☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
5

Lindsey Graham Tells BBC Terrorism Threat Will Require U.S. Military to Deploy Again to Afghanistan

submitted by NationalSocialism to Shitneoconssay 3.8 yearsSep 7, 2021 04:49:42 ago (+5/-0)     (www.breitbart.com)

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/09/06/lindsey-graham-bbc-terrorism-afghanistan/

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said in an interview over that weekend that the Taliban takeover will translate into so great a terrorism threat that the U.S. military will be deployed again to Afghanistan.

“We will be going back into Afghanistan as we went back into Iraq and Syria,” Graham said.

You know he’s only concerned about “our greatest ally”. We need more goyim to die in a land nowhere near the United States.


7 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] Garrett 1 point 3.8 yearsSep 7, 2021 11:22:37 ago (+1/-0)

what aipac (israel) wants, aipac gets

[ - ] yesiknow 1 point 3.8 yearsSep 7, 2021 07:58:14 ago (+1/-0)

With China and Turkey all up in Afghanistan, they're staging world war three. China's got nukes coming out their ass.

World wars one and two were planned for three. Israel was declared a state after one, a nation after two, and if China and Turkey don't nuke israel during the action their ambitions will remain on that winning streak. The US is guaranteed to sacrifice their country for israel, which will put the US in a bigger loss they didn't foresee. Americans just can't comprehend what they would lose.

Russia would be the best place to be right now.

[ - ] Garrett 0 points 3.8 yearsSep 7, 2021 11:23:17 ago (+0/-0)

israel and china work together

[ - ] yesiknow 0 points 3.8 yearsSep 7, 2021 16:40:34 ago (+0/-0)

Apparently. Long term planning though may reveal something a little different. Mao is increasingly persona non grata, and they know who he was a proxy for and how many deaths they caused.

[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 1 point 3.8 yearsSep 7, 2021 05:22:47 ago (+1/-0)

So why did we leave? Don't get me wrong, I'd leave the ME entirely, let the sandniggers fight it out, deal w whoever wins. But if we're going to turn around and go back in we might as well have stayed.

[ - ] Der_Blaue_Konig 2 points 3.8 yearsSep 7, 2021 07:06:56 ago (+2/-0)

There's 3 reasons to advocate going back; the kickbacks from the companies that'll have to replace the seized military equipment, not to mention the equipment that will have to be manufactured for the next 20 years there. Distracting the American public from other issues. And of course, serving the jewish interests in the Middle East by taking out an anti israeli regime in Afghanistan.

[ - ] NationalSocialism [op] 1 point 3.8 yearsSep 7, 2021 05:34:16 ago (+1/-0)

Exactly. The US military left everything behind. All of it should have been destroyed or hauled over to a neighboring country with good relations.

Lindsey isn’t talking about the equipment. He’s referring ambiguously to “terrorism”. That is code word for Israel could have problems with the Taliban.