Supreme Court to scrutinize U.S. protections for social media | Reuters
(www.reuters.com)https://www.reuters.com/legal/supreme-court-scrutinize-us-protections-social-media-2022-10-03/Supreme Court to scrutinize U.S. protections for social media | Reuters
https://www.reuters.com/legal/supreme-court-scrutinize-us-protections-social-media-2022-10-03/October 3, 2022 By Andrew Chung
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a challenge to federal protections for internet and social media companies freeing them of responsibility for content posted by users in a case involving an American student fatally shot in a 2015 rampage by Islamist militants in Paris.
The justices took up an appeal by the parents and other relatives of Nohemi Gonzalez, a 23-year-old woman from California who was studying in Paris, of a lower court's ruling that cleared Google LLC-owned YouTube of wrongdoing in a lawsuit seeking monetary damages that the family brought under a U.S. anti-terrorism law. Google and YouTube are part of Alphabet Inc (GOOGL.O).
The Supreme Court also agreed to hear a separate appeal by Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) of the lower court's decision to revive a similar lawsuit against that company, though not on the basis of Section 230 ....
The Supreme Court and the internet's future, explained
https://web.archive.org/web/20221005124314mp_/https://theweek.com/supreme-court/1017215/the-supreme-court-and-the-internets-future-explainedhttps://news.yahoo.com/supreme-court-internets-future-explained-094609268.htmlJoel Mathis, October 5, 2022,
The Supreme Court is about to decide the future of the internet.
The court this week agreed to hear a case involving Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields internet providers from lawsuits over material posted online by users. The law "helped enable the rise of huge social networks like Facebook and Twitter," ...
"If the Supreme Court erodes Section 230 immunity, it could create a nightmare scenario not just for Big Tech but for anyone [who] runs a website with user-generated content," Axios notes. Legally speaking, then, the whole internet might be up for grabs.
