☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
0

So, that's the new defintion of "pedophile": Someone who points out someone else's pedophilic activity

submitted by HughBriss to whatever 3.9 yearsJun 16, 2021 18:02:02 ago (+2/-2)     (files.catbox.moe)

https://files.catbox.moe/z4m6t7.JPG

I appreciate the clarification.

For the record, I do not think blumen4alles is a pedophile, even though he defends deviant behavior in people who post pornography that shows underage girls. I see little moral difference between a pedophile and a pedophile apologist.


24 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] Guy_Gadbous 2 points 3.9 yearsJun 16, 2021 18:05:20 ago (+2/-0)

Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.


Dietrich Bonhoeffer

[ - ] VitaminSieg 1 point 3.9 yearsJun 16, 2021 20:38:49 ago (+1/-0)

There is "little moral difference between a pedophile and a pedophile apologist", because the folks who apologize for pedophiles are themselves pedophiles.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 17, 2021 09:11:52 ago (+0/-0)

I do not think blumen4alles is a pedophile, even though he defends deviant behavior in people who post pornography that shows underage girls.

… and posts them himself. And spams propaganda that only leftists use to cover it up.

[ - ] Wahaha -1 points 3.9 yearsJun 16, 2021 18:10:38 ago (+2/-3)

If you call someone a pedophile without having evidence to back up your claim, chances are you're projecting, which means calling other people the names of your own sins, because you project your own evil into other people, so you can attack it without attacking yourself.

[ - ] goat777 1 point 3.9 yearsJun 16, 2021 18:35:10 ago (+2/-1)

Or, I actually have a sixth sense for pedophiles. Most dress similarly and have similar mannerisms and speech patterns.

[ - ] Wahaha 2 points 3.9 yearsJun 16, 2021 18:44:15 ago (+3/-1)

Because you can see and listen to people who write posts on the Internet?

[ - ] Antiliberalsociety 1 point 3.9 yearsJun 16, 2021 19:11:23 ago (+2/-1)

You dismiss said evidence as "not real porn" and deflect attention away from the fact a pedo is posting creepshots.

[ - ] Wahaha -2 points 3.9 yearsJun 17, 2021 08:06:05 ago (+0/-2)

Nothing that was brought to my attention here and elsewhere was pedo content. To qualify as pedo content, the subject has to be prepubescent, meaning younger than around 6 to 12 years for girls. Tits of a 17 years and 364 days old girl isn't pedo content. It's not even illegal. Nudity isn't porn. If your dick gets hard looking at nude children the problem is with you.

[ - ] Antiliberalsociety 1 point 3.9 yearsJun 17, 2021 08:42:39 ago (+1/-0)

Where do you get that? Every porn site I've seen has the 18+ disclaimer. You just exposed your pedophile tendency ya sick fuck.

[ - ] Wahaha -2 points 3.9 yearsJun 17, 2021 09:08:10 ago (+0/-2)

Porn of underage people is illegal, but it's not pedo content. Kinda like manslaughter isn't murder. If you're not precise with your language your buzzword loses its shock value. Like racist and nazi and stuff. Once you've turned pedo into a word the general public shrugs at you will have hurt your original goal.

Or maybe you're a paid shill whose mission is to achieve exactly that. Who knows.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 1 point 3.9 yearsJun 17, 2021 10:21:47 ago (+1/-0)

child porn isn’t child porn

Jews, ladies and gentlemen.

[ - ] Wahaha -1 points 3.9 yearsJun 17, 2021 10:47:00 ago (+0/-1)

Yeah, just look in the mirror.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 17, 2021 13:52:59 ago (+0/-0)

you’re a jew if you don’t support child porn

Jews, ladies and gentlemen.

[ - ] Wahaha 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 17, 2021 13:55:58 ago (+0/-0)

Twisting words and baseless accusations are the charge.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 1 point 3.9 yearsJun 17, 2021 09:26:33 ago (+1/-0)

without having evidence

Whoa, crossposter, who the fuck said we don’t have evidence?

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 1 point 3.9 yearsJun 17, 2021 10:22:56 ago (+1/-0)

Reminder that you submitted this content and it’s archived forever so you can’t delete it.

https://archive.is/HwMxO
https://archive.is/8cLXR
https://archive.is/WqLLS
https://archive.is/zVqoB
https://archive.is/rhpeH

[ - ] Wahaha -1 points 3.9 yearsJun 17, 2021 10:48:45 ago (+0/-1)

Who cares about drawings? I had the opportunity to create a new account for new Voat and didn't. I stand by what I post.

[ - ] Tallest_Skil 1 point 3.9 yearsJun 17, 2021 13:52:40 ago (+1/-0)

doesn’t deny it

Commit suicide, pedophile.

[ - ] try -3 points 3.9 yearsJun 16, 2021 18:54:32 ago (+0/-3)*

The list of pedo content deleted by this sub for pedo content is the main proof of pedo content it seems : censor log of deletions :


https://www.voat.xyz/deletelogcomments.php?sub=HitlerWasRight

See? ON Date: 2021-06-11 20:19:07 , days ago , Antiliberalsociety deleted and banned pedo content like that shown in that link :

see for yourself the content of that ban on HitlerWasRight :


"Kikes are so fucking ugly inside and out." is now banned?

either abuse of power by kikes like Antiliberalsociety controlling HitlerWasRight, or perhaps it is pedo content to type that phrase :

"Kikes are so fucking ugly inside and out."

If it is pedo, is in code words known only to other pedos.

Either the phrase "ugly inside and out" is pedo dog whistle or maybe the word "kike" is pedo in some contexts

"Kikes are so fucking ugly inside and out." the complete post, as is, gets your speech BANNED for being pedophilia on HitlerWasRight, as the deletion logs prove on : 2021-06-11 20:19:07 :

https://www.voat.xyz/deletelogcomments.php?sub=HitlerWasRight

Maybe @blumen4alles knows why its pedo content? I did not follow the drama

Either that, or jews now control more of voat.xyz that I thought, and jews are censoring the comment :

"Kikes are so fucking ugly inside and out."

For exposing the censoring of that phrase by "Antiliberalsociety", I bet I will get banned from his subs!

user bans :
https://www.voat.xyz/bannedsubusers.php?sub=HitlerWasRight


Time will tell if he bans people who expose censoring anti Jew speak!

KIKES INFEST VOAT.XYZ

[ - ] Antiliberalsociety -1 points 3.9 yearsJun 16, 2021 19:13:12 ago (+0/-1)*

You defended his pedo post that got deleted by an admin.

https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=60ac16e29756e

I banned him and removed his comment just as he did mine

https://www.voat.xyz/deletelogcomments.php?sub=occult

Go cry to jew media about it

[ - ] try 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 16, 2021 19:17:03 ago (+0/-0)*

Which pedo post? Why do you censor and lie so much? Logs can be checked, you know? A deletion proves nothing, just as I show you deleted people and comments for merely naming jews :

https://www.voat.xyz/deletelogcomments.php?sub=HitlerWasRight

YOUR ATTACKING OF ME WITH LIES IS A CANCER ON VOAT.XYZ

EDIT:

I see he deleted you first for some reason at Date: 2021-06-11 18:52:55

Date: 2021-06-11 18:52:55 precedes your deletion of his free speech on jews AFTER on 2021-06-11 20:19:07

Now I think your deletion is to prove a point I guess, and not related to censoring jew naming.

So sorry for my alarm. It seems you two have fued going and you seem to want to burn down voat.xyz, and bystanders like me in your battle, but his deletion on 2021-06-11 18:52:55 precedes your later battle.

I think he deleted because you typed "Pedophile out of thin air huh..." but I have yet to see exact proof of that claim you type 50 times a day or so. The proof I think you meant erroneously got deleted and was a mere link to another site (catbox.moe) and was partial group nudity, from what I recall.

but I did not know he deleted you first.

[ - ] Antiliberalsociety 0 points 3.9 yearsJun 17, 2021 01:04:31 ago (+0/-0)

I fucking linked it you retard. It's no wonder you defend that piece of shit.