

Just as Pope Francis was deliberately named to deceive the masses, Pope Leo was also meticulously branded to sell the NWO goods to the faithful masses."

https://stateofthenation.info/?p=19536#more-19536

Example. "10 Things That Must Happen To Save America"
https://rmactsc.wordpress.com/2013/07/27/10-things-that-must-happen-to-save-america/

Jude 7

7: Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and GOING AFTER STRANGE FLESH, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

Those who seek to force integration in the schools and churches are now beginning to admit that their real purpose is to bring about RACIAL INTERMARRIAGE. They have been deceived certain well-meaning but ignorant clergymen into helping them. Even without intermarriage, JUST ALLOWING NEGROES AND THE OTHER RACES INTO THE WHITE CHURCHES IS DISOBEDIENCE TO GOD. Do you say, "I didn't see THAT in my Bible?" That is because (deliberate) translation conceals it from you. No doubt, you were puzzled when you read the following:

Deuteronomy 23:2

2: A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD.

You wondered at this, because an illegitimate child is not to blame for the sins of its parents; and why should the penalty extend from ten generations? They might all be legitimately born.

But the Hebrew word mis-translated "bastard" is the word "mamzer:" It means a MIXTURE, A HALF-BREED OR MONGREL. It has nothing to do with whether a child's parents were married, but it refers to THE FORBIDDEN INTERMIXTURE OF RACES. THAT IS WHY THE PENALTY EXTENDS FOR TEN GENERATIONS: and it shows how seriously God treats this sin. It is true that the mulatto child is not to blame for his parents' sins: BUT HE IS STILL A MULATTO. The first generation would be a half-breed; the second would have at least a quarter of the other races blood; the third at least one-eighth; the fourth, one-sixteenth; and so on. IN THE TENTH GENERATION, THE BLOOD MAY BE AS SMALL AS ONE PART IN 1,024; YET GOD HIMSELF SAYS THAT THIS IS TOO MUCH TO BE ALLOWED TO "ENTER INTO THE CONGREGATION OF THE LORD."

The unfortunate children of such marriages or unions are not the guilty ones, of course: the sin is that of their parents. Yet the fact that they cannot help what they are does not change the permanent fact that THEY ARE WHAT THEY ARE. The experience of thousands of years has demonstrated that the dark races do not have what it takes to produce the White Man's high civilization; they have never had it in their own lands, and they only have it here because we, the White majority, make it so."

https://israelect.com/reference/WillieMartin/God%20Commands%20Separation%20[A].htm
---------X
AT THE SAME LINK AS ABOVE, BUT FURTHER DOWN:

KOL NIDRE

On a Chicago Illinois Television Station, on the Day of Atonement in 1992,the announcer said in effect: "Synagogues and temples throughout the city were crowded yesterday as the 24 hour fast began. As Rabbis called on the Jewish people TO JOIN THE FAST, TO SOUND THE KOL NIDRE, THE TRADITIONAL MELODY USED AT THE START OF YOM KIPPUR, AS A GESTURE OF GOOD‑WILL."

That Christians accepted this as a true statement, without any question at all, is amazing. For THE "KOL NIDRE" PRAYER IS A "LICENSE" FOR THE JEWS TO DECEIVE AND CHEAT CHRISTIANS AND NON‑JEWS FOR THE NEXT YEAR, as they have obtained forgiveness in advance from "their" god to lie, cheat, steal and deceive.

Therefore, it is clear for all to see, by the Jews own admission. The Kol Nidre permits the Jews to commit murder, steal, robbery, lying, child molestation, murder of the unborn, sodomy, false swearing (under oath). A Jew is free to commit all of the above and many other such acts with impunity.

Every oath a Jew takes whether in a court of law, or before a public official (whether their hand is on the Holy Bible or not), they can and will lie to cause harm to Christians and non‑Jews. Every Jewish Judge, attorney, court recorder or Government employee is free to doctor or change official records or testimony for their benefit and/or to cause harm to Christians or non‑Jews, at any time, at any place on earth." [MORE]

https://israelect.com/reference/WillieMartin/God%20Commands%20Separation%20[A].htm

"HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sat down with Newsmax’s Greta Van Susteren Tuesday evening and exposed the dirtiest trick in the American food system. He says corporations hijacked an FDA loophole called “GRAS” to quietly flood our food with untested chemicals—without ever proving they were safe.

And the consequences didn’t take long to show up.

In the late 1980s and early ’90s, something strange started happening in America. Chronic illness was on the rise. Obesity rates soared. Autoimmune diseases became more common.

It felt like the health of the nation was unraveling.

According to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., that wasn’t a coincidence. It was the result of a corporate takeover.

“At that time… the tobacco industry took over the food industry,” he said.

“By the early 1990s, the two biggest food companies in the world were R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris.”

The same companies that had perfected the art of chemical addiction through cigarettes were now running the food system. And Kennedy says they brought the same playbook with them.

“They began moving scientists from the endeavor of making tobacco more addictive to developing new lab ingredients that would make food addictive.”

That’s when everything changed.

What had once been real food—grown, cooked, and served—became something else entirely. A highly engineered product designed not to nourish, but to keep people hooked.

The health consequences were immediate. But behind it all, there was something even more insidious: the regulatory system meant to protect Americans had already been compromised.

“Those chemicals were largely untested because of the capture of the FDA by the food and drug industries,” Kennedy warned.

The public trusted the FDA. But the FDA, Kennedy says, had already been captured by the very industries it was supposed to regulate.

Then came the dirtiest trick of all.

Kennedy revealed how the food industry hijacked a decades-old FDA loophole—one that allowed a flood of untested chemicals into our diets.

It started back in the 1940s, when the FDA first began regulating food.

At the time, they made one reasonable exception: ingredients with a long history of safe use—like wheat, eggs, and dairy—wouldn’t need testing.

“When the FDA first began regulating foods in the 1940s, it exempted food ingredients that had been used for generations—like wheat, eggs, and dairy,” Kennedy said.

“They didn’t require testing for those.” But decades later, that narrow exemption was quietly weaponized.

“The food industry later captured that label and applied it to every new chemical they wanted to add.”

Instead of testing new additives, companies simply claimed they were “generally recognized as safe.” And the FDA, Kennedy said, went along with it.

The result? America now has more than 10,000 approved food ingredients. Europe? Just 400.

“In the U.S., chemicals are never safety tested before being added to food,” he said.

Some of those ingredients are derived from petroleum. Others mimic the flavor of strawberries or blueberries, without providing a single nutrient. And they’re not just empty calories.

“These chemicals hijack the brain and trick the body into eating more food while getting less nutrition.” That’s not just unhealthy—it’s unprecedented.

“We are now the fourth most obese country in the world,” Kennedy said, “yet for the first time in history, obesity is often accompanied by malnutrition.”

Think about that for a second.

“The people who are most obese are also malnourished. That’s never been seen before in human history.”

[CONTINUES]:
https://modernity.news/2025/05/08/rfk-jr-blows-the-lid-off-big-foods-worst-scam/

"Ukraine, Palestine, Pakistan, Syria, Haiti – war is indeed a contagion. Yet, certain wars are orchestrated years, if not decades, in advance, as those who read “The Plot to Seize Russia” will understand. Few realize that the war on Gaza was also carefully orchestrated years ago.

“Hamas was encouraged and really started by Israel and the United States to counteract Yasser Arafat.” – Ron Paul

Hamas originated in December 1987 at the start of the first Palestinian intifada. Unlike the PLO, Hamas was rooted in Sunni religious ideology and viewed the battle against Israel as a religious jihad. The PLO and Arafat recognized Israel’s right to exist in 1988; Hamas did not. Hamas declared Arafat was “a creature of Israel” and vehemently opposed his two-state stance.

When Egypt lost Gaza to Israel after the Arab-Israeli War of 1967, the Muslim Brotherhood moved to Gaza...." [Continues]:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/did-the-cia-and-israel-create-hamas/

William Holmes McGuffey is the author of the McGuffey Reader, which was used for over 100 years in our public schools with over 125 million copies sold until it was stopped in 1963. President Lincoln [had] called him the "Schoolmaster of the Nation." Listen to these words of Mr. McGuffey:

"The Christian religion is the religion of our country. From it are derived our nation, on the character of God, on the great moral Governor of the universe. On its doctrines are founded the peculiarities of our free Institutions. From no source has the author drawn more conspicuously than from the sacred Scriptures. From all these extracts from the Bible,I make no apology."

Patrick Henry's full statement, which contained his most famous phrase, is almost never known by the public:

"An appeal to arms and the God of hosts is all that is left us. But we shall not fight our battle alone. There is a just God that presides over the destinies of nations. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone. Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it Almighty God. I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death."

https://famguardian.org/Subjects/ChristianHeritage/Articles/ForgottenHistory.htm

THE CHARTS THEMSELVES ARE SHOWING ONLY AT THE LINK AT THE END. THEY SEEM NOT TO SHOW IN THE POST ITSELF.

THE SECOND 2 LINKS BELOW THAT - WERE POSTED ON OR NEAR JAN 2011.

Chart 1

Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence
Published 1976

Chart 1 reveals the linear connection between the Rothschilds and the Bank of England, and the London banking houses which ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York. The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn,Loeb & Co. were the firms which set up the Jekyll Island Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was drafted, who directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by Congress, and who purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914. These firms had their principal officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Advisory Council in 1914. In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks. Examination of the charts and text in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976 and the current stockholders list of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks show this same family control.


N.M. Rothschild , London - Bank of England
______________________________________
| |
| J. Henry Schroder

| Banking | Corp.
| |
Brown, Shipley - Morgan Grenfell - Lazard - |
& Company & Company Brothers |
| | | |
--------------------| -------| | |
| | | | | |
Alex Brown - Brown Bros. - Lord Mantagu - Morgan et Cie -- Lazard ---|
& Son | Harriman Norman | Paris Bros |
| | / | N.Y. |
| | | | | |
| Governor, Bank | J.P. Morgan Co -- Lazard ---|
| of England / N.Y. Morgan Freres |
| 1924-1938 / Guaranty Co. Paris |
| / Morgan Stanley Co. | /
| / | \Schroder Bank
| / | Hamburg/Berlin
| / Drexel & Company /
| / Philadelphia /
| / /
| / Lord Airlie
| / /
| / M. M. Warburg Chmn J. Henry Schroder
| | Hamburg --------- marr. Virginia F. Ryan
| | | grand-daughter of Otto
| | | Kahn of Kuhn Loeb Co.
| | |
| | |
Lehman Brothers N.Y -------------- Kuhn Loeb Co. N. Y.
| | --------------------------
ľ
| | | |
8
| | | |
Lehman Brothers - Mont. Alabama Solomon Loeb Abraham Kuhn
| | __|______________________|_________
Lehman-Stern, New Orleans Jacob Schiff/Theresa Loeb Nina Loeb/Paul Warburg
------------------------- | | |
| | Mortimer Schiff James Paul Warburg
_____________|_______________/ |
| | | | |
Mayer Lehman | Emmanuel Lehman \
| | | \
Herbert Lehman Irving Lehman \
| | | \
Arthur Lehman \ Phillip Lehman John Schiff/Edith Brevoort Baker
/ | Present Chairman Lehman Bros
/ Robert Owen Lehman Kuhn Loeb - Granddaughter of
/ | George F. Baker
| / |
| / |
| / Lehman Bros Kuhn Loeb (1980)
| / |
| / Thomas Fortune Ryan
| | |
| | |
Federal Reserve Bank Of New York |
|||||||| |
______National City Bank N. Y. |
| | |
| National Bank of Commerce N.Y ---|
| | \
| Hanover National Bank N.Y. \
| | \
| Chase National Bank N.Y. \
| |
| |
Shareholders - National City Bank - N.Y. |
----------------------------------------- |
| /
James Stillman /
Elsie m. William Rockefeller /
Isabel m. Percy Rockefeller /
William Rockefeller Shareholders - National Bank of Commerce N. Y.
J. P. Morgan -----------------------------------------------
M.T. Pyne Equitable Life - J.P. Morgan
Percy Pyne Mutual Life - J.P. Morgan
J.W. Sterling H.P. Davison - J. P. Morgan
NY Trust/NY Edison Mary W. Harriman
Shearman & Sterling A.D. Jiullard - North British Merc. Insurance
| Jacob Schiff
| Thomas F. Ryan
| Paul Warburg
| Levi P. Morton - Guaranty Trust - J. P. Morgan
|
|
Shareholders - First National Bank of N.Y.
-------------------------------------------
J.P. Morgan
George F. Baker
George F. Baker Jr.
Edith Brevoort Baker
US Congress - 1946-64
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders - Hanover National Bank N.Y.
------------------------------------------
James Stillman
William Rockefeller
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders - Chase National Bank N.Y.
---------------------------------------
George F. Baker
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chart 2

Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence
- Published 1983

The J. Henry Schroder Banking Company chart encompasses the entire history of the twentieth century, embracing as it does the program (Belgium Relief Commission) which provisioned Germany from 1915-1918 and dissuaded Germany from seeking peace in 1916; financing Hitler in 1933 so as to make a Second World War possible; backing the Presidential campaign of Herbert Hoover ; and even at the present time, having two of its major executives of its subsidiary firm, Bechtel Corporation serving as Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State in the Reagan Administration.

The head of the Bank of England since 1973, Sir Gordon Richardson, Governor of the Bank of England (controlled by the House of Rothschild) was chairman of J. Henry Schroder Wagg and Company of London from 1963-72, and director of J. Henry Schroder,New York and Schroder Banking Corporation,New York,as well as Lloyd's Bank of London, and Rolls Royce. He maintains a residence on Sutton Place in New York City, and as head of "The London Connection," can be said to be the single most influential banker in the world.


J. Henry Schroder
-----------------
|
|
|
Baron Rudolph Von Schroder
Hamburg - 1858 - 1934
|
|
|
Baron Bruno Von Schroder
Hamburg - 1867 - 1940
F. C. Tiarks |
1874-1952 |
| |
marr. Emma Franziska |
(Hamburg) Helmut B. Schroder
J. Henry Schroder 1902 |
Dir. Bank of England |
Dir. Anglo-Iranian |
Oil Company J. Henry Schroder Banking Company N.Y.
|
|
J. Henry Schroder Trust Company N.Y.
|
|
|
___________________|____________________
| |
Allen Dulles John Foster Dulles
Sullivan & Cromwell Sullivan & Cromwell
Director - CIA U. S. Secretary of State
Rockefeller Foundation

Prentiss Gray
------------
Belgian Relief Comm. Lord Airlie
Chief Marine Transportation -----------
US Food Administration WW I Chairman; Virgina Fortune
Manati Sugar Co. American & Ryan daughter of Otto Kahn
British Continental Corp. of Kuhn,Loeb Co.
| |
| |
M. E. Rionda |
------------ |
Pres. Cuba Cane Sugar Co. |
Manati Sugar Co. many other |
sugar companies. _______|
| |
| |
G. A. Zabriskie |
--------------- | Emile Francoui
Chmn U.S. Sugar Equalization | --------------
Board 1917-18; Pres Empire | Belgian Relief Comm. Kai
Biscuit Co., Columbia Baking | Ping Coal Mines, Tientsin
Co. , Southern Baking Co. | Railroad,Congo Copper, La
| Banque Nationale de Belgique
Suite 2000 42 Broadway | N. Y |
__________________________|___________________________|_
| | |
| | |
Edgar Richard Julius H. Barnes Herbert Hoover
------------- ---------------- --------------
Belgium Relief Comm Belgium Relief Comm Chmn Belgium Relief Com
Amer Relief Comm Pres Grain Corp. U.S. Food Admin
U.S. Food Admin U.S. Food Admin Sec of Commerce 1924-28
1918-24, Hazeltine Corp. 1917-18, C.B Pitney Kaiping Coal Mines
| Bowes Corp, Manati Congo Copper, President
| Sugar Corp. U.S. 1928-32
|
|
|
John Lowery Simpson
-------------------
Sacramento,Calif Belgium Relief |
Comm. U. S. Food Administration Baron Kurt Von Schroder
Prentiss Gray Co. J. Henry Schroder -----------------------
Trust, Schroder-Rockefeller, Chmn Schroder Banking Corp. J.H. Stein
Fin Comm, Bechtel International Bankhaus (Hitler's personal bank
Co. Bechtel Co. (Casper Weinberger account) served on board of all
Sec of Defense, George P. Schultz German subsidiaries of ITT . Bank
Sec of State (Reagan Admin). for International Settlements,
| SS Senior Group Leader,Himmler's
| Circle of Friends (Nazi Fund),
| Deutsche Reichsbank,president
|
|
Schroder-Rockefeller & Co. , N.Y.
---------------------------------
Avery Rockefeller, J. Henry Schroder
Banking Corp., Bechtel Co., Bechtel
International Co. , Canadian Bechtel
Company. |
|
|
|
Gordon Richardson
-----------------
Governor, Bank of England
1973-PRESENT C.B. of J. Henry Schroder N.Y.
Schroder Banking Co., New York, Lloyds Bank
Rolls Royce
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chart 3

Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence
- Published 1976

The David Rockefeller chart shows the link between the Federal Reserve Bank of New York,Standard Oil of Indiana,General Motors and Allied Chemical Corportion (Eugene Meyer family) and Equitable Life (J. P. Morgan).

DAVID ROCKEFELLER
----------------------------
Chairman of the Board
Chase Manhattan Corp
|
|
______|_______________________
Chase Manhattan Corp. |
Officer & Director Interlocks|---------------------
------|----------------------- |
| |
Private Investment Co. for America Allied Chemicals Corp.
| |
Firestone Tire & Rubber Company General Motors
| |
Orion Multinational Services Ltd. Rockefeller Family & Associates
| |
ASARCO. Inc Chrysler Corp.
| |
Southern Peru Copper Corp. Intl' Basic Economy Corp.
| |
Industrial Minerva Mexico S.A. R.H. Macy & Co.
| |
Continental Corp. Selected Risk Investments S.A.
| |
Honeywell Inc. Omega Fund, Inc.
| |
Northwest Airlines, Inc. Squibb Corporation
| |
Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. Olin Foundation
| |
Minnesota Mining & Mfg Co (3M) Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. of NJ
| |
American Express Co. AT & T
| |
Hewlett Packard Pacific Northwestern Bell Co.
| |
FMC Corporation BeachviLime Ltd.
| |
Utah Intl' Inc. Eveleth Expansion Company
| |
Exxon Corporation Fidelity Union Bancorporation
| |
International Nickel/Canada Cypress Woods Corporation
| |
Federated Capital Corporation Intl' Minerals & Chemical Corp.
| |
Equitable Life Assurance Soc U.S. Burlington Industries
| |
Federated Dept Stores Wachovia Corporation
| |
General Electric Jefferson Pilot Corporation
| |
Scott Paper Co. R. J. Reynolds Industries Inc.
| |
American Petroleum Institute United States Steel Corp.
| |
Richardson Merril Inc. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
| |
May Department Stores Co. Norton-Simon Inc.
| |
Sperry Rand Corporation Stone-Webster Inc.
| |
San Salvador Development Company Standard Oil of Indiana
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chart 4

Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence
- Published 1976

This chart shows the interlocks between the Federal Reserve Bank of New York J. Henry Schroder Banking Corp., J. Henry Schroder Trust Co., Rockefeller Center, Inc., Equitable Life Assurance Society ( J.P. Morgan), and the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

Alan Pifer, President
Carnegie Corporation
of New York
----------------------
|
|
----------------------
Carnegie Corporation
Trustee Interlocks --------------------------
---------------------- |
| |
Rockefeller Center, Inc J. Henry Schroder Trust Company
| |
The Cabot Corporation Paul Revere Investors, Inc.
| |
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Qualpeco, Inc.
|
Owens Corning Fiberglas
|
New England Telephone Co.
|
Fisher Scientific Company
|
Mellon National Corporation
|
Equitable Life Assurance Society
|
Twentieth Century Fox Corporation
|
J. Henry Schroder Banking Corporation
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chart 5

Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence
- Published 1976

This chart shows the link between the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Brown Brothers Harriman,Sun Life Assurance Co. (N.M. Rothschild and Sons), and the Rockefeller Foundation.

Maurice F. Granville
Chairman of The Board
Texaco Incorporated
----------------------
|
|
Texaco Officer & Director Interlocks ---------------- Liggett & Myers, Inc.
------------------------------------ |
| |
| |
L Arabian American Oil Company St John d'el Ray Mining Co. Ltd.
O | |
N Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. National Steel Corporation
D | |
O Brown Harriman & Intl' Banks Ltd. Massey-Ferguson Ltd.
N | |
American Express Mutual Life Insurance Co.
| |
N. American Express Intl' Banking Corp. Mass Mutual Income Investors Inc.
M. | |
Anaconda United Services Life Ins. Co.
R | |
O Rockefeller Foundation Fairchild Industries
T | |
H Owens-Corning Fiberglas Blount, Inc.
S | |
C National City Bank (Cleveland) William Wrigley Jr. Co
H | |
I Sun Life Assurance Co. National Blvd. Bank of Chicago
L | |
D General Reinsurance Lykes Youngstown Corporation
| |
General Electric (NBC) Inmount Corporation


** Source: Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence. Staff Report,Committee on Banking,Currency and Housing, House of Representatives, 94th Congress, 2nd Session, August 1976.

[END]
SOURCE:
http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/whofed.html
-----X
[POSTED ON OR NEAR JAN 2011]:

Who Controls the Federal Reserve System? (Part 1)
https://thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-the-federal-reserve-system-part-1/

Who Controlshttps://thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-the-federal-reserve-system-part-2/ the Federal Reserve System? (Part 2)