"Recently, two prominent American MIT researchers at Princeton raised alarms that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposed climate regulations are based on “a hoax” and that the mandated climate agenda is “a disaster” for the United States and the world. The researchers are none other than William Happer, professor emeritus of physics at prestigious Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). They warn, among other things, that the EPA’s new rules to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in electricity production “will be disastrous for the country, without any scientifically motivated reason.”"
"The top researchers in their respective fields then write about what a growing number of other frustrated scientists are trying to point out, that “climate research” is anything but scientific:
“All models predicting catastrophic global warming fail the key test of the scientific method: they predict significant warming versus actual data. The scientific method instead proves that there is no risk of fossil fuels and carbon dioxide causing catastrophic warming and extreme weather.”"
reptillian 0 points 10 months ago
Don't waste our fucking time with those footnote links to known propaganda rags
But let's open your Wiki link shall we. The first sentence of your "100% proof" is:
-----
The Azolla event is a paleoclimatology scenario hypothesized to have occurred in the middle Eocene epoch,[1] around 49 million years ago
-----
Let's stop right there. What kind of fucking 100% proof is a hypothesized scenario "around 49 million years ago" ?