×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate


Flanders
Member for: 1 month

scp: 1679 (+1723/-44)
ccp: 507 (+521/-14)
votes given: 955 (+844/-111)
score: 2186





Trophies
8
Thomas Massie reposted JohnKerry [ (((Cohen))) ]     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 1 day ago

1 comments

Thomas Massie reposted JohnKerry
Dr. Simon Goddek
@goddeketal

Remember when @RepThomasMassie
absolutely humiliated climate cultist @JohnKerry
during that House hearing—so badly that even his colleagues gave up their time just to let the wreckage continue?!

[Video at link below - Thomas Massie VS John Kerry on climate change [1 min 17 secs]

1:10 AM · Apr 27, 2025

https://x.com/goddeketal/status/1916298994109518284
2
"RFK Jr. Explains EXACTLY How They’re Doing The Chemtrails and Why No “Huge Conspiracy” In Necessary"     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 1 day ago

7 comments

"RFK Jr. Explains EXACTLY How They’re Doing The Chemtrails and Why No “Huge Conspiracy” In Necessary"

[The article has both the transcript and the twitter link to the video. Be sure to check the other link that's below this, too.]


"I’ve been talking about chemtrails on this website for 10+ years….

And each time I do, there’s always a small but very vocal group of people who have extremely strong cognitive dissonance reactions.

They get very angry with me, because their brain can’t quite process the fact that they’ve (1) been lied to for decades, and (2) are being actively poisoned by their Government.

I get it, that’s a very tough red pill to swallow.

But I’ve been right all along, and I want you to notice something: RFK Jr. was just asked about chemtrails AGAIN yesterday on Dr. Phil’s show, and I want you to notice what he says in response….

He doesn’t say “oh that’s not real” or “that’s just a conspiracy” or “I really don’t have any information on that.”

Nope.

None of that.

Instead, he confirms flat out that they’re real and then he says he believes DARPA is doing the spraying.

He also says he’s bringing on someone whose entire job will only be to investigate this and shut it down.

So to all the people who think this is just a huge conspiracy theory and you’re going to go down in the comments section and type “bUt NOah theSE aRe just CONtrails not chEmtrails” derpy derpy derp….you’re going to have to content with RFK Jr. who does not agree with you.

Also, there was one other thing that jumped off the screen to me….

Without even being asked, he confirmed something I’ve told you for YEARS now, and it’s in response to the common question I often hear that goes like this: “But Noah, how could such a huge conspiracy be kept quiet all these years? If they’re spraying every day and so many people are in on it, that means the pilots are in on it, the airports, the people who work on the planes, too many people are in on it for the truth to not come out!”

Have you heard that one?

The answer is very simple, and I’ve tried to tell you for years….

There is no longer any massive spraying jets hooked up to planes.

No, they knew that couldn’t be kept quiet. Not sustainable.

No, it’s much simpler now.

Now they’ve found a way to just put the chemicals directly into the fuel and as the fuel burns and the exhaust comes out, the chemicals come out with it.

Simple!

And almost no one needs to be “in on it”.

In fact, most people flying the planes or working on the planes probably don’t know any different.

But don’t take my word for it, take it from RFK Jr. himself.

Watch here:

HOLEE SHIZZLES‼
RFK JR on Stopping Chemtrails:

We don’t know Who’s Doing it, we think DARPA is doing it. 👀

He says he will bring on someone whose only goal is to stop it.

🔴 MY THOUGHTS:
The most concerning thing about this… how the hell do we not know who is spraying… pic.twitter.com/tQhmDAHNxy

— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) April 29, 2025

TRANSCRIPT:

And my biggest concern is the stratospheric aerosol injections
that are continuously peppered on us every day.

Bromium, aluminum, strontium — it’s sprayed in our skies all day long.
And I know you’ve talked to Dane Wigington about this.
He seems to be one of the experts in the field.

Is there a question?
Yes. How do we stop it?

That is not happening in my agency.
We don’t do that. It’s done, we think, by DARPA.
And a lot of it now is coming out of the jet fuel.

Yes, sir. Those materials are put in jet fuel…

I’m going to do everything in my power to stop it.
We’re bringing on somebody who’s going to think only about that,
find out who’s doing it,
and holding them.

Backup here with captions if needed:

RFK Jr. confirms exactly how they do the chemtrails….and why almost no one needs to be “in on it”. pic.twitter.com/kxA7Z1z9bf

— Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) April 29, 2025

*** https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1917262967000748277 *** [THIS is the video link, in case you didn't recognize it above]

https://chemtrailsexposed.com/2025/04/rfk-jr-explains-exactly-how-theyre-doing-chemtrails/
-----------X
[Flanders]:
An excellent site at explaining chemtrails and the dangers associated with them is below.

>Almost everything you want to know about chemtrails and their effects on YOU are in the following link. Just scroll in it.

"Chemtrails 10 0529 ghent (2)"

https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/chemtrails-10-0529-ghent-2/18562875
---------X
>"Chemtrails / GeoEngineering: the Greatest Crime of All Time…. and Here’s the Evidence"

"This aerosol spraying is not the first time Americans have been used as un-informed experimental laboratory animals. Basically, plans to harm us have never stopped. In 2001, Clifford Carnicom posted an excerpt from the Neuremberg War Trials about biological consent of human “subjects.” This consent is essential, but is not part of these covert crimes." See:

https://wakeup-world.com/2013/08/23/chemtrails-the-greatest-crime-of-all-time/
---------X
>"Former Mayor of Belgium Files complaint against Chemtrails"

"“Don’t confuse this with contrails”, said Vereecke. “Those are harmless condensation trails that are only visible for a few seconds. On the other hand chemtrails are clouds of chemicals and disease causing germs that are deliberately sprayed on us to manipulate our behaviour. The councilmen and – women were stunned and listened to his every word. At last some other subject than a loose tile or a backed-up sewage pipe."

https://www.saveourearth.co.uk/blog/2009/09/former-mayor-of-belgium-files-complaint-against-chemtrails/
3
The Hidden Hand      (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 1 day ago

2 comments

"I Am that I Am," the Mason Proclaims

Equally blasphemous is that in the lecture on the seventh, or Royal Arch Degree, of the York Rite, the Mason initiated is asked the question,

"Are you a Royal Arch Mason?"

His answer is required to be: "I am that I am."8

In other words, in this degree's ritual the Mason has not only acknowledged that the devil, in the guise of Jahbuhlun, is his sacred Lord, but he now is declaring that he, himself, a mere man, is the great I am! In other words, he is saying, "I am God!"

Uncovering the Hidden Hand

Now you see why I entitled this chapter, "The Hidden Hand of the Men of Jahbuhlun."

In the early degrees, the Mason is told that the name of God has been lost. He's even told that he should use a substitute name for God, MAHABONE. But later, after he's swallowed whole the rotten fabric of degree ritual after degree ritual, the bamboozled and propagandized fellow is finally told that the one he is to worship goes by the name Jahbuhlun and that he is now ready to declare himself, a man, as the great I AM.

Obviously, the Illuminati's Masonic elite do not want the general public to know these terrible things. After all, incredibly, Freemasonry's public image is that it is some kind of "Christian" group. So, the pretense must be maintained and the secrets buttoned up from the "profane and vulgar" masses (you and me, dear reader).

Therefore, the name of the horrible God whom the Masons worship must stay hidden.

The name and identity of the hidden God must be concealed at all costs, and thus an appropriate hand sign has been devised to represent this grotesque coverup: the Sign of the Hidden Hand."

[Excerpt is further down at this link]"
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/codex_magica/codex_magica04.htm#FOUR

For photos of current and historical figures using this, see:

http://whale.to/b/hand_sign.html
9
Harry Hay – ‘Father of Gay Liberation,’ Communist, and supporter of NAMBLA the Paedophile Advocacy Group     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 1 day ago

3 comments

Harry Hay was the Communist founder of a group known as the ‘Mattachine Society,’ the first gay rights organisation in the US in the 1950s. He was also a supporter of the paedophile advocacy group known as NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association). He was a member of the Communist Party USA, and wanted to model the Mattachine Society on the cell organisation being used by the Communist Party of the United States.

Here we have an example of a radical Communist and militant homosexual, who was a supporter of a militant paedophile advocacy group.

At the 1986 LA ‘Gay pride’ parade, he wore a sign which said ‘NAMBLA walks with me.’

"When people try and deny the reality of Cultural Marxism and the militant homosexual agenda, they are simply trying to cover up the reality that homosexuality was and is viewed by the Cultural Marxist left, with their ideas from the Frankfurt School, as an ideal way in which to deconstruct social institutions in the West such as the family and Christianity.
[Continues]:

https://smashculturalmarxism.wordpress.com/2015/01/30/harry-hay-communist-father-of-gay-liberation-communist-and-supporter-of-nambla-the-paedophile-advocacy-group/
2
The Statue of Liberty and Freemasonry     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 2 days ago

9 comments

She's always been a demonic whore.

"The Statue of Liberty in New York harbour was presented in 1884 as a gift from the French Grand Orient Temple Masons to the Masons of America in celebration of the centenary of the first Masonic Republic.

She is holding the Masonic "Torch of Enlightenment". Also referred to back in the 1700's by the Illuminati Masons as the "Flaming Torch of Reason". The Torch represents the "Sun" in the sky.

The Statue of Liberty's official title is, "Liberty Enlightening the World".

The cornerstone of the statue records how it was laid in a Masonic ceremony (see plaque photo).

https://freemasonrywatch.org/statue_of_liberty.html
3
Tubal Cain, the Secret Password of a Freemason     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 2 days ago

2 comments

https://freemasonrywatch.org/tubalcain.html
4
What is Water Fluoridation?     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 2 days ago

3 comments

"In the United States, the Oral Health Division of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) hails fluoridation as one of the “top ten public health achievements of the 20th century.” However, comprehensive data from the World Health Organization reveals that there is no discernible difference in tooth decay between the minority of western nations that fluoridate water, and the majority that do not. In fact, the tooth decay rates in many non-fluoridated countries are now lower than the tooth decay rates in fluoridated ones.

As is becoming increasingly clear, fluoridating water supplies is an outdated, unnecessary, and dangerous relic from a 1950s public health culture that viewed the mass distribution of chemicals much differently than scientists do today. The few nations that still fluoridate their water should end the practice immediately."

https://fluoridealert.org/key-topics/what-is-water-fluoridation/
1
He is the smartest, most advanced individual to ever strut the planet     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 2 days ago

2 comments

>And what sort of creature inhabits the modern domain? Who
is the modern man?
------

The puppet-masters say he is the
smartest, most advanced individual to ever strut the planet, the
most relatively liberated being in history. But Louis-Ferdinand
Celine said it well, "What does the modern public want? It
wants to go down on its knees before money and before crap!"

The public have been trained to do this by two principle
methods: direct "speaking" archetypal messages of pure terror
("psychic driving" as the CIA's Dr. Ewan Cameron termed it),
encoded in massively publicized "lone nut" mass murders, and
the sinister flattery heaped upon them by their masters in the
cult of civilization and progress.

The acid test of a human being's freedom and will to protect
the quality of his life, lies in a person's attitude toward his
oppressor. What is modern man's attitude toward Wall Street
and the bankers, toward Dan Rather and the ignorance-
bestowing media and advertising man, toward Lincoln and
Truman, FDR and Reagan, George Bush and Johnny Carson,
Exxon and Monsanto?

As one writer has observed, "The most amazing thing about
the American people is that they are constantly defending their
worst betrayers." Who then is the modern man? He is a mind-
bombed patsy who gets his marching orders from "twilight
language" key words sprinkled throughout "his" news and
current events. Even as he dances to the tune of the elite
managers of human behavior, he scoffs with great derision at
the idea of the existence and operation of a technology of mass
mind control emanating from the media and government.
Modern man is much too smart t o believe anything as
superstitious as that!

Modern man is the ideal hypnotic subject: puffed up on the
idea that he is the crown of creation, he vehemently denies the
power of the hypnotist's control over him, even as his head
bobs up and down on a string.

Michael A. Hoffman II - Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare Page 10
https://www.howardnema.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Secret-Societies-and-Psychological-Warfare-by-Hoffmann-1.pdf
0
Rich White traitors have free reign     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 2 days ago

3 comments


>“Ultimate strength lies anchored within the folk themselves: in their unanimity, in their inner unity, and in their idealistic faith. That is the power which can move the mountains of resistance!” – Adolf Hitler

Whites becoming a minority in America is no longer a future warning, but a present day fact. By now White Nationalists will likely have seen the demographic map, adjusted for the middle-east and north african population, of under 35 year old Whites in North America. If you haven’t, you need to see it.
[Shown at the site]

We are past the point of putting a White Nationalist in the White House. Past the point of groveling for “White Civil Rights”. Past the point of even the illusion of a political solution to our replacement.

The powers that be work very hard to encourage, on the one hand, anti-racial and pro-multicultural sentiments among our folk, while simultaneously allowing a race-neutral patriotism to exist as controlled opposition. To put it in plain terms, the only acceptable opinions “allowed” to us are outright self-destruction from the so-called Left, or a slow descent into mongrelization, wrapped in an American flag, from the so-called Right.

Our people have been struggling to free themselves for several decades now, to little effect. This failure to offer meaningful resistance can in large part be traced to a fatal flaw in our folk-consciousness: that this is still our country.

If, hypothetically, this WERE still the case, elections would offer meaningful change, trust in government and public institutions would be high, the media would offer news and perspectives that were pro-White, anti-social behaviors would be punished instead of celebrated, and so on.

A nice fantasy, but…does any of this sound remotely like what we currently have? If the answer is no, it logically follows that this is NOT our country any longer. We are people without space, a nation without a state. Yet our folk act as if we can find remedy working within the confines of the System.

Call a spade a spade. What we are living under is FOREIGN OCCUPATION, a dictatorship of Jews, allowing rich White traitors free reign, while both use non-Whites as bioweapons against us. They will not let us go our own way without hamstringing us at every turn, attacking us at every opportunity in any form they can get away with.

The Folkish movement offers the remedy: organizing, building communities, creating a culture based on the teachings of Adolf Hitler, and claiming physical territory that will one day be liberated by any means necessary."

[Continues]:
https://volkish.org/2025/04/21/sweet-dreams-and-harsh-realities/
6
Multiculturalism will cause civil war in the West within five years, professor warns     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 2 days ago

5 comments

>https://www.noticer.news/civil-war-multiculturalism-david-betz/

--------------
[BELOW IS THE TEXT, BUT THE ARTICLE ITSELF IS EASIER TO READ, AND IT HAS SEVERAL VIDEOS, TOO].

The Professor has credentials which gives his voice an utmost credence:

"The former chancellor, Betz writes, “once pointed the finger directly at multiculturalism, declaring that in Germany it had ‘utterly failed’.” This was later echoed by Cameron, who stated that multiculturalism “ghettoises people into minority and majority groups with no common identity”.

It is worth emphasising that these remarks do not come from fringe or “far-right” figures, but by the leaders of major European states, both of whom Betz describes as “noteworthy centrists”.

Nations that have adopted multiculturalism have seen a “collapse of trust”, a “draining of social capital” and an “acceleration of factional polarisation”, Betz adds.

This has been encouraged and “inflected by the introduction of identity politics” as the new social norm and has led to the “shattering of a generation of pre-political loyalties of national populations”.
--------------

"A leading academic has warned of the “practically inevitable” occurrence of civil war within western societies within the next five years.

David Betz, a professor of War Studies at King’s College London, has declared a “high statistical probability” of civil conflict “within one or more of at least a dozen countries” before 2030, after which it is extremely likely that this conflict will “metastasize” to other countries.

Betz describe Western states – including Britain, France and America – as “explosively configured” or as proverbial “powder kegs” or “ticking time-bombs” waiting to go off.

Betz’s comments come from a range of podcasts he has appeared on and are based on a 2023 paper he wrote for Military Strategy Magazine titled Civil War Comes to the West.

According to Betz, the chief cause of our impeding conflict is multiculturalism.

Instead of the praise that diversity usually receives among elites, Betz views it as a highly destructive phenomenon. As he writes, multiculturalism (or “identity politics”) is a situation “in which people having a particular racial, religious, ethnic, social, or cultural identity tend to promote their own specific interests or concerns without regard to the interests or concerns of any larger political group.”

Multiculturalism, therefore, is not a source of strength but its polar opposite.

“It is this above all that makes civil conflict in the West not merely likely but practically inevitable,” Betz writes.

In further support of this point, Betz cites key political figures such as former British PM David Cameron and ex-German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

The former chancellor, Betz writes, “once pointed the finger directly at multiculturalism, declaring that in Germany it had ‘utterly failed’.” This was later echoed by Cameron, who stated that multiculturalism “ghettoises people into minority and majority groups with no common identity”.

It is worth emphasising that these remarks do not come from fringe or “far-right” figures, but by the leaders of major European states, both of whom Betz describes as “noteworthy centrists”.

Nations that have adopted multiculturalism have seen a “collapse of trust”, a “draining of social capital” and an “acceleration of factional polarisation”, Betz adds.

This has been encouraged and “inflected by the introduction of identity politics” as the new social norm and has led to the “shattering of a generation of pre-political loyalties of national populations”.

Betz writes that the failures of multiculturalism are manifest in two main ways.

Firstly, they are seen in the ire of common people towards the ruling class, but they are also seen in increasingly obvious inter-group tensions, and Betz writes that the West is now witnessing the “twin vectors” of “a popular revolt against elites” and an emerging “inter-ethnic civil war”.

Betz further cites popular British political commentators Matthew Goodwin and David Goodhart in support of his thesis, as well as Russian-American theorist Peter Turchin, whose work highlights the problem of “political disintegration”.

For, as Betz observes, what we in the West are now experiencing is nothing less than the exhaustion of the post-war liberal order as we approach the “limits of managed democracy” or the end of what others have termed “technocratic managerialism”.

Put simply, our elites’ managerial techniques “no longer work”. “Economically, politically and socially, the West is in the end game,” Betz states.

This has become essentially undeniable as the situation in Western states almost exactly mirrors what the academic literature describes as the “perfect conditions” for civil war.

“It is not simply that the conditions are present in the West; it is, rather, that the conditions are nearing the ideal,” Betz writes.

Betz – citing American expert on civil conflict Barbara Walter – writes that Western states have a trio of trends that are highly-predictive of serious internal strife.

The first is the presence of factionalism – in particular the rise of explicitly ethnic or ethno-religious blocs. The second is the loss of status – or “downgrading” – of the formerly dominant majority. The third is a general loss of faith in society and in the future.

This last trend is especially prevalent among the young and is accompanied by an overall loss of belief in the possibility of social change via normal political methods. Indeed, as Betz affirms, all of these phenomena are “startlingly evident across at least a dozen Western states”.

The young, as mentioned, are particularly badly affected. Relative to their parents, today’s youth are “less likely to own property”, they are “less likely to get married and procreate”, and they are “less likely to earn an equivalent amount of money”. The entire generation is now subject to “declining expectations”’.

Yet the most important driver of civil conflict is “downgrading” or the loss of status of a once-dominate majority. Betz, citing the academic literature, explains that “downgrading” is a term used in civil-war theory that “refers to the perception of a dominant group that what is occurring to them is … a situation of status reversal, not just political defeat”.

“Dominant groups go from a situation where, one moment, they get to decide whose language is spoken, whose laws are enforced, and whose culture is revered, to a situation where they do not.”

This “downgrade” is thus a key casual factor in civil conflict and it is evident across the West. This is especially concerning as the most unstable countries, per Betz, are not highly diverse states (which struggle to unify) but “moderately homogenous societies, particularly when there is a perceived change in the status of a titular majority, or significant minority, which possesses the wherewithal to revolt on its own”.

This is obviously the situation now seen across Europe, North America and Australasia, with “White majorities (trending rapidly toward large minority status in some cases) [which] live alongside multiple smaller minorities”. This also explains the heavy-handed approach Western governments have taken to any form of “White nationalist” or “ethnic particularist” movement, no matter how numerically small.

Yet what has further enflamed tensions is that Anglo-European or “White” majorities are also subject to “a sort of ‘asymmetric multiculturalism’ in which in-group preference, ethnic pride, and group solidarity – notably in voting – are acceptable for all groups except Whites for whom such things are considered to represent supremacist attitudes that are anathematic to social order”.

This has led to a circumstance in which there is a is “a perception that the status quo is invidiously unbalanced, which provides an argument for revolt on the part of the White majority (or large minority) that is rooted in stirring language of justice.”

These are thus the chief causes of what Betz believes is the almost-certain presence of some form of imminent civil war.

The exact form this will take, however, is still unknown. Betz writes that in some countries it may resemble a “Latin-American style dirty war” but in others it may be more akin to the Troubles of Northern Ireland. Yet all states involved will experience a “generalised state of violent civil disorder and accelerating economic decline”.

Crucially, Betz states that our impending internal conflict is likely to involve attacks on urban infrastructure. Utilities such as gas pipelines, electricity grids, and transport and telecommunications networks are all expected to be targeted.

This will result in almost-immediate urban chaos and it will lead to a situation in which “large cities will be practically unliveable for normal people”.

This will precipitate a flight from the cities and a de-facto civil conflict between urban and rural areas. These tensions will be further exacerbated by the ethno-racial reality that rural areas are much more demographically homogenous than their urban counterparts.

Betz writes: “There is a distinctively observable urban-rural dimension to immigrant settlement patterns: basically, the cities are radically more heterogenous than the countryside. Thus, logically, we may conclude that civil wars in the West that burn across ethnic cleavages will have a distinctively rural vs. urban character.”

Indeed, in a further rebuke to our left-liberal utopians, Betz confirms that our impending civil conflict will be strongly determined by ethnicity: “We may observe that the civil wars for which the West is in store will be demarcated along ethnic lines.”

Betz further adds that “approximately 75% of post-Cold War civil conflicts have been fought by ethnic factions” and that we may descend into a nightmarish internal conflict that is “a free-for-all, neighbour-on-neighbour, based on beliefs and skin colour and religion”. A situation, of course, which “would be horrific”.

In support of this, Betz refers to recent ethno-religious tensions in the UK. As he writes, an “intertribal conflict” has emerged in Leicester which has “witnessed recurring violence between the local Hindu and Muslim populations, both sides animated by intercommunal tensions in distant south Asia”, with a Hindu mob marching “through the Muslim part of town chanting ‘Death to Pakistan’.”

These cases of natural tribal affinity clearly undermine the notion of civic nationalism. As Betz observes, what this reflects above all “is the considerable irrelevance of Britishness as an aspect of the pre-political loyalty of significant fraction of two of the largest minorities in Britain. Who wants to fight whom and over what? The answer in this case to this good strategic question has very little to do with the nominal nationality of the people who have observably already begun to fight.”

What we are witnessing, therefore, is the crack-up of western states. Our countries, Betz writes, have shifted from largely cohesive societies with a general “sense of common identity and heritage” into “incohesive political entities, jigsaw puzzles of competing identity-based tribes, living in large part in virtually segregated ‘communities’ competing over diminishing societal resources increasingly obviously and violently”.

The broader picture to come from all this is that West may soon see “large-scale population movements” – akin to what occurred in Europe at the end of Second World War – and the formation of “newly balkanised ethnic statelets”.

What Betz claims is now occurring is nothing less than a “new status quo based around the retribalisation of western societies”.

Australia is not explicitly mentioned in Betz’s analysis, but we can note that many – if not all – of the preconditions of civil conflict are present here. Examples like our nationwide pro-Palestine protests, Sydney’s Cronulla Riots, and ram-raid attacks and sectarian violence in Melbourne between Hindu and Sikh communities only further confirms Betz’s thesis.

Header image: A police van burns during civil unrest in England after the stabbing murders of three English girls by a Rwandan knifeman (By StreetMic LiveStream,

https://www.noticer.news/civil-war-multiculturalism-david-betz/
1
"Shoot Americans? (New World Order Survey) - Survey Results One In Four Marines would fire!"     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 3 days ago

8 comments


-----

"Very Disturbing: This is how the question was posed to the Marines: "The U.S. Government declares a ban on the possession, sale, transportation, and transfer of all non‑sporting firearms. A thirty (30) day amnesty period is permitted for these firearms to be turned over to the local authorities. At the end of this period, a number of citizen groups refuse to turn over their firearms. [b]"Consider the following statement:'I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government'."[/b] The question was then posed as to what degree the individual Marine agreed with the statement. According to results given in Cunningham's thesis, a total of 88 percent, or 264 Marines, responded to the question. Of the 264 who responded, 26.34 percent, or 79 Marines indicated they would be willing to fire upon U.S. citizens."

Of that total, 18.67 percent or 56 Marines, indicated they "agree" with the statement, and 7.67 percent or 23 Marines, indicated that "strongly agree." A total of 61.66 percent, or 185, indicated that they were opposed to firing on citizens.

Of that total, 42.33 percent, or 127 indicated they "strongly disagree" and 19.33 percent or 58, indicated they "disagree." In is thesis, Cunningham noted: "This particular question, unlike the others, elicited from 15.97 percent of the respondents with an opinion, either heavier pen or pencil marks on the response or written comments in the margin space. The responses to this scenario suggest that a complete unit breakdown could occur in a unit tasked to execute this mission."

In other words, if a commander asked the men of his unit to raise their hands in a simple poll, he could determine the position of such servicemen and those who responded in the affirmative could be tasked for such a mission. This is just one of the reasons the question, not to mention the fact that it was allowed to be asked, is obviously potentially dangerous. In fact, several [b]months before the survey was taken at Twenty‑Nine Palms, the SPOTLIGHT, MODERN GUN and other publications revealed the question posed by Cunningham in his survey had ben asked of members of a U.S. Seal (Sea‑Air‑land) team. In addition, despite Navy and Marine Corps denials, there have been dozens of reports, unconfirmed, that the survey has been given to other servicemen, as well as various law enforcement agents.[/b]
--------
The results of another question, No. 45, posed by the survey indicates American soldiers are not eager to swear allegiance to the United Nations, although nearly one in four would do so. Question 45 states: "I would swear to the following code:'I am a United Nations fighting person. I serve in the forces which maintain world peace and every nation's way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their defense'." A total of 69.33 percent, or 208 Marines surveyed, indicated they disagreed, with 117, or 39 percent, indicating they strongly disagreed.

[b]On the other hand, 71 Marines, or 23.66 percent, indicated they would be willing to swear such allegiance to the UN,[/b] with 19, or 6.33 percent, indicating they were strongly in favor of doing so. "For thousands of years." Cunningham notes in his thesis, "military organizations have required their soldiers to swear to some kind of code or allegiance. A code provides a standard for the soldiers to live up to and, in many cases, to die for. A code can be a powerful tool for establishing and sustaining unit cohesion. But what if the mission a solider is assigned to perform counters or confuses the code he has sworn to uphold? Question 45 was presented to determine if the solders would swear to such a code." No one knows if the American personnel traveling in the helicopter shot down over Iraq [by "friendly fire"] in April 1994 would have sworn allegiance to such a code.

[b]Yet, Vice President Albert Gore stated that these Americans "died in the service of The United Nations."[/b] "It is patently clear," a retired high ranking Army Officer told The SPOTLIGHT,"that this survey raises some very serious issues, not the least of which is that U.S. servicemen are not being properly educated as to the limits of their service in the civilian sector. This is most dangerous, and, I should think the Congress has an obligation to the people to take a careful look at this, not to mention the people at the Pentagon."

https://israelect.com/reference/WillieMartin/FIRE-1%20[A].htm
1
"The not-so-friendly Jewish Board Members at the World Economic Forum" [ INCLUDING, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe ]     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 4 days ago

0 comments


"Peter Brabeck-Letmathe

Known more simply as Peter Brabeck, his WEF profile declares him the Vice-Chairman of the Board of Trustees. Brabeck was the CEO of Nestle Corporation for over ten years, and Chairman of the Board for part of that time. He is a former Board member of Credit Suisse, Exxon-Mobile, and L’Oreal, among many others. He was also the Former Chairman, of the 2030 Water Resources Group, a public-private partnership operating as part of the World Bank.

Brabeck provoked outrage and condemnation when in a 2005 documentary titled We Feed the World, he shared some of his own views. Only slightly distorted, this is a fairly good summary of Brabeck’s statements: “Brabeck believes that nature is not ‘good,’ that there is nothing to worry about with GMO foods, that profits matter above all else, that people should work more, and that human beings do not have a right to water.” He made others. Nestle has been involved in ongoing scandals in California for its low-cost access to major water sources for its high-priced bottled water sales, during extended drought when other Californians suffered rationing.

In 1998, for Israel’s fiftieth independence celebration, Israeli PM Netanyahu bestowed “the highest tribute ever awarded by the State of Israel, the Jubilee Award,” recognizing those individuals and organizations that have done the most to strengthen Israel’s economy. Peter Brabeck-Letmathe of Nestle was one of three recipients in the Food category.

This source is also highly suggestive:

Nestle owns 50.1% of Osem Investments, an Israel-based company engaged directly in the production and distribution of food products in Israel and abroad. The Nestle Purina Israel, Director and Corporate Executive at Osem Investment Ltd and CEO of Osem International Ltd., Gad Propper, is the Chairman of the Israel-European Union Chamber of Commerce. He is also Chairman of L’Oreal Israel, 30% owned by L’Oreal, another prominent supporter of Israel.

Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, CEO of Nestle, is also on the Board of Directors of L’Oreal, that has a history of breaking laws to support Israel. He is also a director of Credit Suisse, which is a board member of the Swiss-Israeli Chamber of Commerce. Brabeck-Letmathe is also on the foundation board of the World Economic Forum (WEF), which in 2006 removed from its Global Agenda Magazine an article that called for a peaceful boycott of Israel until it complied to international law and human rights. In contrast to the WEF’s promotion of peaceful free speech, the article was said to be “totally in contradiction to … the Forum’s mission and values.”

Nestlé, the world’s largest food company, set up their R&D Center in Israel (greatly enhancing Israel through their technical know-how, expertise and distribution channels). This R&D center was built on Sderot – stolen and illegally occupied Palestinian land that was once a town called Najd. The presence of Nestle’s plant effectively sabotages the Palestinians’ right to return as stated by UN Resolution 194 and also the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 13, Section 2." Continues with Peter Brabeck and MANY MORE of the jews interlocking network within the WEF and MANY associated corporations and organizations.

https://human-synthesis.ghost.io/2023/08/21/the-not-so-friendly-folks-at-the-world-economic-forum/
4
Peter Brabeck-Letmathe takes over at WEF, former CEO of the Nestlé, and involved with the European Round Table of Industrialists and Bilderbergers     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 4 days ago

4 comments


"Klaus Schwab is out; Peter Brabeck-Letmathe takes over with immediate effect"

"Peter Brabeck-Letmathe (“Brabeck”) is an Austrian businessman and former chairman and CEO of the Nestlé Group.

Writing in The Guardian in 2006, Jane Martinson noted that “Peter Brabeck-Letmathe is an unlikely bogeyman. Yet ask many food campaigners to name their least favourite corporate executive and the silver-haired Austrian at the head of the world’s largest food company, Nestlé, would come high on many lists.”

As well as Nestlé, he has also held positions on the board of directors of Credit Suisse Group, L’Oréal and ExxonMobil.

Additionally, Brabeck has been involved in various influential organisations and events. He is a member of the Attali Commission, the European Round Table of Industrialists and the London Technology Club. He is chairman of the Geneva Science and Diplomacy Anticipator (“GESDA”) Foundation, which was launched in 2015 by the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs to find ways to strengthen Geneva’s role in global governance. He is also the founder and chairman of the 2030 Water Resources Group, a public-private partnership that operates within the World Bank.

And last but not least, he has been a longstanding vice-chairman of WEF’s board of trustees. With Klaus Schwab stepping down as head of WEF’s board of trustees on 20 April, Brabeck has been named interim chairman until a new chairman has been found.

WEF has established a “Search Committee” to select a new chairman, a WEF statement said on Monday, without indicating when a new chair might be appointed. According to CEO Today, Brabeck’s close relationship with Schwab and longstanding involvement in WEF make him the clear frontrunner to become Schwab’s permanent successor.

Contents of this article shows his significant involvement in the following and continues with full details at the link:

Brabeck, Nestlé and the 1973 Chilean Coup
Attali Commission
European Round Table of Industrialists and Bilderbergers
2030 Water Resources Group
The London Technology Club

https://expose-news.com/2025/04/24/klaus-schwab-is-out/ [THIS ARTICLE LINK]
----------X
Peter Brabeck-Letmathe 1944— [BUSINESS Biography]
https://www.referenceforbusiness.com/biography/A-E/Brabeck-Letmathe-Peter-1944.html
0
Illegal Invader released by Biden raped a 13 year old boy in Florida [1 Min]     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 4 days ago

1 comments

https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1630066/breaking-illegal-released-by-biden-rped-a-13-year-old-boy-in-florida/
1
"Trump’s Voter ID Plan Stopped by Federal Judge – Her Past Move Against a 75 year-old Christian Grandma Revealed"      (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 4 days ago

3 comments


"Washington, D.C. – U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly dealt a blow to President Trump’s voter ID plan on April 24, 2025, issuing a 120-page ruling that blocks the administration from requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote and from assessing the citizenship of public assistance recipients, per Twitchy []. The decision, which also prevents the Election Assistance Commission from withholding federal funds from non-compliant states, has conservatives on X, like @MAGAForce2024, fuming: “If everyone on the planet can vote in America’s elections, there is no such thing as America anymore!” [Continues]:

https://www.usasupreme.com/trumps-voter-id-plan-stopped-by-federal-judge-her-past-move-against-christian-grandma-revealed/
23
"Polish professor estimates how much each migrant costs Poland, says immigrants want ‘revenge’ against Europe"     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 4 days ago

8 comments

"The University of Warsaw professor said Poland cannot afford mass immigration and that those that come to Poland want "revenge" against Europe"

https://rmx.news/article/polish-professor-estimates-how-much-each-migrant-costs-poland-says-immigrants-want-revenge-against-europe/
3
1 Lone Russian vs. an Entire Clan of Illegals [Video 45 Seconds]     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 4 days ago

3 comments

https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1630080/the-1-lone-russian-vs-an-entire-clan-of-illegals-ridiculous-it-s-everywhere/
5
"Why don’t Poles like banks? President of major bank blames it on ‘anti-Semitism’ because Jews were the ‘only moneylenders’     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 4 days ago

2 comments

[There are more descriptions and explanations before the article gets to the part below]:

"There was a sharp war of words, for instance, with Israel and Poland back in 2019, which involved former Foreign Minister Yisrael Katz stating that Poles “imbibe anti-Semitism in their mothers’ milk.” It did not help afterwards that op-eds appeared in the Israeli press affirming that this statement is true.

The Polish publication Do Rzeczy writes that, in light of the banker’s statement, “it is worth recalling that the average interest rate on new loans in Poland is the highest in Europe. Moreover, according to data from the Central Statistical Office, in 2024 the net financial result of banks amounted to PLN 42,001 million, which means an increase of 51.9 percent year-on-year.”

The balance sheet total of banks at the end of 2024 was 10.8 percent higher than a year earlier and amounted to PLN 3.317 trillion, or €773 billion."

https://rmx.news/article/why-dont-poles-like-banks-president-of-major-bank-blames-it-on-anti-semitism-because-jews-were-the-only-moneylenders/
5
Russia wants immediate peace talks. ((( Zelensky))) wants perpetual war [to kill more White Ukrainians and Russians]     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 4 days ago

2 comments

https://www.rt.com/russia/616374-zelensky-peace-talks-preconditions/
0
"Nordic state to invest millions in ‘war railway’" - "Finland has reportedly earmarked funds....     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 4 days ago

0 comments


"Finland has reportedly earmarked funds for planning a link that would enable the movement of NATO hardware from Sweden and Norway

Finland has allocated €20 million for the planning of a new railway line connecting the Nordic nation with neighboring Sweden and Norway that would facilitate the movement of NATO military equipment in the event of war, according to the newspaper Iltalehti.

Helsinki abandoned its longstanding policy of neutrality and joined the US-led military bloc in April 2023, citing security concerns over the Ukraine conflict. Sweden followed suit in 2024, citing the same reasons. In response, Moscow vowed to beef up its defensive posture in northwestern Russia.

In the article on Wednesday, Iltalehti, citing anonymous government sources, claimed that the rail project is getting underway now that the Finnish government has earmarked the funds for its planning. According to the publication, the cost of the entire undertaking will likely run into billions of euros, with actual construction work expected to “take place well into the 2030s.”

The article further claimed that the Finnish government is hoping to secure European Union funding for the project.
Russia could attack in a ‘couple of years’ – NATO state READ MORE: Russia could attack in a ‘couple of years’ – NATO state

Explaining the need for the railway project in an interview to Iltalehti back in November, Finland’s minister of transport and communications, Lulu Ranne cited a perceived Russian threat.

“Tanks and cannons must be able to be moved in any situation,” she emphasized at the time.

According to a NATO policy update published last month, the bloc is “continuing to integrate [its] newest members – Finland and Sweden – into plans, forces, and command structures, including by developing a presence in Finland.”

Earlier this week, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated that with NATO military infrastructure having been “gradually appearing on Finnish territory” in recent years, Moscow is taking “measures to improve its security that our military deems necessary.”

Speaking to French weekly Le Point, he emphasized that Russia never had “any problems” with Finland or Sweden joining NATO, and has no intention of attacking them.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has rejected allegations that Moscow harbors any aggressive intentions toward NATO countries, calling them “nonsense” designed to alarm Western Europeans and legitimize major increases in defense budgets."

https://www.rt.com/news/616372-media-finland-railway-plans-nato-hardware/
5
"Israeli's Attempt to Sink the U.S.S. Liberty"      (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 1 week ago

0 comments


"The U.S.S. Liberty was deliberately attacked in International Waters as it monitored communications during the Six‑Day War. Israel used U.S.‑donated equipment to jam the ship's S.O.S., hoping to sink it and murder all aboard"

1967: The U.S.S. Liberty was deliberately attacked in International Waters as it monitored communications during the Six‑Day War. Israel used U.S.‑donated equipment to jam the ship's S.O.S., hoping to sink it and murder all aboard before word could get out. 34 sailors were butchered and 170 wounded in this blatant Act of War. The Liberty was part of the Sixth Fleet, a powerful group of men and ships paid for by U.S. Taxpayers to protect the Israeli's. What do the Jews think of our American Service Men, the descendants of the men who pulled their chestnuts out of the fire in World War II? Read the following for Just a sample of the many murders of American military, the Jews have committed.

Even though the United States, beguiled by Zionist propaganda and fearful of domestic political pressures by the Israeli lobby in the United States, has been the major supporter of Israel and has become an accessory to Israeli crimes by providing the financial backing and sinews of war used by the Israelis, Americans, and even American servicemen, are not exempt from Israeli-perpetrated massacres if the highest Israeli authorities consider them to be in the way of their objectives.

During the June 1967 war of aggression unleashed by Israel against Egypt, Jordan and Syria, it was vitally important to the Israeli leaders that their plan for aggression against the Arab countries should not be monitored. They were exceedingly upset at the presence of an American intelligence ship, the USS Liberty, in the Eastern Mediterranean monitoring communications traffic in the area.

According to CIA Intelligence Reports, General Moshe Dayan ordered the June 8, 1967, strafing by Israeli aircraft of the USS Liberty and the resultant massacre of her defenseless crew of American sailors. In the words of Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, United States Navy, "During this unprovoked attack, 34 U.S. Navy men were killed and 171 wounded."

���
The U.S.S. Liberty was deliberately attacked in International Waters as it monitored communications during the Six‑Day War. Israel used U.S.‑donated equipment to jam the ship's S.O.S., hoping to sink it and murder all aboard before word could get out. 34 sailors were butchered and 170 wounded in this blatant Act of War.

The Liberty was part of the Sixth Fleet, a powerful group of men and ships paid for by U.S. Taxpayers to protect the Israeli's. What do the Jews think of our American Service Men, the descendants of the men who pulled their chestnuts out of the fire in World War II? Read the following for Just a sample of the many murders of American military, the Jews have committed.

���� Israeli's Attempt to Sink the U.S.S. Liberty

An eyewitness report from the U.S.S. Liberty, by John Hrankowski: "June 8, 1967, was a bright, sunny day in international waters off Egypt. A breeze tracked our electronic‑laden vessel, the U.S.S. Liberty, cruising under orders of the U.S. Navy. As an engineer I was not on deck, but when several jets began buzzing us I bounded to the main deck. My shipmates waved, laughed, and joked. Among the planes was a Piper Cub, clearly marked with the Star of David. The plane flew so low and so slowly that we could see its camera turret as it snapped our picture. Over our communications equipment we could hear the aircraft identify our ship as the U.S.S. Liberty. These were our allies, our friends, the Israeli's. Several hours later, about 2 P.M., the jets returned and made five to seven passes over us, machine‑gunning and rocketing our lightly‑armed ship. More planes arrived, this time Mirage Jets, and loosed bursts of bullets and cannon fire as well as napalm into the ship.

���
In the initial attack, nine of my surprised comrades died, scores more were lying everywhere, wounded, horribly burned, moaning, dead or dying. I was seriously wounded by rocket shrapnel. This, however, was not the end of the two‑and‑one‑half hour ordeal. Israeli torpedo boats streaked toward our stricken ship and fired five torpedoes. One hit home, bringing violent death to 25 more American crew members. Preparing to abandon ship, some of my shipmates dropped rubber rafts into the sea. It seemed like a horrible, slow motion movie as we watched the(Israeli) Torpedo Boats Circle Back and

Fire Machine Guns at the Helpless Survivors on Deck and in the Rubber Rafts Already in the Sea. One curious torpedo boat skipper even picked up an empty raft ‑‑ perhaps to keep as a souvenir.

���
To prevent the Liberty from communicating with other vessels and navy communication centers, our radio was jammed. This, we later learned, could only have been accomplished by a 'Friendly' nation who knew our radio frequencies...For 19 (This report was published in The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs ‑‑ December, 1986) my shipmates and I have been trying to get out the truth about the attack that killed 34 Americans and wounded 171 others. All of us agree that The Attack Could Not Possibly Have Been A Mistake. The Israeli aircraft that came within 200 feet, the messages giving the ship's name, the two large U.S. Navy Flags billowing in the breeze, the big GTR‑5 stenciled on the bow; characters well known to friend and foe as a U.S. Navy designation, all clearly identified us.

���
For years our crew was puzzled, and incredulous, when Israeli authorities claimed our ship had been mistaken for an Egyptian freighter. Of it all I Believe it was no Coincidence that the Israeli Attack Took Place on June 8, and that the next day Israel invaded Syrian territory, capturing the Golan Heights, an area it still holds years later and which it now says it has annexed for permanent retention.

���
The Liberty was a navy electronic 'ferret' research vessel, listening to communications from both sides in the Six Day War...Very little of this information has ever reached the American public. Even Congress, importuned for decades by survivors to at least investigate the reasons behind the attack on a U.S. Military Vessel, up to now has refused to do so. After the attack, when the surviving crew members were still together aboard the ship, we were Officially Warned not to talk to Reporters. The Navy has Never been willing to release, even to us, a list of crew members so that we can mobilize them to tell our story...

���
I speak frequently in the upstate New York area, and I find people invariably shocked that they have been kept ignorant of this incident. The fact that the American public remains largely unaware of what happened at the hands of a so‑called ally proves that the press has failed to exercise its mandate to keep the American People informed. The American public will believe and support us, when they learn Americans like themselves who joined the Navy to serve their country, when we produce irrefutable evidence that the attack on June 8, 1967, could not have been an error. It was, in fact, an Attempt to Sink an American Ship that might have Alerted the World to an(Senseless and Murderous) Israeli Act of Aggression.

���
Americans should know the facts so they can judge the readability and reliability of a nation that wants us to believe it is 'our closest ally.' The American tax payers should know because they bought the planes, the boats, the bombs, rockets, torpedoes, and napalm that struck us. At one time we surviving crew members hoped official naval inquiries would elicit all the facts. But we have given up on that. Those inquires, we're convinced, were part and parcel of the American Government Coverup: Evidence was concealed, key crew witnesses were never interviewed; The Israeli Government's conclusions were never really queried or published...' I just cannot accept the explanation that the attack was a case of mistaken identity,' Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, said. 'I think, Without a Doubt, that those 34 men who were killed in the Sneak Attack on the Liberty were Killed(Murdered) Deliberately.'..."

Is it not strange that on June 8, 1967, Israeli Jews viciously attacked the American Ship U.S.S. Liberty, leaving 34 American Sailors dead and 171 injured, yet to this day the Jewish media has ignored it and American Congressmen have wittingly forgotten about it. The attack was deliberate, lasting almost 2 hours, and due to political orders the U.S. Military would not come to the aid of the U.S.S. Liberty.� General Dayan was a hero to the media in the United States. They never mentioned his complicity in such massacres as Kibya [67]. They swept under the rug his direct responsibility for the USS Liberty massacre. Even worse, the United States Government, for domestic political reasons, conducted a massive cover-up of the crime, making it an accessory after the fact to this slaughter of American servicemen. If the same criteria were used to investigate and try those responsible for the USS Liberty massacre as has been used on German and Japanese war criminals, the entire Israeli War Cabinet and General Staff would have been convicted for the crime. For his direct order of the massacre of defenseless sailors on an unarmed communications vessel sailing in neutral waters, General Dayan would have been hung, and then President of the United States Lyndon Johnson would have been sentenced to many years of incarceration in prison for obstructing justice in a criminal cover-up of the USS Liberty massacre.

���� President Johnson and The U.S.S Liberty Incident

The weekly newspaper "Christian News" is published by the Lutheran Church movement. In their issue of June 15, 1987, a very interesting article regarding the U.S.S. Liberty incident was published. The title of the article was "LBJ gave the order to let the USS Liberty sink and let all hands on board drown."

Some very important information was revealed in that article that is very relative to our survival today as a Christian Nation. The article revealed: "In a private interview of U.S.S. Liberty survivor Commander (Ret.) David Lewis, who was in command of the scientific mission of the ship which was the gathering and dissemination of intelligence data. He told me that the order to Abandon The USS Liberty and her crew to the attacking Israeli planes and Torpedo Boats came from President Lyndon B. Johnson. Two days after the rescue of the survivors, and after Commander Lewis had regained his eyesight, he was hit by an exploding torpedo ‑‑ Admiral and Commanding Officer of the Mediterranean Fleet Larry Geis called him into his quarters and said to him, 'Commander, we received your calls for help, and we attempted to send our planes to the rescue. But in the event that something happens to me, or if I am blamed for not answering your call for help, I want you to know exactly what happened. As soon as we received your radio call for help I deployed our fighter‑bomber planes and radioed the Pentagon of our action. A few minutes later I received a call from Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara ordering me to recall the planes because they were carrying nuclear arms. So I called them back. I immediately rearmed another squadron with conventional weapons, deployed it, and reported to the pentagon. A few minutes later I got another call from McNamara ordering me to recall these planes too. I was angry and mystified, and exercised my prerogative to go to the next highest level of authority so as to have McNamara's order reversed.

���
Seconds later President Lyndon Johnson was on the radiophone, and I made my case to him. I told him that the USS Liberty had been under attack for an hour, and had radioed for help, and that I had sent out a squadron of fighter‑bombers armed with conventional weapons to the rescue. Then the President said to me, 'I Don't Care If The Ship Sinks and Every Man On Board Drowns, we are not going to fight against our allies (Israel).'"

The article then discusses the holding of the 20th Anniversary reunion of the members of the USS Liberty Veterans Association in a Washington, D.C. hotel on 5, 6 and 7 June, 1987. The article then continues: "Besides us ordinary citizens and many other sympathizers and supporters at the banquet there were many retired naval officers, including three admirals, and a retired United States Ambassador. Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and former United States Ambassador to Egypt, Lucius Battle were the main speakers. Both told of their absolute belief that the one and one‑half hour air and sea attack by Israel was deliberate, that the official refusal to disclose all that is known about the attack is shameful, and that if the United States does not soon recognize that its interests are for the most part different from Israel's interests in the Middle East and in the world, there will be dire consequences. In our USS Liberty petition signing booth near the Vietnam Memori�al...twenty‑five hundred signatures have been collected. On Saturday, June 6, six of the USS Liberty survivors dropped by to add their signatures to the petition. While we were reminiscing another citizen identified himself as a member of AIPAC (American‑Israel Political Affairs Committee), and reminded us that AIPAC Controls the election or defeat of every member of Congress!"

As far as I know the "Only" so‑called national publication which is patriotic enough to print it was the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, in their September issue. Isn't that something, our enemies so the Jews say, or would have to believe so, is the only ones who respect our American Service Men enough to publicize, what should have been a National Event; but it was not because of the almost absolute control over our government that ZOG has at the present time. It is an article by Paul Findley who served in Congress from 1961 to 1982.

The USS Liberty Heroes Honored: "Thirty surviving crewmen of the USS Liberty, a US Navy reconnaissance ship nearly destroyed by Israeli forces 22 years ago (1967), gathered in Milwaukee the weekend of June 9‑11 for a reunion to recall that dreadful day and pay tribute to the 34 sailors Killed (Murdered) In the Assault. They have a lot to remember: The Liberty, an intelligence‑gathering ship, had only a pair of 50‑caliber machine guns for defense. But on the bright, clear afternoon of June 8, 1967, with its American Flag fluttering in a strong breeze, the ship came under a thundering, pitiless 75‑minute assault by air and sea forces. Israel, already victorious over Egypt and Jordan in the first three days of the Six‑Day War of June 1967, was planning a surprise ground offensive the next day against Syria (which for its part was calling a cease‑fire). The best explanation for what followed is that the Israelis feared the Liberty 'MIGHT' intercept messages revealing Israeli intentions, pass reports to Washington, and frustrate Israel's plans to scale and hold Syria's Golan Heights.

���
Whatever the motivation, the Liberty endured an assault so fierce and sustained that crew members were convinced that Israel wanted the ship and its entire crew destroyed. Who but the survivors can relive those awful moments, the cries of the wounded as lethal bursts of cannon fire swept the ship; the stench of burning flesh as napalm created instant infernos on the deck; the earsplitting thunder as a torpedo tore an immense hole in the ship's sides; decks made slippery with blood; the feeling of outrage as circling torpedo boats deliberately shot to pieces rubber life rafts launched in case the ship had to be abandoned.

���
Israel claimed the attack was a case of mistaken identity, apologized, and eventually paid reparations. President Lyndon Johnson, facing a crisis in Vietnam, accepted the apology warmly and did his best to keep from public knowledge the overwhelming conviction of crew members and their commanders, both the Navy and the National Security Agency, that the attack was deliberate. Why the cover‑up? For one thing, President Johnson feared publicity about the Liberty might alienate Jewish citizens he wanted to support the Vietnam war. Whatever the motivations, his cover‑up succeeded. Few Americans, even to this day, are aware of this tragedy, one of the worst in the Navy's peacetime history. As a consequence, the bravery of the Liberty crewmen has been little noted, and no Congressional investigation into the attack has occurred."

Although Minister of Defense General Moshe Dayan was principally responsible for the USS Liberty massacre, then Israeli Prime Minister Levi Eshkol also shared responsibility. Because the USS Liberty was an intelligence monitoring vessel, it is also certain that Meier Amit, head of Mossad (Israeli Intelligence) in 1967, and General Aharon Yariv, then head of Military Intelligence, had to give clearance for the attack. General Yitzhak Rabin, had legal responsibility to ensure that Israeli aircraft did not fire upon neutral vessels in neutral waters.

General Mordekhai Hod, then Commander of the Israeli Air Force, and later president of Israeli Aircraft Industries, Ltd., also was legally responsible for the crime committed by his pilots, as were the pilots themselves for carrying out obviously unlawful orders to strafe an unarmed neutral vessel in international waters. The same criteria of judgment rendered on the German and Japanese war criminals of World War II would have held these as well as other Israeli political and military leaders individually responsible and accountable for their acts of omission and commission regarding the USS Liberty massacre.

Following are details on the massacre recounted by the distinguished former U.S. Congressman from Illinois, Paul Findley: "The day of the attack began in routine fashion, with the ship first proceeding slowly in an easterly direction in the eastern Mediterranean, later following the contour of the coastline westerly about fifteen miles off the Sinai Peninsula. On the mainland, Israeli forces were winning smashing victories in the third Arab-Israeli war in nineteen years. Israeli Chief of Staff Yitzhak Rabin, announcing that the Israelis had taken the entire Sinai and broken the blockade on the Strait of Tiran, declared: 'The Egyptians are defeated.' On the eastern front the Israelis had overcome Jordanian forces and captured most of the West Bank.

���
At 6 a.m. an airplane, identified by the Liberty crew as an Israeli Noratlas, circled the ship slowly and departed. This procedure was repeated periodically over an eight-hour period. At 9 a.m. a Jew appeared at a distance, then left. At 10 a.m. two rocket-armed jets circled the ship three times. They were close enough for their pilots to be observed through binoculars. The planes were unmarked. An hour later the Israeli Noratlas returned, flying not more than 200 feet directly above the Liberty and clearly marked with the Star of David. The ship's crew members and the pilot waved at each other. This plane returned every few minutes until 1 p.m. By then, the ship had changed course and was proceeding almost due west. At 2:00 p.m. all hell broke loose. Three Mirage fighter planes headed straight for the Liberty, their rockets taking out the forward machine guns and wrecking the ship's antennae. The Mirages were joined by Mystere fighters, which dropped napalm on the bridge and deck and repeatedly strafed the ship. The attack continued for over 20 minutes. In all, the ship sustained 821 holes in her sides and decks. Of these, more than 100 were rocket size. As the aircraft departed, three torpedo boats took over the attack, firing five torpedoes, one of which tore a 40-foot hole in the hull, killing 25 sailors. The ship was in flames, dead in the water, listing precariously, and taking water. The crew was ordered to prepare to abandon ship. As life-rafts were lowered into the water, the torpedo boats moved closer and shot them to pieces. One plane concentrated machine-gun fire on rafts still on deck as crew members there tried to extinguish the napalm fire. Petty Officer Charles Rowley declares, 'They didn't want anyone to live.'" [68]

Paul Findley continues: "At 3:15 p.m. the last shot was fired, leaving the vessel a combination morgue and hospital. The ship had no engines, no power, no rudder. Fearing further attack, Captain McGonagle, despite severe leg injuries, stayed at the bridge. An Israeli helicopter, its open bay door showing troops in battle gear and a machine gun mounted in an open doorway, passed close to the deck and then left. Other aircraft came and went during the next hour. Although U.S. air support never arrived, within fifteen minutes of the first attack and more than an hour before the first assault ended, fighter planes from the USS Saratoga were in the air ready for a rescue mission under orders 'to destroy or drive off any attackers.' The carrier was only 30 minutes away, and, with a squadron of fighter planes on deck ready for a routine operation, it was prepared to respond almost instantly. But the rescue never occurred. Without approval by Washington, the planes could not take aggressive action, even to rescue a U.S. ship confirmed to be under attack. Admiral Donald Engen, then captain of the America, the second U.S. carrier in the vicinity, later explained: 'President Johnson had very strict control. Even though we knew the Liberty was under attack, I couldn't just go and order a rescue.' The planes were hardly in the air when the voice of Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara was heard over Sixth Fleet radios: 'Tell the Sixth Fleet to get those aircraft back immediately.' They were to have no part in destroying or driving off the attackers.

���
Shortly after 3 p.m., nearly an hour after the Liberty's plea was first heard, The White House momentary approval to a rescue mission and planes from both carriers were launched. At almost precisely the same instant, the Israeli Government informed the U.S. naval attach� in Tel Aviv that its forces had 'erroneously attacked a U.S. ship' after mistaking it for an Egyptian vessel, and offered 'abject apologies.' With apology in hand, Johnson once again ordered U.S. aircraft back to their carriers." [69]

The cowardly and callous attempt by the Israeli air force to ensure that there would be no survivors to their crime constituted an offense in its own right. Lord Russell of Liverpool, who was legal adviser to the Commander-in-Chief in respect of all trials of German war criminals in the British Zone of Occupied Germany, reports a similar crime committed by German submarine U-i52's commander Kapitanleutnant Heinz Eck, who had ordered his crew to open fire on the rafts of the Greek vessel SS Peleus in 1943. "The commander and four members of his crew were tried by a British Military Court in Hamburg in October 1945 for being concerned in the killing of members of the crew of the Peleus by firing and throwing grenades at them. All were found guilty of the charge and the commander and three others sentenced to suffer death by shooting." [70] Details on CIA documents indicting the Israeli leadership for murder of the defenseless crew of the USS Liberty were uncovered through the painstaking research of James M. Ennes, Jr., an officer of the USS Liberty and an eyewitness to the massacre: "The CIA reported a conversation with a confidential Israeli source who strongly implied that the attack was no error. The message read in part: 'He said that 'you've got to remember that in this campaign there is neither time nor room for mistakes,' which was intended as an obtuse reference to the fact that Israel's forces knew what flag the Liberty was flying and exactly what the vessel was doing off the cost. (The source) implied that the ship's identity was known at least six hours before the attack but that Israeli headquarters was not sure as to how many people might have access to the information the Liberty was intercepting. He also implied that there was no certainty or control as to where the information was going and again reiterated that Israeli forces did not make mistakes in their campaign. He was emphatic in stating to me that they knew what kind of ship the USS Liberty was and what it was doing offshore. This report gains credibility when we recall that Israel did identify the ship six hours before the attack. Hence, the informant does indeed have access to inside information.

���
On November 9, 1967, a confidential source reported clearly and unequivocally that General Moshe Dayan ordered the attack. The message read: '(The source) commented on the sinking (sic) of the US Communications ship Liberty. They said that Dayan personally ordered the attack on the ship and that one of his generals adamantly opposed the action and said, 'This is pure murder.' One of the admirals who was present also disapproved the action, and it was he who ordered it stopped and not Dayan." [71]
-----------------
From what seems to be an entire book about the Israeli jews atrocities after having invaded and occupied Palestine and other areas, and the preliminary events which allowed the jews to do those with impunity, sometimes with jewed-"US" help, and almost entirely hidden from the American people, the USA.

The active link to the lenghty book with an unknown name and author is below at the archive for Watchman, Dr Willie Martin's works:

https://israelect.com/reference/WillieMartin/1982%20[A].htm * [This linked excerpt - almost halfway down at the page]*
14
Lyndon Johnson was a high-level Zionist who had been involved for decades with the Jewish Freemasonic organization, the International Order of the B'nai B'rith, in the illegal immigration of Jews from Poland      (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 1 week ago

1 comments


Lyndon Johnson was a high-level Zionist who had been involved for decades with the Jewish Freemasonic organization, the International Order of the B'nai B'rith, in the illegal immigration of Jews from Poland

[IMAGE] "President Johnson had been involved in illegal Zionist activities since the 1930s and had a "special relationship" with Israeli president Levi Eshkol, seen here at Johnson's ranch in 1966.

Lyndon B. Johnson, who became the president on the day Kennedy died, was an ardent Zionist and devoted supporter of the state of Israel. His aunt Jessie Johnson Hatcher, who was a major influence on Lyndon, was a member of the Zionist Organization of America. While it seems very likely that his family was in fact Jewish (i.e.Crypto-Jews), there is absolutely no question that Lyndon Johnson was a high-level Zionist who had been involved for decades with the Jewish Freemasonic organization, the International Order of the B'nai B'rith, in the illegal immigration of Jews from Poland to Galveston. The smuggling operation of Jews to Texas in which LBJ was involved from 1937 is known as "Operation Texas".

While it seems very likely that his family was in fact Jewish (i.e.Crypto-Jews), there is absolutely no question that Lyndon Johnson was a high-level Zionist who had been involved for decades with the Jewish Freemasonic organization, the International Order of the B’nai B’rith….”.

SOURCE:
LBJ & the Zionist Cover-up of the Conspiracy to Kill Kennedy
November 18, 2013
http://www.bollyn.com/lbj-the-zionist-cover-up-of-the-conspiracy-to-kill-kennedy-2/
6
Betrayal behind Israeli attack on U.S. ship,[ USS LIBERTY] - ADM. THOMAS MOORER [His Letter to the American people]     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 1 week ago

1 comments


Betrayal behind Israeli attack on U.S. ship [USS Liberty] - By ADM. THOMAS MOORER, Jan 11, 2004

After State Department officials and historians assembled in Washington, D.C., last week to discuss the 1967 war in the Middle East, I am compelled to speak out about one of U.S. history's most shocking cover-ups.

On June 8, 1967, Israel attacked our proud naval ship -- the USS Liberty -- killing 34 American servicemen and wounding 172. Those men were then betrayed and left to die by our own government.

U.S. military rescue aircraft were recalled, not once, but twice, through direct intervention by the Johnson administration. Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara's cancellation of the Navy's attempt to rescue the Liberty, which I personally confirmed from the commanders of the aircraft carriers America and Saratoga, was the most disgraceful act I witnessed in my entire military career.

To add insult to injury, Congress, to this day, has failed to hold formal hearings on Israel's attack on this American ship. No official investigation of Israel's attack has ever permitted the testimony of the surviving crew members.

A 1967 investigation by the Navy, upon which all other reports are based, has now been fully discredited as a cover-up by its senior attorney. Capt. Ward Boston, in a sworn affidavit, recently revealed that the court was ordered by the White House to cover up the incident and find that Israel's attack was "a case of mistaken identity."

Some distinguished colleagues and I formed an independent commission to investigate the attack on the USS Liberty. After an exhaustive review of previous reports, naval and other military records, including eyewitness testimony from survivors, we recently presented our findings on Capitol Hill. They include:

· Israeli reconnaissance aircraft closely studied the Liberty during an eight-hour period prior to the attack, one flying within 200 feet of the ship. Weather reports confirm the day was clear with unlimited visibility. The Liberty was a clearly marked American ship in international waters, flying an American flag and carrying large U.S. Navy hull letters and numbers on its bow.

Despite claims by Israeli intelligence that they confused the Liberty with a small Egyptian transport, the Liberty was conspicuously different from any vessel in the Egyptian navy. It was the most sophisticated intelligence ship in the world in 1967. With its massive radio antennae, including a large satellite dish, it looked like a large lobster and was one of the most easily identifiable ships afloat.

· Israel attempted to prevent the Liberty's radio operators from sending a call for help by jamming American emergency radio channels.

· Israeli torpedo boats machine-gunned lifeboats at close range that had been lowered to rescue the most seriously wounded.

As a result, our commission concluded that:

· There is compelling evidence that Israel's attack was a deliberate attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire crew.

· In attacking the USS Liberty, Israel committed acts of murder against U.S. servicemen and an act of war against the United States

· The White House knowingly covered up the facts of this attack from the American people.

· The truth continues to be concealed to the present day in what can only be termed a national disgrace.

What was Israel's motive in launching this attack? Congress must address this question with full cooperation from the National Security Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency and the military intelligence services.

The men of the USS Liberty represented the United States. They were attacked for two hours, causing 70 percent of American casualties, and the eventual loss of our best intelligence ship.

These sailors and Marines were entitled to our best defense. We gave them no defense.

Did our government put Israel's interests ahead of our own? If so, why? Does our government continue to subordinate American interests to Israeli interests? These are important questions that should be investigated by an independent, fully empowered commission of the American government.

The American people deserve to know the truth about this attack. We must finally shed some light on one of the blackest pages in American naval history. It is a duty we owe not only to the brave men of the USS Liberty, but to every man and woman who is asked to wear the uniform of the United States.
Moorer was chairman of the joint chiefs of staff from 1970 to 1974. He is joined in the independent commission of inquiry by Gen. Ray Davis (recently deceased); Rear Adm. Merlin Staring; former Judge Advocate General of the Navy and Ambassador James Akins.

Jan 11, 2004

ADM. THOMAS MOORER

SOURCE:
https://www.chron.com/opinion/outlook/article/betrayal-behind-israeli-attack-on-u-s-ship-1493153.php
5
European Council President Ursula von der Leyen Claims ‘Europe Has The Values Of The Talmud’     (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 1 week ago

4 comments


"Recently, a video of Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Council, has resurfaced — of a speech she gave upon receiving an honorary doctorate degree at the Ben Gurion University of the Negev in Israel in 2022:

Von der Leyen: Europe Embraces Talmudic Values

Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, stated that 'Europe has the values of the Talmud.' The Talmud is a central text of Rabbinic Judaism, emphasizing values such as personal responsibility, justice, and… pic.twitter.com/L3mxsKt6Uq
— INDEPENDENT PRESS (@IpIndependent) April 8, 2025

Von der Leyen — whom Forbes described as “the world’s most powerful woman” — stated “Europe has the values of the Talmud — the Jewish sense of personal responsibility, justice, and of solidarity.”

Of course, her comments have predictably set off a firestorm of criticism — with many pointing out that the “values” of the Talmud are completely at odds with European values — and are the basis of Jewish supremacism and the genocide of non-Jews.

While these criticisms are certainly valid, there should be no doubt, however, that what Von der Leyen is saying is true — that Europe today is under the boot heel of Jewish supremacists — and the “values” of the European Union — the new incarnation of the judeo-Soviet Union — are indeed “Talmooodic”, as she was careful to pronounce correctly.

However, the Talmud is not a universalist book — rather it teaches that the “goyim” are mere animals who exist only to serve the Jews — and those who refuse will be killed at the whim of the Jews — exactly what we saw with the Jewish-dominated Bolshevik takeover of Russia and eastern Europe — and the ensuing genocide."

[CONTINUES with video and more] - Be sure to check the comments for more, THERE IS more]:
https://christiansfortruth.com/european-council-president-ursula-von-der-leyen-claims-europe-has-the-values-of-the-talmud/
6
First American Jewish Families: 600 Genealogies, 1654-1988. This publication is an historical document, and it is not our intention to alter it in any way.      (whatever)

submitted by Flanders to whatever 1 week ago

7 comments


First American Jewish Families

"Introduction

When it first appeared in 1960, Malcolm Stern's Americans of Jewish Descent marked a milestone in the study of American Jewish genealogy. The Jacob Rader Marcus Center of the American Jewish Archives is proud to make the latest edition of this classic text available online.

Researchers now have access to the complete text of Rabbi Stern's monumental volume that was published in 1991 as the updated and revised 3rd edition titled: First American Jewish Families: 600 Genealogies, 1654-1988. This publication is an historical document in its own right, and it is not our intention to alter it in any way. Students of American Jewish genealogy are encouraged to use this text as a basis for their research."
https://sites.americanjewisharchives.org/publications/fajf/index.php

Margaret E. Pg: 256 (ALL). LESTER, Margaret Isabelle Russell Pg: 256 (ALL) ... Sarah (see also Lopez, Catherine (Sarah)). LOPEZ, Sarah de Jeudah Cohen ...
https://sites.americanjewisharchives.org/publications/fajf/results.php?letter=L