They are mostly outdoing the reds because they can eat acorns that aren't ripe yet and digest the tannins, but reds can't and have to leave it on the tree until it is fully ripe. So, the grey's eat and store all the food before the reds are even able to grab them, and their larger size makes it impossible for reds to protect their home turf.
A bit husky for my taste, The Petersen's (Ellie) did a pretty good cover i.m.o.
https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=joUwy8lpvP0
Also here is mirror for your vid
https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=p-AIzsAfsBQ
You say that like there is a downside, but I can't think of one. Do you lament inner city violence as well? It would be better if the journalists were armed and shooting back, come to think of it.
https://xcancel.com/DrEliDavid/status/1812341891318313297
Dr. Eli David
@DrEliDavid
Jul 14
.@realDonaldTrump and @elonmusk must be protected at all costs. The future of the entire free world rests on their safety.
With pic
https://files.catbox.moe/hex5lg.jpg
clickbaitin' faggot
Invidious mirror:
https://yewtu.be/watch?v=BR3fuaKrEwU
Dark mode:
https://invidious.perennialte.ch/watch?v=BR3fuaKrEwU
Edit: Huh, there sure seem to be a nice round number of comment likes:
https://files.catbox.moe/wp5l6d.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/q7elqo.jpg
How very peculiar.
Archive:
https://archive.is/vpE6I
lmao that picture they used of him, they paused a video of his speech and screenshotted at just the right moment to subliminally mislead their readers
There is a historical NC law that passes the new guidelines that bans "dangerous and unusual" weapons. The fact that full-auto is legally owned by thousands of citizens makes it fail the "unusual" part, but ballistic missiles are very unusual and would stay illegal. Many people own jets and kevlar vests though, (and if machine guns are legal than you could fit your jet with up to .50 caliber guns, making it a "fighter") so they will be *federally* legal, which vests already are anyway. Explosives would be limited to what miners and demo experts **usual**ly use, no RPGs.
It is currently illegal to modify a semi-auto to increase it's rate of fire, only guns manufactured before 1986 that already possessed the capability to fire full-auto qualify for a tax stamp. This case rules that the NFAs rules against post-1986 made guns are unconstitutional, thus legalizing-by-precedent the ability for anyone to buy or modify a full-auto weapon, **possibly** without requiring permission via tax stamp from the government.
It may still be applied that you must request a stamp with a $200 fee, but only if the ATF loses the ability to deny any application, and changes from a may-issue to a must-issue, and removing the grandfather clause, so any weapon made anytime will be legal to own after registering. The main issue in this case was her ownership of a post-1986 manufactured weapon, they didn't charge her with failing to request a tax stamp, because *before* this case, it was impossible for her to do so. This case only says that the right of a person to own a modern machinegun is protected by the 2nd, nothing about local or national registration requirements.
It is saying that *she* doesn't, she took a semi-auto AF-15 in .300 and converted to full-auto, which now is fully legal for *her* to own, until it gets appealed, anyway. A recent Supreme Court case (Bruen) says that prosecutors have to justify a modern gun law with a historical gun law that is very similair, or else the modern law gets trumped by the 2nd Amendment. They couldn't do that *in this case*, but it sounds like they didn't try very hard.
Yes, but the gun in question was an Anderson Arms AF-15 chambered in .300 blackout. That wasn't around in 1986. No stamp, no NFA paperwork, just a semi-auto converted to full-auto that she can now fully legally own and operate. The trial was in Kansas, but it was a US judge in Federal Court, if they appeal it up the line and the Supreme declines to take the case, it will become standing federal law, unofficially.
I am sure that the first few dozen people who publically take advantage of the new loophole will be challenged in court as well, but until the Supreme Court says the final word, it will be a mix of people being proven to legally own full-autos and people spending a lot of time in federal prison, depending on how the judge they get decides to interpret the Bruen decision, or if the prosecution is able to definitively find an analogous historical law.
There will never be unmanned self driving semi trucks. Insurance companies require an individual to be "a party" in an accident. Same as how red light camera tickets always get dropped if you take it to court since there isn't an actual physical witness at the scene.
Damn nibba, meeting the masseuse when you walk in is n00b-tier, most non-happy-ending professionals use massagebook.com, about 70-85% are on there, in every city/town/village in the US. You get to see their pic and bio, what they specialize in (muscle injury repair instead of feel-good-rubs), see online what place has which people at which days and times, etc. You don't need to sign up for anything, I just use it to pick a place, person, time, type and then call the business and set the appt. up.
breh2 1 point 1 day ago
Archive: https://archive.is/Hq1xL
/v/WorldNews viewpost?postid=670c606cacd46
breh2 1 point 1 week ago
They are mostly outdoing the reds because they can eat acorns that aren't ripe yet and digest the tannins, but reds can't and have to leave it on the tree until it is fully ripe. So, the grey's eat and store all the food before the reds are even able to grab them, and their larger size makes it impossible for reds to protect their home turf.
/v/funny viewpost?postid=66ff62b15b4d0
breh2 0 points 1 week ago
What the hell is a Alabama Hot Pocket? It sounds like a weird sex thing, but I (apparently) can't find out
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=670336b0923e7
breh2 0 points 1 week ago
Be honest, you said "laeda" and "loita"
/v/TellUpgoat viewpost?postid=670318a6316a6
breh2 0 points 2 weeks ago
>they're not urethral
Good lord I fucking hope not, I don't want energy fields anywhere near my urethra
/v/History viewpost?postid=66fa12d4110cb
breh2 0 points 2 weeks ago
Johnny Rebel - If I Could Be A Nigger For A Day.mp4
https://files.catbox.moe/xctkwy.mp4
/v/Niggers viewpost?postid=66f98887b635f
breh2 1 point 2 weeks ago
A bit husky for my taste, The Petersen's (Ellie) did a pretty good cover i.m.o.
https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=joUwy8lpvP0
Also here is mirror for your vid
https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=p-AIzsAfsBQ
/v/RadioFreeVOAT viewpost?postid=66f9fe0851967
breh2 0 points 1 month ago
Paul_Neri's mother is a saint, and I am tired of hearing people say otherwise.
/v/Memes viewpost?postid=66d93e0833725
breh2 1 point 1 month ago
You say that like there is a downside, but I can't think of one. Do you lament inner city violence as well? It would be better if the journalists were armed and shooting back, come to think of it.
/v/IsraelCrimes viewpost?postid=66d5c839cc177
breh2 10 points 1 month ago
10/10 would watch in theater at least 5 times
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66d244dd50c9e
breh2 0 points 1 month ago
Safest option, jews "complain" advertising so glowniggers can make a list of steam users to watch closer
/v/funny viewpost?postid=66d18bf06c2d5
breh2 2 points 1 month ago
Mirror:
https://yewtu.be/watch?v=nlxu5dDwhO0
/v/FunnyVideos viewpost?postid=66ccac96b22a7
breh2 1 point 1 month ago
Bitch Tits Bob will become Bitsy Tits Barbara
/v/Screenshot viewpost?postid=66cc337b99ab1
breh2 2 points 1 month ago
Pear->Pearl missed opportunity
/v/FunnyVideos viewpost?postid=66cc10e23fc84
breh2 0 points 1 month ago
https://xcancel.com/DrEliDavid/status/1812341891318313297
Dr. Eli David
@DrEliDavid
Jul 14
.@realDonaldTrump and @elonmusk must be protected at all costs. The future of the entire free world rests on their safety.
With pic
https://files.catbox.moe/hex5lg.jpg
clickbaitin' faggot
/v/JewMedia viewpost?postid=66cbad41e5ae5
breh2 0 points 1 month ago*
Invidious mirror:
https://yewtu.be/watch?v=BR3fuaKrEwU
Dark mode:
https://invidious.perennialte.ch/watch?v=BR3fuaKrEwU
Edit: Huh, there sure seem to be a nice round number of comment likes:
https://files.catbox.moe/wp5l6d.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/q7elqo.jpg
How very peculiar.
/v/USPolitics viewpost?postid=66cb87096445d
breh2 0 points 1 month ago*
Archive:
https://archive.is/vpE6I
lmao that picture they used of him, they paused a video of his speech and screenshotted at just the right moment to subliminally mislead their readers
/v/WorldNews viewpost?postid=66caecb4ed657
breh2 0 points 1 month ago
There is a historical NC law that passes the new guidelines that bans "dangerous and unusual" weapons. The fact that full-auto is legally owned by thousands of citizens makes it fail the "unusual" part, but ballistic missiles are very unusual and would stay illegal. Many people own jets and kevlar vests though, (and if machine guns are legal than you could fit your jet with up to .50 caliber guns, making it a "fighter") so they will be *federally* legal, which vests already are anyway. Explosives would be limited to what miners and demo experts **usual**ly use, no RPGs.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66c94945e0634
breh2 1 point 1 month ago
It is currently illegal to modify a semi-auto to increase it's rate of fire, only guns manufactured before 1986 that already possessed the capability to fire full-auto qualify for a tax stamp. This case rules that the NFAs rules against post-1986 made guns are unconstitutional, thus legalizing-by-precedent the ability for anyone to buy or modify a full-auto weapon, **possibly** without requiring permission via tax stamp from the government.
It may still be applied that you must request a stamp with a $200 fee, but only if the ATF loses the ability to deny any application, and changes from a may-issue to a must-issue, and removing the grandfather clause, so any weapon made anytime will be legal to own after registering. The main issue in this case was her ownership of a post-1986 manufactured weapon, they didn't charge her with failing to request a tax stamp, because *before* this case, it was impossible for her to do so. This case only says that the right of a person to own a modern machinegun is protected by the 2nd, nothing about local or national registration requirements.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66c94945e0634
breh2 6 points 1 month ago
If it's Boeing, I ain't going.
/v/owned viewpost?postid=66ca221768060
breh2 0 points 1 month ago
>handguns
Sidearms are only for when you run out of ammo in your main weapon
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66c94945e0634
breh2 0 points 1 month ago
It is saying that *she* doesn't, she took a semi-auto AF-15 in .300 and converted to full-auto, which now is fully legal for *her* to own, until it gets appealed, anyway. A recent Supreme Court case (Bruen) says that prosecutors have to justify a modern gun law with a historical gun law that is very similair, or else the modern law gets trumped by the 2nd Amendment. They couldn't do that *in this case*, but it sounds like they didn't try very hard.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66c94945e0634
breh2 0 points 1 month ago
Yes, but the gun in question was an Anderson Arms AF-15 chambered in .300 blackout. That wasn't around in 1986. No stamp, no NFA paperwork, just a semi-auto converted to full-auto that she can now fully legally own and operate. The trial was in Kansas, but it was a US judge in Federal Court, if they appeal it up the line and the Supreme declines to take the case, it will become standing federal law, unofficially.
I am sure that the first few dozen people who publically take advantage of the new loophole will be challenged in court as well, but until the Supreme Court says the final word, it will be a mix of people being proven to legally own full-autos and people spending a lot of time in federal prison, depending on how the judge they get decides to interpret the Bruen decision, or if the prosecution is able to definitively find an analogous historical law.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66c94945e0634
breh2 0 points 1 month ago
There will never be unmanned self driving semi trucks. Insurance companies require an individual to be "a party" in an accident. Same as how red light camera tickets always get dropped if you take it to court since there isn't an actual physical witness at the scene.
/v/TellUpgoat viewpost?postid=66c8850aa9088
breh2 1 point 1 month ago
Damn nibba, meeting the masseuse when you walk in is n00b-tier, most non-happy-ending professionals use massagebook.com, about 70-85% are on there, in every city/town/village in the US. You get to see their pic and bio, what they specialize in (muscle injury repair instead of feel-good-rubs), see online what place has which people at which days and times, etc. You don't need to sign up for anything, I just use it to pick a place, person, time, type and then call the business and set the appt. up.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=66c5e8fd19c84