You shared an archived link, where that link was just archived and included only one comment at the time of archiving from an account with almost your same exact name.
I'm not judging, but you might think about why you don't seem credible in your statement that it isn't your account.
Thanks. Yeah. My brother is getting older and is having all kinds of feelings about his legacy and wants to make an "Outlaw" country album, so I started trying to find "my sound" for it.
I just plugged in the hummingbird straight into the Hendrix set up with marshall and phaser and turned it down until I didn't get any feedback. Other than that, it's more tracks than you'd think at a first listen through the looper... 6 guitar tracks and a bass. What sounds like 1 fingerpicking guitar is actually 3 woven together because... well... it's hectic to try to do all at once.
The phaser at different depths and intensities sometimes build to almost sound like a fiddle or harmonica in the background.
California Coi Fish
http://sndup.net/rkj5
Short of writing the words for him and doing the vocals, I've just about got the album done. I used water themed titles as place holders, but I'll be curious to see what he comes up with.
My interaction with groups much larger than the talk loli audience, as well as your own personal reaction, are clear outliers. This audience size, at this site... it's ultimately meaningless.
The real value is showing how bad actors gatekeep containment boards to prevent politically sensitive topics from becoming popular; like you're doing, now.
Well, you clearly want it to be about drama spam. You won, right?
I do think the information in the book is good.
A little help fact checking would be great... constructive criticism.
Any kind of genuine feedback would be great.
But that's not what is going on, here, is it?
Conversations, here, must pass through your gatekeeping, where you and a few others are camping on new and controlling what gets to "hot" and not. But, this is a slow enough moving board, people might still find my post at "new." So, you have to play a little game, you and your friends.
It's subversive censorship and, yes, of course, I'm going to point it out when you do it because it's your full time job. While I can account for my life and that I'm just a guy trying to get to the truth, you and your little pals can't really manage that. Why is that?
I'm not a bad actor and it is already known.
Any group of researchers is subjected to tension based strategies designed to split groups and you're the people doing it. You spew hate and bile and engage in retard sophistry and keep everything steered towards degeneracy.
It is obvious and this is the obvious time and place to point it out; because your group is opposed to the information in book work coming out.
If you weren't so obvious at playing gatekeeper, then we wouldn't be having this conversation.
But... it's important to call you out for what you are.
The number of views versus the number of people participating in this conversation show that there are eyes on this conversation. Why wouldn't I expose you, here and now?
Why wouldn't I point out that @system doesn't even have to be in on your little scheme for you to control his site with voting chicanery. For all your dox talk, nobody ever seems concerned @system will dox them. Could he? Sure. But why?
Your hypocrisy is plain for the world to see. Sure, maybe regular talk lolis will move along... but when others come to search to see the response... they will see you and what you are doing.
You've presented zero evidence that I'm a bad actor. You paint me as a troll, though you're the one incapable of having an honest conversation. You paint me as incorporating off topic information, when you're the people bringing the off topic info into the conversation.
So... remind us... other than baseless accusations... how I'm a bad actor? I'm doxxed. It's not like my life is a secret. I'm completely open about my research and sources. I always have been.
And the only people criticizing me? Are flat earth Q tards. THAT is the company you keep. So, why should we truist you when you say that I'm a bad actor... with zero evidence?
What proof do you have? Because we have all the proof we need you're the bad actor, as far as I can tell. You jumped right into the role of suppressing information that you could have easily ignored.
Don't worry... there's a lot of other ways to expose you. But, you're doing a fine job exposing yourself.
You want to pretend to be reasonable, all of the sudden? Where's your evidence of your claims? What, specifically, in my presentation is incorrect information? I look forward to a non-shill reply.
If I'm a troll, then why do you respond to all my posts? Wouldn't that mean you are, in fact, the troll? Personally, I ignore trolls unless they're in my threads.
That makes it YOUR shilling, and YOUR tantrums.
I am merely addressing your narrative that YOU brought up. It's weird that you are NOW worried about me showing how you are engaged in a disinformation campaign... which happens to be a topic in the book. OFFTOPIC!!! TROLL!!!
Nobody is buying it, man. You've outed yourself.
And don't worry. I don't expect to make a dime from my eBook... I have other books that Amazon won't ban from their book store.
It does serve as a useful topic to expose bad actors because of the information in the book.
I didn't turn the topic of the book into how you Roblox and Minecraft losers shill, but you showed up and demanded to have the conversation, anyways.
So, I ask... why, NOW, are you crying about me addressing the topics YOU raised?
Your circlejerk is officially complete, where you're now complaining about the contents of your own comments.
Notice that the number of views far outweigh the number of votes and participating users, in this conversation. There is, apparently, a lot more interest than you're willing to admit.
In the end, OF COURSE, I am interested in seeing how different groups on the Internet respond to different types of information. Not just an eBook.
My entire shtick is about making posts on all platforms to reveal what the shills come after. Hence... here you are. I've been doing it for years and I've explained my methods and results for years.
Mostly, the response to my work is very positive. That's why it is a red flag when I come to "alt right" corners of the Internet who have the opposite reaction. It shows you aren't alt right, you're just shills.
/r/WorldPolitics is a good example of what you are trying to do... they just bury a normal forum in shitposts so that it becomes unusable to people seeking useful information.
It's important to expose that they are rabid bad actors.
They are part of an illegal RICO scheme to cover for corruption and they belong in jail.
Should there ever be a day when justice is served, even if in small portions, it is important to remember that these psychos protect child rapists.
But, more than that, they and their cohorts... people they don't even realize they participate with... have come after me and my family. Should the day come when I get a chance to expose them, I will. I've already started at the other end. It isn't even because I have a choice.
If I do nothing, my life will be torn apart by these people who play being victims. "Just ignore" them isn't really an option because then I get served with lawsuits, my kids get targeted by the New York Times, they try to convince family members to help destroy my life.
They've made it pretty personal.
Point being, I have to point out the bad actors and document what really happens when you try to write about corruption. I am faced with "just ignore them" at every juncture... and I listened. But, then they do things like get my site taken down. They attack me. Then, to cover their tracks, they pretend like I'm the bad guy.
I need to take the opportunity to point out that they are, in fact, a lot worse than just shit posters.
By posting contrary information, it is a lot easier to explore strategies and tactics on how to pre-emptively deal with psychos like Crensch and Vindicator and Srayzie. The truth is that SBBH, as a whole, doesn't attack me.
Watch the numbers. It's a handful of bad actors that are focused on splitting research groups. They descend on good research like locusts and destroy trust and goodwill. The second you start bringing up ways to hold them accountable, their psychopathy reveals itself whereas most people would "just ignore it."
I have a better eBook ready, but, ultimately, I had to do a test run to see how it would get attacked so that I could "pre-bunk" these idiots.
Why would I deny someone pinged me? That's a weird gaslight, right off the bat. I get pinged, mostly, by MAGA follow groups, but IFB All, so it results in all kinds of spam pings. Are you suggesting I'm part of some sort of anti Q group? I'm not, but given that I provide original information, it makes sense that those groups are interested in what I have to say.
But, imagine digging for a random ping to slide the actual information I present. Your effort to discredit me is... well, it's obvious you're grasping at straws. What about my eBook makes it so that you feel the need to make up a dumb angle to discredit me?
Mike Rothschild is another Q Tard... though on the opposite end of the spectrum. He always claimed Q was fake, but he intentionally got a lot of facts wrong about it.
I get pinged on all kinds of stuff. Maybe you should include how they tried to drag me into "MIGA" (Make Iran Great Again), even though I had zero interest.
I don't actually interact with any of these pings...
So... it's weird you'd assume that I have anything to do with them.
Go ahead... check all my "pings". Most of them are pretty random.
Basically, you're reaching. The eBook speaks for itself.
I did converse with... SaveSequim, who has an interest in the origins of Q.
The Origins of Q are not a partisan issue. Of course actual Leftists should be interested, but the second they realize Democrats are involved at the top, they shy away. Generally, the Leftists who have worked to expose Q insist on painting it as a bunch of rabid white supremacists... this is the portrait that Mike Rothschild likes to paint.
Like Megyn Kelly doing a softball interview with James Alefantis, Mike Rothschild has carefully avoided important questions regarding Q. I don't even think he's an actual Rothschild... but I did check out some of his information, early on. He was such a rabid lefty, that it's laughable anyone would try to bad jacket him with me.
If that's your aim... it's a dumb one.
"Voat guy"? Doxx? Do you mean the same people who doxed me and then got upset when I did it right back?
Are you really going to use the tired trope that it's okay for me to be doxed, but doxing the people who doxed me is bad?
First of all, I didn't dox anyone; they doxxed themselves because they used their Facebook accounts to interface with Voat users. They were already collecting information on Voat users before I came along.
AFTER srayzie's nudes began to come out and AFTER katharszo already doxed srayzie, I took it to the next level by providing additional PUBLIC information.
I also noted poor opsec on the part of a handful of Voaters, but never doxed them.
But yeah... it's okay to dox me... so I don't understand the hate over doxers. You guys hate it when I am rumored to have doxed, but don't hate it when I'm doxed.
It's shillery 101. DARVO tactics 101. It's a shill red herring.
OSINT makes it easy to dox anyone. Privacy on the Internet does not exist. The fake outrage against me is more properly directed at Google who is providing everyone's dox. Truepeoplesearch. Maltego. SEON. The list goes on and on.
And the Voat User SaveSequim seems interested in? Vindicator? Is another shill who looked at srayzie's tits and swooned and had no problem doxing his enemies. So... why is it okay for Vindicator to engage in behavior of bad actors? Why is it okay for everyone else, but not me?
Because it's a shill red herring to avoid anyone from reading the actual information about political corruption at the highest levels of power; it is global; it is targeting children.
But here you are... taking the conversation all over the place with THIN accusations about a ping that I had nothing to do with originating? And had no reaction to?
Vindicator is pathetic loser whose dox would reach irrelevancy the moment they hit the web. Literally nobody would do anything to Vindicator except make fun if his weight and repeated "attempts" at weight loss, trying to get under that 260 mark. Srayzie's dox also proved to be irrelevant, immediately, though some imgflip memes still exist with her nudes in them. If Srayzie didn't want her nudes out, then she shouldn't have sent them to every pervert on Voat. Fortunately, I was never in receipt of them. I can't be blamed. Remember when they thought it was okay to dox TexasVet and harp on it?
They think it's funny. In truth, you guys think doxing is funny, unless it's you... and, the truth is... nobody would care if you guys were doxxed, because you're nonces who produce nothing of value.
ANYTHING but Hunter Biden, the shadowy origins of Q and the global corruption, right?
You accuse me of making a Minecraft account for you 4 years ago? I'm not interested in winning hearts and minds. Mainly, I knew my eBook would draw out bad actors, especially on Voat, and... here you are.
And you accuse me of making a Minecraft account for you? Wow, man. That's a bit of a stretch.
So... you have a better explanation for your hate crush on me? A better way to explain how you find and attack my content within moments every time? Frankly, you seem obsessed.
Are we to interpret your approach to my content as originating from a "bad actor" or a "good actor"?
Would you say that the person in the picture resembles a young Zelensky?
Yes, it's obvious you're a bad actor. Let's review:
You like to draw attention to black phalluses. What group of people do we know that does that?
You hate on information that exposes corruption. What group of people do we know that does that?
You rely on shill tactics, rather than genuine discussion. What group of people do we know who does that?
You love to call out entire races as bad actors... but you never actually manage to name specific names or specific crimes; like you're participating in a limited hangout. What group of people do we know who does that?
It's weird that you care enough to find everything I post and complain. You have alerts set for my posts? The same three people showed up in this thread as the last thread.
Can you shills be anymore obvious? Your group and their vote manipulation scheme is exactly what makes talk.lol useless to nearly everyone.
Crensch. I never said Q was real. It's weird you keep repeating that.
You're such an obvious bad actor and it is a good opportunity to point out that talk.lol is not usable by the average person because these agents intentionalyl attack anything that isn't part of the narrative.
"HeyJames" has never produced any type of respectable research and, when cornered, engages in defamation per se, calling people he doesn't like "pedophiles".
Your use of vote manipulation pegs you as a shill and a bad actor.
Notice that you only ever engage in "shoot the messenger" logical fallacy against my work, where you try to discredit me, as my information and conclusions are sound and well sourced.
Your posts reveal nothing but a toddler throwing a tantrum about information you don't like because you are, functionally, a moron who pretends to be a pseudointellectual on the Internet.
So... now that you've had your tantrum, are we to expect you to further refuse to engage in the evidence and conclusions presented? Are you just going to concern troll?
Because that's what shills do... they concern troll.
And your little talk loli group is camping on new, gatekeeping everything that comes through, and orchestrate fake little conversations and fake little dramas to subversively censor.
You used vote chicanery on Voat and other sites, and you use vote chicanery, now.
Look at that. You found the post within moments and, without reading anything in the eBook, are quick to say "no."
What reason would you have for such a thing? Most people ignore posts that have no relevance to themselves.
What is it about you, that the information in my eBook causes you to hunt down mentions on the Internet, within moments of appearing, to try to convince others not to read it?
Could it be that you are actually a shill? One who plays Roblox and Fortnite?
Looks like you got banned from Wikipedia; an IP ban, no less. Is that your real IP?
I have to assume most of these Diggernicks on the Internet who are playing Fortnite and Roblox are the same person.
https://pastebin.com/P69pQrtA
Have you ever purchased "Natrol L-Arginine 3000 mg Sexual Health 90 Tablets"? That might help others narrow it down.
Oh weird... you have Q "art" on your Deviant Art account.
These are far from the only ones... and they are from before Q got started on the chans.
What is more likely, that I began to expose Q and the shills lost their minds... or does it look like I supported the Q movement? But, let's take a closer look.
Notice what happened when Crensch was allowed free reign to manipulate votes on Voat.
https://searchvoat.co/v/ProtectVoat/4091371
Remember, the people who don't want you to read my material are the same "Patriots" who downvoted and suppressed Hunter Biden data on Voat.
https://searchvoat.co/v/Censorship/4120519
Even on the Q Research board on 8chan wiped all the Hunter data.
https://8kun.top/qpatriotresearch/res/15848.html
Here is an explanation of how Crensch and the Q tards were using Mossad tactics and drama spamming to "split" research groups and destroy cohesion. They only want simps in their circles.
https://searchvoat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3249228
Seeing as how the attack on my site, within a minute of my post on /v/pizzagate, originated from
QinetiQ, I started to have the sneaking suspicion that QinetiQ might be participating with the Q Group.
Later, it was exposed that SITE Intelligence, a Mossad cut out, was also operating on Voat and Poal and they are here, at Talk.Lol.
We also see from OSINT manuals that the European Action Group also used Voat and searchvoat was listed as one of their research resources. It is heavily implied that 5 Eyes participate, as well, as that is where the EAG comes in.
THIS material is why you see the crybabies come out in force to attack my information.
The easiest way to spot them is by their behavior.
THAT is what Crensch doesn't want you to know... that he is a shill and that his friends are also shills and their tantrums and drama are part of a psyop that they run to keep everyone angry and distract from actual research.
It's weird that you guys feel like it's okay to dox me, but start to pee your pants when that is turned the other way. What are you so afraid of? You're either bad actors, who deserve to be doxxed, or nobody cares. So, which is it? My information is good, and this weird narrative you guys are married to is 1) total BS, 2) designed to chase people away from proving the Q movement was fraudulent.
Take note, everyone, this is how the Q shills treat you. They are not your friends. They do not promote research and good faith discussions. They will turn to terrorism to keep you afraid of facts.
First, you're retarded and don't know anything about technology, if that's your take. Alexa, Google and all the site stat collectors are hoarding your browser information and post it publicly, to a certain extent. If 100 people visited Voat, Google or Alexa would know their locations. If one of those shows as being in the UK, then you can easily guess which user was in the UK, at that time.
Should people be worried about privacy on the Internet? Yes.
But, to act like I'm Google, shows that you have no idea what you're talking about or, more likely, are just lying to everyone.
The question remains, whether or not my information is correct. It is. The amount of drama you stir up around me, shows that you are a bad actor and it is obvious after years of your lies.
So, you won't read it, and you already know all about it. Weird. It's like you are just trying to create drama to drive people away from good information.
webofslime 1 point 1.4 years ago
that can happen in -1,072.4 degrees
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=65b0b9f198cf7
webofslime 4 points 1.4 years ago
I hope he wears a GoPro so we can see the footage.
/v/ShitpostLitterBox viewpost?postid=65b0cad7959dc
webofslime 4 points 1.4 years ago
You shared an archived link, where that link was just archived and included only one comment at the time of archiving from an account with almost your same exact name.
I'm not judging, but you might think about why you don't seem credible in your statement that it isn't your account.
/v/MeanwhileOnReddit viewpost?postid=65b0bf48ef03e
webofslime 3 points 1.4 years ago
Which people did they poll?
/v/America viewpost?postid=65b0c42449adf
webofslime 2 points 1.8 years ago
Thanks. Yeah. My brother is getting older and is having all kinds of feelings about his legacy and wants to make an "Outlaw" country album, so I started trying to find "my sound" for it.
I just plugged in the hummingbird straight into the Hendrix set up with marshall and phaser and turned it down until I didn't get any feedback. Other than that, it's more tracks than you'd think at a first listen through the looper... 6 guitar tracks and a bass. What sounds like 1 fingerpicking guitar is actually 3 woven together because... well... it's hectic to try to do all at once.
The phaser at different depths and intensities sometimes build to almost sound like a fiddle or harmonica in the background.
California Coi Fish
http://sndup.net/rkj5
Short of writing the words for him and doing the vocals, I've just about got the album done. I used water themed titles as place holders, but I'll be curious to see what he comes up with.
Thanks for checking it out. Have a good week.
/v/Guitar viewpost?postid=64e0018ea103d
webofslime 2 points 1.8 years ago
Right-Handed Lightning Whelk
http://sndup.net/f2p2
/v/Guitar viewpost?postid=64e0018ea103d
webofslime -1 points 2.9 years ago
My interaction with groups much larger than the talk loli audience, as well as your own personal reaction, are clear outliers. This audience size, at this site... it's ultimately meaningless.
The real value is showing how bad actors gatekeep containment boards to prevent politically sensitive topics from becoming popular; like you're doing, now.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d94102a1e
webofslime -2 points 2.9 years ago
Well, you clearly want it to be about drama spam. You won, right?
I do think the information in the book is good.
A little help fact checking would be great... constructive criticism.
Any kind of genuine feedback would be great.
But that's not what is going on, here, is it?
Conversations, here, must pass through your gatekeeping, where you and a few others are camping on new and controlling what gets to "hot" and not. But, this is a slow enough moving board, people might still find my post at "new." So, you have to play a little game, you and your friends.
It's subversive censorship and, yes, of course, I'm going to point it out when you do it because it's your full time job. While I can account for my life and that I'm just a guy trying to get to the truth, you and your little pals can't really manage that. Why is that?
I'm not a bad actor and it is already known.
Any group of researchers is subjected to tension based strategies designed to split groups and you're the people doing it. You spew hate and bile and engage in retard sophistry and keep everything steered towards degeneracy.
It is obvious and this is the obvious time and place to point it out; because your group is opposed to the information in book work coming out.
If you weren't so obvious at playing gatekeeper, then we wouldn't be having this conversation.
But... it's important to call you out for what you are.
The number of views versus the number of people participating in this conversation show that there are eyes on this conversation. Why wouldn't I expose you, here and now?
Why wouldn't I point out that @system doesn't even have to be in on your little scheme for you to control his site with voting chicanery. For all your dox talk, nobody ever seems concerned @system will dox them. Could he? Sure. But why?
Your hypocrisy is plain for the world to see. Sure, maybe regular talk lolis will move along... but when others come to search to see the response... they will see you and what you are doing.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d94102a1e
webofslime -2 points 2.9 years ago
Why lie?
You've presented zero evidence that I'm a bad actor. You paint me as a troll, though you're the one incapable of having an honest conversation. You paint me as incorporating off topic information, when you're the people bringing the off topic info into the conversation.
So... remind us... other than baseless accusations... how I'm a bad actor? I'm doxxed. It's not like my life is a secret. I'm completely open about my research and sources. I always have been.
And the only people criticizing me? Are flat earth Q tards. THAT is the company you keep. So, why should we truist you when you say that I'm a bad actor... with zero evidence?
What proof do you have? Because we have all the proof we need you're the bad actor, as far as I can tell. You jumped right into the role of suppressing information that you could have easily ignored.
Don't worry... there's a lot of other ways to expose you. But, you're doing a fine job exposing yourself.
You want to pretend to be reasonable, all of the sudden? Where's your evidence of your claims? What, specifically, in my presentation is incorrect information? I look forward to a non-shill reply.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d94102a1e
webofslime -2 points 2.9 years ago
If I'm a troll, then why do you respond to all my posts? Wouldn't that mean you are, in fact, the troll? Personally, I ignore trolls unless they're in my threads.
That makes it YOUR shilling, and YOUR tantrums.
I am merely addressing your narrative that YOU brought up. It's weird that you are NOW worried about me showing how you are engaged in a disinformation campaign... which happens to be a topic in the book. OFFTOPIC!!! TROLL!!!
Nobody is buying it, man. You've outed yourself.
And don't worry. I don't expect to make a dime from my eBook... I have other books that Amazon won't ban from their book store.
It does serve as a useful topic to expose bad actors because of the information in the book.
I didn't turn the topic of the book into how you Roblox and Minecraft losers shill, but you showed up and demanded to have the conversation, anyways.
So, I ask... why, NOW, are you crying about me addressing the topics YOU raised?
Your circlejerk is officially complete, where you're now complaining about the contents of your own comments.
Notice that the number of views far outweigh the number of votes and participating users, in this conversation. There is, apparently, a lot more interest than you're willing to admit.
In the end, OF COURSE, I am interested in seeing how different groups on the Internet respond to different types of information. Not just an eBook.
My entire shtick is about making posts on all platforms to reveal what the shills come after. Hence... here you are. I've been doing it for years and I've explained my methods and results for years.
Mostly, the response to my work is very positive. That's why it is a red flag when I come to "alt right" corners of the Internet who have the opposite reaction. It shows you aren't alt right, you're just shills.
/r/WorldPolitics is a good example of what you are trying to do... they just bury a normal forum in shitposts so that it becomes unusable to people seeking useful information.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d94102a1e
webofslime -2 points 2.9 years ago*
It's important to expose that they are rabid bad actors.
They are part of an illegal RICO scheme to cover for corruption and they belong in jail.
Should there ever be a day when justice is served, even if in small portions, it is important to remember that these psychos protect child rapists.
But, more than that, they and their cohorts... people they don't even realize they participate with... have come after me and my family. Should the day come when I get a chance to expose them, I will. I've already started at the other end. It isn't even because I have a choice.
If I do nothing, my life will be torn apart by these people who play being victims. "Just ignore" them isn't really an option because then I get served with lawsuits, my kids get targeted by the New York Times, they try to convince family members to help destroy my life.
They've made it pretty personal.
Point being, I have to point out the bad actors and document what really happens when you try to write about corruption. I am faced with "just ignore them" at every juncture... and I listened. But, then they do things like get my site taken down. They attack me. Then, to cover their tracks, they pretend like I'm the bad guy.
I need to take the opportunity to point out that they are, in fact, a lot worse than just shit posters.
By posting contrary information, it is a lot easier to explore strategies and tactics on how to pre-emptively deal with psychos like Crensch and Vindicator and Srayzie. The truth is that SBBH, as a whole, doesn't attack me.
Watch the numbers. It's a handful of bad actors that are focused on splitting research groups. They descend on good research like locusts and destroy trust and goodwill. The second you start bringing up ways to hold them accountable, their psychopathy reveals itself whereas most people would "just ignore it."
I have a better eBook ready, but, ultimately, I had to do a test run to see how it would get attacked so that I could "pre-bunk" these idiots.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d94102a1e
webofslime -2 points 2.9 years ago*
Why would I deny someone pinged me? That's a weird gaslight, right off the bat. I get pinged, mostly, by MAGA follow groups, but IFB All, so it results in all kinds of spam pings. Are you suggesting I'm part of some sort of anti Q group? I'm not, but given that I provide original information, it makes sense that those groups are interested in what I have to say.
But, imagine digging for a random ping to slide the actual information I present. Your effort to discredit me is... well, it's obvious you're grasping at straws. What about my eBook makes it so that you feel the need to make up a dumb angle to discredit me?
Mike Rothschild is another Q Tard... though on the opposite end of the spectrum. He always claimed Q was fake, but he intentionally got a lot of facts wrong about it.
I get pinged on all kinds of stuff. Maybe you should include how they tried to drag me into "MIGA" (Make Iran Great Again), even though I had zero interest.
I don't actually interact with any of these pings...
@weve_read
@QOrigins
@FluorescentGrey
@ATafoyovsky
@laura_greenaura
@a_papasavva
@_MAArgentino
@SK1LLLS
@CullenHoback
@FantasticGvnFox
@gumby4christ
@QuacksAnonymous
@PokerPolitics
@travis_view
@rothschildmd
@Prism_Metanews
@AlxnderThaGr8
@MichaelJCat1
@HousatonicLive
@webofslime
So... it's weird you'd assume that I have anything to do with them.
Go ahead... check all my "pings". Most of them are pretty random.
Basically, you're reaching. The eBook speaks for itself.
I did converse with... SaveSequim, who has an interest in the origins of Q.
The Origins of Q are not a partisan issue. Of course actual Leftists should be interested, but the second they realize Democrats are involved at the top, they shy away. Generally, the Leftists who have worked to expose Q insist on painting it as a bunch of rabid white supremacists... this is the portrait that Mike Rothschild likes to paint.
Like Megyn Kelly doing a softball interview with James Alefantis, Mike Rothschild has carefully avoided important questions regarding Q. I don't even think he's an actual Rothschild... but I did check out some of his information, early on. He was such a rabid lefty, that it's laughable anyone would try to bad jacket him with me.
If that's your aim... it's a dumb one.
"Voat guy"? Doxx? Do you mean the same people who doxed me and then got upset when I did it right back?
Are you really going to use the tired trope that it's okay for me to be doxed, but doxing the people who doxed me is bad?
First of all, I didn't dox anyone; they doxxed themselves because they used their Facebook accounts to interface with Voat users. They were already collecting information on Voat users before I came along.
AFTER srayzie's nudes began to come out and AFTER katharszo already doxed srayzie, I took it to the next level by providing additional PUBLIC information.
I also noted poor opsec on the part of a handful of Voaters, but never doxed them.
But yeah... it's okay to dox me... so I don't understand the hate over doxers. You guys hate it when I am rumored to have doxed, but don't hate it when I'm doxed.
It's shillery 101. DARVO tactics 101. It's a shill red herring.
OSINT makes it easy to dox anyone. Privacy on the Internet does not exist. The fake outrage against me is more properly directed at Google who is providing everyone's dox. Truepeoplesearch. Maltego. SEON. The list goes on and on.
And the Voat User SaveSequim seems interested in? Vindicator? Is another shill who looked at srayzie's tits and swooned and had no problem doxing his enemies. So... why is it okay for Vindicator to engage in behavior of bad actors? Why is it okay for everyone else, but not me?
Because it's a shill red herring to avoid anyone from reading the actual information about political corruption at the highest levels of power; it is global; it is targeting children.
But here you are... taking the conversation all over the place with THIN accusations about a ping that I had nothing to do with originating? And had no reaction to?
Vindicator is pathetic loser whose dox would reach irrelevancy the moment they hit the web. Literally nobody would do anything to Vindicator except make fun if his weight and repeated "attempts" at weight loss, trying to get under that 260 mark. Srayzie's dox also proved to be irrelevant, immediately, though some imgflip memes still exist with her nudes in them. If Srayzie didn't want her nudes out, then she shouldn't have sent them to every pervert on Voat. Fortunately, I was never in receipt of them. I can't be blamed. Remember when they thought it was okay to dox TexasVet and harp on it?
They think it's funny. In truth, you guys think doxing is funny, unless it's you... and, the truth is... nobody would care if you guys were doxxed, because you're nonces who produce nothing of value.
ANYTHING but Hunter Biden, the shadowy origins of Q and the global corruption, right?
Are you not sliding the topic?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d94102a1e
webofslime -2 points 2.9 years ago
You accuse me of making a Minecraft account for you 4 years ago? I'm not interested in winning hearts and minds. Mainly, I knew my eBook would draw out bad actors, especially on Voat, and... here you are.
And you accuse me of making a Minecraft account for you? Wow, man. That's a bit of a stretch.
That's what you want us to believe?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d94102a1e
webofslime -2 points 2.9 years ago
So... you have a better explanation for your hate crush on me? A better way to explain how you find and attack my content within moments every time? Frankly, you seem obsessed.
Are we to interpret your approach to my content as originating from a "bad actor" or a "good actor"?
Would you say that the person in the picture resembles a young Zelensky?
https://pic8.co/sh/hURUIA.png
Compare with this video.
https://rumble.com/vw7898-ukrainian-president-volodymyr-zelensky-in-a-gay-show-.html
Is there are reason you chose the "young zelensky" picture? Because, according to your Friend Finder page, it doesn't really line up with the age.
And do all you losers play Minecraft and Roblox? Or are you on these platforms specifically to talk to kids?
https://mcuuid.net/?q=lord_nougat
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d94102a1e
webofslime -2 points 2.9 years ago
Yes, it's obvious you're a bad actor. Let's review:
You like to draw attention to black phalluses. What group of people do we know that does that?
You hate on information that exposes corruption. What group of people do we know that does that?
You rely on shill tactics, rather than genuine discussion. What group of people do we know who does that?
You love to call out entire races as bad actors... but you never actually manage to name specific names or specific crimes; like you're participating in a limited hangout. What group of people do we know who does that?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d94102a1e
webofslime -2 points 2.9 years ago
Yeah, and it's easy to ignore the billion other posts on social media... yet, you always show up at mine to whine.
It's pretty obvious who you are.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d94102a1e
webofslime -2 points 2.9 years ago*
It's weird that you care enough to find everything I post and complain. You have alerts set for my posts? The same three people showed up in this thread as the last thread.
Can you shills be anymore obvious? Your group and their vote manipulation scheme is exactly what makes talk.lol useless to nearly everyone.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d94102a1e
webofslime -2 points 2.9 years ago*
Crensch. I never said Q was real. It's weird you keep repeating that.
You're such an obvious bad actor and it is a good opportunity to point out that talk.lol is not usable by the average person because these agents intentionalyl attack anything that isn't part of the narrative.
"HeyJames" has never produced any type of respectable research and, when cornered, engages in defamation per se, calling people he doesn't like "pedophiles".
Your use of vote manipulation pegs you as a shill and a bad actor.
Notice that you only ever engage in "shoot the messenger" logical fallacy against my work, where you try to discredit me, as my information and conclusions are sound and well sourced.
Your posts reveal nothing but a toddler throwing a tantrum about information you don't like because you are, functionally, a moron who pretends to be a pseudointellectual on the Internet.
So... now that you've had your tantrum, are we to expect you to further refuse to engage in the evidence and conclusions presented? Are you just going to concern troll?
Because that's what shills do... they concern troll.
And your little talk loli group is camping on new, gatekeeping everything that comes through, and orchestrate fake little conversations and fake little dramas to subversively censor.
You used vote chicanery on Voat and other sites, and you use vote chicanery, now.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d94102a1e
webofslime -2 points 2.9 years ago
Look at that. You found the post within moments and, without reading anything in the eBook, are quick to say "no."
What reason would you have for such a thing? Most people ignore posts that have no relevance to themselves.
What is it about you, that the information in my eBook causes you to hunt down mentions on the Internet, within moments of appearing, to try to convince others not to read it?
Could it be that you are actually a shill? One who plays Roblox and Fortnite?
Looks like you got banned from Wikipedia; an IP ban, no less. Is that your real IP?
I have to assume most of these Diggernicks on the Internet who are playing Fortnite and Roblox are the same person.
https://pastebin.com/P69pQrtA
Have you ever purchased "Natrol L-Arginine 3000 mg Sexual Health 90 Tablets"? That might help others narrow it down.
Oh weird... you have Q "art" on your Deviant Art account.
https://www.deviantart.com/diggernicks
Why does that not surprise me?
You're a Flat Earth Q Tard.
https://pic8.co/sh/eM8uDV.png
And you don't want the truth about Q coming out.
And that is why you seethe.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=62f3d94102a1e
webofslime -1 points 2.9 years ago
Remembers what, exactly? That the Q tards lost their minds when I posted the IamQ email address from 2016?
https://searchvoat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3130351
[email protected] 34db7ed52753394de58d0f72a8c49bd7
[email protected] curtis999
[email protected] geujVdbWf
[email protected] angel1
[email protected] pk3x7w9W
These are far from the only ones... and they are from before Q got started on the chans.
What is more likely, that I began to expose Q and the shills lost their minds... or does it look like I supported the Q movement? But, let's take a closer look.
Notice what happened when Crensch was allowed free reign to manipulate votes on Voat.
https://searchvoat.co/v/ProtectVoat/4091371
Remember, the people who don't want you to read my material are the same "Patriots" who downvoted and suppressed Hunter Biden data on Voat.
https://searchvoat.co/v/Censorship/4120519
Even on the Q Research board on 8chan wiped all the Hunter data.
https://8kun.top/qpatriotresearch/res/15848.html
Here is an explanation of how Crensch and the Q tards were using Mossad tactics and drama spamming to "split" research groups and destroy cohesion. They only want simps in their circles.
https://searchvoat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3249228
Seeing as how the attack on my site, within a minute of my post on /v/pizzagate, originated from
QinetiQ, I started to have the sneaking suspicion that QinetiQ might be participating with the Q Group.
[email protected] goatblower
This is when Crensch's QTard crew got really upset about doxxing...
https://i.imgur.com/YHMJnnP.png
[email protected] goatblower
[email protected] trolling
[email protected] babydoll
[email protected] babydoux
[email protected] thematrix
[email protected] scorpio
[email protected] 69tuchita6985
[email protected] rudem00d
[email protected] picojode
[email protected] Empire
[email protected] Peachfield1
[email protected] PhantomF4J
[email protected] unicorns
[email protected] iamking357
[email protected] 4076911_NyJy
[email protected] dad1234
[email protected] dogsoldiers
[email protected] Tugb0at1
[email protected] gobble!
[email protected] biscuit
[email protected] stargate
[email protected] wunderkind
[email protected] lemon73
[email protected] hogdog
[email protected] stegosaur
[email protected] catdog
[email protected] MPMtopologyMPM
[email protected] bishop
[email protected] Jellybaby1
[email protected] agentorange
[email protected] gothic1
[email protected] electrolube
[email protected] tigercub
[email protected] lollipop01
[email protected] Maxdomcarmen1
[email protected] montanaismyname
[email protected] 7955265186z
Later, it was exposed that SITE Intelligence, a Mossad cut out, was also operating on Voat and Poal and they are here, at Talk.Lol.
We also see from OSINT manuals that the European Action Group also used Voat and searchvoat was listed as one of their research resources. It is heavily implied that 5 Eyes participate, as well, as that is where the EAG comes in.
THIS material is why you see the crybabies come out in force to attack my information.
The easiest way to spot them is by their behavior.
THAT is what Crensch doesn't want you to know... that he is a shill and that his friends are also shills and their tantrums and drama are part of a psyop that they run to keep everyone angry and distract from actual research.
/v/books viewpost?postid=62ef078d705ae
webofslime -2 points 2.9 years ago
It's way above your head, anyways, as you lack the intellectual honesty to admit that the earth is not flat.
/v/books viewpost?postid=62ef078d705ae
webofslime -3 points 2.9 years ago
It's weird that you guys feel like it's okay to dox me, but start to pee your pants when that is turned the other way. What are you so afraid of? You're either bad actors, who deserve to be doxxed, or nobody cares. So, which is it? My information is good, and this weird narrative you guys are married to is 1) total BS, 2) designed to chase people away from proving the Q movement was fraudulent.
Take note, everyone, this is how the Q shills treat you. They are not your friends. They do not promote research and good faith discussions. They will turn to terrorism to keep you afraid of facts.
/v/books viewpost?postid=62ef078d705ae
webofslime -2 points 2.9 years ago*
First, you're retarded and don't know anything about technology, if that's your take. Alexa, Google and all the site stat collectors are hoarding your browser information and post it publicly, to a certain extent. If 100 people visited Voat, Google or Alexa would know their locations. If one of those shows as being in the UK, then you can easily guess which user was in the UK, at that time.
Should people be worried about privacy on the Internet? Yes.
But, to act like I'm Google, shows that you have no idea what you're talking about or, more likely, are just lying to everyone.
The question remains, whether or not my information is correct. It is. The amount of drama you stir up around me, shows that you are a bad actor and it is obvious after years of your lies.
/v/books viewpost?postid=62ef078d705ae
webofslime -1 points 2.9 years ago
So, you won't read it, and you already know all about it. Weird. It's like you are just trying to create drama to drive people away from good information.
/v/books viewpost?postid=62ef078d705ae
webofslime -1 points 2.9 years ago
Good save. Good save. But still... why would you pass on information about corruption? Why would you set that example?
Is there something in the Hunter Biden data you don't want anyone to know about? Talk.lol seems really scant on Hunter Biden evidence.
What happened to the "research spirit" from Voat?
Is... is the "research spirit" scary to you? Is that why you lash out with ad hominem from your black phallus reference username?
I mean... lol... you're a real shining star, bro.
Your intellectual contribution to the Internet is a staggering pile of hate and bullshit.
But go ahead... pretend like you can gaslight me.
/v/books viewpost?postid=62ef078d705ae