Well, here's something that only non-retards are gonna recognize. A high IQ is pretty much irrelevant for addressing questions about the existence of God (within reason). Humans are universally unreliable when it comes to their metaphysical beliefs, and IQ pertains to very simple cognitive tasks that we do very reliably.
There are no philosophy questions on an IQ test. No IQ test will ask you to write an argumentative essay or a syllogism. It's hard for me to believe this man is smart in the relevant way when he is comparing two things which, if they are not incommensurable, they're pretty damned close. In other words, he either doesn't understand what IQ measures and why it's mostly irrelevant, or he does know and he is being a shit.
Also, an IQ of 1,000 isn't adding any historical evidence to what already exists for the religious claims.
CHIRO 1 points 3 hours ago
Well, here's something that only non-retards are gonna recognize. A high IQ is pretty much irrelevant for addressing questions about the existence of God (within reason). Humans are universally unreliable when it comes to their metaphysical beliefs, and IQ pertains to very simple cognitive tasks that we do very reliably.
There are no philosophy questions on an IQ test. No IQ test will ask you to write an argumentative essay or a syllogism. It's hard for me to believe this man is smart in the relevant way when he is comparing two things which, if they are not incommensurable, they're pretty damned close. In other words, he either doesn't understand what IQ measures and why it's mostly irrelevant, or he does know and he is being a shit.
Also, an IQ of 1,000 isn't adding any historical evidence to what already exists for the religious claims.