Sign into an existing account

Whenever you see a movie or go to a pastor, you are led to believe the Romans were the ones who killed Jesus. Whils this does sound plausible at first ... it doesnt. See Pilate himself said he washes himself of the sin of crucifying Jesus. Hence, the question becomes, who really killed Jesus? Was it really the Romans, or rather did the Romans simply let the pharisees kill him? Whilst Jesus is dead both ways the question of who actually commited the crime gives a very different meaning to the rejection of Christ. If the Romans did it the question becomes why would the Romans kill someone who by their own words posed no threat to them? And if the pharisees killed them, it proves they rejected Christ. One of these makes sense, the other is complete nonsensical horseshit