Is it really changing that much? They're banning sex acts and real or simulated fluids that occur during sex, etc.
Nude & risqué photos are still allowed, which I thought was what the platform predominately is in the first place. Maybe I'm naïve, but I don't much like to concern myself with evil. Though, I hope this curbs some degeneracy.
Is this move "controlled opposition"? Is it a false morale boost? Will anything actually change because of this...?
They’re getting sued to fuck by the parents of minors who were whoring themselves on their site. That’s why they’re changing the rules now. Whether it can save them from bankruptcy via litigation is yet to be seen though. One thing I did learn from all this is that the company was set up in Essex, which is utterly hilarious for anyone who has ever met, or even seen, an Essex girl.
It was originally launched as a patreon type site for artists. According to the company they grew increasingly uncomfortable with legally and morally riskier content dominating the site, so they're cutting it off.
According to the e-whores they deliberately used them to build the site's popularity and brand recognition then kicked them to the curb once the site got big.
I suspect the latter. Kinda like bitchute and odyssee using youtube refugees to build critical mass.
I think the multiple legal actions against them from the parents of minors who were whoring themselves on their site thanks to their piss poor age control probably has more to do with it than anything else tbh. They’ve basically shuttered their company with this move, it’s not like people will flocking to it to support artists thanks to the whores giving them brand recognition. Also, it was set up by some cunt from Essex - that level of degeneracy is probably considered fine art in that utter kip of a place.
[ - ] xachariah 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 15:08:07 ago (+1/-0)
Remember that Onlyfans is ran by Jews. They're only doing this to Jew harder. They'll implement these new rules inconsistently to allow them to try and push an agenda without looking like they're pushing an agenda.
Sex by a couple with an account? Instantly Banned. Interracial sex? Whoops. Looks like the algorithm missed it. Normal looking woman? Banned. Tatted up slut? Whoops, looks like she got to stay. White women already got some money and dependent on Onlyfans? Kicked off now. New white chicks? Whoops. They get to stay and now have room to be noticed, long enough to be corrupted then they're kicked off. Kids? Whoops. Faggots? Whoops. Mulattos? Whoops.
It's not degenerate enough for them. This lets them pretend they're trying to make it better while giving them a very powerful lever to make it worse.
They got lots of young women to post nudes of themselves for money.
Those women made lots of money and started thinking about it as a career.
So now the women have branded themselves as whores for all time they are pulling the plug on their lucrative career leaving them with nothing but a back history that will follow them for life.
It was a betrayal of the women. It was all about degrading them and the thots fell for it.
Now they have to go work at Starbucks with their colleagues able to find this dirt on them.
Sure looks a lot like satanic ritual humiliation to me.
[ + ] SilentByAssociation
[ - ] SilentByAssociation 5 points 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 11:23:55 ago (+5/-0)
Nude & risqué photos are still allowed, which I thought was what the platform predominately is in the first place. Maybe I'm naïve, but I don't much like to concern myself with evil. Though, I hope this curbs some degeneracy.
Is this move "controlled opposition"? Is it a false morale boost? Will anything actually change because of this...?
[ + ] Irelandlost
[ - ] Irelandlost 5 points 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 14:12:11 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] SilentByAssociation
[ - ] SilentByAssociation 3 points 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 14:44:15 ago (+3/-0)
I can't say I've ever met a girl from Essex. What makes this so humorous?
[ + ] Irelandlost
[ - ] Irelandlost 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 21:34:33 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] vorpal85
[ - ] vorpal85 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 20:37:37 ago (+1/-0)
also today news was credit card companies including MasterCard wanted hard extreme porn gone (fisting, play rape, shitting, etc)
so is a jew on jew war
either way, with jews we lose and even if they one day stopped porn a new jew porn site would pop up that day
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle [op] 2 points 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 11:25:32 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Strange_Coincidences
[ - ] Strange_Coincidences 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 15:47:46 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle [op] 2 points 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 16:24:15 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Strange_Coincidences
[ - ] Strange_Coincidences 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 16:27:20 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle [op] 2 points 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 16:34:45 ago (+2/-0)
Edit: thank you for the source.
[ + ] Monica
[ - ] Monica 3 points 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 11:22:35 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 2 points 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 14:09:00 ago (+2/-0)
According to the e-whores they deliberately used them to build the site's popularity and brand recognition then kicked them to the curb once the site got big.
I suspect the latter. Kinda like bitchute and odyssee using youtube refugees to build critical mass.
[ + ] Irelandlost
[ - ] Irelandlost 2 points 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 14:15:22 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 18:38:30 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] SparklingWiggle
[ - ] SparklingWiggle [op] 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 16:25:46 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Broc_Liath
[ - ] Broc_Liath 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 18:30:06 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ToNigIsToNog
[ - ] ToNigIsToNog 2 points 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 12:50:50 ago (+2/-0)
so OF said fuck it. we make plenty on nudes.
the people "making money" here are still whores and kikes.
[ + ] xachariah
[ - ] xachariah 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 15:08:07 ago (+1/-0)
Sex by a couple with an account? Instantly Banned. Interracial sex? Whoops. Looks like the algorithm missed it.
Normal looking woman? Banned. Tatted up slut? Whoops, looks like she got to stay.
White women already got some money and dependent on Onlyfans? Kicked off now. New white chicks? Whoops. They get to stay and now have room to be noticed, long enough to be corrupted then they're kicked off.
Kids? Whoops. Faggots? Whoops. Mulattos? Whoops.
It's not degenerate enough for them. This lets them pretend they're trying to make it better while giving them a very powerful lever to make it worse.
[ + ] RedBarchetta
[ - ] RedBarchetta 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 14:16:22 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GeneralDisarray
[ - ] GeneralDisarray 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 14:09:21 ago (+1/-0)
Those women made lots of money and started thinking about it as a career.
So now the women have branded themselves as whores for all time they are pulling the plug on their lucrative career leaving them with nothing but a back history that will follow them for life.
It was a betrayal of the women. It was all about degrading them and the thots fell for it.
Now they have to go work at Starbucks with their colleagues able to find this dirt on them.
Sure looks a lot like satanic ritual humiliation to me.
[ + ] FellowWhite
[ - ] FellowWhite 2 points 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 14:12:02 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] WhiteGoat
[ - ] WhiteGoat 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 21, 2021 12:55:21 ago (+1/-0)