This whole situation is so funny. She starts out oblivious to the jq, then makes a video talking about the things you can't talk about. Noticers notice and meme the shit out of it. The jdf notices the noticing and then attacks her, unaware that she was unaware, now making her aware.
Good work by the original memelords that put those captions up. They gave a sideways bait to the nose into poking in where it wasn't actually being criticized.
You know they had a sextant? How does a sextant work in space? Against what ground are you measuring an angle against? Relative to earth? Could they even see the stars? Jury's out on that one.
According to the astronauts, they used that thing in space. Bizarre.
It's to do with the 7th commandment, marriage, and divorce.
Essentially the enforced monogamy within the church does more harm than good. While it is true that men were created in the image of God and men and women created he them, there is no strict prohibition on men having more than one wife. Unless you want to be a deacon. Even then it may be a translation error as "husband of one wife" could just be "husband of the first wife," essentially making the condition of the position having never been divorced.
Every instance of old testament law or prophet excoriation used against polygyny is more accurately applied against divorce.
Today this sort of thing spells disaster for women. Can you find a virgin wife? No. Can any man in the west? Women have it in their heads that adultery can go both ways, when in actuality it is a matter of adulteresses and adulterators. Men can adulterate, but women are adulterated.
I did not come to this conclusion lightly. The book Polygamia Triumphatrix outlines many arguments, both secular and scriptural, as to polygyny as a natural Christian position that was quashed by Rome or other agents. It includes a conspiracy that I have trouble with the translation of, but it seems like an ancient tranny cult around 900 to 1100 AD had some provocation towards removing the tendency of multi-marriage to diminish their numbers. "Neither male nor female" the thing was supposed to be. The other book is Thelyphthora a treatise on female ruin. Thankfully this one was written in English. It's three volumes, of which I have read the first through to the addendum. It raises arguments that are well put together. Included in the arguments is the notion that if Christian marriage really is meant to be plural and polygynous, as the parable of the groomsman the ten virgins are waiting for indicates, then considering the Godhead identifies Himself as a polygynous entity, our metaphorical understanding of Him may be itself adulterated as we have an inappropriate scaffolding upon which to shape it.
As far as errors go, if this is accurate, it's a pretty big one. Espousing it is sure to make one the subject of ridicule or accusations of selfishness. And I must admit I may only be so easily convinced of it out of my own selfish ends, although I have to say it is not the answer to the problem of mass loneliness and white childlessness I was hoping for. The rampant adulterous mess of the current "dating" scene that many so-called Christians are entangled in would need a harder rock to slay it than simply saying this. It may even make matters worse for the truly lonely unless implemented with honesty and earnestness, if there is even something to be implemented.
Consider the history of the split of the RC and Anglican church. The matter was made over divorce. If monogamous marriage was not the doctrine of the day, there would have been no issue. The king just takes an extra fertile bride or two. Consider the state of ugly women in the early feminist years. Men ignore them as the one woman they marry must tick as many boxes as possible. From these desperate lonely women we get the feminist movement's fertile ground. If they could have been joined to practical unions for purposes other than beauty, then we may not see the disaster we are currently living through.
This retrospective is hypothetical. It's impossible to honestly examine the fruits of something that hasn't happened. There may well be gross consequences of it I cannot predict as a mass application of something this contrary to today has no example. I encourage you to read the books provided, particularly Thelyphthora as it is actually readable.
As a position its a hard one to back up, since most of what we have about Christianity outside of the Gospels themselves is based on Paul's theological essays and letters. Paul's arguments stand as solid arguments, and are what helped convert me. I would find this a hard point to argue.
That said, researching some topics that make life even possible to live as a Christian today has led me to the conclusion that there is one glaring error in Church doctrine almost universally since the error itself predates the split of the Catholic church.
I'm also a fan of the tin bath to make flat glass. Those large plate glass sheets are made in a continuous stream of molten silicates on a bath of molten tin. The only thing flattening the glass is its natural state relative to the earth floating on a denser fluid until it is brought out to cool. The end result has no deviation from flat when put vertical. The largest panes of glass on earth are made in this way and they are larger than would be necessary to detect a curve if the earth did indeed curve.
If you want to call out false doctrines, how about this one?: Marriage is a bond between one man and one woman.
I have been studying the matter for a few weeks now. Reading over old, banned books dismissed as heretical. The first of them being Polygamia Triumphatrix, or Polygamy Triumphant. The other being Thelyphthora, or a treatise on female ruin. There was another book but it must have been completely destroyed. The first one I was able to get an impromptu translation done with ChatGPT. The latter is already in English. I haven't yet completed it, but it does make salient arguments. So far as I can tell it offers few real solutions as to the massive slut problem.
I started down this line of inquiry attempting to figure out what to do with feminism and the natural reply MGTOW. The latter is an emergent phenomenon. It can't be motivated away. You say it's detrimental to our society? They would say "yes, that's the point." Currently the only change the world takes when it comes to men's issues is "beating will continue until morale improves." All stick, no carrot.
What does this have to do with polygyny? It's the only form of marriage so far that is actually illegal. A polygynous relationship solves some of the problems above. One of the troubles of the current marriage situation is that a woman can get married and then refuse intimacy, then divorce and get cash and prizes. With a second wife, that woman no longer has the intimacy monopoly.
Overall, especially in an agricultural setting, having extra women to help eachother in child birthing and rearing gives a house hold stronger footing. The command 'go forth and multiply' is readily fulfilled.
Though I can't be sure of the translation, Polygamia Triumphatrix mentions some one "neither man nor woman" who started monogamy as a conspiracy to dwindle Christian numbers. Basically a middle ages tranny with a woman's empowerment motif.
Anyway, there's stuff I'm leaving out. I'd still like a solution to the problem, but merely wailing against MGTOW isn't going to do it.
That weak ass man peddling his bullshit esoterica.
Prior to the youtube clampdown of 2018, you had actual esoteric stuff going algorithmically viral. They gave it the banhammer so hard, but the appetite for that sort of thing vanished. Then you have fudge packers like this puffing up horse droppings like pole shift, censored by the CIA.
Blah blah blah.
I am wondering how many children of each sex are being born. Of the vaxxies I know who have since given birth, all of the children are female. Anecdotal at this point. If anyone finds any data on the matter please post it.
Vaids
I'm aware of at least three elderly people two of which have had previous cancers and one of which is perpetually hospitalized that are now having "suspicious lumps in the lungs."
It's basically a one-to-one ratio of those who recently went in for cancer screenings are coming out cancer positive.
The same reason Tokyo can handle earthquakes. They build for the cold. Actual insulation. Building materials that keep the heat in. Vestibules that act like an air lock to the outside.
In places where they build to keep cool, a freak cold snap coming in from some weaponized weather can really wreck ya.
Oddly enough, you can predict the motion of planets without knowing if the world is flat or a globe.
All that's required is observation and charting celestial bodies relative to the earth. This is all NASA does too.
I also find your argument weak. There is no need to have a replacement that is 100% correct if you can prove conclusively that the proposed theory is false. Imagine you're charged with murder. You can prove you were not in the same city at the time, therefore you are free to go. You are not required to supply the actual murderer in order to supplant the current theory. It may even be that the solution is not that there was a murderer at all but in fact it was a suicide.
You can see this in the current crisis of cosmology with the Webb telescope. They've disproved the big bang. They don't have anything to replace it yet, but continuing to support the big bang is not a sound position. You have a bunch of astro-types going "what now?"
The globe Earth requires a curve. Tests to prove the curve detect no curve. Therefore the earth is not curved. It's the same situation as the big bang test: look for something the theory necessitates and if you find it the theory holds. If you don't find it though, the theory is disproved. The non-globe position is a little more basic than most are willing to admit.
This is a nice bit of mid-awake propaganda. The intent is to get the would-be snitch to associate antivaxxers with jews in world war 2 according to the normie script. In effect, getting the truly asleep to associate themselves with their programmed Nazi nemesis.
Of course if you know the truth about wooden doors et all this is comes off a little flat.
dicedice 0 points 1.8 years ago
This whole situation is so funny. She starts out oblivious to the jq, then makes a video talking about the things you can't talk about. Noticers notice and meme the shit out of it. The jdf notices the noticing and then attacks her, unaware that she was unaware, now making her aware.
Good work by the original memelords that put those captions up. They gave a sideways bait to the nose into poking in where it wasn't actually being criticized.
/v/Jews viewpost?postid=64c4c33c3b27f
dicedice 1 point 1.8 years ago
fertile white vaginas.
And then you have the mystery juice on top of that.
/v/WhiteGenocide viewpost?postid=64a77856a6810
dicedice -1 points 2.0 years ago
You know they had a sextant? How does a sextant work in space? Against what ground are you measuring an angle against? Relative to earth? Could they even see the stars? Jury's out on that one.
According to the astronauts, they used that thing in space. Bizarre.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=64652f29b2099
dicedice 1 point 2.0 years ago
What was really going on behind the screen during the anointing?
/v/princeharryhate viewpost?postid=64590c50bbedd
dicedice 1 point 2 years ago
It has the feel of prophecy about it.
/v/TheJewishProblem viewpost?postid=644e77e95de7e
dicedice 3 points 2 years ago
Not the guy you're replying to, but Columbo. Love hearing him say shit like, "A woman? As your boss? Oh no, I don't think I could do that.'
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=64416a20b9888
dicedice 2 points 2 years ago
I prefer Geneva 1560.
You've already been told about the "Latin original."
I have a Greek NT. I'm looking to get a copy of the Septuagint.
/v/religion viewpost?postid=643fed41663aa
dicedice 0 points 2 years ago
Tattoos are a sexually transmitted disease.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=643b04eae57a4
dicedice 2 points 2 years ago
I prefer the line, "Hitler did nothing wrong." It's a more accurate statement, and gets the holocaust denial in on the down low.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=64372caf27fb0
dicedice 0 points 2 years ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZoSTyp9eIQ
Here's another video. It's a small yacht vanishing from view.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=6436a5abecd34
dicedice 0 points 2 years ago
It's to do with the 7th commandment, marriage, and divorce.
Essentially the enforced monogamy within the church does more harm than good. While it is true that men were created in the image of God and men and women created he them, there is no strict prohibition on men having more than one wife. Unless you want to be a deacon. Even then it may be a translation error as "husband of one wife" could just be "husband of the first wife," essentially making the condition of the position having never been divorced.
Every instance of old testament law or prophet excoriation used against polygyny is more accurately applied against divorce.
Today this sort of thing spells disaster for women. Can you find a virgin wife? No. Can any man in the west? Women have it in their heads that adultery can go both ways, when in actuality it is a matter of adulteresses and adulterators. Men can adulterate, but women are adulterated.
I did not come to this conclusion lightly. The book Polygamia Triumphatrix outlines many arguments, both secular and scriptural, as to polygyny as a natural Christian position that was quashed by Rome or other agents. It includes a conspiracy that I have trouble with the translation of, but it seems like an ancient tranny cult around 900 to 1100 AD had some provocation towards removing the tendency of multi-marriage to diminish their numbers. "Neither male nor female" the thing was supposed to be. The other book is Thelyphthora a treatise on female ruin. Thankfully this one was written in English. It's three volumes, of which I have read the first through to the addendum. It raises arguments that are well put together. Included in the arguments is the notion that if Christian marriage really is meant to be plural and polygynous, as the parable of the groomsman the ten virgins are waiting for indicates, then considering the Godhead identifies Himself as a polygynous entity, our metaphorical understanding of Him may be itself adulterated as we have an inappropriate scaffolding upon which to shape it.
As far as errors go, if this is accurate, it's a pretty big one. Espousing it is sure to make one the subject of ridicule or accusations of selfishness. And I must admit I may only be so easily convinced of it out of my own selfish ends, although I have to say it is not the answer to the problem of mass loneliness and white childlessness I was hoping for. The rampant adulterous mess of the current "dating" scene that many so-called Christians are entangled in would need a harder rock to slay it than simply saying this. It may even make matters worse for the truly lonely unless implemented with honesty and earnestness, if there is even something to be implemented.
Consider the history of the split of the RC and Anglican church. The matter was made over divorce. If monogamous marriage was not the doctrine of the day, there would have been no issue. The king just takes an extra fertile bride or two. Consider the state of ugly women in the early feminist years. Men ignore them as the one woman they marry must tick as many boxes as possible. From these desperate lonely women we get the feminist movement's fertile ground. If they could have been joined to practical unions for purposes other than beauty, then we may not see the disaster we are currently living through.
This retrospective is hypothetical. It's impossible to honestly examine the fruits of something that hasn't happened. There may well be gross consequences of it I cannot predict as a mass application of something this contrary to today has no example. I encourage you to read the books provided, particularly Thelyphthora as it is actually readable.
/v/Christianity viewpost?postid=64340cf3b1170
dicedice 1 point 2 years ago
As a position its a hard one to back up, since most of what we have about Christianity outside of the Gospels themselves is based on Paul's theological essays and letters. Paul's arguments stand as solid arguments, and are what helped convert me. I would find this a hard point to argue.
That said, researching some topics that make life even possible to live as a Christian today has led me to the conclusion that there is one glaring error in Church doctrine almost universally since the error itself predates the split of the Catholic church.
/v/Christianity viewpost?postid=64340cf3b1170
dicedice 0 points 2 years ago
Good point. Why should I care about someone's opinion if they aren't going to live forever?
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=643450a584c30
dicedice 1 point 2.1 years ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMGkbrETU8M
Pretty long.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=641e527767f29
dicedice 1 point 2.1 years ago
I'm also a fan of the tin bath to make flat glass. Those large plate glass sheets are made in a continuous stream of molten silicates on a bath of molten tin. The only thing flattening the glass is its natural state relative to the earth floating on a denser fluid until it is brought out to cool. The end result has no deviation from flat when put vertical. The largest panes of glass on earth are made in this way and they are larger than would be necessary to detect a curve if the earth did indeed curve.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=641e527767f29
dicedice 0 points 2.1 years ago
You. I like you.
/v/Niggers viewpost?postid=641530018e3a4
dicedice 0 points 2.1 years ago
If you want to call out false doctrines, how about this one?: Marriage is a bond between one man and one woman.
I have been studying the matter for a few weeks now. Reading over old, banned books dismissed as heretical. The first of them being Polygamia Triumphatrix, or Polygamy Triumphant. The other being Thelyphthora, or a treatise on female ruin. There was another book but it must have been completely destroyed. The first one I was able to get an impromptu translation done with ChatGPT. The latter is already in English. I haven't yet completed it, but it does make salient arguments. So far as I can tell it offers few real solutions as to the massive slut problem.
I started down this line of inquiry attempting to figure out what to do with feminism and the natural reply MGTOW. The latter is an emergent phenomenon. It can't be motivated away. You say it's detrimental to our society? They would say "yes, that's the point." Currently the only change the world takes when it comes to men's issues is "beating will continue until morale improves." All stick, no carrot.
What does this have to do with polygyny? It's the only form of marriage so far that is actually illegal. A polygynous relationship solves some of the problems above. One of the troubles of the current marriage situation is that a woman can get married and then refuse intimacy, then divorce and get cash and prizes. With a second wife, that woman no longer has the intimacy monopoly.
Overall, especially in an agricultural setting, having extra women to help eachother in child birthing and rearing gives a house hold stronger footing. The command 'go forth and multiply' is readily fulfilled.
Though I can't be sure of the translation, Polygamia Triumphatrix mentions some one "neither man nor woman" who started monogamy as a conspiracy to dwindle Christian numbers. Basically a middle ages tranny with a woman's empowerment motif.
Anyway, there's stuff I'm leaving out. I'd still like a solution to the problem, but merely wailing against MGTOW isn't going to do it.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=641210c71ce8d
dicedice 2 points 2.2 years ago
That weak ass man peddling his bullshit esoterica.
Prior to the youtube clampdown of 2018, you had actual esoteric stuff going algorithmically viral. They gave it the banhammer so hard, but the appetite for that sort of thing vanished. Then you have fudge packers like this puffing up horse droppings like pole shift, censored by the CIA.
Blah blah blah.
/v/EarthquakesAndVolcanoes viewpost?postid=64034a114dcfe
dicedice 3 points 2.2 years ago
I know the feeling. Or do I?
I mean, I know I do, but you don't know.
"On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog."
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63fbbc1ac12bc
dicedice 3 points 2.2 years ago
I am wondering how many children of each sex are being born. Of the vaxxies I know who have since given birth, all of the children are female. Anecdotal at this point. If anyone finds any data on the matter please post it.
/v/fakepandemic viewpost?postid=63f5fddcd65ad
dicedice 1 point 2.3 years ago
Vaids
I'm aware of at least three elderly people two of which have had previous cancers and one of which is perpetually hospitalized that are now having "suspicious lumps in the lungs."
It's basically a one-to-one ratio of those who recently went in for cancer screenings are coming out cancer positive.
/v/videos viewpost?postid=63b3e771cbffe
dicedice 4 points 2.4 years ago
The same reason Tokyo can handle earthquakes. They build for the cold. Actual insulation. Building materials that keep the heat in. Vestibules that act like an air lock to the outside.
In places where they build to keep cool, a freak cold snap coming in from some weaponized weather can really wreck ya.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63a64aac966b4
dicedice 6 points 2.4 years ago
Not all cars have those cords. They're by law in places like Alaska or Alberta, but you might not see them in Texas or Florida.
/v/BushCamp viewpost?postid=63a66030da098
dicedice 0 points 2.4 years ago
Oddly enough, you can predict the motion of planets without knowing if the world is flat or a globe.
All that's required is observation and charting celestial bodies relative to the earth. This is all NASA does too.
I also find your argument weak. There is no need to have a replacement that is 100% correct if you can prove conclusively that the proposed theory is false. Imagine you're charged with murder. You can prove you were not in the same city at the time, therefore you are free to go. You are not required to supply the actual murderer in order to supplant the current theory. It may even be that the solution is not that there was a murderer at all but in fact it was a suicide.
You can see this in the current crisis of cosmology with the Webb telescope. They've disproved the big bang. They don't have anything to replace it yet, but continuing to support the big bang is not a sound position. You have a bunch of astro-types going "what now?"
The globe Earth requires a curve. Tests to prove the curve detect no curve. Therefore the earth is not curved. It's the same situation as the big bang test: look for something the theory necessitates and if you find it the theory holds. If you don't find it though, the theory is disproved. The non-globe position is a little more basic than most are willing to admit.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63a56e7a61492
dicedice 2 points 2.4 years ago
This is a nice bit of mid-awake propaganda. The intent is to get the would-be snitch to associate antivaxxers with jews in world war 2 according to the normie script. In effect, getting the truly asleep to associate themselves with their programmed Nazi nemesis.
Of course if you know the truth about wooden doors et all this is comes off a little flat.
/v/whatever viewpost?postid=63a5470394b70