[ - ] Nagasaki 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 25, 2021 07:48:36 ago (+1/-0)*
Garrett you always post high quality content. I click on a post because I see you made it. 9/11 is one topic in which I feel I can offer you something in return.
I think a nearly complete understanding of how the jews did 9/11 can be put together from the independent work of Simon Shack (an Italian computer graphics professional) and Heinz Pommer (a German nuclear technician).
The first understands how the planes were faked but is at a loss as to how the buildings fell (calls the free falling as CGI). The second knows how the buildings fell into their own footprints, but doesn't understand how purported planes could have managed to fly into skyscrapers (even if they had nothing to do with the demolition). Their explanations create a very nearly complete picture together.
Simon Shack's documentary on the doctored news footage that day and what was released later:
I understand that this sounds absolutely retarded, but I don't think there were planes, and I think they used ~90 meter deep subterranean nukes in the shafts under each of the three buildings.
Dimitri Khalezov has a less focused (and more confused) 4 hour video on the subject. He was a retired USSR nuclear division officer. As part of his job he saw quite a lot of subterranean nuclear tests.
Although it is 4 hours, Dimitri does an excellent job explaining how unfathomable it is that an aluminum airplane wing would penetrate or cut 2.5 inch thick steel sidewalls of vertical boxes on the facade (arranged such that each wing must have sliced through ~ten instances of 2 feet of 2.5 inch steel):
Unfortunately, Dmitri then says that the planes were projected holograms (he has no viable explanation because he too thought the "live" news broadcasts were undelayed). He was also unaware that many people didn't see planes.
In my opinion, anything that mentions "space weapons" or "energy weapons" or "holograms" is CIA seeded disinformation.
The singular take away from Judy Wood's account is her passing mention that the CIA/FBI were internally prepped if the radiation was discovered. "Prepped," meaning that the director told her that terrorist might have "dirty bombs" just a month before the jews did 9/11.
This way if the radiation was found, the US agencies would believe from the top down that it was cave-dwelling Muslims.
The rest of her testimony is gaslighting to make people even entertain the idea that it had anything to do with hijackers. They didn't even exist.
[ + ] Nagasaki
[ - ] Nagasaki 1 point 3.8 yearsAug 25, 2021 07:48:36 ago (+1/-0)*
I think a nearly complete understanding of how the jews did 9/11 can be put together from the independent work of Simon Shack (an Italian computer graphics professional) and Heinz Pommer (a German nuclear technician).
The first understands how the planes were faked but is at a loss as to how the buildings fell (calls the free falling as CGI). The second knows how the buildings fell into their own footprints, but doesn't understand how purported planes could have managed to fly into skyscrapers (even if they had nothing to do with the demolition). Their explanations create a very nearly complete picture together.
Simon Shack's documentary on the doctored news footage that day and what was released later:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/knJn426TyRlt/
Heinz Pommer presents his analysis of a simple nuclear 9/11 demolition, and a unification of the evidence:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry4UWQjJnSc
German version:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=99F_k4-6MVk
I understand that this sounds absolutely retarded, but I don't think there were planes, and I think they used ~90 meter deep subterranean nukes in the shafts under each of the three buildings.
Dimitri Khalezov has a less focused (and more confused) 4 hour video on the subject. He was a retired USSR nuclear division officer. As part of his job he saw quite a lot of subterranean nuclear tests.
Although it is 4 hours, Dimitri does an excellent job explaining how unfathomable it is that an aluminum airplane wing would penetrate or cut 2.5 inch thick steel sidewalls of vertical boxes on the facade (arranged such that each wing must have sliced through ~ten instances of 2 feet of 2.5 inch steel):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kckDpPrV82Ij/
Unfortunately, Dmitri then says that the planes were projected holograms (he has no viable explanation because he too thought the "live" news broadcasts were undelayed). He was also unaware that many people didn't see planes.
[ + ] Majiqai
[ - ] Majiqai 0 points 3.8 yearsAug 25, 2021 16:21:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Nagasaki
[ - ] Nagasaki 0 points 3.8 yearsAug 26, 2021 00:34:46 ago (+0/-0)
The singular take away from Judy Wood's account is her passing mention that the CIA/FBI were internally prepped if the radiation was discovered. "Prepped," meaning that the director told her that terrorist might have "dirty bombs" just a month before the jews did 9/11.
This way if the radiation was found, the US agencies would believe from the top down that it was cave-dwelling Muslims.
The rest of her testimony is gaslighting to make people even entertain the idea that it had anything to do with hijackers. They didn't even exist.
[ + ] Garrett
[ - ] Garrett [op] 0 points 3.8 yearsAug 26, 2021 04:12:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] 1Icemonkey
[ - ] 1Icemonkey 0 points 3.8 yearsAug 25, 2021 01:04:56 ago (+0/-0)