Sign into an existing account

In reference to:
https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=64d4ea2f0bfa2

The entire premise, the 'journalist' questioning bill gates, the back and forth, the articles on obscure news sites editorializing "slammed!", "wrecked!", "destroyed!" etc, all of it if you look at it for what it is, appears designed to keep us complacent. It's feel good bullshit. Which means its being run by the enemy by defintion. Explains the proliferation of sites like conservativeus.com.

People are starting to catch on to this gatekeeping keep-the-crowd-thinking-anything-is-actually-is-being-done-at-all grift, which is why the gatewaypundit recently closed its own comment section.

Which shows us something important: We can do the same thing. All it takes is for a few of us to be the talking heads, appearing to support one set of issues vs another, while reasonably well dressed 'journalists', also played by our people, do this back and forth.

Acts as instant content for news sites we could set up, as well as 'journalism/news channels' on videohosting sites.

Why fake a single news channel that can be censored, when we could be faking our own opposition and a whole narrative and movement?

Fight fire with fire. They accuse us of 'misinformation', because they're afraid of the effectiveness of the tactic. They're afraid that we will start doing what The Regime already does against all of us.

I'm perfectly willing to play the devils advocate if we can get some well spoken populists to fill the otherside of the debate. Messaging is important. Disrupting the narrative of occupied D.C. does real damage to their control over america. This also acts as a beachhead for incubating and vetting candidates. This tactic can also be used for a fake leftwing infomovement, which we can use to vet candidates that act as infiltrators.

I'm up for it if others are.